博碩士論文 103430015 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:32 、訪客IP:18.219.232.153
姓名 黃雅琳(Ya-Lin Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 財務報表重編與會計穩健性
(Financial Report Restatements and Accounting Conservatism)
相關論文
★ 以房養老貸款政策-由台灣金融業之觀點論析★ 企業導入電子商務對經營績效之影響-以N公司為例
★ 台灣網通業應收帳款管理-論析信用保險之功能★ 蘋果概念股金屬機殼產業之投資分析
★ 由鑑識會計角度偵測公司之舞弊-以某個案公司為例★ 企業流程再造-以某食品原料加工公司之報價作業流程為例
★ 企業資源規劃系統導入之關鍵成功因素與效益評估-以某個案公司為例★ 企業組織再造之分析-以某醫材業公司為例
★ 金融機構執行共同申報及盡職審查作業辦法之影響★ 中美貿易戰對台灣企業之影響 -以某公司為例
★ 管理報表編制對企業經營績效之影響—以A公司為例★ 現金減資宣告之股價異常報酬-以台灣上市公司為例
★ 公司價值評估-以半導體產業某公司為例★ 公司併購價格之決定-以電子業大聯大收購文曄為例
★ 製造業轉型之研究-以某個案公司為例★ 鑑識會計於政府採購招標階段之應用
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 本文首先依循Basu(1997)實證模型為基礎,接著將此實證模型做一些變化。本研究使用台灣自2006年至2014年上市櫃公司為樣本,採用配對樣本法及迴歸探討財務報表重編與會計穩健性之關聯性。實證結果發現重編公司相較於未重編公司的會計穩健程度較大,且證管會強制重編公司相較於其他未發生及已發生財報重編公司的盈餘穩健程度亦較大。最後,將未強制重編公司與證管會強制重編公司做比較,發現證管會強制重編公司相較於未強制重編公司擁有更高的會計穩健性。
本研究提供台灣上市櫃公司有關財務報表重編與會計穩健性關聯之證據,可做為未來研究者探討之基礎。
摘要(英) First, the author followed Basu (1997) empirical model, then did some changes on it. The author studied the firms from 2006 to 2014 in Taiwan stock market, and used a matched-sample and regression analysis to investigate the relevance between financial restatement and accounting conservatism. The empirical results showed that accounting conservatism was positively related to the restatement firms, and the firms which Securities & Futures Institute requested the restatement also had positively related to accounting conservatism. Finally, we found the firms which Securities & Futures Institute requested the restatement tended to have more accounting conservatism than the other firms.
The results provided evidences on the relevance between financial restatement and accounting conservatism. They can also be used as the basis to study further for researchers.
關鍵字(中) ★ 會計穩健性
★ 財務報表重編
★ 自行重編
★ 強制重編
關鍵字(英) ★ Accounting conservatism
★ Financial restatement
★ Voluntary restatement
★ Securities & Futures Institute
論文目次 目錄
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝辭 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
第一章、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景、動機 1
1-2 研究架構 4
第二章、文獻探討與假說發展 5
2-1 財務報表重編原因與影響 5
2-2 會計穩健性 6
2-3 財務報表重編與會計穩健性 7
第三章、研究設計 9
3-1 資料來源與樣本選取 9
3-1-1 財務報表重編公司樣本 10
3-1-2 配對樣本 12
3-2 會計穩健性的衡量 12
3-3 實證模型 14
第四章、實證結果 16
4-1 敘述性統計分析 16
4-2 實證結果分析 19
4-2-1 原始模型迴歸結果 19
4-2-2 重編公司與未重編公司會計穩健性比較 19
4-2-3 強制重編公司與其他未發生及已發生財報重編公司會計穩健性比較 19
4-2-4 未強制重編公司與強制重編公司會計穩健性比較 20
第五章、結論 26
參考文獻 27
參考文獻 [英文部分]
[1]Arthaud-Day, M. L., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2006). A changing of
the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1119-1136.
[2]Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers.
Journal of accounting research, 159-178.
[3]Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss
recognition timeliness. Journal of accounting and economics, 39(1), 83-128.
[4]Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors
on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of accounting and economics, 29(1), 1-51.
[5]Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: properties of
accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of accounting and economics, 36(1), 235-270.
[6]Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings 1.
Journal of accounting and economics, 24(1), 3-37.
[7]Basu, S., Huang, A. Y. F., Mitsudome, T., & Weintrop, J. (2005). Timeliness and
conservatism of Taiwanese earnings. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 12(2), 113-134.
[8]Beaver, W. H. (1981). Financial reporting: an accounting revolution. Prentice Hall.
[9]Beaver, W. H., & Ryan, S. G. (2000). Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the
ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of accounting research, 38(1), 127-148.
[10]Beaver, W., Lambert, R., & Morse, D. (1980). The information content of security prices.
journal of Accounting and Economics, 2(1), 3-28.
[11]Brooks, L. D., & Buckmaster, D. A. (1976). Further evidence of the time series properties
of accounting income. The Journal of Finance, 31(5), 1359-1373.
[12]Bushman, R. M. (2005). Capital allocation and timely accounting recognition of
economic losses (Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago).
[13]Callen, J. L., Segal, D., & Hope, O. K. (2010). The pricing of conservative accounting
and the measurement of conservatism at the firm-year level. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(1), 145-178.
[14]Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor
dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 95-117.
[15]Chakravarthy, J., DeHaan, E., & Rajgopal, S. (2014). Reputation repair after a serious
restatement. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1329-1363.
[16]Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Lo, A. K. (2013). Accounting restatements and external financing
choices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(2), 750-779.
[17]Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Lo, A. K. (2013). Is the decline in the information content of
earnings following restatements short-lived?. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 177-207.
[18]Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of
earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary accounting research, 13(1), 1-36.
[19]Dichev, I. D., & Tang, V. W. (2008). Matching and the changing properties of accounting
earnings over the last 40 years. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1425-1460.
[20]Donelson, D. C., McInnis, J. M., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2013). Discontinuities and
earnings management: Evidence from restatements related to securities litigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 242-268.
[21]Ettredge, M., Huang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2012). Earnings restatements and differential
timeliness of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 489-503.
[22]Givoly, D., Hayn, C. K., & Katz, S. P. (2010). Does public ownership of equity improve
earnings quality?. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 195-225.
[23]Grice, J. S., & Ingram, R. W. (2001). Tests of the generalizability of Altman′s bankruptcy
prediction model. Journal of Business Research, 54(1), 53-61.
[24]Hribar, P., & Jenkins, N. T. (2004). The effect of accounting restatements on earnings
revisions and the estimated cost of capital. Review of accounting studies, 9(2-3), 337-356.
[25]Kedia, S., & Philippon, T. (2009). The economics of fraudulent accounting. Review of
Financial Studies, 22(6), 2169-2199.
[26]Kinney, W. R., Palmrose, Z. V., & Scholz, S. (2004). Auditor Independence, Non‐Audit
Services, and Restatements: Was the US Government Right?. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 561-588.
[27]Kothari, S. P., & Sloan, R. G. (1992). Information in prices about future earnings: Implications for earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2), 143-171.
[28]Manski, C. F., & Lerman, S. R. (1977). The estimation of choice probabilities from
choice based samples. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1977-1988.
[29]Pae, J., Thornton, D. B., & Welker, M. (2005). The link between earnings conservatism
and the price‐to‐book ratio. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3), 693-717.
[30]Pae, J., Thornton, D. B., & Welker, M. (2005). The link between earnings conservatism
and the price‐to‐book ratio. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3), 693-717.
[31]Palmrose, Z. V., & Scholz, S. (2004). The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of
Non‐GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 139-180.
[32]Richardson, S. A., Tuna, A., & Wu, M. (2002). Predicting earnings management: The
case of earnings restatements. Min, Predicting Earnings Management: The Case of Earnings Restatements (October 2002).
[33]Roychowdhury, S., & Watts, R. L. (2007). Asymmetric timeliness of earnings,
market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1), 2-31.
[34]Srinivasan, S. (2005). Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors:
Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 291-334.
[35]Staubus, G. J. (1985). An induced theory of accounting measurement. Accounting
Review, 53-75.
[36]United States. General Accounting Office. (2002). Financial statement restatements:
Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges. US General Accounting Office. Washington D.C. GAO-03-138.
[37]United States. General Accounting Office. (2006). Financial statement restatements:
update of public company trends, market impacts, and regulatory enforcement activities. US General Accounting Office. Washington D.C. GAO-06-678.
[38]Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications.
Accounting horizons, 17(3), 207-221.
[39]Watts, R. L. (2003a). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications.
Accounting horizons, 17(3), 207-221.
[40]Watts, R. L. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research
opportunities. Accounting horizons, 17(4), 287-301.
[41]Wilson, W. M. (2008). An empirical analysis of the decline in the information content of
earnings following restatements. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 519-548.
[42]Wu, M. (2002). Earnings restatements: A capital market perspective. Available at SSRN
1844265.
[中文部分]
[1]林佳穎,2006,「我國財務報表穩健特性及穩健原則攸關價值之研究」,國立成功大
學會計研究所碩士論文。
[2]林宛瑩、李宛臻,2005,「財務報表重編類型、特性與盈餘管理誘因及治理環境特性
之關聯性研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
[3]馬秀慧,2011,「財務報表重編前後報酬與每股盈餘及現金流量之相關性研究」,中
原大學會計研究所碩士論文,1-44頁。
[4]高蘭芬、陳怡凱、陳美蓮,2011,「代理問題與盈餘穩健性」,會計評論,第52期
(1月):103-136。
[5]戚務君、廖益均與林蟬娟,2008,「我國企業盈餘穩健特性之研究」,會計學報,第
1卷第1期:1‐28頁。
[6]戚務君、謝昇樺,2015,「從審計研究看財務報表的誤述與重編:文獻與中國的實況
(下)」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,113卷,36-55頁。
[7]詹玉霞與蘇裕惠 ,2003,「財務績效、財務剝奪假說對財務報告重編之影響」,會
計理論與實務研討會。
[8]羅松如,2008,「財務報表穩健特性之研究:跨期間及亞洲四小龍證據」,國立成功
大學會計研究所碩士論文。
指導教授 王曉雯(Hsiao-Wen Wang) 審核日期 2016-8-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明