摘要(英) |
A fluid injection test was made at the two wells with distance of 39m at the TCDP drilling site. The fault zone as identified from the drill cores were at the depth of 1111m and 1132 m, respectively. The two wells were perforated at the identified fault zone depth to keep the communication of te two holes. During the FIT experiment, the pressure was kept as constant at 4MPa to inject the tap water into hole C with the observation and analyze of fluid at hole A. The FIT experiment was made twice as the for 1st pre-FIT on Novenber , 2006 for the continuous of injecting constant pressure water at hole-C for 108.5 hours , The total amount of water used in the 1st pre-FIT was 450L.The 2nd pre-FIT was made in January , 2007 for injecting of water for 90 hours , and the total amount of injected water is about 50 L. The main FIT was made in April 2007, however, no gas and chemistry observations were made for the main-FIT. Thus, this thesis concentrates on the results for the two pre-FIT. For the 1st pre-FIT , after 68hours and 15 min. from the beginning of the experiment, we detected clearly effect of gas , and also of water at almost same time, and the water comes about 192hr after the experiment.
For the 2nd FIT , Gas’’ effect can’’t be detected until 75.25 hours after the experiement , the water chemical effect was detected at 110hr40min after the experiment. And the arrival of the water was difficult to detect due to its minor change in the flow. Even though the experiments of the two pre-FIT was only 2 months apart, the difference observed in these two experiments, suggesting the possibility of lower permeability of the fault zone for the 2nd pre-FIT. However, another possibility is the blog of the material in the perforated holes and in the fault zone. The exact reason for the difference is hard to be explained now. However, the arrivals of the signals from the communicated two wells as the gas coming first, then, chemical component, then, the fluid itself, bring some odds in the character of these components. Although no specific mechanism can be proposed now in this thesis, these observations are intriguing, and hopefully can bring some information to the future fault zone behavior studies. |
參考文獻 |
〔1〕Wang, Chien-Ying., et al, “Mapping the Northern Portion of the Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan by Shallow Reflection Seismics”, Geoph. Res. Letter, Vol. 29, No. 6, p.951-954, 2002 (SCI).
〔2〕Wang, Chien-Ying., et al, “Shallow Reflection Seismics Aiding Geologic Drilling into the Chelungpu Fault of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan”, TAO, Vol. 13, NO. 2, p.153-170, 2002 (SCI-exp).
〔3〕Ma, K.-F., et al, “Slip Zone and Energetics of a Large Earthquake from the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project”, Nature, 444, doi:10.1038/nature05253, 2006
〔4〕Hirono, T., et al, “Nondestructive continuous physical property measurements of core samples recovered from Hole B, Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, B07404, doi:10.1029/2006JB004738 , 2007.
〔5〕Lin, A. T., et al, “Lithostratigraphy of the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project-A borehole and its neighboring region, central Taiwan”, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 18, 223-241, doi:10.3319/TAO.2007.18.2.223(TCDP) , 2007.
〔6〕Doan, M.L., et al, “In-situ measurement of the hydraulic diffusivity of the active Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan. In Geophys”, Res. Lett., 33 (16) doi :10.1029/2006GL026889, 2006.
〔7〕蔡義本等人,「臺灣地區新近地震資料在大地構造上之意義」,中國地質學會專刊, 第2號,第13-41頁 ,1977。
〔8〕Seno, T., “The instantaneous rotation vector of the Philippine Sea plate relative to the Eurasian plate”, Tectonophysics, Vol. 42, 209-226, 1977.
〔9〕何春蓀,台灣地質概論─台灣地質圖說明書,經濟部中央地質調查所,共164 頁,1986。
〔10〕林朝棨,臺灣地形,臺灣省文獻委員會,臺灣省通志稿,卷一,第一冊,共423頁,1957。
〔11〕翁勳政、張寶堂、劉進金,台中盆地潛在地質災害之初步探討,「臺灣之第四紀」第六次研討會暨「台北盆地地下地質與工程環境綜合調查研究」成果發表會論文集,第220-223頁,1996。
〔12〕李錦發,東勢圖幅說明書,經濟部中央地質調查所,共117頁,2000。
〔13〕Hidemi Tanaka, et al, “Initial Science Report of Shallow Drilling Penetrating into the Chelungpu Fault Zone, Taiwan”, TAO, Vol. 13, No. 3, p.227-252, 2002 (SCI-exp)
〔14〕呂維瑾,「地震斷層作用後的流體滲透作用: 檢視TCDPA井車籠埔斷層斷層岩的 化學及礦物組成」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2006。
〔15〕TU Yi-min, CHEN Yun-tai, “The accurate location of the injection- induced microearthquakes in German Continental Deep Drilling Program”,Acta Seismologica Sinica,vol.06 , 2002.
〔16〕T. JAHR, et al, “Fluid injection and surface deformation at the KTB location: modelling of expected tilt effects”,Geofluids, Volume 5, Number 1, February 2005 , pp. 20-27(8) , 2005.
〔17〕Tadokoro, K, et al, “Seismicity changes related to a water injection experiment in the Nojima Fault Zone”,The Island Arc, Volume 10, Numbers 3-4, 1 September , pp. 235-243(9) , 2001.
〔18〕SUGISAKI R., et al, “Geochemical features of gases and rocks along active faults”, Geochemical Journal 14, 101–12 , 1980.
〔19〕WAKITA H., et al, “Hydrogen release: New indicator of fault activity”,Science 210, 188–90 , 1980.
〔20〕SATO M., SUTTON A. J. & MCGEE K. A., “Monitoring of hydrogen along the San Andreas and Calaveras Faults in central California in 1980–1984”,Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 12 315–26 , 1986.
〔21〕Tsunogai & Wakita, “Precursory chemical changes in ground water: Kobe Earthquake, Japan”,Science 269, 61–3 , 1995.
〔22〕Igarashi , et al, “Ground-water radon anomaly before the Kobe Earthquake in Japan”,Science 269, 60–1, 1995.
〔23〕TAKASHI ARAI, TAMOTSU OKUSAWA AND HIROAKI TSUKAHARA, “Behavior of gases in the Nojima Fault Zone revealed from the chemical composition and carbon isotope ratio of gases extracted from DPRI 1800 m drill core”,The Island Arc , 10, 430–438 , 2001.
〔24〕Lee, H.F., et al, “Fumarolic gas composition of the Tatun Volcano Group, northern Taiwan”,Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 16(4), 843-864 , 2005.
〔25〕島崎邦彥等人,野島?層小倉注水試? ,月刊地球,?外No.21,?S集?層解剖計?,P33-P37,1998。
〔26〕Yen-Yu Lin, “Observation and Scaling of Microevents from TCDP Borehole Seismometers2008”,Workshop on water Injection Experiments(FIT) at Nojima and Chelungpu Faults , 13th March , 2008.
〔27〕H. Darcy, Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon, Dalmont, Paris (1856). |