使用代理駕駛行為意向之影響因素分析-以多樣本結構方程模式之應用

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：24

、訪客IP：3.21.21.209

姓名

呂茗儀(Ming-Yi Lu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程學系

論文名稱

使用代理駕駛行為意向之影響因素分析-以多樣本結構方程模式之應用
(Factor Affecting Behavior Intention to Have a Designated Driver – Application of the Multi-sample Structure Equation Modeling)

相關論文

★ 圖書館系統通閱移送書籍之車輛途程問題	★ 起迄對旅行時間目標下高速公路匝道儀控之研究
★ 結合限制規劃法與螞蟻演算法求解運動排程問題	★ 共同邊界資料包絡分析法在運輸業之應用-以國內航線之經營效率為例
★ 雙北市公車乘客知覺服務品質、知覺價值、滿意度、行為意向路線與乘客之跨層次中介效果與調節式中介效果	★ Investigating the influential factors of public bicycle system and cyclist heterogeneity
★ A Mixed Integer Programming Formulation for the Three-Dimensional Unit Load Device Packing Problem	★ 高速公路旅行時間預測之研究--函數資料分析之應用
★ Behavior Intention and its Influential Factors for Motorcycle Express Service	★ Inferring transportation modes (bus or vehicle) from mobile phone data using support vector machine and deep neural network.
★ 混合羅吉特模型於運具選擇之應用-以中央大學到桃園高鐵站為例	★ Preprocessing of mobile phone signal data for vehicle mode identification using map-matching technique
★ 含額外限制式動態用路人均衡模型之研究	★ 動態起迄旅次矩陣推估模型之研究
★ 動態號誌時制控制模型求解演算法之研究	★ 不同決策變數下動態用路人均衡路徑選擇模型之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

根據內政部警政署統計通報得知，近六年臺灣A1類道路交通事故肇事原因均以「酒醉(後)駕駛失控」為首，顯示酒駕肇事往往釀成嚴重傷亡。本研究以計劃行為理論與風險感認、自我效能構念進行民眾使用代理駕駛行為意向的探討，並根據內政部警政署統計酒駕死亡人數資料選擇高雄市、臺中市、桃園縣做為調查地點，最後研究共回收1,088份有效問卷。透過敘述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、結構方程模式及多樣本結構方程模式分析，結果顯示態度、主觀規範、知覺行為控制、風險感認對於行為意向有顯著正向影響；自我效能對於行為意向則有顯著負向影響。在多樣本結構方程模式分析中，測量恆等性結果符合指標，顯示性別與年齡特性對於模式部分並不具有調節效果、階層調節迴歸顯示顯示性別與年齡特性對於模式斜率項具有調節效果。

摘要(英)

According to National Police Agency statistics that in recent 6 years Taiwan A1 class traffic accident cause of the “driving under the influence” most. It means driving under the influence tend to make heavy casualties. This study based on the theory of planned behavior, risk perception and self-efficacy factors to investigate the people’s behavior intention about using designated driver service. According to National Police Agency statistic, select Kaohsiung, Taichung and Taoyuan cities to be the sampling locations. A total of 1088 questionnaires are fully completed. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analysis, t-test and structural equation modeling. The results showed that “attitude”, “subjective norm”, “perceived behavior control” and “risk perception” factors have significant positive effect to behavior intention, “self-efficacy” factor has significant negative effect to behavior intention. In the multi-group structural equation modeling, the results showed that study model can pass the measurement invariance test. In this study, the structure has no moderator effect about different ages and genders.

關鍵字(中)

★ 測量恆等性
★ 代理駕駛

關鍵字(英)

★ measurement invariance
★ designated driver

論文目次

目錄
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 .iii
目錄 .iv
圖目錄 .vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 ................................................................................................................1
1.1 研究背景與動機............................................................................................1
1.2 研究目的........................................................................................................3
1.3 研究範圍與對象............................................................................................3
1.4 研究流程........................................................................................................4
第二章文獻回顧........................................................................................................6
2.1 酒後駕駛防制與現況....................................................................................6
2.1.1 國內外酒駕標準及罰則................................................................7
2.1.2 指定駕駛........................................................................................9
2.1.3 代理駕駛......................................................................................10
2.2 計劃行為理論..............................................................................................14
2.2.1 理性行為理論內涵......................................................................14
2.2.2 計劃行為理論內涵......................................................................15
2.2.3 相關文獻應用..............................................................................16
2.3 風險感認......................................................................................................19
2.4 自我效能......................................................................................................22
2.5 駕駛者行為差異..........................................................................................23
第三章研究方法......................................................................................................26
3.1 研究架構與假設..........................................................................................26
3.2 操作型定義與問卷設計..............................................................................26
3.3 資料分析方法..............................................................................................29
3.3.1 敘述性統計分析..........................................................................29
3.3.2 項目分析......................................................................................29
3.3.3 結構方程模式的評鑑..................................................................30
3.3.4 結構方程模式..............................................................................32
3.3.5 多樣本結構方程模式..................................................................33
3.3.5.1 模式與內涵說明..................................................................33
3.3.5.2 恆等性檢驗..........................................................................35
3.3.5.3 恆等性研究流程..................................................................40
3.3.5.4 恆等性衡量依據..................................................................42
第四章問卷施測與樣本結構分析..........................................................................44
4.1 問卷資料蒐集..............................................................................................44
4.1.1 調查對象......................................................................................44
4.1.2 樣本數之界定..............................................................................44
4.1.3 預試階段......................................................................................45
4.1.4 正式問卷發放階段......................................................................45
4.2 受測者基本資料分析..................................................................................46
4.3 受測者背景差異分析..................................................................................49
4.3.1 性別..............................................................................................49
4.3.2 年齡..............................................................................................52
4.3.3 交叉分析......................................................................................56
4.3.3.1 個人背景屬性......................................................................56
4.3.3.2 使用者經驗..........................................................................56
4.3.3.3 價格合宜性分析..................................................................57
4.3.4 小結..............................................................................................58
4.4 項目分析......................................................................................................59
4.5 驗證性因素分析..........................................................................................59
4.5.1 態度構念......................................................................................60
4.5.2 主觀規範構念..............................................................................60
4.5.3 知覺行為控制構念......................................................................62
4.5.4 行為意向構念..............................................................................63
4.5.5 自我效能構念..............................................................................64
4.5.6 風險感認構念..............................................................................65
4.6 相關分析......................................................................................................68
4.7 路徑分析......................................................................................................68
第五章多樣本結構方程模式..................................................................................71
5.1 各別樣本結構方程模式分析......................................................................71
5.2 多樣本恆等性檢測......................................................................................74
5.2.1 性別..............................................................................................75
5.2.2 年齡..............................................................................................76
5.2.3 分群斜率比較..............................................................................77
5.2.4 小結..............................................................................................77
第六章結論與建議..................................................................................................78
6.1 結論..............................................................................................................78
6.1.1 研究分析總結..............................................................................78
6.1.2 結果討論......................................................................................79
6.2 建議..............................................................................................................80
6.2.1 理論應用之建議..........................................................................80
6.2.2 實務應用之建議..........................................................................81
參考文獻..........................................................................91

參考文獻

[1] 中華民國交通部，http://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/index.jsp。
[2] 內政部警政署，http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/。
[3] 行政院主計處，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1。
[4] 交通部交通安全入口網，http://168.motc.gov.tw/TC/index.aspx。
[5] 臺北市政府交通局，http://www.dot.taipei.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=117001。
[6] 桃園縣政府交通局，http://traffic.tycg.gov.tw/index.asp。
[7] 台中市政府交通局，http://www.traffic.taichung.gov.tw/。
[8] udn個人理財-保險-保險最前線-酒後代駕撐起「保」護，http://money.udn.com/wealth/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=291771#ixzz357Vn3X9L。
[9] 邱皓政，結構方程模式：LISREL的理論技術與應用，初版，雙葉書廊，臺北市，民國94年。
[10] 黃芳銘，社會科學方法學－結構方程模式，初版，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，臺北市，民國93年。
[11] 黃芳銘，結構方城模式理論與應用，五版，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，臺北市，民國96年。
[12] 吳明隆，結構方程模式：AMOS的操作與應用，初版，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，臺北市，民國96年。
[13] 陳惠國，研究方法：理論與實務，滄海書局出版股份有限公司，臺中市，民國99年。
[14] 涂金堂，量表編製與SPSS，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，臺北市，民國101年。
[15] 張偉豪、鄭時宜，與結構方程模型共舞：曙光初現，初版，前程文化，新北市，民國101年。
[16] 林大煜、林豐福、許洽濤、袁正平、傅毓良、曹瑞和，駕駛人行為反應之研究－酒精對駕駛人生理之實驗分析，交通部運輸研究所，民國82年。
[17] 鐘易詩、翁士博，年輕機車駕駛超速行為分析：習慣與計劃行為理論，中華民國運輸學會論文研討會，民國102年。
[18] 劉明興，以計劃行為理論探討代理駕駛服務介入酒後駕車防治之研究，國立澎湖科技大學，服務業經營管理研究所碩士在職專班，民國99年。
[19] 蘇晉煒，客運司機偏差駕駛行為的影響因素之研究-階層線性模型之應用，國立中央大學土木工程學系，碩士論文，民國101年。
[20] 吳以雯，乘客協助駕駛人安全行車傾向之研究，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系，碩士論文，民國102年。
[21] Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Gifford, R., Vlek, C., “Factors Influencing Car Use for Commuting and the Intention to Reduce It: A Question of Self-Interest or Morality”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 317-324, 2009.
[22] Ajzen, I., “The Theory of Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179-211, 1991.
[23] Barry, A. E., Chaney, B. H., Stellefson, M. L. “Breath Alcohol Concentrations of Designated Drivers”, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Vol.74, No. 4, pp. 509, 2013.
[24] Bandura, A., Principles of Behavior Modification, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.
[25] Bandura, A., “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”, Psychological Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 191, 1977.
[26] Bandura, A. “Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency”, American Psychologist, Vol.37, No. 2, pp.122, 1982.
[27] Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1986.
[28] Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Macmillan, 1997.
[29] Bandura, A., Cervone, D., Self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal System, E.T. Higgins, A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Motivational Science–Social and Personality Perspectives, Taylor and Francis, Ann Arbor, MI, 2002.
[30] Brody, G. H., Shaffer, D. R., “Contributions of Parents and Peers to Children′s Moral Socialization”, Developmental Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 31-75, 1982.
[31] Brown, I. D., Groeger, J. A., “Risk Perception and Decision Taking During the Transition Between Novice and Experienced Driver status”, Ergonomics, Vol. 31, pp. 585–597, 1988.
[32] Bruijn, G. J., Kremers, S. P., Singh, A., Van den Putte, B., Van Mechelen, W., “Adult Active Transportation: Adding Habit Strength to the Theory of Planned Behavior”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 189-194, 2009.
[33] Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., Muthén, B., “Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement in Variance”, Psychological Bulleti, Vol. 105, pp. 456-466, 1989.
[34] Byrne, B. M., Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.
[35] Caudill, B. D., Kantor, G. K., Ungerleider, S., “Driving While Intoxicated: Increased Deterrence or Alternative Transportation for the Drunk Driver”, Journal of Substance Abuse, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 51-67, 1990.
[36] Caudill, B. D., Wayne M. H., Brent A. M., “At-Risk Drinkers Use Safe Ride Services to Avoid Drinking and Driving”, Journal of Substance Abuse, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 149-159, 2000.
[37] Castanier, C., Deroche, T., Woodman, T., “Theory of Planned Behaviour and Road Violations: The Moderating Influence of Perceived Behavioural Control”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 18, pp. 148-158, 2013.
[38] Chang, H. L., Yeh, T. H., “Motorcyclist Accident Involvement by Age, Gender, and Risky Behaviors in Taipei, Taiwan”, Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 109-122, 2007.
[39] Cheung, G. W., Rensvold, R. B., “Evaluating Goodness-Of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance”, Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 9, pp. 233-255, 2002.
[40] Cohn, L. D., Macfarlane S., Yanez, C., Imai, W. K., “Risk-Perception: Differences Between Adolescents and Adults”, Health Psychol, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 217–222, 1995.
[41] Cortina, J. M., “What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 98-104, 1993.
[42] Deery, H. A., “Hazard and Risk Perception Among Young Novice Drivers”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 225-236, 2000.
[43] DeJong, W., Winsten, J. A., “The Use of Designated Drivers by US College Students: a National Study”, Journal of American College Health, Vol. 47, No.4, pp. 151-156, 1999.
[44] Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J. A., Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated, Sage, 2000.
[45] George, D., Mallery, P., SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2003.
[46] Glik, D., Kronenfeld, J., Jackson, K., “Predictors of Risk Perceptions of Childhood Injury Among Parents of Preschoolers”, Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 285-301, 1991.
[47] Harding, W. M., Caudill, B. D., Moore, B. A., Frissell, K. C., “Do Drivers Drink More When They Use a Safe Ride”, Journal of Substance Abuse, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 283-290, 2001.
[48] Heinen, E., Maat, K., Wee, B. V., “The Role of Attitudes Toward Characteristics of Bicycle Commuting on the Choice to Cycle to Work over Various Distances”, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 102-109, 2011.
[49] Hill, T., Lewicki, P., Statisyics: Methods and Applications, StatSoft, 1st Edition, 2007.
[50] Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., Purc-Stephenson, R., “Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations”, Psychological Methods, Vol. 14, pp. 6-23, 2009.
[51] Jöreskog, K. G., “Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations”, Psychometrika, Vol. 36, pp. 409-426, 1971.
[52] Little, T. D., “Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 32, pp. 53-76, 1997.
[53] Lonczak, H. S., Neighbors, C., Donovan, D. M., “Predicting Risky and Angry Driving as a Function of Gender”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.536-545, 2007.
[54] Machin, M. Anthony, Sankey S. K., “Relationships Between Young Drivers’ Personality Characteristics, Risk Perceptions, and Driving Behavior”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 541-547, 2008.
[55] McAuley, E., “Self-Efficacy and the Maintenance of Exercise Participation in Older Adults”, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.103-113, 1993.
[56] Milfont, T. L., Fischer, R., “Testing Measurement Invariance A cross Groups: Applications in Coss-Cultural Research”, International Journal of Psychological Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 111-121, 2010.
[57] Moan, I. S., Rise, J. “Predicting Intentions Not to Drink and Drive Using an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1378-1384, 2011.
[58] Oltedal, S., Rundmo, T., “The Effects of Personality and Gender on Risky Driving Behaviour and Accident Involvement”, Safety Science, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 621-628, 2006.
[59] Rhodes, N., Pivik, K., “Age and Gender Differences In Risky Driving: The Roles of Positive Affect and Risk Perception”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 923-931, 2011.
[60] Rundmo, T., Sjdberg, L., “Risk Perception by Offshore Oil Personnel During Bad Weather Conditions”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 18, pp. 111–118, 1998.
[61] Rundmo, T., “Safety Climate, Attitudes and Rrisk Perception in Norsk Hydro”, Safety Science, Vol. 34, pp. 47–59, 2000.
[62] Rundmo, T., Iversen, H., “Risk Perception and Driving Behaviour Among Adolescents In Two Norwegian Counties Before and After a Traffic Safety Campaign”, Safety Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1-21, 2004.
[63] Rivara, F. P., Chew, A. R., Wang, J., Riley, s., Boisvert, D., Gomez, T., “Drinking Behaviors in Young Adults: the Potential Role of Designated Driver and Safe Ride Home Programs”, Injury Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 168-172, 2007.
[64] Shinar, D., Schechtman, E., Compton, R., “Self-Reports of Safe Driving Behaviors in Relationship to Sex, Age, Education and Income in The US Adult Driving Population”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 111-6, 2001.
[65] Sitkin, S. B., Pablo, A. L., “Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17, No.1, pp.9-38, 1992.
[66] Sörbom, D., “Model Modification”, Psychometrika, Vol. 54, pp. 371-384, 1989.
[67] Sjöberg, L., “Worry and Risk Perception”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 85-93, 1998.
[68] Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., “The Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory—Scale Construct and Validation”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 323-332, 2004.
[69] Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., “Motivational Sources of Driving and Their Associations With Reckless Driving Cognitions and Behavior”, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 51-64, 2008.
[70] Timmerman, M. A., Geller, E. S., Glindemann, K. E., Fournier, A. K., “Do the Designated Drivers of College Students Stay Sober”, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.127-133, 2003.
[71] Ulleberg, P., “Personality Subtypes of Young Drivers. Relationship to Risk-Taking Preferences, Accident Involvement, and Response to a Traffic Safety Campaign”, Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 279-297, 2001.
[72] Ulleberg, P., Rundmo T., “Personality, Attitudes and Risk Perception as Predictors of Risky Driving Behaviour Among Young Drivers”, Safety Science, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 427-443, 2003.
[73] Vandenberg, R. J., Lance, C. E., “A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, pp. 4-70, 2000.
[74] World Health Organization, “Drinking and Driving: a Road Safety Manual for Decision-Makers and Practitioners”, Geneva: Global Road Safety Partnership, 2007.

指導教授

陳惠國(Huey-Kuo Chen)

審核日期

2014-7-22

推文