台灣利率和股價波動對總體經濟影響之分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：90

、訪客IP：3.12.155.183

姓名

張航溱(Hang-chen Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所在職專班

論文名稱

台灣利率和股價波動對總體經濟影響之分析
(The Study on the Relationship of Interest Rate, Stock Price Volatility)

相關論文

★ 銀行授信行為之研究	★ 經發會前後台股指數、期貨指數、電子指數與金融指數之關聯性
★ 台灣家庭夏天用電需求分析	★ 影響台銀黃金存摺價格因素之研究
★ 國際原油投資報酬與資金行情之探討-GARCH模型	★ 電子商務對企業經營績效之影響
★ 有害廢棄物之處理與再利用研究：以A公司為例	★ 台灣電燈用電需求量探討--以縣市資料為例
★ 台美股價、匯率、利率之動態關聯-VECM與VECM-GARCH應用	★ 台灣攤販業獲利決定因素-人力資本的影響
★ 航空客運經濟帶油決定因素之實證分析	★ 台灣都會區用電需求影響因素實證分析
★ 便利商店現煮咖啡銷售之研究	★ 大陸鋼鐵出口與台灣鋼鐵價格的關聯性
★ 人口結構變遷對財政教育支出之影響	★ 運動鞋製業的市場結構、行為與績效分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要結合利率與股價議題，將探討貨幣政策與股價及總體經濟
因素之間的關係。企圖分析自2000 年以後，台灣在股市開放外資及政府
積極改善金融市場的弊端後，我國的貨幣政策、股價與總體經濟指標彼此
之間的關連性。主要以利率、加權股價指數，以及新台幣兌美元、總出口
值、GDP、工業生產指數及失業率等五項總體經濟指標，探討這些序列彼
此之間的長期均衡關係，以及短期的互動關係。
經由實證後獲得主要結果，支持利率變動具有領先反應未來總體經濟
面訊息的優勢，且支持利率變動會居於總體經濟指標變動之領先地位。而
股價與匯率變動之間的關係是呈現股價上漲則匯率升值的反向關係。其
次，也發現股價變動為利率變動的因、而匯率變動為利率變動的因，利率
變動則分別為出口值變動、工業生產指數變動和失業率變動等三種總體經
濟指標的因。最後，並支持加權股價指數的漲跌為總體經濟的領先指標。

摘要(英)

The target of this research is to integrate the issues of interest rates and share prices, scrutinizing the connections between monetary policy, share prices, and macroeconomic factors. The research attempted to analyze the connection of monetary policy, share prices, and macroeconomic indicators after the opening of foreign direct investment (FDI) in stock market and the amelioration of financial markets in 2000. The main axis of discussion is about the long-term balance and short-term interactive relationship of the sequences, which are interest rates, weighted stock index, New Taiwan Dollar and US Dollar exchange differences, total export values, gross domestic product (GDP), index of industrial production, and unemployment rate.
Depending upon the outcome, there was a superiority that the change of interest rate could prior to reflect the tendency of macroeconomics as well as there was a leading position that the change of interest rate could prior to the change of macroeconomic indicators. Additionally, changes between share prices and exchange rates represented an inverse relationship that the rising share prices accompanying with the appreciation of exchange rates. Furthermore, the outcome referred the change of share prices brought about the interest rate change of Granger Cause whereas the change of exchange rate resulted in the interest change of Granger Cause; namely, the change of interest rates are respectively the causes of the change of export rate, the change of industrial production, and the change of unemployment rate. Eventually, the ebb and flow of weighted stock index was the leading indicator of macroeconomics.

關鍵字(中)

★ 利率
★ 股價波動

關鍵字(英)

★ Interest Rate
★ Stock Price Volatility

論文目次

中文摘要 ----------------------I
ABSTRAC ----------------------II
誌謝 ----------------------III
目錄 ----------------------IV
表目錄 ----------------------VI
圖目錄 ----------------------VII
第一章緒論-------------------1
第一節研究背景與動機-----------1
第二節研究目的----------------3
第三節研究章節內容及流程架構----4
第二章相關文獻回顧-------------7
第一節探討貨幣政策與利率對經濟的影響------------7
第二節分析股價與總體經濟指標之間的關係----------8
第三節研究利率、股價與總體經濟指標之間的關係-----10
第三章資料說明與研究方法---------------------12
第一節定義變數與資料說明---------------------12
第二節研究序列之單根檢定---------------------13
第三節 Johansen共整合檢定--------------------15
第四節向量誤差修正模型-----------------------18
第五節 Granger因果關係檢定-------------------19
第六節衝擊反應函數分析-----------------------21
第四章實證結果及分析------------------------23
第一節基本統計分析--------------------------23
第二節單根檢定及VECM模型的最佳落後期數的決定----28
第三節共整合與VECM模型的建立-----------------33
第四節 Granger因果關係檢定-------------------38
第五節衝擊反應函數分析-----------------------41
第五章研究結論及建議------------------------46
參考文獻 -----------------------------------48

參考文獻

1.陳旭昇(2013)，央行「阻升不阻貶」? -- 再探台灣匯率不對稱干預政策，台灣效率與生產力學會 2012 年聯合年會暨第 13 屆全國實證經濟學研討會，頁 (1) - (26) 。
2.馮惠珊、余惠芳與高偉娟(2013)，台灣重貼現率對所得利率物價匯率關聯性之探討，華人前瞻研究，第九卷第一期，頁1-14。
3.劉祥熹與涂登才(2012)，美國股市及其總體經濟變數間關連性與波動性之研究--VEC GJR DCC-GARCH-M 之模型應用，經濟研究，第四十八卷第一期，頁139-189。
4.Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P. and F. Zilibotti, (2006), “Distance to frontier, selection, and ecomomic growth”, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 4(1), pp. 37-74.
5.Aggarwal, R. (1981), “Exchange rates and stock prices: A study of U.S. capital markets under floating exchange rates”, Akron Business and Economics Review, vol. 12(2), pp.7-12.
6. Interaction between monetary policy and stock prices: a comparison between the Caribbean and the US. (Applied Financial Economics, 2013, 23, 515–534)
7.Alam, M. M. and M. G. S. Uddin, (2009), “ Relationship between interest rate and stock price: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries”, International Journal of business and Management, vol.4(3), pp. 36-42.
8.Alina, C. and M. R. Stone,(2006), “Inflation targeting regimes”, Eu-ropean Economic Review, vol. 50, pp. 1297-1315.
9.Aydemir, O. and E. Demirhan, (2009), “The relationship between stock prices and exchange rates evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 23, pp. 207-215.
10.Bernanke, B. S. and K. N. Kuttner, (2005), “What explains the stock market′s reaction to Federal Reserve Policy”, Journal of Finance, vol. 60, pp. 1221-1257.
11.Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger, (1987), “Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing”, Econometrical, vol. 55, pp. 251-276.
12.Christopher, G., Minsoo, L., Hwa, A.Y. H. and Z. Jun, (2006), “Macroeconomic variables and stock market interactions: New Zealand evidence”, Investment Management and Financial Innovations, vol. 4, pp.89-101.
13.Erbaykal, E. and H. A. Okuyan, (2007), “Hisse Senedi Fiyatları İle Döviz Kuru İlişkisi: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, vol. 1(1), pp. 77-89.
14.Fama, E. F. (1981), “Stock returns, real activity, inflation, and money”, The American Economic Review, vol. 71(4), pp. 545-565.
15.Granger, C. W.J. (1969), “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods”, Econometrica, vol.37, pp. 424-438.
16.Hatemi, J. A. and M. Irandoust, (2002), “On the causality between exchange rates and stock prices: A note”, Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 54(2), pp. 197-203.
17.Huang, H. C. and C. H. Shen (2002), “Estimation of Taiwan’s Binary Monetary Policy Reaction Function,” Journal of Economic Studies, 29, 222–239.
18.Ireland, P. N. (2004), “Money’s role in the monetary business cycle”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 36, pp. 969-983.
19.Jensen, G. R. and J. M. Mercer, (2002), “Monetary policy and the cross-section of expected stock returns”, Journal of Financial Research, vol. 25, pp. 125-140.
20.Johansen. S. (1988),”Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors”, Journal of Economics and Dynamics and Control, vol. 12, pp. 231-254.
21.Kalra, R. (2012), “Impact of macroeconomic variables on Indian stock market”, The IUP Journal of Financial Risk Management, vol. 9(1), pp. 43-54.
22.Kurihara, Y. (2006), “The relationship between exchange rate and stock prices during the quantitative easing policy in Japan”, International Journal of Business, vol. 11(4), pp. 375-386.
23.Liao, E. A. and C. H. Teng, (2008), “The effects of monetary policy: a DSGE model analysis of Taiwan”, Applied Economics, vol. 40, pp. 1043-1051.
24.Pan, M. S., Fok, R. C. W. and Y. A. Liu, (2007), “Dynamic linkages between exchange rates and stock prices: Evidence from east Asian markets”, International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 16(4), pp. 503-520.
25.Ratneswary, R. and V. Rasiah, (2010), “Macroeconomic activity and the Malaysian stock market: Empirical evidence of dynamic relations”, International Journal of Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(2), pp. 59-70.
26.Ritter, L. S., Silber, W. L. and G. F. Udell, (2009), Principles of money, banking and financial markets, 12 Edition, Prentice Hall.
27.Said, S. and D. Dickey, (1984), “Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models with unknown order”, Biometrica, vol. 71(3), pp. 599-607.
28.Srinivasan, P. I. (2011), “Causal nexus between stock market return and selected macroeconomic variables in India: Evidence from the National Stock Exchange (NSE)”, Journal of Financial Risk Management ,vol. 8(4), pp7-24.
29.Taylor, J. B. (1993), “Discretion versus policy rules in Practice”, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 39, pp. 195–214.
30.Yutaka K. (2006), “The relationship between exchange rate and stock prices during the quantitative easing policy in Japan”, International Journal of Business, vol. 11(4), pp.376-386.
31.Ahmad, M. I., Rehman, R. U. and A. Raoof, (2010), “Do interest rate, exchange rate effect stock returns? A Pakistani perspective”, Journal of Finance and Economics, vol. 50, pp. 146-150.

指導教授

劉錦龍(Jin-long Liu)

審核日期

2015-1-26

推文