企業併購歷程中有效進行管理模式再造之探討─以鴻海併購建漢為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：57

、訪客IP：3.137.198.232

姓名

黃力行(Li-hsing Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

企業併購歷程中有效進行管理模式再造之探討─以鴻海併購建漢為例
(Research on the model of management control by reengineering in M&A Process –A Case Study of Foxconn and CyberTan)

相關論文

★ 聯合國海洋法公約生效後，我國海洋管理策略及其因應作為之研究	★ 大陸供應鏈金融平台策略探討─以F公司昆山廠為例
★ 台資企業績效獎勵制度改善方案探討─以L 公司吳江廠為例	★ 自動光學檢測導入方案及其效益探討─以A電池公司為例
★ 以精實物流結合自動化進行倉儲系統再造之個案研究	★ 電腦產業出貨排程系統之發展：系統分析方法的應用
★ 筆記型電腦代工製造業供應鏈遷徙之個案研究：製造佈局的觀點	★ 零售業物流自動化技術導入與服務創新
★ 由精實生產助力轉型工業4.0－以C公司為例	★ 大型自動化專案工程估價方法之研究
★ ODM廠商工業4.0實踐模式之探討：工業模式轉型的觀點	★ 國際企業研發管理模式之探討─以M公司為例
★ 全球化企業研發管理模式之探討─以RobertBOSCH為研究個案	★ 企業併購案例分析：以L公司併購N公司為例
★ 筆記型電腦產業的工業4.0：一個以流程為導向的實踐案例	★ 台灣中小企業暨傳統產業的轉型探討─以L公司轉型研究探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

企業面臨低毛利時代及激烈競爭的環境下，許多企業選擇以最快速的成長模式—併購，來做為成長的方式，並確保持續獲利的成長。但併購交易本身是不會自動產生併購綜效，併購的整體價值取決於有效的併購整合管理，倘若企業未能有效地進行併購後整合管理，將會造成企業價值損失大於收益，導致併購交易失敗收場。

本論文的研究，在探討併購歷程中有效進行管理模式對企業經營績效之影響，經由個案分析實際的改善歷程，從經營管理、人力資源系統、產品成本結構、資訊系統整合、品保系統整合、及表單流程系統…等構面，來進行管理模式探討，最後進行財務報表分析，從2006年至2013年來評估此併購案，於併購後是否有顯著的綜效。
本研究結論如下：
1.併購後初期，原始客戶會有所疑慮，客戶下單時會分散風險，所以會造成業績下滑。
2.併購後與原有組織有重疊的現象，可利用有效的管理，來達成組織精簡的效果。
3.併購後會造成人心的不安，影響員工知覺感受與滿意度，可利用簽約的方式來留住主要的人才。
4.併購後兩家的資訊系統不一，須建構統一之平台，來達成資訊同步化，並可縮短其流程。
綜合以上，本研究從個案中得到驗證，併購後需要有更多的管理，才能得到顯著的併購綜合綜效，其綜效並不是因合併而產生，而是要靠管理產生的。

摘要(英)

Enterprises of our country are confronting Low-Profit market and intensely competitive environment. For ensuring profitable growth from the market, many enterprises choose a feasible business model - Merger and Acquisition (M&A). As we know that the benefits associated with synergy for mergers and acquisitions transactions are not automatic. Actually, PMI, Post-Merger Integration is the most essential factor to deliver values and benefits for enterprise involved in an M&As. It would result in M&As transaction failures and enterprise value loss greater than revenues if enterprise fails to execute a post-M&As integration effectively.

The research focuses the impact of effective integration execution in M&A process on enterprise management performance through case study analysis of improvements in entire M&A process, including Business management, Human Resources Management System (HRMS), Structure of Product Costs, Integrated Information System, Integrated Quality Management System (QMS) and Process Data Reporting System. Eventually, we will evaluate this M&A case with financial reporting and statement analysis from 2006 thru 2013.

The conclusion is shown as follows:

1.In the early- stage of corporate merger and acquisition (M&A), customer defections are a major reason why the combined company fails to deliver the benefits associated with synergy.
2.Developing effective integration strategy (i.e. executing communication plan or offering different rewards and incentives) to minimize any problems occur in combined organization after merge.
3.After hearing the announcement of company’s acquisition, its employees were restless and uneasy. The head of human resources personally come and talk with the employees to put them at ease. For retaining key employees, HR professionals have employees re-sign enforceable contracts and sign an acknowledgement that they have read, understood and have no objections to the company’s employee handbook.
4.The integration of different Information Systems (IS) is one of the most critical challenges that companies face during the whole post-merger integration process. First of all, the company has to build up information system (IS) integration in different organizations for various data synchronization.

Based our review of the research, an effective Post-Merger Integration is the key to M&As success Post-Merger Integration, such as strategy , organization design , and talent assessment .

關鍵字(中)

★ 併購
★ 鴻海
★ 建漢
★ 整合管理
★ 改善

關鍵字(英)

★ Merger & Acquisition
★ Foxconn
★ CyberTAN
★ Post-Merger Integration (PMI)
★ Improvement

論文目次

Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與研究方法 2
1.3 論文架構 2
第二章、文獻探討 3
2.1 併購的定義與類型 3
2.2 併購動機之相關理論 5
2.3 併購後整合改善分析的文獻 12
2.4 併購綜效 16
第三章、網通產業特色及發展分析 19
3.1 網通產業的定義與介紹 19
3.2 台灣網通產業概況 24
3.3 小結 29
第四章、個案分析 31
4.1 前言 31
4.2 個案公司介紹 31
4.3 合併後改善歷程 32
4.4 營運能力分析 40
4.5 個案改善討論 43
第五章、研究討論 45
5.1 定性綜效討論 45
5.2 定量綜效討論 50
第六章、結論與後續研究 54
6.1 結論 54
6.2 後續研究 55
參考文獻 56

參考文獻

1.Ashkenas R.N, Demonaco L.J. & Francis S.C., (1998), Making The Deal Real: Giw GECapital Integrates Acquisitions, Harvard Business Review. Vol 76, iss 1, pp165-178
2.Banerjee, Ajeyo and Woodrow E. Eckard (1998). “Are Mega-Mergers Anti-Competitive? Evidence from the First Great Merger Wave.” Rand Journal of Economics, 29, 803–827.
3.Berkoiytch, E., and Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: an empirical Investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, pp.347-362.
4.Birkinshaw, J., H. Bresman & L. Hakanson，Managing the post-acquisition integration process， Journal of Management Studies，vol. 37，pp.395-423，2000。
5.Bower,J.L.,(2001), Not all M&As are alike-and That Matters, Harvard Business Review vol79 ,pp. 93-101
6.Bragado J.F., (1992), Setting the correct speed for postmerger integration. M&A Europe 5:24–31.
7.Brahma S.S, & Srivastava B L,(2007), Communication, Executive Retention,and Employee Stress as Predictors of Acquisition Performance:An Empirical Evidence, The Icfai Journal of Mergers&Acquisitions, Vol. IV, No. 4
8.Bramson, R. N., (2000). HR’s role in mergers and acquistions, Training & Development,vol.54, iss.10, pp.59-66
9.Brouthers, K. D.,Hastenburg, P. V. & Joran, V. D.,(1998). If Most Mergers Fail Why Are They so Popolar? Long Range Planning , vol. 31, iss.3, pp.347-353
10.Brouthers, B., Sanderson, S. & Voorde, M.V.D.,(1998), How to Achieve Value behind the Deal during Merger Integration, Oil & Gas Journal, vol.96, iss.37, pp.21-28
11.Capron L, Mitchell W, Swaminathan A. (2001).Asset divestiture following horizontal acquisitions: a dynamic view. Strategic Management Journal 22(9): 817–844.
12.Denton, G. A. and White, B. (2000). Implementing a balanced scorecard approach to managing hotel operations. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41（1）,94-108.
13.Eccles, R.G. & Pyburn, P.F.(1992). Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance, Management Accounting ,74(1), 41-44.
14.Fujitsu Consulting. ,(2001), M&A Survey: The Link between Shareholder Value and Post-Merger Integration. DMR: New York.
15.Gammelgaaed, J. (2004). Access of competence: An emerging acquisition motive. European Business Forum, 17(1), 44- 47.
16.Gonsalves, A. J., Eiler, R.G., 1996, “Managing Complex Through Performance Measurement”, Management Accounting (August), pp.34-39.
17.Haspeslagh, & Jemison. (1991). Creating value through corporate renewal. New York and Toronto: Free Press.
18.Haspeslagh, & Jemison. (1991). Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal,. New: NY: Free Press.
19.Kang, N.H. and Johansson, S. (2000) Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions: Their Role in Industrial Globalization. STI Working Papers. DSTI/DOC(2000).
20.Larrson, R. and S. Finkelstein(1999)“Integration Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquitions：A Case of Synergy Realization,”Organization Science, Vo1. 10,Iss. 1,p1~19
21.Lewellen, Wilbur G(1971), A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger, Jorunal of Ftnance .,vol.26, P521-537.
22.Mitleton-Kelly, E.,(2004), An integrated methodology to facilitate the emergence of new ways of organizing,Conference Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, European Conference on Research Methodology.
23.Mitleton-Kelly, E.,(2006), Coevolutionary integration: The co-creation of a new organizational form following a merger and acquisition, E:CO Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 2006 pp.36-48
24.Nai-Fu Chen, Richard Roll, and Stephen Ross (1986) “Economic Forces and the Stock Market,” Journal of Business, 59, 386-403
25.Ramaswamy, K.P. & J.F. Waegelein(2003)，Firm financial performance following mergers ， Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting，20，115-126。
26.Robert S.Kaplan and David Norton, The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, Feb. 1992
27.Singh H, Montgomery CA.,(1987), Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal 8(4): 377–386.
28.Sorensen, D.E.(2000)，Characteristics of merging firms，Journal of Economics and Business，52，423-433。
29.Stewart C. Myers , （1977） “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Economics 5, 147-175
30.Stigler, George J. 1989. Interview by David Levy. The Region (Federal Reserve BankofMinneapolis)
31.Tetenbaum,(1999)Merger & acquisition failure: improve the chance for expected integration and synergies. Organizational Dynamics, pp.22~35.
32.Weaver, Samuel C. and Weston J Fred (2001). Mergers and Acquisitions, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
33.Weston, J. Fred, Kwang S. Chung and Juan A. Siu (1998). Takeoves, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, 2nd edition, New York: Prentice Hall Companies, Inc.
34.Weston, J. Fred, Kwang S. ; Hoag, Susan E (1996). Mergers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, New York: Prentice Hall Companies, Inc.
35.Williamson, O. E.(1975), Markets and Hierarchies, Free Press, New York.
36.Williamson, O. E.(1983), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications,” Journal of Law & Economics, pp.315-366.
37.Weaver, S. C., ＆ J. F. Weston 著，「企業併購」，陳儀譯，Mc Graw Hill，2002 年。
38.Dennis Carcy. Robert J. Aiello. Michacl D. Watkins 著，2002，「合併與收購」，李田樹譯，天下遠見出版，臺北市。
39.J.Fred Weston, Juan A Siu, Brian A. Johnson ，2004，企業併購與重組，台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司，台北市。
40.Mitchell Iee Marks和Philip Mirvis著，1999，企業力結合一企業併購 - 聯盟教戰手冊，林麗寬譯，中國生產力，台北市。
41.劉育秀(1993)，購併決策影響購併績效及經營績效之關鍵因素：台灣企業購併之實證研究，管理會計，第25 期。
42.伍忠賢，購併後如何選任高階管理者，管理雜誌第135 期。
43.伍忠賢(1999)，企業購併聖經
44.伍忠賢(2000)，「企業購併理論與實務-跨世紀全球投資觀點」，台北：新陸書局股份有限公司。
45.王泰允，1991，企業併購實用，源流出版社，台北市。
46.王泰允，1995，國際企業經營－策略與實務，台北：環球經濟社商務印書局
47.王文宇（1998），「世界主要國家購併相關法律規定之比較」，經濟情勢暨評論，1998 年8 月，pp. 60-102。
48.併購之後，誰去誰留，(2002) ，哈佛管理評論。
49.誰把人才併掉了？，(2007)，哈佛管理評論。
50.吳啟銘，「企業評價：個案實證分析」，智勝文化，2001 年。
51.萬哲鈺/高崇瑋，「財務報表分析實務與應用」，華泰，2003 年。
52.羅玉潔，2000，「網景AOL合併周年問題湧現」，經濟日報，九版。
53.周朝崇, 2001, 台灣商業銀行合併後經營績效之研究
54.薛明玲總編審，企業併購策略與最佳實務，財團法人資誠教育基金會，初版，2011年。
55.IEK 產業情報網（http://ieknet.itri.org.tw）。
56.ITIS 產業資訊服務網（http://www.itis.org.tw）
57.中華徵信所『全方位企業資料庫』(http://www.credit.com.tw/Project)
58.建漢科技2006-2013年度財務報表、股東會年報
59.公開觀測站：http://newmops.tse.com.tw/

指導教授

呂俊德(Jun-der Leu)

審核日期

2014-7-14

推文