就業保護政策對經濟成長的影響分析─以全球82個經濟體之實質GDP變動為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：37

、訪客IP：18.224.0.25

姓名

鄧惠中(Hui-zhong Deng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

就業保護政策對經濟成長的影響分析─以全球82個經濟體之實質GDP變動為例

相關論文

★ 公平交易法對多層次傳銷定義之研究－「給付一定代價」是否應予保留	★ 產業群聚與ICT、電子商務技術擴散－以臺灣製造業為例
★ 人力資本與經濟成長：以TIMSS測驗分數作為人力資本代理變數可行性之探討	★ 個人預計退休年齡的決定
★ 租稅幻覺與已婚婦女勞動供給之影響	★ 宗教認知對修行投入時間影響之探討
★ 退休金給付制度及強制退休時點與員工互動之探討	★ 台灣管理階層薪資結構 Tournament Theory 之實證研究
★ 人才移動、家庭遷移與技術移轉－以台商在上海地區就職為例	★ 電子商務消費者行為計量分析
★ 台灣B2C電子商務市場商品價格變動因素之探討—兼論虛擬市場與實體市場間之整合	★ 高科技產業垂直分工與群聚效果之分析—以新竹科學園區為例
★ 電信不對稱管制之研究	★ 臺灣地區大學教育報酬率時間變化趨勢之分析
★ 肢體障礙勞工教育與就業狀況之探討－以傳訊理論與歧視理論為基礎	★ 教育的信號功能分析─以國內事業單位為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

面對經濟全球化的高度競爭環境下，各國相繼出現以去除勞動管制的方式來降低失業率與提升國際競爭力。本研究目的即是探討勞動管制產生的就業市場僵固性對國家的實質產出有正面抑或是負面影響？因此，本研究利用《經商環境報告》中的就業市場僵固性指標（由雇用困難度指標、工時僵固度指標與解雇困難度指標組成）及遣散成本指標作為量化勞動市場保護管制的來源依據，以全球82個經濟體，2004年至2008年期間資料作為研究樣本，使用固定效果法作實證估計。此外，本研究亦根據世界銀行公布之所得分類標準，將全部樣本區分成「中所得以上」與「中所得以下」兩個所得類型，探討國家經濟發展程度是否會影響勞動管制與實質產出成長的關係。

本研究的實證結果顯示，整體而言，就業市場僵固性與國家實質GDP有負向關係。然而在不同所得類型之間的結果則有所差異，其中「中所得以上」國家的雇用困難度與實質產出存在凹函數（concave function）關係，隱含雇用困難度在中所得以上國家不可過於僵化，也應避免太過寬鬆的就業保護環境，適當地規範雇主的人事雇用能力將有助於國家產出水準發展；「中所得以下」國家的勞動管制大致上會負向影響國家的實質產出成長，不過遣散成本相關的勞動法令嚴格程度與國家實質產出成長則存在正向關係。基於上述結果，本研究建議各國政策制定者在擬定勞動市場保護管制走向時應配合其國家所處所得階段，方能找到適合的勞動政策。

摘要(英)

Under the increasingly international competitive pressures generated by the globalization, there seems to be more and more countries want to use the labor market deregulation way to decrease unemployment rate and enhance country’s international competitiveness. This paper is aimed at investigating whether “rigid” labor market, which generated by labor market protection law, will affect country’s real GDP growth. Therefore, we use the rigidity of employment index (which is composed of difficulty of hiring, rigidity of hours, and difficulty of firing) and firing cost index, which developed by Doing Business Report, as proxy variables to measure the degree of labor regulation and perform the fixed effect regression method for a sample of 82 economies during the period of 2004-2008. To test whether labor market regulation affects real GDP growth differently according to the economic development level of economies, we also divide the sample economies into two groups. Following the World Bank criterion for income level, samples are classified as either higher- or lower-income economies.
The empirical results show that “rigidity of employment” has a negative effect on real GDP growth in all economies. However, there are different estimates among two income groups. For higher-income economies, there is a concave function relationship between “difficulty of hiring” and real GDP growth. This result reveals that the rule of hiring should not be too stringent or less, and that properly regulate employer’s hiring ability would be beneficial to national real GDP growth; For low-income economies, most of indicators of labor market regulations have negative effect on national’s real GDP growth except for the “firing cost index”. In regard to above mentioned empirical results, we recommend that policy makers should take their economic development stage into account when they are trying to find their suitable labor regulation policies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 勞動市場保護管制
★ 所得分類
★ 實質產出成長
★ 固定效果模型

關鍵字(英)

★ labor market regulation
★ income level
★ real GDP growth
★ fixed effect model

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究動機與目的 1
1.2 研究方法 5
1.3 研究架構 5
第二章文獻回顧 6
2.1 勞動市場保護管制內涵與學派介紹 6
2.2 勞動市場管制對勞動市場影響之實證研究 8
2.3 勞動市場管制對國家經濟表現影響之實證研究 10
2.4 本章小節 13
第三章實證假說與模型設定 14
3.1 勞動市場管制對經濟成長的影響(第一階段) 14
3.2 探討國家發展程度差異與勞動管制效果之互動(第二階段) 18
3.3 實證估計方法 19
第四章資料來源與變數說明 21
4.1 勞動市場保護管制來源介紹 21
4.2 國家分類標準 24
4.3 變數說明 24
4.4 變數敘述性統計 32
第五章實證結果 35
5.1 勞動市場管制對國家實質產出變動影響 35
5.2 國家發展程度差異與勞動管制影響效果之互動 38
5.3 本章小節 48
第六章結論與研究限制 52
6.1 結論與建議 52
6.2 研究限制與未來研究方向 54
參考文獻 55
附錄 59

參考文獻

一、中文部分
【1】易永嘉，(2010)，「改善我國在世界銀行勞動指標評比之對策與建議」，《台灣勞工季刊》，24：99-111。
【2】洪清海，(2009)，「從「去管制化」看法國工時變革」，台灣總工會勞動論壇。
【3】黃怡綾，(2006)，「資遣費制度與國家發展的關係及其對勞動市場的影響：以台灣等東亞十國為例」，中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
【4】童小珠，(2005)，「經濟全球化下台灣勞動問題與就業對策之探討」，第二屆中山學術與社會科學學術研討會：全球化、法制化與國家發展，中山大學中山學術研究所。

二、英文部分
【1】Acharya, Viral V; Ramin P Baghai and Krishnamurthy V Subramanian. 2010. "Labor Laws and Innovation." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16484.
【2】Addison, John T and Paulino Teixeira. 2003. "The Economics of Employment Protection." Journal of Labor research, 24(1), 85-128.
【3】Adjemian, Stéphane; François Langot and Coralia Quintero-Rojas. 2010. "How Do Labor Market Institutions Affect the Link between Growth and Unemployment: The Case of the European Countries." European Journal of Comparative Economics, 7(2), 347-71.
【4】Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt. 1994. "Growth and Unemployment." The Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 477-94.
【5】Alonso, Alberto; Cristina Echevarria and Kien C Tran. 2004. "Long-Run Economic Performance and the Labor Market." Southern Economic Journal, 70(4), 905-19.
【6】Arulampalam, Wiji and Alison L. Booth. 1998. "Training and Labour Market Flexibility: Is There a Trade-Off?" British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(4), 521-36.
【7】Barro, Robert J. 1996. "Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5698.
【8】Bean, Charles and Christopher Pissarides. 1993. "Unemployment, Consumption and Growth." European Economic Review, 37(4), 837-54.
【9】Benhabib, Jess and Mark M Spiegel. 1994. "The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data." Journal of Monetary economics, 34(2), 143-73.
【10】Besley, Timothy and Robin Burgess. 2004. "Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91-134.
【11】Blanchard, Olivier and Justin Wolfers. 2000. "The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence." The Economic Journal, 110(462), 1-33.
【12】Blanchflower, David G and Andrew J Oswald. 1995. "An Introduction to the Wage Curve." The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), 153-67.
【13】Boeri, Tito; Brooke Helppie and Mario Macis. 2008. "Labor Regulations in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and Directions for Future Research." World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper, 833.
【14】Calderón, César and Alberto Chong. 2005. "Are Labor Market Regulations an Obstacle for Long-Term Growth." In Labor Markets and Institutions, ed. J. E. Restrepo and A. Tokman. Santiago, Chile: Central Bank of Chile.
【15】Calderon, César; Alberto Chong and Gianmarco Leon. 2007. "Institutional Enforcement, Labor-Market Rigidities, and Economic Performance." Emerging Markets Review, 8(1), 38-49.
【16】Daveri, Francesco and Guido Tabellini. 2000. "Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries." Economic Policy, 15(30), 47-104.
【17】Doing Business. 2003. Doing Business in 2004: Understanding Regulation. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【18】Doing Business. 2004. Doing Business in 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【19】Doing Business. 2005. Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【20】Doing Business.2006. Doing Business 2007: How to Reform. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【21】Doing Business. 2007. Doing Business 2008. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【22】Doing Business. 2008. Doing Business 2009. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【23】Doing Business. 2009. Doing Business 2010: Reforming through Difficult Times. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【24】Doing Business. 2010. Doing Business 2011: Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【25】Doing Business. 2011. Doing Business 2012: Doing Business in a More Transparent World. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【26】Doing Business. 2012. Doing Business 2013:Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【27】Doing Business. 2013. Doing Business 2014: Understanding Relations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington DC: The World Bank.
【28】Elmeskov, Jørgen; John P Martin and Stefano Scarpetta. 1998. "Key Lessons for Labour Market Reforms: Evidence from Oecd Countries′ Experience." Swedish Economic Policy Review, 5(2), 205-52.
【29】Forteza, Alvaro and Martin Rama. 2006. "Labor Market ‘Rigidity’and the Success of Economic Reforms across More Than 100 Countries." The Journal of Policy Reform, 9(1), 75-105.
【30】Freeman, Richard. 1993. "Labor Market Institutions and Policies: Help or Hindrance to Economic Development?," Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992, 117-144, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
【31】Freeman, Richard B and Stephen Nickell. 1988. "Labour Market Institutions and Economic Performance." Economic Policy, 64-80.
【32】Garibaldi, Pietro and Paolo Mauro. 1999. Deconstructing Job Creation. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 99/109.
【33】Heckman, James J. 2000. "The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets," National bureau of economic research Working Paper 7773.
【34】ILO (International Labour Office). 1991. “Employment Policies in the Economic Restructuring of Latin America and the Caribbean”, Tripartite Symposium on Structural Adjustment and Employment in Latin America and the Caribbean. WEP 1-4-07 (Doc. 2). August. Geneva.
【35】Lazear, Edward P. 1990. "Job Security Provisions and Employment." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(3), 699-726.
【36】Lee, Keun and Byung-Yeon Kim. 2009. "Both Institutions and Policies Matter but Differently for Different Income Groups of Countries: Determinants of Long-Run Economic Growth Revisited." World development, 37(3), 533-49.
【37】Nickell, Stephen. 1997. "Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe Versus North America." The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 55-74.
【38】Nickell, Stephen and Richard Layard. 1999. "Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance." In Handbook of labor economics, volume 3C, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, 3029-84.
【39】Ochel, Wolfgang. 2009. "Employment Protection: Concepts and Measurement." CESifo DICE Report, 7(2), 30-38.
【40】OECD. Oecd Employment Outlook 1999. OECD Publishing.
【41】Parcon, Hazel. 2008. "Labor Market Flexibility as a Determinant of Fdi Inflows,"Working Papers 200807, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
【42】Patterson, Zuriashe and Seymour Patterson. 2012. "Social Protection and Economic Growth." American Economist, 57(2), 188-95.
【43】Pissarides, Christopher A. 1990. Equilibrium Unemployment Theory. MIT press.
【44】Rix, A., Davies, K., Gaunt, R., Hare, A., and Cobbold, S. 1999. The Training and Development of Flexible Workers. Department for Education and Employment Research Report No.118.
【45】Standing, Guy and Victor E. Tokman. 1991. Towards Social Adjustment: Labour Market Issues in Structural Adjustment. Geneva : International Labour Office.
【46】Storm, Servaas and CWM Naastepad. 2009. "Labor Market Regulation and Productivity Growth: Evidence for Twenty Oecd Countries (1984–2004)." Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 48(4), 629-54.

指導教授

單驥(Gee San)

審核日期

2014-8-7

推文