參考文獻 |
參考文獻
一、中文文獻:
1. 方世榮、黃瓊瑤、陳育成(民97)。投資人回應企業網站資訊揭露訊號模型-代理理論與關係行銷的觀點。中原企管評論,1,99-114。
2. 林宜諄、高希均(民97)。企業社會責任入門手冊。台北市:天下遠見。
3. 周立新(民99)。家族企業社會責任:研究動態。商業經濟與管理,11,47-52。
4. 邱毅(民89)。追求利益或社會責任。經濟前瞻雙月刊,71,114-116。
5. 范宏書、陳慶隆(民96)。會計師異動、存在最終家族控制股東與財務報表公佈時效性之探討。當代會計,1,1-34。
6. 高希均(民96)。企業社會責任-雄心與良心的地圖。哈佛商業評論中文版,16,138-140。
7. 徐俊明(民94)。財務管理理論與實務。台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。
8. 郭人誌(民88)。上市公司交叉持股行為特性之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。政治大學,台北市。
9. 許士軍(民86)。家族主義、專業主義與創業-以華人企業為背景的探討。管理評論,1,1-9。
10. 許士軍、陳光中(民78)。台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係。行政院國家科學會專題研究。
11. 黃光國(民73)。談家族企業的組織型態。中國論壇,7,21-22。
12. 陳光榮(民85)。企業的社會責任與倫理。經濟情勢暨評論季刊,4,150-158。
13. 陳定國(民75)。有效經營。台北市:經濟與生活出版事業股份有限公司。
14. 陳泰和(民90)。台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素(未出版之碩士論文)。台灣大學,台北市。
15. 郭麗娟(民96)。台灣家族企業所有權型態與生產力關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,台中市。
16. 詹凱玲(民96)。股權結構、董事會組成與公司績效之關係―以家族與非家族企業之角度(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,台北市。
17. 廖大穎(民88)。證券市場與股份制度論。台北市:元照出版。
18. 劉美纓、丁碧慧、朱奐聿(民103年6月)。企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究。「科際整合管理研討會」發表之論文,台北市東吳大學。
19. 廖亞妮(民99)。金控公司之社會責任指標對營運績效與公司價值之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄應用科技大學,高雄市。
20. 謝兆翔(民90)。現金增資長期績效與交叉持股之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中正大學,嘉義縣。
21. 鍾喜梅(民95年10月)。控制、代理成本與國際多角化:台灣集團企業的實證研究。臺大管理論叢,「台灣企業與國際競爭力-創新、國際化、策略」專刊研討會,台灣大學。
二、英文文獻:
1. Aerts, W., Cormier, D., and Magnan, M. (2006). Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and public Policy, 25(3), 299-331.
2. Alcorn, P. B. (1982). Success and Survival in the Family-Owned Firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Ali, A., Chen, T. Y., and Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1), 238-286.
4. Anderson, R. C., and Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1327
5. Appold, S. J., Siengthai, S., & Kasarda, J. D. (1998). The employment of women managers and professionals in an emerging economy: Gender inequality as an organizational practice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 538-565.
6. Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis ofa backward society. New York: Glencol.
7. Barnes, L. B., and Hershon, S. A. (1976). Transferring power in family business. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 105-114.
8. Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., and Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205-214.
9. Bøhren, Ø., and Michalsen, D. (1994). Corporate cross-ownership and market aggregates: Oslo Stock Exchange 1980–1990. Journal of Banking & Finance,18(4), 687-704.
10. Berle, A. A., and Means, G. G. C. (1991). The modern corporation and private property. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
11. Boli, J., and Hartsuiker, D. (2001). World culture and transnational corporations: sketch of a project. International Conference on Effects of and Responses to Globalization, Istanbul.
12. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility and Accountability. New York: New York University Press.
13. Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., and Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2167-2202.
14. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
15. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., and Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non-Family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335-354.
16. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1), 81-112.
17. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. & Lang, L. H. P (1999). Expropriation on minority shareholders: Evidence from East Asia, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2088. http://www.worldbank.org/html/dec/Publications/Workpapers/wps2000series/wps2088/wps2088.pdf
18. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academic of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
19. Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777-798.
21. Graafland, J. J. (2002). Sourcing ethics in the textile sector: the case of C&A. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(3), 282-294.
22. Handler, W. C. (1989). Managing the Family Firm Succession Process: The Next Generation Family Member’s Experience (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Boston University, Boston.
23. Hill, C. W., and Snell, S. A. (1989). Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 25-46.
24. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
25. Karnani, A. (2011). CSR Stuck in a Logical Trap. California Management Review, 53(2), 105-111.
26. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The journal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
27. McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
29. Mok, H. M., Lam, K., and Cheung, I. (1992). Family control and return covariation in Hong Kong′s common stocks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19(2), 277-293.
30. Morck, R., and Yeung, B. (2004). Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391-409.
31. Preston, L. E., and O’bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and society, 36(4), 419-429.
32. Schuler, D. A., and Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540-558.
33. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., and Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization science, 12(2), 99-116.
34. Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance. Strategic management journal, 8(4), 303-319.
35. Westphal, J. D., Seidel, M. D. L., and Stewart, K. J. (2001). Second-order imitation: Uncovering latent effects of board network ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 717-747.
36. Westphal, J. D., and Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative science quarterly, 40, 60-83.
37. Whetten, D. A., and Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41(4), 393-414.
38. Wood, D. J., and Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International journal of organizational analysis, 3(3), 229-267.
三、參考網站:
1. CSR 天下企業公民: http://topic.cw.com.tw/csr/
2. Domini社會型投資官網:http://www.domini.com/QADSI4000.htm
3. 中華公司治理協會: http://www.cga.org.tw/
4. 台灣經濟新報資料庫: http://www.tej.com.tw/
|