在虛擬情境中之外語協同學習任務設計 – 以Second Life為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：18.117.9.138

姓名

蕭有廷(Yu-ting Hsiao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

在虛擬情境中之外語協同學習任務設計 – 以Second Life為例
(The design of collaborative learning tasks on foreign language learning in virtual world – A case study in Second Life)

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

法語是國際間被廣泛使用的語言之一，在台灣較少有法語的情境提供給學生學習，但學習是需要在自然情境中發生，因此找到一個合適的情境來提供學生學習是很重要的。本研究之目的即為觀察學生在3D情境式task-based learning (TBL)教學流程中，學生的協同學習模式為何，及模式差異對於學生法語學習成果與學習觀感之影響。研究對象為臺灣某私立大學法文課程學生，使其在以豐富情境著稱的Second Life (SL)平台進行法語學習，藉由小組合作式腳本撰寫與影片錄製作業等任務內容來評估學生的學習成果及整體表現，並以問卷、在SL中錄影觀察、對話紀錄及訪談回饋結果評估及觀察這些學生在完成任務過程中的小組協作模式及其學習成效。研究結果顯示，學生的學習模式共分為三種，即情境合作 (context-inclusive collaboration)、傳統合作 (context-exclusive collaboration)以及集權領導 (context-exclusive centralization)，在學習成效上以情境合作最佳，傳統合作次之，集權領導最不理想。由此研究結果得知context-based learning正面影響了學生的口說及學習成果的各個層面，亦促進了學生的協同合作功效，而context-based learning及collaboration對學生benefits 的觀感有正向的影響，但學生對於時程壓力所帶來的焦慮及操作問題所造成的困擾會對學生affective觀感造成負面的影響。

摘要(英)

Though French is one of the widely used languages globally, the learning environment provided for students to learn it in Taiwan has been comparatively insufficient. As language acquisition needs to occur in a natural setting, it is of vital importance that a proper natural setting be provided to language learners. The study hence aims to observe the collaborative learning model students adopted in task-based learning process in a 3D setting, and its impacts on the results and reactions of French language learners due to different learning models adopted. The subjects of this study are French learning students of a private university in Taiwan. These students were asked to engage themselves in the platform of Second Life (SL), known for its rich virtual settings, through the form of group tasks that included scripts writing and video shooting for French learning. The outcome and final performance were evaluated and observed by questionnaires, video shooting on SL, conversation records, and interviews to understand collaborative models adopted by students and the learning efficacy. The study indicates that the learning models students adopted can be divided into three types: context-inclusive collaboration (CICO), context-exclusive collaboration (CECO), and context-exclusive centralization (CECE). When compared students’ learning efficacy, CICO was the most effective, CECO is the second, and CECE was the least effective. We can infer from the study that context-based learning has positive impacts on students′ speaking capability and other aspects of learning performance, and at the same time facilitates the effects of collaboration for students. Besides, when it comes to students’ feedbacks, “context-based learning” and “collaboration” are considered as positive factors (benefits), while the time pressure and operation problems are considered as negative factors (effective) for French learning on SL.

關鍵字(中)

★ Second Life
★ Context-based Learning
★ Collaborative Learning
★ Learning French

關鍵字(英)

★ Second Life
★ Context-based Learning
★ Collaborative Learning
★ Learning French

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review 7
2.1 Language teaching in SL 7
2.2 Task-based learning 7
2.3 Collaborative learning 10
3. Methodology 13
3.1 Participants 13
3.2 Research method 13
3.3 Instruments 15
3.3.1 Learning platform 15
3.3.2 Learning content 17
3.4 TBL activity design 17
3.5 Interview 19
3.6 Rubrics 20
4. Results 22
4.1 Impacts of different collaborative models adopted by students to learn French in the 3D situated TBL learning process 22
4.2 Perceptions of different collaborative models adopted by students learning French in the 3D situated TBL learning process 28
5. Discussion 32
5.1 Impacts of different collaborative models adopted by students on their performance in learning French 34
5.2 Impacts of different collaborative models adopted by students on their perceptions about the French-learning activity 36
6. Conclusion and Future Works 39
Bibliographies 41
Appendix A – Rubrics 49
Appendix B – Interview questions for students 51
Appendix C – Interview questions for teacher 52

參考文獻

Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18.
Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y. & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287–302.
Andreas, K., Tsiatsos, T., Terzidou, T. & Pomportsis, A. (2010). Fostering collaborative learning in Second Life: Metaphors and affordances. Computers & Education, 55(2), 603–615.
Annetta, L. A. (2008). Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 229 – 239.
Arvaja, M. (2011). Analyzing the contextual nature of collaborative activity. Analyzing Interactions in CSCL, 25-46.
Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P. & Major, C. H. (2004). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A. & Primavera, L. (2010). Supporting authors in the development of task-based learning in serious virtual worlds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 86–107.
Bishop, J. (2009). Enhancing the understanding of genres of web-based communities: the role of the ecological cognition framework. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 5(1), 4 – 17.
Bulu, S. T. (2012). Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 58(1), 154–161.
Çelik, S., Aytın, K., & Bayram, E. (2013). Implementing cooperative learning in the language classroom: Opinions of Turkish teachers of English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1852-1859.
Cheng, G. (2014). Exploring students′ learning styles in relation to their acceptance and attitudes towards using Second Life in education: A case study in Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 70, 105-115.
Chou, M. (2011). The influence of learner strategies on oral presentations: A comparison between group and individual performance. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 272-285.
Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T.M. & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136–1144.
Consortium, T. N. M. (2007). The horizon report. Technical Report.
De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220-233.
Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in Second Life - a comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2), 206-226.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
East, M. (2009). Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing. Assessing Writing, 14(2), 88–115.
Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 19–45.
Foster, P. (1999). Task-based learning and pedagogy. ELT Journal, 53(1), 69–70.
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., & Alvarez, I. (2010). Formative e-feedback in collaborative writing assignments: the effect of the process and time. eLearn Center Research Paper Series, (1), 49-59.
Helmer, J., & Light, L. (2007). Second Life and virtual worlds. Learning Light Limited, 2007.
IELTS Speaking band descriptors (Public version). (n.d.). Retrieved July 11, 2015, from https://www.ielts.org/PDF/UOBDs_SpeakingFinal.pdf
Jamshidnejad, A. (2011). Developing accuracy by using oral communication strategies in EFL Interactions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 530-536.
Jara, C. A., Candelas, F. A., Torres, F., Dormido, S., Esquembre, F. & Reinoso, O. (2009). Real-time collaboration of virtual laboratories through the Internet. Computers & Education, 52(1), 126–140.
Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53(1), 169 – 182.
Jauregi, K. & Canto, S. (2012). Enhancing meaningful oral interaction in Second Life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, 111–115.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The fairyland of Second Life: Virtual social worlds and how to use them. Business horizons, 52(6), 563-572.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. USA: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. London: Prentice-Hall International.
KUO, M.H., (2010), High school second language - French - A case study of the materials, methods of "elementary education", The 7th Cross-Strait Conference on Foreign Language Teaching ＆ Learning.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lan, Y.J., Kan, Y.H., Hsiao, I. Y. T., Yang, S. J. H. & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Designing interaction tasks in Second Life for Chinese as a foreign language learners: A preliminary exploration. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 184–202.
Lee, J. (2000). Tasks and communicating in language classrooms. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Liou, H. C. (2011). The roles of Second Life in a college computer assisted language learning (CALL) course in Taiwan, ROC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI:10.1080/09588221.2011.597766.
Liu, T.Y. & Chu, Y.L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630–643.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task‐based syllabus design. Tesol Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56.
Lucia, A. D., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2008). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220-233.
Meadows, M. S. (2007, December 27). I, avatar: The culture and consequences of having a second life. New Riders.
Molka-Danielsen, J., & Deutschmann, M. (2009). Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life. Tapir Academic Press.
Olteanu, R. L., Bîzoi, M., Gorghiu, G., & Suduc, A. (2014). Working in the Second Life environment-A way for enhancing students’ collaboration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1089-1094.
Peterson, M. (2010a). Learner participation patterns and strategy use in Second Life: an exploratory case study. ReCALL, 22(03), 273-292.
Peterson, M. (2010b). Massively multiplayer online role-playing games as arenas for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 429-439.
Petrakou, A. (2010). Interacting through avatars: Virtual worlds as a context for online education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1020-1027.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rankin, Y., Gold, R., & Gooch, B. (2006). 3D role-playing games as language learning tools. Proceedings of EuroGraphics.
Roger, T., & Johnson, D. W. (1994). An overview of cooperative learning. Creativity and collaborative learning.
Rose, D. E. (2012). Context-based learning. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 799-802.
Saddler, B. & Andrade, H. (2004). The writing Rubric. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 48–52.
Salmon, G. (2009). The future for (second) life and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 526 – 538.
Second Foreign Language Proficiency Test-Basic Report. https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/SFLPT/report/%E5%9C%8B%E5%85%A7%E6%B3%95%E8%AA%9E%E5%88%9D%E5%AD%B8%E9%9A%8E%E6%AE%B5%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E7%8F%BE%E6%B3%81%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E8%88%87%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90.pdf
Thornton, P. (1999). Reading together. In D. Kluge & S. McGuire (Eds.), JALT Applied Materials: Cooperative Learning (pp. 23-36). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Association for Language Teaching.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 34-41.
Wang, C. X., Song, H., Stone, D. E. & Yan, Q. (2009). Integrating second life into an EFL program in China: Research Collaboration across the Continents. TechTrends, 53(6), 14–19.
Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 414–426.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, U.K. Longman Addison-Wesley.
Witmer, B. G. & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240.
Yang, Y.-T. C., Chuang, Y.-C., Li, L.-Y. & Tseng, S.-S. (2013). A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education, 63, 285–305.
Yang, Y.T. C., Gamble, J. & Tang, S.Y. S. (2012). Voice over instant messaging as a tool for enhancing the oral proficiency and motivation of English-as-a-foreign-language learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 448–464.
Zahedi, M. (2012). The Effect of Collaborative Learning on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Oral Skills and Motivation. Advances in English Linguistics, 1(3), 56-60.
Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), 434-446.

指導教授

楊鎮華

審核日期

2015-7-15

推文