博碩士論文 103427006 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：24 、訪客IP：18.191.240.243
姓名 詹怡芬(Yi-Fen Chan)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 領導者內隱追隨理論與晉升力評分之關聯性—以主管部屬交換關係與績效為中介變項
(The Relationship between Leader’s Implicit Followership Theories and Promotability: The Mediating Effect of Leader-Member Exchange and Performance)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 追隨者存在於組織中的各個階層，當員工具備有效的追隨力，才能在晉升後藉由有效的追隨與領導來協助團隊獲得成功。過去的研究中，鮮少將追隨力作為預測晉升的變數，另外，雖存在有效與無效追隨力之概念，也無研究針對正反向之追隨力作更進一步的探討。本研究結合上述議題，以社會交換理論及贊助性流動為理論基礎，利用Sy(2010)提出之內隱追隨理論原型及反原型，來探討領導者角度的內隱追隨理論與晉升力之相關，並以主管部屬交換關係和績效作為中介變項，證實其間的因果關係與中介機制。
本研究共發出348份問卷，並回收有效問卷共237份，研究結果顯示內隱追理論原型中的勤奮及公民行為會透過主管部屬交換關係與績效來對其晉升力評分產生正向影響，熱忱則否；追隨理論反原型中的不稱職、盲從他人與不服從皆與主管部屬交換關係及績效沒有顯著相關。在晉升的變項衡量中，部屬績效與晉升力評分具顯著相關，部屬績效與部屬過去實際的晉升次數卻無顯著相關。同時勤奮與公民行為亦對部屬績效有直接效果；主管部屬交換關係對部屬晉升次數呈現顯著正相關。研究證實部屬展現之追隨特質會對於其未來晉升的可能性有正向的關聯性。
摘要(英) No matter in which level of the organization, followership exists in almost every employee. The promoted employees who have effective followership could influence their supervisors and team positively. However, there are few studies taking followership as the predictor of promotability, but only the relationship between followership and performance. Regarding these issues, we use the Implicit Followership Theories scale of prototype and antiprototype to investigate the relationship between followership and promotability from the supervisors’ view. Based on the social exchange theory and sponsored-mobility, we proposed that leader-member exchange (LMX) and performance mediating between followership and promotability.
348 questionnaires were delivered and 237 were successfully collected. The result showed that the prototype Industry and Good Citizen have positive effect on the LMX, performance, and promotability while Enthusiasm doesn’t. All antiprototype has no effect on LMX, performance, and promotability. Employees’ performance has positive effect on promotability but no effect on real promoting numbers. Meanwhile, Industry and Good Citizen also have direct effect on performance; LMX has direct effect on real promoting numbers. Our result provides the empirical evidence of the relationship between followership and promotability with the mediating effect of LMX and employees’ performance.
關鍵字(中) ★ 內隱追隨理論
★ 追隨力
★ 主管部屬交換關係
★ 部屬績效
★ 晉升力評分
★ 晉升次數
★ 向上影響
★ 贊助性流動
★ 社會交換理論		 關鍵字(英) ★ Leader’s Implicit Followership Theories (LIFTs)
★ followership
★ leader-member exchange (LMX)
★ performance
★ promotability
★ promotion
★ upward influence
★ sponsored-mobility
★ social exchange theory
論文目次 一、 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的與預期貢獻 4
二、 文獻探討 6
2-1 社會交換理論與贊助性流動 6
2-2 追隨力：領導者內隱追隨理論觀點 7
2-3 內隱追隨理論之原型與反原型 10
2-4 領導者內隱追隨理論與主管部屬交換關係(LMX) 10
2-5 LMX與部屬工作績效 13
2-6 部屬工作績效與部屬晉升 14
2-7 領導者內隱追隨理論、LMX與部屬工作績效的關係 16
2-8 LMX、部屬工作績效和部屬晉升的關係 17
三、 研究方法 18
3-1 研究架構 18
3-2 研究對象與流程 18
3-3 研究變項衡量 19
3-4 資料分析與統計方法 21
四、 研究結果 23
4-1 資料來源與樣本特性 23
4-2 信度與效度分析 24
4-3 相關分析 28
4-4 假設模型檢驗 30
五、 結論與討論 34
5-1 結論與討論 34
5-2 學術與實務貢獻 36
5-3 管理意涵 37
5-4 研究限制與未來建議 39
參考文獻 41
參考文獻 英文文獻
1. Allinson, C. W., Armstrong, S. J., & Hayes, J. (2001). The effects of cognitive style on leader‐member exchange: A study of manager‐subordinate dyads. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(2), 201-220.
2. Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice: Basic books.
3. Anderson, J. C., Milkovich, G. T., & Tsui, A. (1981). A model of intra-organizational mobility. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 529-538.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 11(4), 629.
5. Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership. Theory, research and managerial applications, 4.
6. Bennis, W. G. (2000). Managing the dream: Reflections on leadership and change: Da Capo Press.
7. Blanchard, A. L., Welbourne, J., Gilmore, D., & Bullock, A. (2009). Followership styles and employee attachment to the organization. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12(2), 111-131.
8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life: Transaction Publishers.
9. Bollen, K. A. (2014). Structural equations with latent variables: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Bommer, W. H., Rubin, R. S., & Baldwin, T. T. (2004). Setting the stage for effective leadership: Antecedents of transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(2), 195-210.
11. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
12. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 168.
13. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136.
14. Carraher, S. M., Sullivan, S. E., & Crocitto, M. M. (2008). Mentoring across global boundaries: An empirical examination of home-and host-country mentors on expatriate career outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1310-1326.
15. Carsten, M. K., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2012). Follower Beliefs in the Co-Production of Leadership Examining Upward Communication and the Moderating Role of Context. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 220(4), 210-220. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000115
16. Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 543-562. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.015
17. Chaleff, I. (1995). The Courageous Follower: Standing Up To and For Our Leaders: San Francisco: Berrett—Koehler.
18. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 541-560.
19. Cox, T., & Nkomo, S. M. (1992). Candidate age as a factor in promotability ratings. Public Personnel Management, 21(2), 197-210.
20. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
21. Crossman, B., & Crossman, J. (2011). Conceptualising followership–a review of the literature. Leadership, 7(4), 481-497.
22. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
23. De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 553-563.
24. de Vries, R. E., & van Gelder, J.-L. (2005). LEADERSHIP AND NEED FOR LEADERSHIP. Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations, 3, 277.
25. Deluga, R. J. (1998). Leader-Member Exchange Quality and Effectiveness Ratings The Role of Subordinate-Supervisor Conscientiousness Similarity. Group & Organization Management, 23(2), 189-216.
26. Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., & Dorfman, P. W. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic: transformational leadership universally endorsed? . The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 219-256.
27. Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
28. Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers revealed. Engineering Management Journal, 15(1), 19-26.
29. Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 499-521.
30. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
31. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 335-362.
32. Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 988-1010.
33. Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories "in the wild": Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858-881. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005
34. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition, 2nd. NY: McGraw-Hill, 16-15.
35. Ford, D. K., Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Rejected But Still There: Shifting the focus in applicant reactions to the promotional context. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 402-416.
36. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
37. Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133-187.
38. Gentry, W. A., & Sosik, J. J. (2010). Developmental relationships and managerial promotability in organizations: A multisource study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 266-278. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.010
39. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827.
40. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694-734.
41. Goodwin, V. L., Wofford, J., & Boyd, N. G. (2000). A laboratory experiment testing the antecedents of leader cognitions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 769-788.
42. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 161-178.
43. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Leadership frontiers, 143, 165.
44. Graen, G., Liden, R. C., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 868.
45. Graen, G., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in organizational behavior.
46. Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
47. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102(1), 4.
48. Gupta, M., & Bhal, K. (2014). Impact of LMX Congruence on Subordinate Performance, Promotability and Organization Commitment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance: ICMLG 2014.
49. Hair, J., JF, Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1995). Multiple discriminant analysis. Multivariate data analysis, 178-256.
50. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Black (1998), Multivariate data analysis: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51. Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). An examination of temporal variables and relationship quality on promotability ratings. Group & Organization Management, 31(6), 677-699. doi:10.1177/1059601106286889
52. Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639-683.
53. Hollander, E. P. (1974). Processes of leadership emergence. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(4), 19-33.
54. Homans, G. C. (1961). Its Elementary Forms. Social Behavior, 488-531.
55. Hoption, C., Christie, A., & Barling, J. (2012). Submitting to the Follower Label Followership, Positive Affect, and Extra-Role Behaviors. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 220(4), 221-230. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000116
56. House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of world business, 37(1), 3-10.
57. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
58. Hunt, J., Boal, K. B., & Sorenson, R. L. (1990). Top management leadership: Inside the black box. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(1), 41-65.
59. Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269.
60. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233-244.
61. Jawahar, I. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A Longitudinal Investigation of Task and Contextual Performance Influences on Promotability Judgments. Human Performance, 24(3), 251-269. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.580806
62. Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 80-105.
63. Jussim, L. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological review, 93(4), 429.
64. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations: Wiley.
65. Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders: Harvard Business School Press Boston.
66. Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers: Harvard Business Review Case Services.
67. Kelley, R. E. (1992). The power of followership: How to create leaders people want to follow, and followers who lead themselves: Broadway Business.
68. Kelloway, E. K., & Santor, D. A. (1999). [Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modelling: A Researcher′s Guide]. Canadian Psychology, 40(4), 381.
69. Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 602.
70. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S., Price, K., & Stitt, C. (1981). Why do I like thee: is it your performance or my orders? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(3), 324.
71. Kleinsmith, S. L., & Everts-Rogers, S. (2000). The Art of Followership. School Administrator, 57(8), 35-38.
72. Kline, R. (2004). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd edn Guilford. New York.
73. Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090-1109.
74. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465.
75. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662.
76. Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1991). Executive leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and organizational performance. Wellington, MA: Unwin Hyman.
77. Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 93-120.
78. Mitchell, T. (1983). The effects of social, task, and situational factors on motivation, performance, and appraisal. Performance measurement and theory, 39, 59.
79. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
80. Mosley, D. C., & Patrick, D. K. (2011). Leadership and followership: The dynamic process of building high performance cultures. Organization Development Journal, 29(2), 85.
81. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475.
82. Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
83. Palmer, B., Walls, M., Burgess, Z., & Stough, C. (2001). Emotional intelligence and effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(1), 5-10.
84. Poole, P. P., Gioia, D. A., & Gray, B. (1989). Influence modes, schema change, and organizational transformation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(3), 271-289.
85. Porter, L. W., Angle, H. L., & Allen, R. W. (2003). Organizational influence processes: ME Sharpe.
86. Roach, E., Lloyd, B. B., Wiles, J., & Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization.
87. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1984). Career mobility in a corporate hierarchy: Academic Pr.
88. Rosenthal, R. (1993). Interpersonal expectations: Some antecedents and some consequences. Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, 3-24.
89. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16-20.
90. Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26(3), 565-606.
91. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 63-113.
92. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1948). An outline of social psychology, NY. Harpers.
93. Shondrick, S. J., & Lord, R. G. (2010). 1 Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories: Dynamic Structures for Leadership Perceptions, Memory, and Leader-Follower Processes. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 25(1), 1-33.
94. Sibunruang, H., Capezio, A., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2014). Getting Ahead Through Flattery: Examining the Moderating Roles of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Political Skill in the Ingratiation-Promotability Relationship. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 610-626. doi:10.1177/1069072713514821
95. Snead, K. B. (2013). Contextual Constraints: An Examination of Implicit Followership Theories.
96. Sturman, M. C. (2003). Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: Meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. Journal of Management, 29(5), 609-640.
97. Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.001
98. Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Biosocial Science, 1(S1), 173-191.
99. Truxillo, D. M., Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (2004). The importance of organizational justice in personnel selection: Defining when selection fairness really matters. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1‐2), 39-53.
100. Turner, R. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 855-867.
101. Tzafrir, S. S., & Hareli, S. (2009). Employees′ emotional reactions to promotion decisions: The role of causal attributions and perceptions of justice. Career Development International, 14(4), 351-371.
102. Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in personnel and human resources management, 18(1), 137-185.
103. Uhl-Bien, M., Tierney, P. S., Graen, G. B., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Company Paternalism and the Hidden-Investment Process Identification of the" Right Type" for Line Managers in Leading Japanese Organizations. Group & Organization Management, 15(4), 414-430.
104. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
105. van Gils, S., van Quaquebeke, N., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 333-363.
106. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525.
107. Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526.
108. Wakabayashi, M., Graen, G., Graen, M., & Graen, M. (1988). Japanese management progress: Mobility into middle management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 217.
109. Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1809-1824.
110. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers′ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420-432.
111. Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232-260.
112. Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 577-595.
113. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
114. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3): Sage.
115. Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders′ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 822-834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.006
116. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
117. Wofford, J., & Goodwin, V. L. (1994). A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 161-186.
118. Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6), 879-919.
119. Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organizations: Prentice Hall.
120. Yukl, G. A. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66-85.

中文文獻
1. 曹元坤、祝振兵，「内隱追隨理論：概念、測量、前因及後果」，心理科學進展，第二卷第十四期，2015年。
2. 楊红玲、彭堅，「內隱追隨理論研究評述」，外國經濟與管理，第三十七卷第三期，16~26頁，2015年。
3. 劉珮琪，「華人社會追隨力之概念初探; An Exploratory Study of followership in Chinese society.」，國立中央大學碩士論文，民國104年。
4. 羅文豪，「追随研究的歷史溯源，現實驅力與未來展望」，中國人力資源開發，第十五期，6~15頁。
指導教授 林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin) 審核日期 2016-7-12
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明