| 摘要(英) |
Vision is “knowledge and practice based on future aspirations and values.” Through its power to describe future scenes and promote the advancement of organizations, vision becomes a source of strategic planning. In a world where nothing seems certain or permanent, it is important to know how to correctly and effectively strategize and make management decisions.
As the Ten Great Schools of Strategic Thought have observed, a system of values is the central basis upon which a given school of knowledge takes shape. However, differences between knowledge systems can lead to errors or basing decision-making on irrational values that people still hold on to. For this reason, we can only make rational decisions that truly address the problems at hand by determining the nature of values and eliminating irrational beliefs. To do this, we can adopt the eight levels of consciousness from Thirty Verses on Consciousness to explore the inner mental processes of decision-making. Through exploring and thereby knowing our inner hearts, it is possible to recover an infallible method for determining values and thus discover solutions for the unsolvable Black Box problems of the Ten Great Schools. The goals of this study include: advancing the methods of values-exploration, validating the feasibility of these methods, and exploring the nature of values.
This study applies a mixed research method to data gathered during an Elite Lecture course. Prior to the course commencement, the questionnaires survey was conducted on experimental subjects in order to collect qualitative data. After 18 weeks of classes, we conducted an importance and performance analysis to obtain a quantitative set of factors suggesting both positive achievements and things that could be improved. Using an identical model, we compared data collected over three years using dialectical and Markov analyses to discover points where results were maintained, improved, and remained unchanged, and a set of critical factors for the over-investment of data. The uniform set of factors that was obtained from this forms an inferential basis for the nature of values.
This study result relied on collecting data via questionnaires and importance and performance analysis. It established a value exploration model through positive, negative, integrated, and Markov chain concepts. Through the Elite Seminar program, it conducted the verification of value exploration model, identified consistent factors, and derived the natures of values in different cases. The exploring results in the natures of case values are stated as follows. In course cognition, the natures of value are learning paradigm, work inspiration, and experience. In course arrangement purpose, its nature of value is future elite cultivation, interdisciplinary knowledge, and career development. Also, in expectation, the natures of value are learning paradigm, work inspiration, and experience. Concerning the characteristics of speakers, the natures of value are living experience, characteristic in leadership, and living philosophy. In lecturing topics, the natures of value are career development, living philosophy, trend topics, and international and current affairs. |
| 參考文獻 |
英文部份
Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review, 78, 171-206.
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 7, pp. 1-101). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1991). Contributions to information integration theory (vols. 1, 2, 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ashforth, B.E, & Meal F., (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Cooke, R.A.,& Rousseau DM., (1988). Behavioral Norms and ExpectationsA Quantitative Approach To the Assessment of Organizational Culture. Group Organization Management, 13(3), 245-273.
Edward, W., (1961). Behavioral Decision Theory. Annual Review of Psychology. 12, 473-498.
Engel, J.F., Kollat, D.T. & Blackwell, R.D. , (1968). Consumer behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Enz, C.A., (1988). The Role of Value Congruity in Intraorganizational Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 284-304.
Fischhoff, B., (1975). Hindsight Foresight: The effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty. Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1, 288-299.
Fishbein, M. (1967). A behavioral theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and attitude toward that object. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 389-400). New York: Wiley.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, J., (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory Research: Reading. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Freud, Sigmund., (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. A. A. Brill. The MajorWorks of Sigmund Freud. London: Encyclopedia Britannica, inc, 135- 398.
Freud, Sigmund., (1910) Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Trans. James Strachey, New York: W. W.Norton & Company.
Freud, Sigmund., (1923). The Ego and Id. Trans. Joan Riviere The Major Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Encyclopedia Britannica, inc, 697-717.
Gordon, D. G. (2001). Classroom management: Problems and solutions. Music Educators Journal, 88(2), 17-23.
Gordon, T. J., & Helmer, O., (1964). Report on a Long-Range Forecasting Study. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica/ California.
Hammond, K.R. & Adelman, L., (1976). Social Judgment Theory. In M. Kaplan S. Schwartz Eds. Human Judgement and Decision Process. New York: Academice Press.
Hammond, K.R., Mcaleffanf. G.H., & Mumpover, J., (1980). Human Judgemnt and Decision Making theories, methods and procedures. New York: Praeger Publication.
Heckausen, H. (1985). Achievement motivation in perspective. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Hofstede, G., Nejijen, B., Ohayv, D.D., & Sanders, G., (1990). Measuring Organizational Culture: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 286-316.
Holden, M. C., & Wedman, J. F., (1993). Future Issues of Computer-mediated Communication: The Results of a Delphi Study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4), 5-24.
Liu, H.J., ＆ Shiue, Y.C., (2011). Exploring the Dharma of Strategic Value. BAI 2011 International Conference, Thailand.
Liu, H.J., ＆ Shiue, Y.C., (2012). Formulating and Evaluating Corporate Policy Using the Importance-Performance Analysis to Verification of Dharma of Value. BAI 2012 International Conference, Sapporo, Japan.
Jennifer, M., & Gareth, R. (2004). Organizational behavior, structure, processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jerome, C. G., & Theodore J. G., (2009). Futures Research Methodology—Version 3.0. The Millennium Project.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A., (1972). Subjectives Probability: A judgment of Representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
Kahneman, D,. & Tversky, A., (1973). On the Psychology of Predicition. Psychological Review. 80(4), 237-251.
Kenny, R. L.,& Raiffa, F., (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley.
Kluckhohn, C. K., (1951). Value and Value Organization in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G., (2001). Principle of Marketing(9th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., (1991). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control(7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M., (1979). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. MA: Addison-Wesly Publishing Company.
Louis MR., (1983). Organizations as Culture-bearing millieux. In Organization symblism, Pondy L, Forst R, Morgan G, Dandrige T (eds.). JAI Press: Greewich, CT.
Louviere, J.J., (1988). Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. London New Delhi: Sage.
Martilla JA., & James JC., (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
Martin J., & Siehl C., (1983). Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 52-64.
Maslow, A. H., (1943). Maslow′s Hierarchy of Needs. Originally Published in Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Mintzberg H., & Quinn JB., (1988). Readings in the strategy process 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River: New Jersey.
Mintzberg H., Lampel J., &Ahlstrand B., (2005). Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. Business Weekly Publications, Inc.
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O., (1995). Delphi: A versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
O’Reilly CA., Chatman J., & Caldwell DF., (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
Rokeach, M., (1973). The Nature Of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Sahin, S.O., Ulengin,F., & Ulengin,B., (2004). Using Neural Networks and Cognitive Mapping in Scenario Aanalysis: The Case of Turkey’s Inflation Dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(1), 124-145.
Sampson, S.E.& Showalter, M.J. (1999). The Performance-Importance Response Function: Observations and Implications. The Service Industries Journal, 1-25.
Schwartz SH., (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Zanna M (ed). Academic Press: San Diego.
Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1976). Job satisfaction and their correlation. American Behavior & Scientist, 18, 346-68.
Shy, O., (2000). The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge Univ Pr.
Wiener N., (1988). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Da Capo Press.
中文部份
Cooper, D.R., & Schindler, P.S. 著。古永嘉和楊雪蘭編譯(2009)。《企業研究方法》。第三版。美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司: 台灣分公司。
IBM商業價值研究院. (2007). 消除策略盲點：技術驅動型企業策略推動創新和成長. (http://www-935.ibm.com/services/multimedia/strategies_to_eliminate_blind_spots.pdf)
于凌波. (1992)。《唯識學綱要》。台北市：東大圖書。pp.91-172; 223-242。
于凌波. (1994)。《唯識三論今詮》。台北市：東大圖書。 pp.27-35; 151-212。
弗洛伊德著。車文博編。 (1998)。《弗洛伊德文集(全八卷)》。長春出版社。第三卷與第六卷。
朱邦復. (2008)。《智慧學九論(修訂本) 》。台灣商務. pp.229-256。
亨利‧明茲伯格 (Henry Mintzberg)，約瑟夫‧藍佩爾(Joseph Lampel)，布魯斯‧亞斯蘭(Bruce Ahlstrand)著。林金榜譯 (2006)。《明茲伯格策略管理》。商周出版。
余民寧(2002)。《教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量》。心理出版社。
李政賢(2006)。《質性研究設計與規劃撰寫》。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
姜祖恕(2005)。馬可夫鏈的簡介。2013年5月29日。取自: http://episte.math.ntu.edu.tw/articles/mm/mm_09_3_08/index.html
陳世佳(2009)。臺灣大學生的學習歷程與表現。載於張雪梅、彭森明（主編），大學生學期間打工現象之分析。臺北市：師大教評中心。pp.239-259。
陳柏亦. (2009)。以辯證思維規律分析決策的形成。國立中央大學組織管理研究所碩士論文。
黃玉湘(2002)。我國社區大學學員學習動機與學習滿意度之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
黑格爾著。賀麟譯. (1980)。《小邏輯(精選本) 》。商務(香港)。
劉創馥 (2006)。黑格爾思辯哲學與分析哲學之發展。國立政治大學哲學學報。第十五期.。pp. 81-134。
薛義誠(2008)。《策略規劃與管理》。雙葉書廊。pp.1-16,179-189,238-248。 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit