博碩士論文 93622018 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:82 、訪客IP:52.15.37.74
姓名 郭挺鈞(Ting-chun Kuo)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 地球物理研究所
論文名稱 台灣車籠埔斷層注水實驗期間的氣體與水化學分析
(Gas and Water Analyses during fluid injection into Chelungpu-fault zone, Taiwan)
相關論文
★ 台灣地區中大型地震震源參數分析★ 台灣北部地區之隱沒樣貌
★ 九二一集集地震之餘震(Mw≧6.0)震源破裂滑移分佈★ 利用雙差分地震定位演算法重新定位過去十年台灣中、大型地震之餘震
★ 九二一集集地震三維震源過程與震波傳遞分析★ 花蓮瑞穗地區斑點片岩鈉長石變質斑晶之成因與變質溫度壓力演化
★ 台灣弧陸碰撞構造之地殼及頂部地函的三維S波衰減模型★ 集集地震之震前、同震及震後變形模式研究
★ 台灣地震震源尺度分析:2003年規模>6.0地震分析★ 使用震源機制逆推台灣地區應力分區狀況
★ 地震水井水力學之理論模式改良與發展及同震水位資料分析★ 台灣東北部外海地震之三維強地動模擬
★ 利用臨時寬頻地震網觀測嘉義地區淺層地殼之非均向性★ 中大規模地震斷層參數之同步求解
★ 集集地震同震及震後應力演化與地震活動之相關性★ 地震斷層作用後的流體滲透作用:檢視TCDPA井車籠埔斷層斷層岩的化學及礦物組成
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究透過在台中大坑跨斷層間距39公尺的雙井進行注水實驗,維持4MPa的壓力將地面的河水注入TCDP的C井內,並且從A井抽取斷層帶的流體進行氣體與水化學的分析以觀察注水實驗所引起的各種效應。兩次注水實驗分別於2006年11月及2007年1月進行了108.5個小時與90個小時,注入的水量分別為450公升與50公升。我們分析井水的氣泡與水化學參數,發現在第一次注水實驗開始68小時15分鐘,水化學與氣體的變化同時出現,每個成分都分別產生劇烈的變化,而大量的流體則是在實驗開始之後192小時到達A井。
第二次注水實驗中,氣體在實驗開始之後75小時又15分才產生變化,水化學參數則是在110小時40分鐘之後產生變化,而且並未偵測到明確的流體到來的反應。此等變化似乎暗示了兩次實驗雖僅隔約2個月所觀察,此地區的地層滲透率可能降低了或其他目前無法解釋的因素所造成,如斷層帶或井壁穿孔處堵塞所造成,因此第一次的實驗結果應較有參考價值。但研究中氣體的觀測比化學成份觀測有較快的傳遞速率,而化學成份又比液體有較快的傳遞速率。雖然本文目前並無法提出具體的機制來解釋此現象,但此世界上唯一跨斷層的現地注水實驗,觀測的氣體,水化學及液體在斷層的傳遞特性,希望能對未來斷層構造及相關觀測提供參考。
摘要(英) A fluid injection test was made at the two wells with distance of 39m at the TCDP drilling site. The fault zone as identified from the drill cores were at the depth of 1111m and 1132 m, respectively. The two wells were perforated at the identified fault zone depth to keep the communication of te two holes. During the FIT experiment, the pressure was kept as constant at 4MPa to inject the tap water into hole C with the observation and analyze of fluid at hole A. The FIT experiment was made twice as the for 1st pre-FIT on Novenber , 2006 for the continuous of injecting constant pressure water at hole-C for 108.5 hours , The total amount of water used in the 1st pre-FIT was 450L.The 2nd pre-FIT was made in January , 2007 for injecting of water for 90 hours , and the total amount of injected water is about 50 L. The main FIT was made in April 2007, however, no gas and chemistry observations were made for the main-FIT. Thus, this thesis concentrates on the results for the two pre-FIT. For the 1st pre-FIT , after 68hours and 15 min. from the beginning of the experiment, we detected clearly effect of gas , and also of water at almost same time, and the water comes about 192hr after the experiment.
For the 2nd FIT , Gas’’ effect can’’t be detected until 75.25 hours after the experiement , the water chemical effect was detected at 110hr40min after the experiment. And the arrival of the water was difficult to detect due to its minor change in the flow. Even though the experiments of the two pre-FIT was only 2 months apart, the difference observed in these two experiments, suggesting the possibility of lower permeability of the fault zone for the 2nd pre-FIT. However, another possibility is the blog of the material in the perforated holes and in the fault zone. The exact reason for the difference is hard to be explained now. However, the arrivals of the signals from the communicated two wells as the gas coming first, then, chemical component, then, the fluid itself, bring some odds in the character of these components. Although no specific mechanism can be proposed now in this thesis, these observations are intriguing, and hopefully can bring some information to the future fault zone behavior studies.
關鍵字(中) ★ 水化學分析
★ 車籠埔斷層
★ 注水實驗
★ 氣體觀測
關鍵字(英) ★ FIT
★ Fluid Injection Test
★ Chelungpu-fault zone
★ Gas Monitoring
★ Water chemical
論文目次 中文提要 ……………………………………………………………… i
英文提要 ……………………………………………………………… ii
誌謝 ……………………………………………………………… iii
目錄 ……………………………………………………………… iv
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………… v
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………… viii
一、 緒論………………………………………………………… 1
1-1 研究動機與目的…………………………………………… 1
1-2 研究區域地質背景………………………………………… 4
1-2-1 台灣地理環境概述………………………………………… 4
1-2-2 台中地區地質背景………………………………………… 5
1-2-3 車籠埔斷層………………………………………………… 6
二、 前人研究…………………………………………………… 10
2-1 德國KTB注水實驗……………………………………… 10
2-2 日本野島斷層的注水實驗………………………………… 11
2-3 日本野島斷層的氣體分析………………………………… 11
2-4 台灣北部大屯火山群火山氣體分析……………………… 12
三、 實驗方法…………………………………………………… 18
3-1 注水實驗…………………………………………………… 18
3-2 氣體分析…………………………………………………… 19
3-3 水化學分析………………………………………………… 21
四、 實驗結果與討論…………………………………………… 26
4-1 氣體分析數據……………………………………………… 26
4-1-1 1st Pre FIT(2006 11/7 22:00至11/12 08:30)…… 27
4-1-2 2nd Pre FIT(2007 1/23 18:00至1/27 12:00)……… 29
4-2 水化學分析數據…………………………………………… 31
4-2-1 1st Pre FIT(2006 11/7 22:00至11/12 08:30)…… 32
4-2-2 2nd Pre FIT(2007 1/23 18:00至1/27 12:00)……… 34
4-3 其他分析數據……………………………………………… 36
4-3-1 氡氣分析…………………………………………………… 36
4-3-2 流量紀錄…………………………………………………… 36
4-3-3 微震紀錄…………………………………………………… 38
五、 結論………………………………………………………… 75
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………… 78
參考文獻 〔1〕Wang, Chien-Ying., et al, “Mapping the Northern Portion of the Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan by Shallow Reflection Seismics”, Geoph. Res. Letter, Vol. 29, No. 6, p.951-954, 2002 (SCI).
〔2〕Wang, Chien-Ying., et al, “Shallow Reflection Seismics Aiding Geologic Drilling into the Chelungpu Fault of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan”, TAO, Vol. 13, NO. 2, p.153-170, 2002 (SCI-exp).
〔3〕Ma, K.-F., et al, “Slip Zone and Energetics of a Large Earthquake from the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project”, Nature, 444, doi:10.1038/nature05253, 2006
〔4〕Hirono, T., et al, “Nondestructive continuous physical property measurements of core samples recovered from Hole B, Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, B07404, doi:10.1029/2006JB004738 , 2007.
〔5〕Lin, A. T., et al, “Lithostratigraphy of the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project-A borehole and its neighboring region, central Taiwan”, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 18, 223-241, doi:10.3319/TAO.2007.18.2.223(TCDP) , 2007.
〔6〕Doan, M.L., et al, “In-situ measurement of the hydraulic diffusivity of the active Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan. In Geophys”, Res. Lett., 33 (16) doi :10.1029/2006GL026889, 2006.
〔7〕蔡義本等人,「臺灣地區新近地震資料在大地構造上之意義」,中國地質學會專刊, 第2號,第13-41頁 ,1977。
〔8〕Seno, T., “The instantaneous rotation vector of the Philippine Sea plate relative to the Eurasian plate”, Tectonophysics, Vol. 42, 209-226, 1977.
〔9〕何春蓀,台灣地質概論─台灣地質圖說明書,經濟部中央地質調查所,共164 頁,1986。
〔10〕林朝棨,臺灣地形,臺灣省文獻委員會,臺灣省通志稿,卷一,第一冊,共423頁,1957。
〔11〕翁勳政、張寶堂、劉進金,台中盆地潛在地質災害之初步探討,「臺灣之第四紀」第六次研討會暨「台北盆地地下地質與工程環境綜合調查研究」成果發表會論文集,第220-223頁,1996。
〔12〕李錦發,東勢圖幅說明書,經濟部中央地質調查所,共117頁,2000。
〔13〕Hidemi Tanaka, et al, “Initial Science Report of Shallow Drilling Penetrating into the Chelungpu Fault Zone, Taiwan”, TAO, Vol. 13, No. 3, p.227-252, 2002 (SCI-exp)
〔14〕呂維瑾,「地震斷層作用後的流體滲透作用: 檢視TCDPA井車籠埔斷層斷層岩的 化學及礦物組成」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2006。
〔15〕TU Yi-min, CHEN Yun-tai, “The accurate location of the injection- induced microearthquakes in German Continental Deep Drilling Program”,Acta Seismologica Sinica,vol.06 , 2002.
〔16〕T. JAHR, et al, “Fluid injection and surface deformation at the KTB location: modelling of expected tilt effects”,Geofluids, Volume 5, Number 1, February 2005 , pp. 20-27(8) , 2005.
〔17〕Tadokoro, K, et al, “Seismicity changes related to a water injection experiment in the Nojima Fault Zone”,The Island Arc, Volume 10, Numbers 3-4, 1 September , pp. 235-243(9) , 2001.
〔18〕SUGISAKI R., et al, “Geochemical features of gases and rocks along active faults”, Geochemical Journal 14, 101–12 , 1980.
〔19〕WAKITA H., et al, “Hydrogen release: New indicator of fault activity”,Science 210, 188–90 , 1980.
〔20〕SATO M., SUTTON A. J. & MCGEE K. A., “Monitoring of hydrogen along the San Andreas and Calaveras Faults in central California in 1980–1984”,Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 12 315–26 , 1986.
〔21〕Tsunogai & Wakita, “Precursory chemical changes in ground water: Kobe Earthquake, Japan”,Science 269, 61–3 , 1995.
〔22〕Igarashi , et al, “Ground-water radon anomaly before the Kobe Earthquake in Japan”,Science 269, 60–1, 1995.
〔23〕TAKASHI ARAI, TAMOTSU OKUSAWA AND HIROAKI TSUKAHARA, “Behavior of gases in the Nojima Fault Zone revealed from the chemical composition and carbon isotope ratio of gases extracted from DPRI 1800 m drill core”,The Island Arc , 10, 430–438 , 2001.
〔24〕Lee, H.F., et al, “Fumarolic gas composition of the Tatun Volcano Group, northern Taiwan”,Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 16(4), 843-864 , 2005.
〔25〕島崎邦彥等人,野島?層小倉注水試? ,月刊地球,?外No.21,?S集?層解剖計?,P33-P37,1998。
〔26〕Yen-Yu Lin, “Observation and Scaling of Microevents from TCDP Borehole Seismometers2008”,Workshop on water Injection Experiments(FIT) at Nojima and Chelungpu Faults , 13th March , 2008.
〔27〕H. Darcy, Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon, Dalmont, Paris (1856).
指導教授 馬國鳳、陳維民
(Kuo-Fong Ma、Wei-Min Chen)
審核日期 2008-7-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明