獎賞方式對學習成效的影響－以英文字彙學習之準實驗研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：48

、訪客IP：18.217.4.250

姓名

林碩芸(Shuo-Iun Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

獎賞方式對學習成效的影響－以英文字彙學習之準實驗研究
(The effect of reward on learning achievement–English vocabulary learning of quasi-experimental research)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

現今為數位學習的時代，利用數位教材來進行教學為學校與社會組織競爭優勢的來源，眾多組織利用獎賞來激勵成員學習知識，但獎賞具有訊息面以及控制面兩種效果，故是否能有效激勵成員學習成效還有待確認。

本研究以大學組織行為課程為實驗環境，探討獎賞方式與個人感知自主性以及感知勝任感的關係，進而探討獎賞方式與兩種基本心理需求是否能有效提升學習成效。
本研究為準實驗研究，探討無獎賞、任務型伴隨獎賞以及績效型伴隨獎賞三種獎賞方式與個人心理需求、學習時間與學習成效的關係，共有72份有效樣本。經過分析後，有以下結果：
1.相較有獎賞週次，無獎賞週次其感知自主性較高。
2.相較無獎賞週次，有獎賞週次其感知勝任感較高。
3.相較無獎賞週次，有獎賞週次其學習時間較多。
4.相較無獎賞週次，有獎賞週次其學習成效較優。
5.相較任務伴隨獎賞週次，績效伴隨獎賞週次其學習成效較優。
6.個人學習時間正向影響其學習成效。

根據上述結果，本研究建議若組織欲增加成員學習知識動機，應以增加組織成員感知自主性以及感知勝任感為主要方式，使其有自發性的內在動機學習，若缺乏內在動機，則建議可採用獎賞機制以鼓勵成員學習，但必須仔細評估且平衡不同獎賞方式對於上述兩種心理需求的影響，因此不同獎賞方式的拿捏與使用極為重要，若組織決定採用獎賞機制，績效型伴隨獎賞為較佳的獎賞方式。

摘要(英)

Today is at an era of information explosion. People use information technologies to learn many things by their selves. This study notices the trend and decides to find out the relationships of reward, learning time and learning achievement. In addition, the study explores whether the different ways of reward can effectively influence two basic psychological needs--perceived autonomy and perceived competence.

Quasi-experimental research method is employed in this study. Valid data were collected from 72 students. Several major findings of this study include:
1.Comparing with the reward weeks, participants in the no reward weeks demonstrate higher perceived autonomy.
2.Comparing with the no reward weeks, participants in the reward weeks demonstrate higher perceived competence.
3.Comparing with the no reward weeks, participants in the reward weeks demonstrate higher learning time.
4.Comparing with the no reward weeks, participants in the reward weeks demonstrate higher learning achievement.
5.Comparing with the task-contingent reward week, participants in the performance-contingent reward week demonstrate higher learning achievement.
6.Learning time of participants significantly predict learning achievement of participants.

In order to promote knowledge learning atmosphere in organizations, managers can enhance employees’ perceived autonomy as well as their perceived competence. In addition, reward is an effective mechanism for enhancing employees’ knowledge learning intention. However, the results show that although rewards can improve the perceived competence, it will weaken the perceived autonomy. So, it is crucial to find the balancing point before adopting reward strategy. Comparing with task-contingent reward, performance-contingent reward mechanism can better serve organization on achieving its goal.

關鍵字(中)

★ 自我決定理論
★ 獎賞制度
★ 學習成效
★ 感知自主性
★ 感知勝任感

關鍵字(英)

★ Self-determination theory
★ reward
★ learning achievement
★ perceived autonomy
★ perceived competence

論文目次

摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 2
1-3 論文架構 2
二、文獻探討 4
2-1 自我決定理論 4
2-2 基本心理需求理論 8
2-3 獎賞與認知評價理論 9
2-4 學習成效 11
2-5 學習時間 12
三、研究方法 14
3-1 研究方法之選擇 14
3-2 研究架構 14
3-3 研究假說 16
3-4 實驗設計 20
3-5 實驗流程 21
3-6 問卷設計 23
四、資料分析與討論 25
4-1 敘述性統計分析 25
4-2 問卷之信度、效度分析 30
4-3 研究假說檢定 32
4-4 訪談結果 38
4-5 研究結果討論 41
五、研究結論與建議 45
5-1 研究結論 45
5-2 研究貢獻與實務意涵 46
5-3 研究限制與未來研究方向建議 48
參考文獻 51
附錄一研究問卷 54
附錄二訪談問題 56

參考文獻

Adams, J. Stacy. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In B. Leonard (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 267-299). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159-174.

Anderson, L. W., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Timepiece: Extending and Enhancing Learning Time: ERIC.

Brown, S.D., Lent, R.W., Larkin, K.C. (1989). Self-Efficacy as a Moderator of Scholastic Aptitude-academic Performance Relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35(1), 64-75.

Chan, S. H., Sutton, S. G., & Yao, L. J. (2009). The paradoxical effects of feedback and reward on decision performance. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 12, 109-143.

Christensen, L.B. (2007). Experimental methodology. New York: Pearson Education.

Condry, J. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), 459.

Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001, March). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: Impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 245-252). ACM.

Deci, E. L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(2), 217-229.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27, 930-942.

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Fisher, C. W., & Berliner, D. C. (Eds.). (1985). Perspectives on instructional time. New York: Longman.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Frank,M., Reich,N., & Humphreys, K.(2003). Respecting the human needs of students in the development of e-learning.Computers & Education, 40(1). 57-70.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.

Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Best practices in increasing academic learning time. Best practices in school psychology IV, 1, 773-787.

Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5). Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Hair, J. F. (2006). Tatham (2006) JF Hair, WC Black, BJ Babin, RE Anderson and RL Tatham, Multivariate data analysis.

Houlfort, N., Koestner, R., Joussemet, M., Nantel-Vivier, A., & Lekes, N. (2002). The impact of performance-contingent rewards on perceived autonomy and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 26(4), 279-295.

Kirk, J. J. (2002). E-Learning: An Executive Summary. pp.1-14.

Klein, B. D., Goodhue, D. L., & Davis, G. B. (1997). Can humans detect errors in data? Impact of base rates, incentives, and goals. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 169-194.

Mckeachie, W. J. (1987). The New Look in Instructional psychology: Teaching Strategies for Learning and Thinking. Learning and Instruction, 1, 443-456.

Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R. & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401-426.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 736-750.

Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226-249.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85-94.

Squires, D. A. (1983). Effective Schools and Classrooms: A Research-Based Perspective: ERIC.

Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 142-169.

Weinstein, A. G., & Holzbach, R. L. (1973). Impact of individual differences, reward distribution, and task structure on productivity in a simulated work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(3), 296-301.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-Wen Chou)

審核日期

2014-7-14

推文