體感式合作學習系統之開發與應用成效分析-以高職英文學習為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：95

、訪客IP：3.135.207.137

姓名

陳品澤(Pin-tse Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

體感式合作學習系統之開發與應用成效分析-以高職英文學習為例
(The Development Application and Learning Performance Analysis of Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning System in a Vocational High School)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響	★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習
★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲	★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估
★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響	★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養
★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps	★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies	★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要目的以全肢體反應教學法（Total Physical Response, TPR）理論為基礎，結合體感辨識科技與合作學習活動，探討Collaborative Total Physical Response（CTPR）對高職生英文學習之影響。本研究採用Kinect科技並開發出Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning (CKEL)系統，結合兩人一組合作學習活動的實驗設計，並從系統使用過程、前測、後測、問卷與訪談活動中收集資料加以分析。
從科技接受模型問卷與訪談分析中得知，參與者對實驗所採用的學習系統與學習活動都有不錯的認同程度。並藉由凱勒學習動機問卷與訪談的分析，實驗組參與者在學習上更有信心，有助於提昇學習者的學習動機。
後測總分與後測字彙測驗實驗組都顯著優於控制組，僅在後測句子測驗這項結果無達到顯著優於控制組(I)，但實驗組平均分數比控制組(I)高。而本研究檢驗在應用TRP理論採用動作、姿勢學習不同詞類在學習成效上的分析結果，顯示動詞、名詞、形容詞的學習成效無顯著差異，所以若能將字彙發想出適合的關聯動作，皆可應用TPR的方式學習。
綜合分析結果，本研究所提出的學習方式讓參與者覺得有趣並更主動學習，促進了小組成員間的互動與合作學習。因此，這種CTPR比傳統個人TPR更適合英語學習，因為這樣的語言學習有互動與對話，讓參與者更有信心、更主動，進而達到更顯著的學習效果。

摘要(英)

The main purpose of this study is to combine kinesthetic recognition technology and collaborative learning activities based on Total Physical Response (TPR) for investigating the effect of Collaborative Total Physical Response (CTPR) in English learning of vocational high school students. This study applies Kinect technology to develop a Collaborative Kinesthetic English Learning (CKEL) System which allow and two students to have collaborative learning activities in pairs. Besides, the experiment evaluation consists of using CKEL system record, pre-test, post-test, questionnaire and interview.
The analysis of technology acceptance model questionnaires and interviews show that the almost participants accepted CKEL system and learning activities of the experiment. According to the analysis of Keller’s Learning Motivation ARCS Questionnaire and interviews, the participants of experimental group had more confidence in this learning activities and the experimental design could enable them to improve learning motivation.
The learning outcomes of the experimental group was significantly better than the control groups in the post-test and the vocabulary part of posttest ,and the average mean of sentence part of posttest of the experimental group was higher than the control groups. In addition, the study analyzed the learning outcomes of using gestures, posture to learn different parts of speech based on TPR theory, and the results showed the verbs, nouns, adjectives learning were no significant difference. So, if the vocabulary can be combined with appropriate related action, it can be applied TPR theory to learn.
Finally, this learning style can enhance learning attention of participants, also give more active learning, promoting interaction and collaboration among members of the group. Therefore, CTPR is more suitable English language learning than the traditional personal TPR, this is due to the including of interaction and dialogue can enhance participants to have more confident and active.

關鍵字(中)

★ 全肢體反應教學法
★ 合作學習
★ 英文學習
★ 體感學習
★ Kinect

關鍵字(英)

★ Total Physical Response
★ Collaborative learning
★ English learning
★ Kinesthetic Learning
★ Kinect

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 3
1.3 研究問題 5
1.4 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章文獻探討 7
2.1 認知與語言學習相關理論 7
2.2 TPR應用體感科技於語言學習之研究 11
2.3 合作學習與TPR相結合 13
2.4 語言詞類與TPR的應用探討 16
第三章系統設計與實作 17
3.1 系統設計 17
3.2 動覺的互動機制 19
3.3 學習活動模組 22
3.4 單人模式使用的系統 32
第四章研究方法 33
4.1 研究對象 33
4.2 研究設計 34
4.3 研究流程 36
4.4 研究工具 37
4.5 活動設計 41
4.6 資料蒐集 44
4.7 資料處理與分析 45
第五章結果分析與討論 47
5.1 問卷分析 47
5.1.1 科技接受模型（TAM） 47
5.1.2 凱勒學習動機（ARCS） 55
5.2 學習成效分析 61
5.2.1 前測差異檢驗 61
5.2.2 後測學習成效檢驗 61
5.3 基於肢體動作姿勢方式學習的不同詞類之學習成效分析 65
5.4 學習者的學習行為與學習成效間相關性之分析 67
5.4.1 學習階段活動與學習成效相關性之分析 67
5.4.2 遊戲活動和學習成效相關性之分析 70
5.5 學習者的學習行為與學習成效間迴歸分析 73
5.6 實驗組雙人的合作學習方式 75
5.7 意含與建議 79
第六章結論與建議 81
6.1 結論 81
6.2 未來工作與建議 83
參考文獻 85
附錄一字彙 89
附錄二前測考卷 90
附錄三後測句子測驗考卷 96
附錄四開放性問卷 101
附錄五訪談題目 102

參考文獻

Alexiadis, D. S., Kelly, P., Daras, P., O′Connor, N. E., Boubekeur, T., & Moussa, M. B. (2011). Evaluating a dancer′s performance using kinect-based skeleton tracking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia.
Asher, J. J. (1966). The learning strategy of the total physical response: A review: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Asher, J. J. (1968). The total physical response method for second language learning: DTIC Document.
Asher, J. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning*. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17.
Blakemore, S.-J., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education: Blackwell publishing.
Cantoni, G. P. (1999). Using TPR-Storytelling To Develop Fluency and Literacy in Native American Languages. 53.
Carels, P. E. (1981). Pantomime in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 14(5), 407-411.
Carruthers, S. W. (2010). The Total Physical Response Method and Its Compatibility with Adult ESL Learners.
Chang, C. Y., Chien, Y. T., Chiang, C. Y., Lin, M. C., & Lai, H. C. (2013). Embodying gesture‐based multimedia to improve learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E5-E9.
Chang, C. Y., Lange, B., Zhang, M., Koenig, S., Requejo, P., Somboon, N., . . . Rizzo, A. A. (2012). Towards pervasive physical rehabilitation using Microsoft Kinect. Paper presented at the Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference on.
Chang, Y. J., Chen, S. F., & Huang, J. D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2566-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.002
Chang, Y. J., Chou, L. D., Wang, F. T. Y., & Chen, S. F. (2013). A kinect-based vocational task prompting system for individuals with cognitive impairments. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(2), 351-358. doi: 10.1007/s00779-011-0498-6
Chao, K. J., Huang, H. W., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2013). Embodied play to learn: Exploring Kinect-facilitated memory performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E151-E155. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12018
Davis Jr, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456.
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 27-50.
Garcia, R., Asher, J. J., & Asher, J. (1988). Instructor′s Notebook: How to Apply TPR for Best Results: Sky Oaks.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
Guilherme, M. (2007). English as a global language and education for cosmopolitan citizenship. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 72-90.
Jorczak, R. L. (2011). An information processing perspective on divergence and convergence in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 207-221. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9104-6
Kashiwagi, H., Xue, Y., Sun, Y., Kang, M., & Ohtsuki, K. (2009). A Language Learning System Utilizing RFID Technology for Total Physical Response Activities. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains (Vol. 5613, pp. 119-128): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313-334.
Kuhl, P. K. (2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron, 67(5), 713-727.
Kuo, F.-R., Hsu, C.-C., Fang, W.-C., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1, Supplement), 63-70. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003
Lange, B., Koenig, S., McConnell, E., Chang, C., Juang, R., Suma, E., . . . Rizzo, A. (2012). Interactive game-based rehabilitation using the Microsoft Kinect. Paper presented at the Virtual Reality Workshops (VR), 2012 IEEE.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching: Oxford university press.
Liang, M. Y. (2010). USING SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE PEER RESPONSE GROUPS IN EFL WRITING: REVISION-RELATED DISCOURSE. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 45-64.
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 241-261. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami002
Liu, T.-Y., & Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
Macedonia, M., & von Kriegstein, K. (2012). Gestures Enhance Foreign Language Learning. BIOLINGUISTICS, 6(3-4), 393-416.
Nguyen, K., Stanley, N., & Stanley, L. (2014). Storytelling in Teaching Chinese as a Second/Foreign Language.
Nijhof, W., & Kommers, P. (1985). An analysis of cooperation in relation to cognitive controversy. Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, 125-145.
Nikolaidou, G. N. (2012). ComPLuS model: A new insight in pupils’ collaborative talk, actions and balance during a computer-mediated music task. Computers & Education, 58(2), 740-765. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.027
Pishkar, K., & Ketabi, S. (2013). Effects of teaching of Modern American Drama As a Method for Speaking Fluency in BA EFL students. American Open Modern Language Journal, 1(1).
Pontual Falcão, T., & Price, S. (2010). Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 539-559. doi: 10.1007/s11412-010-9101-9
Reinders, H. (2014). TOUCH AND GESTURE-BASED LANGUAGE LEARNING SOME POSSIBLE AVENUES FOR RESEARCH AND CLASSROOM PRACTICE. Teaching English with Technology(1), 3-8.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences.
Su, M.-C., & Lin, H.-Y. (2013). A Simple Approach to a Human Action Recognition System and Its Application in an Interactive TPR-based English Learning System. Journal of Advanced Technology and Management, 3(2), 15-27.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97, 114.
Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8(2), 219-235.
Tomasello, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition: Harvard University Press.
Vygotskiĭ, L. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard university press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolfe, D. E., & Jones, G. (1982). Integrating total physical response strategy in a level I Spanish class. Foreign Language Annals, 15(4), 273-280.
Wortzel, R. (1979). Multivariate analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Zack, M.(1999),” Developing a Knowledge Strategy.” California Management Review, 41(3), 125-143.
Yeo, T. M., & Quek, C. L. (2011). Investigating design and technology students′ peer interactions in a technology-mediated learning environment: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 751-764.
Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words? Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system. Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory, 151-198.
周克謙. (2013). 體感科技支持全肢體反應教學法應用於高中英語教學之成效. (碩士論文).
游婷雅. (2007). 樂在學習的腦－神經科學可以解答的教育問題 (2007/05/16 ed.). 台北市: 遠流出版公司.

指導教授

黃武元

審核日期

2014-7-16

推文