| 摘要(英) |
Abstract
According to IHS (2014) market survey, the global small-median size display demand is approximately 42.3 billion US dollars in year 2014. Its primary applications are smart phone, mobile PC and automotive monitor. These are also the areas known to the general public. The mainstream technology is Thin-Film Transistor LCD display. The Passive-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode (PMOLED) display technology has been limited to the niche market due to its product characteristics.
This study focuses on a median sized PMOLED company, attempting to gain more insight into the issue of sales performance evaluation and motivation. The traditional approach in the industry has been to measure sales performance based on an index consisting of sales revenue and profitability. This may not be the appropriate approach, since the sales force may focus on his/her own short-term performance and overlook the real requirements of the important customers.
Like other electronics components producers, the clients of small-median size display are electronics product produces. New electronics products require considerable lead-time to develop. There are uncertainties in finally selling a component, even if is adopted during design-in phases. Meanwhile, there are possibilities of multi-sourcing policy for end product producers, and this will also affect the final sales. The activities of business development to engage in each development phase for the clients are the core value of sales. Thus, the most effective sales always involve early in new product development for leading system companies and to ensure becoming one of their suppliers. However, this is a long-term endeavor.
As a result, new business development is one of the critical Sales functions for the niche market supplier. This study analyzed the performance evaluation for the sales force, and attempted to design a better measure, taking into account of the longer term activities, so as to reflect the real values of the sales function. The new measure is based on the motivation theory, product life cycle model, and the a sales funnel approach. This new sales performance index is the key factors to determine the incentive programs. The new system is expected to lead the sales team to a clear goal of mid-term sales growth momentums.
Keywords: Small-median size display, Passive-Matrix OLED (PMOLED), Niche market, incentive program, Sales performance_
|
| 參考文獻 |
參考文獻
一. 中文部分
1. Moore, Geoffrey A.（1990），Crossing the Chasm，Harper Collins。陳正平（2000），跨越鴻溝，臉譜出版社。
2. V. 庫馬爾、沙朗．桑德、羅伯特．雷昂內（2015），「用未來價值鑒定誰是真的明星銷售」，哈佛商業評論，2015年5月。
3. 公開資訊觀測站(2014)，上櫃公司年報及股東會相關資料，2015年6月5日，取自http://doc.twse.com.tw/pdf/2013_5245_20140623F11_20150712_111224.pdf
4. 王幸琪（2007），探討績效評量指標建構原則對我國電子業員工紅利制度激勵效果之影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 吳啟銘 （2004），「員工激勵制度與財務規劃策略~維持內外均衡創造雙贏契機」，2004年10月，會計研究月刊227期。
6. 林燕萍（1993），直銷商獎勵制度之激勵效果分析，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
7. 林明華（1990），產品生命週期對消費者資訊處理模式之影響，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
8. 周鉦琪（2003），利用新聞討論群文章內容發掘資訊產品之生命週期，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
9. 施正雄（2001），影響銷售專員績效的因素探討之研究─以外商藥品公司銷售專員為研究對象，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
10. 洪明洲（1999），管理，華彩軟體出版，台北。
11. 馬克．羅貝哲（2015），「擅用最佳薪酬計畫」，哈佛商業評論，2015年5月。
12. 許濱松（1981），論激勵管理與人力資源的有效運用，七友出版傳播，台北。
13. 張潤書（2007），行政學，三民書局，台北。
14. 黃英忠（2005）等著，員工激勵與績效管理，國立空中大學。
15. 廖育斌（2009），中小尺寸OLED產業分析，逢甲大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
16. 潘明燦（1991），業務員激勵制度的激勵效果分析及其受個人特質及組織經驗的影響-以電子資訊業為實證，國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
17. 鄭素玲 (2000) ，文化特徵、獎酬制度及其成效關係之研究－以台灣地區美商、日商、台商企業行銷部門為例，淡江大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
18. 鍾娉華（2006），人力資源管理措施知覺對員工工作績效之影響-工作投入及組織承諾之中介效果分析，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
二. 英文部分
1. Baiman, Stanley (1990), “Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Second Look”, Accounting Organization and Society.
2. Bayus B.L. (1998), “An analysis of product iefetimes in a Technologically Dynamic Inductry,” Journal of Management Science, June.
3. Berelson, Bernard, and Gary A. Steiner, (1964), Human Behavior: An Inventory of Scientific Findings, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
4. Carvell, M.R., & Kuzmits F.E. (1982), Personnel: Management of Human Resource, New York, Bell & Howell Co.
5. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989),“Agency theory: An assessment and review,” Acadmy of Management Journal, pp57-74.
6. Huh, Myung-Soo, Yang, Bong-Seop, Oh, Seung-Hu (2015), Epitaxial Growth and Doping, http://thinfilm.snu.ac.kr/amoled.htm, May 2015.
7. IHS Technology (2015), Quarterly Small Medium Shipment and Forecast Report, Q1 2015.
8. Kanter, R.M. (1987), “From status to contribution: Some organuzaional implications of the changing basis for pay,” Personnel, pp.12-37.
9. Lambert, R. A., D. F. Larcker, and K. Weigelt. (1993), “The structure of organizational incentives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.438-461.
10. Lawler, E.E. III. (1989), “Outlook in compensation and benefit: Pay for performance making it work,” Personnel, pp.68-71.
11. Levitt T. (1965), “Exploit The Product Life Cycle,” Journal of Harvard Business Review, Nov.~Dec.
12. Milkovich, G. and Milkovich, C. (1992), “Strengthening the pay-performance relationship: The research,” Compenation and Benefits Review, pp.53-62.
13. Porter, L. III W. and Lawler, E.E. (1989), “Outlook in compensation and benefit: Pay for performance making it work,” Personnel, pp.68-71.
14. Rink, D.R. and Swan, J.F. (1979), “Product Life Cycle Research: A Literature Review,” Journal of Business Research, July, pp.219-242.
15. Robbins, S. (1998), Organizational behaviour concepts, controversies, application, New Jersey: Prentice-hall International.
16. Rogers, Everett M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovation, New York: Free Press.
17. Vroom, V. (1964), Work and Motivation, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
.
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit