博碩士論文 974401027 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:65 、訪客IP:18.118.227.199
姓名 張榕容(JungJung Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 知識基礎對新產品績效影響之研究:探討產品創造力之中介效果
(A Study of Knowledge Base on New Product Performance: Exploring the Mediating Effect of Product Creativity)
相關論文
★ 台灣LCD監視器產業廠商經營策略之研究★ 智慧資本對新產品發展績效影響之研究
★ 市場導向對新產品開發速度影響之研究★ 創業家失敗復原歷程之研究
★ 組織間協同合作與科技能力的因果模糊對新產品研發績效相關之研究★ 購併後跨部門整合與新產品開發績效之研究
★ 資源承諾與彈性對新產品發展績效影響之研究-關係學習與吸收能力之中介效果★ 顧客參與、產品創新程度與組織間關係對新產品開發績效之影響
★ 運動贊助有效性之探討-以洛杉磯市場推廣臺灣觀光為例★ 區塊鏈技術應用於冷鏈農產品之研究:以台灣蘭花出口為例
★ 專案團隊控制制度與新產品開發績效關係之研究★ 研發專案管理制度之探討-以參與「業界科專」廠商為例
★ 漸進式和急遽式專案主持人管理角色與新產品開發績效關係之研究★ 供應商選擇標準與供應商發展活動對製造績效影響之研究
★ 供應商涉入角色與新產品開發專案績效關係之研究★ 技術知識特性、知識整合機制與知識移轉關係之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究從資源基礎的觀點出發,關注於瞭解知識深度與知識廣度分別對產品創造力(涵蓋產品新穎性與產品合適性)的影響。並探討知識基礎如何透過產品創造力影響新產品績效。以台灣之製造業為調查對象,共回收233份問卷,有效回收率約29.1%。研究結果顯示,知識廣度對產品新穎性與產品合適性的影響大於知識深度對產品新穎性與合適性的影響。且不論生產新穎性產品或是合適性產品皆能提升新產品績效。但新穎性對新產品績效的影響顯著性大於合適性對新產品績效的影響。此外,與知識深度相比,當企業擁有廣度知識時若透過產品創造力生產具新穎性與合適性的產品可以提升更多新產品績效。反之,與擁有廣度知識的效果相比下,深度知識會更多直接影響新產品績效,而較少透過產品創造力的中介對新產品績效產生間接影響。本研究藉由探討知識基礎、產品創造力與新產品績效的關係,使企業瞭解在資源有限的環境下應評估其既有資源,以強化深度知識促進新產品績效或是拓展廣度知識再透過產品創造力提升新產品績效。進而對新產品開發之相關文獻做出理論與實務上的貢獻。
摘要(英) Based on the resource-based view, this research aims to understand the influences of both knowledge depth and knowledge breadth on product creativity, which includes product novelty and product appropriateness. Meantime, this research investigates how knowledge base influences new product performance through product creativity. A survey among the manufacturers in Taiwan resulted in 233 responses, or a response rate of 29.1%. The survey results show that the impacts of knowledge breadth on product novelty and product appropriateness are larger than those of knowledge depth. Both product novelty and product appropriateness help enhance product performance and the former has a significantly larger impact on performance than the latter. Besides, compared with knowledge depth, a company’s knowledge breadth further improves new product performance through producing novel and appropriate new products, i.e., through product creativity. On the other hand, compared with knowledge breadth, knowledge depth has more direct impact on new product performance and less impact indirectly through product creativity. Through understanding the relationships among knowledge base, product creativity and new product performance, this research contributes to the new product development literature and practices. The results here suggest that, when facing limited resources, a company evaluate its available resources, before deciding whether it should improve new product performance through strengthening knowledge depth or through expanding knowledge breadth leading to product creativity.
關鍵字(中) ★ 知識基礎
★ 知識廣度
★ 知識深度
★ 產品創造力
★ 新穎性
★ 合適性
★ 新產品績效
關鍵字(英) ★ Knowledge Base
★ Knowledge Breadth
★ Knowledge Depth
★ Product Creativity
★ Novelty
★ Appropriateness
★ New product performance
論文目次 1. 緒論 ............................................................................................................. 1
1.1. 研究動機 .......................................................................................... 1
1.2. 研究目的 .......................................................................................... 2
1.3. 研究流程 .......................................................................................... 3
2. 文獻回顧與假說 ......................................................................................... 5
2.1. 產品創造力的兩個構面 .................................................................. 5
2.2. 知識基礎 .......................................................................................... 8
2.3. 知識基礎對產品創造力的影響 .....................................................11
2.4. 新產品績效 .................................................................................... 12
2.5. 產品新穎性與產品合適性對新產品績效的影響 ........................ 15
2.6. 產品新穎性與產品合適性的中介效果 ........................................ 16
3. 研究方法 ................................................................................................... 17
3.1. 研究架構 ........................................................................................ 17
3.2. 測量量表 ........................................................................................ 18
3.3. 問卷設計 ........................................................................................ 20
3.4. 研究樣本 ........................................................................................ 21
3.5. 資料蒐集 ........................................................................................ 21
3.6. 問卷回收概況 ................................................................................ 21
3.7. 無反應偏差(nonresponse bias) ...................................................... 22
3.8. 共同方法變異(common method variance, CMV) ......................... 22
3.9. 資料分析方法 ................................................................................ 23
4. 分析與結果 ............................................................................................... 27
4.1. 樣本基本資料分析 ........................................................................ 27
4.2. 不同產業差異性分析 .................................................................... 30
4.3. 假說檢定結果 ................................................................................ 31
5. 討論 ........................................................................................................... 33
5.1. 理論意涵 ........................................................................................ 35
5.2. 管理意涵 ........................................................................................ 36
5.3. 研究限制與未來研究 .................................................................... 37
參考文獻 ........................................................................................................... 38
參考文獻 Aaker, D. A. & Jacobson, R. 1994. ′The financial information-content of perceived quality.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 31:2, 191-201.
Ali, A. 2000. ′The impact of innovativeness and development time on new product performance for small firms.′ Marketing Letters, 11:2, 151-63.
Amabile, T. M. 1983. ′The social-psychology of creativity - A componential conceptualization.′ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45:2, 357-76.
Amabile, T. M. 1988. ′A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.′ Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-67.
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. ′Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach approach.′ Psychological Bulletin, 103:3, 411-23.
Andrews, J. & Smith, D. C. 1996. ′In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 33:2, 174-87.
Arbuckle, J. L. 2006. Amos (Version 7.0). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. S. 1977. ′Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 14:3, 396-402.
Atuahene-Gima, K. 1995. ′An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance: A contingency approach.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12:4, 275-93.
Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J. & Bass, B. M. 1991. ′Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue.′ Journal of Management, 17:3, 571-87.
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. & Phillips, L. W. 1991. ′Assessing construct validity in organizational research.′ Administrative Science Quarterly, 36:3, 421-58.
Bao, Y. C., Sheng, S. B. & Zhou, K. Z. 2012. ′Network-based market knowledge and product innovativeness.′ Marketing Letters, 23:1, 309-24.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986. ′The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.′ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:6, 1173-82.
Bicen, P., Kamarudin, S. & Johnson, W. H. A. 2014. ′Validating new product creativity in the eastern context of Malaysia.′ Journal of Business Research, 67:1, 2877-83.
Bierly, P. & Chakrabarti, A. 1996. ′Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry.′ Strategic Management Journal, 17, 123-35.
Boden, M. A. 1999. ′Computer models of creativity.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity: 351-72. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Calantone, R. & Cooper, R. G. 1981. ′New product scenarios: Prospects for success.′ Journal of Marketing, 45:2, 48-60.
Calantone, R. J. & Di Benedetto, C. A. 2012. ′The role of lean launch execution and launch timing on new product performance.′ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40:4, 526-38.
Chang, J. J., Hung, K. P. & Lin, M. J. J. 2014. ′Knowledge creation and new product performance: The role of creativity.′ R & D Management, 44:2, 107-23.
Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open innovation:The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
Chi, R. M. & Glaser, M. F. 1988. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Christensen, C. M. & Bower, J. L. 1996. ′Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms.′ Strategic Management Journal, 17:3, 197-218.
Clark, K. B. & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. ′Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.′ Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:1, 128-52.
Cooper, R. G. 1979. ′The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure.′ Journal of Marketing, 43:3, 93-103.
Cooper, R. G. 1993. Winning at new products. NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Danneels, E. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. 2001. ′Product innovativeness from the firm′s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18:6, 357-73.
Davila, T., Epstein, M. & Shelton, R. 2006. ′Mapping innovation: What is innovation and how do you leverage it?′ Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it, updated edition: 29-58. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Davis, K., Davis, L., Muller, T. & Bowman, A. 2014. ′Apple and IBM deliver first wave of IBM mobile first for iOS Apps.′ Apple press info.
De Luca, L. M. & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2007. ′Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance.′ Journal of Marketing, 71:1, 95-112.
Dibiaggio, L., Nasiriyar, M. & Nesta, L. 2014. ′Substitutability and complementarity of technological knowledge and the inventive performance of semiconductor companies.′ Research Policy, 43:9, 1582-93.
Faems, D., Janssens, M., Madhok, A. & Van Looy, B. 2008. ′Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application.′ Academy of Management Journal, 51:6, 1053-78.
Feist, G. J. 1999. ′The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity: 273-96. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fleming, L. 2001. ′Recombinant uncertainty in technological search.′ Management Science, 47:1, 117-32.
Fleming, L. & Sorenson, O. 2001. ′Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data.′ Research Policy, 30:7, 1019-39.
Ford, C. M. & Gioia, D. A. 2000. ′Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making.′ Journal of Management, 26:4, 705-32.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. 1981. ′Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 18:1, 39-50.
Galunic, D. C. & Rodan, S. 1998. ′Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation.′ Strategic Management Journal, 19:12, 1193-201.
Garcia, R., Calantone, R. & Levine, R. 2003. ′The role of knowledge in resource allocation to exploration versus exploitation in technologically oriented organizations.′ Decision Sciences, 34:2, 323-49.
Gatignon, H. & Xuereb, J. M. 1997. ′Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 34:1, 77-90.
Gotteland, D. & Boule, J. M. 2006. ′The market orientation-new product performance relationship: Redefining the moderating role of environmental conditions.′ International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23:2, 171-85.
Grant, R. M. 1996. ′Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm.′ Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-22.
Gruber, H. E. & Wallace, D. B. 1999. ′The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity: 93-115. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E. & Black, W. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Han, J. K., Kim, N. & Srivastava, R. K. 1998. ′Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link?′ Journal of Marketing, 62:4, 30-45.
Henard, D. H. & McFadyen, M. A. 2012. ′Resource dedication and new product performance: A resource-based View.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29:2, 193-204.
Henard, D. H. & Szymanski, D. M. 2001. ′Why some new products are more successful than others.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 38:3, 362-75.
Hong, J., Song, T. H. & Yoo, S. 2013. ′Paths to success: How do market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation produce new product success?′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30:1, 44-55.
Hsu, T. T., Tsai, K. H., Hsieh, M. H. & Wang, W. Y. 2014. ′Strategic orientation and new product performance: The roles of technological capability.′ Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 31:1, 44-58.
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. 1999. ′Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.′ Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6:1, 1-55.
Hulland, J. 1999. ′Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies.′ Strategic Management Journal, 20:2, 195-204.
Hurley, R. F. & Hult, G. T. M. 1998. ′Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination.′ Journal of Marketing, 62:3, 42-54.
Im, S., Hussain, M. & Sengupta, S. 2008. ′Testing interaction effects of the dimensions of market orientation on marketing program creativity.′ Journal of Business Research, 61:8, 859-67.
Im, S., Montoya, M. M. & Workman, J. P. 2013. ′Antecedents and consequences of creativity in product innovation teams.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30:1, 170-85.
Im, S., Nakata, C., Park, H. & Ha, Y. W. 2003. ′Determinants of Korean and Japanese new product performance: An interrelational and process view.′ Journal of International Marketing, 11:4, 81-112.
Im, S. & Workman, J. P. 2004. ′Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms.′ Journal of Marketing, 68:2, 114-32.
Jackson, P. W. & Messick, S. 1965. ′The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity.′ Journal of Personality, 33:3, 309-29.
Katila, R. & Ahuja, G. 2002. ′Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction.′ Academy of Management Journal, 45:6, 1183-94.
Katz, N. & Du Preez, N. 2008. ′The role of knowledge management in supporting a radical innovation project.′ In A. Bernard & S. Tichkiewitch (Eds.) Methods and Tools for Effective Knowledge Life-Cycle-Management: 331-46. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
Kim, N., Im, S. & Slater, S. F. 2013. ′Impact of knowledge type and strategic orientation on new product creativity and advantage in high-technology firms.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30:1, 136-53.
Kleinschmidt, E. J. & Cooper, R. G. 1991. ′The impact of product innovativeness on performance.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8:4, 240-51.
Kogut, B. & Zander, U. 1992. ′Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology.′ Organization Science, 3:3, 383-97.
Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J. & Robben, H. S. J. 2004. ′The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21:2, 79-94.
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. 1993. ′The myopia of learning.′ Strategic Management Journal, 14:S2, 95-112.
Lin, B. W. & Wu, C. H. 2010. ′How does knowledge depth moderate the performance of internal and external knowledge sourcing strategies?′ Technovation, 30:11-12, 582-89.
Lindell, M. K. & Whitney, D. J. 2001. ′Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.′ Journal of Applied Psychology, 86:1, 114-21.
Liu, X., Yeung, A. C. L., Lo, C. K. Y. & Cheng, T. C. E. 2014. ′The moderating effects of knowledge characteristics of firms on the financial value of innovative technology products.′ Journal of Operations Management, 32:3, 79-87.
Lubart, T. I. 1999. ′Creativity across cultures.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity: 339-50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lumsden, C. J. 1999. ′Evolving creative minds: Stories and mechanisms.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Majchrzak, A., Wagner, C. & Yates, D. 2013. ′The impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis.′ Mis Quarterly, 37:2, 455-69.
Marinova, D. 2004. ′Actualizing innovation effort: The impact of market knowledge diffusion in a dynamic system of competition.′ Journal of Marketing, 68:3, 1-20.
Martindale, C. 1999. ′Biological bases of creativity.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity: 137-52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, S. & Slotegraaf, R. J. 2013. ′Building an innovation base: Exploring the role of acquisition behavior.′ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41:6, 705-21.
Montoyaweiss, M. M. & Calantone, R. 1994. ′Determinants of new product performance - A review and meta-analysis.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11:5, 397-417.
Moorman, C. & Miner, A. S. 1997. ′The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 34:1, 91-106.
Moorthy, S. & Polley, D. E. 2010. ′Technological knowledge breadth and depth: Performance impacts.′ Journal of Knowledge Management, 14:3, 359-77.
Nag, R. & Gioia, D. A. 2012. ′From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm-specific use of knowledge as a resource.′ Academy of Management Journal, 55:2, 421-57.
Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Nickerson, R. S. 1999. ′Enhancing creativity.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Ozman, M. 2010. ′The knowledge base of products: Implications for organizational structures.′ Organization Studies, 31:8, 1129-54.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. ′Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.′ Journal of Applied Psychology, 88:5, 879-903.
Prabhu, J. C., Chandy, R. K. & Ellis, M. E. 2005. ′The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison pill, placebo, or tonic?′ Journal of Marketing, 69:1, 114-30.
Reed, R. & Defillippi, R. J. 1990. ′Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage.′ Academy of Management Review, 15:1, 88-102.
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S. & Moorman, C. 2008. ′Cross-sectional versus longitudinal survey research: Concepts, findings, and guidelines.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 45:3, 261-79.
Sethi, R. 2000. ′Superordinate identity in cross-functional product development teams: Its antecedents and effect on new product performance.′ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28:3, 330-44.
Sethi, R. & Sethi, A. 2009. ′Can Quality-Oriented firms develop innovative new products?′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26:2, 206-21.
Sethi, R., Smith, D. C. & Park, C. W. 2001. ′Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 38:1, 73-85.
Shalley, C. E. 2008. ′Creating roles: What managers can do to establish expectations for creative performance.′ In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.) Handbook of organizational creativity: 147-64. NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Song, M. & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. 2001. ′The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development.′ Academy of Management Journal, 44:1, 61-80.
Song, X. M. & Parry, M. E. 1994. ′The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure in state enterprises in the People′s Republic of China.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11:2, 105-18.
Song, X. M. & Parry, M. E. 1997. ′The determinants of Japanese new product successes.′ Journal of Marketing Research, 34:1, 64-76.
Song, X. M. & Parry, M. E. 1999. ′Challenges of managing the development of breakthrough products in Japan.′ Journal of Operations Management, 17:6, 665-88.
Song, X. M. & Perry, M. E. 1997. ′A cross national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States.′ Journal of Marketing, 61:2, 1-18.
Sternberg, R. J. 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. 1999. ′The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity: 3-15. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stevens, G. A. & Burley, J. 2003. ′Piloting the rocket of radical innovation.′ Research-Technology Management, 46:2, 16-25.
Taylor, A. & Greve, H. R. 2006. ′Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams.′ Academy of Management Journal, 49:4, 723-40.
Tripsas, M. & Gavetti, G. 2000. ′Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging.′ Strategic Management Journal, 21:10-11, 1147-61.
Tsai, K. H. & Hsu, T. T. 2014. ′Cross-Functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation model.′ Industrial Marketing Management, 43:2, 293-303.
Wei, Y. H., Frankwick, G. L. & Nguyen, B. H. 2012. ′Should firms consider employee input in reward system design? The effect of participation on market orientation and new product performance.′ Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29:4, 546-58.
Weisberg, R. W. 1999. ′Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to thories.′ In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of creativity: 226-50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E. & Griffin, R. W. 1993. ′Toward a theory of organizational creativity.′ Academy of Management Review, 18:2, 293-321.
Wu, J. & Shanley, M. T. 2009. ′Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: Research on the United States electromedical device industry.′ Journal of Business Research, 62:4, 474-83.
Yayavaram, S. & Ahuja, G. 2008. ′Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability.′ Administrative Science Quarterly, 53:2, 333-62.
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. 2002. ′Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension.′ Academy of Management Review, 27:2, 185-203.
Zhang, J. & Baden-Fuller, C. 2010. ′The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration.′ Journal of Management Studies, 47:4, 679-704.
Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C. & Mangematin, V. 2007. ′Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry.′ Research Policy, 36:4, 515-28.
Zhou, K. Z. & Li, C. B. 2012. ′How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing.′ Strategic Management Journal, 33:9, 1090-102.
Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K. & Tse, D. K. 2005. ′The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations.′ Journal of Marketing, 69:2, 42-60.
指導教授 林明杰(Ming-Ji James Lin) 審核日期 2015-1-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明