參考文獻 |
參考文獻
于宗先、王金利 (2009),「台灣人口變動與經濟發展」,聯經出版事業公司。
王金利 (1987),「臺灣人口因素對家庭消費型態之影響」,《現代經濟探討叢書》,中央 研究院經濟研究所。
王瑞壎 (2008),「人口結構變遷下我國師資培育現況之分析」,《台東大學教育學報》, 19(2), 143–182。
朱瑞淵、林俊妤和陳宗玄 (2009),「台灣家庭國外旅遊支出影響因素之研究─世代分析 之應用」,朝陽大學第十屆管理學域國際研討會。
宋畹玖 (2009),「高齡化社會從風險管理觀點論長期看護風險」,《嶺東學報》,26, 127-146。
李安妮、侯仁義和柯亮群 (2010),「能源消費及節能意識之性別差異分析」,台灣綜合 研究院。
吳淑妍 (2014),「因應人口高齡化的居家照護產業發展」,《經濟前瞻》,155,14-20。
邱萬生和常如君 (2004),「熟年世代—台灣 50~64 歲生活型態族群研究」,統一夢公園 生活事業公司。
林唐裕 (2014),「因應不確定性因素情境下電力負載預測之研究」,台電綜合研究所委 託研究計畫。
莊朝榮 (2005),「高齡化對金融市場的影響」,《貨幣觀測與信用評等》,第 56 期,29。
郭迺鋒 (2013),「人口結構對公共醫療衛生支出影響之探討:跨國 Panel 迴歸分析」, 《貨幣觀測與信用評等》,第 101 期,25-42。
彭素玲、郭迺鋒、周濟和方文秀 (2009),「人口年齡結構、所得分配與產業結構轉型對 臺灣民間消費與總體產出之影響」,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》,39(2),51–101。
蕭佳純 (2008),「人口結構變遷下我國終身教育政策之評析」,《教育與社會研究》,第 16 期,105–126。
- 47 -
鍾俊文,蔡旭明 (2009),「高齡與少子化對勞動參與及經濟成長的影響」,《貨幣觀測與 信用評等》,第 77 期,47-74。
鄭保志 (2004a),「教育擴張與工資不均度:台灣男性全職受雇者之年群分析」,《經濟 論文叢刊》, 32:2, p.233-265。
鄭潤道 (2012),「人口高齡化與老人福利措施-韓國經驗的初步分析」,《韓國學報》, 23,320-335。
Büttner, T. and A.Grübler (1995) “The birth of a ‘green’ generation? generational dynamics of resource consumption patterns,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 50, 113– 134.
Brounen, Dirk, Nils Kok and John M. Quigley (2012), “Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics,” European Economic Review, 56.5: 931-945. Cole, M.A. and E. Neumayer ( 2004), “Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution.” Population and Environment, 26 (1), 5–21.
Dietz, Thomas and Eugene A. Rosa (1997), “Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 175–179.
Ehrlich, Paul R. and John P. Holdren (1971), “ The impact of population growth,” Science, 171, 1212–1217.
Fan, Y., L.-C Liu, G.. Wu and Y.-M Wei (2006), “ Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 377–395.
Farzin, Y.H.and C.A. Bond (2006), “Democracy and environmental quality,” Journal of Development Economics, 81 (1), 213–235.
Fougère, Maxime, Jean Mercenier and Marcel Mérette (2007), “A sectoral and occupational analysis of population ageing in Canada using a dynamic CGE overlapping generations model,” Economic Modelling, 24, 690–711.
Glenn, N. D. (2005), Cohort Analysis, 2th edition, California SAGE.
Garau, Giorgio, Patrizio Lecca, and Giovanni Mandras (2013), “The impact of population ageing on energy use: Evidence from Italy,” Economic Modelling, 35: 970-980.
Heijdra, B.J., J.P. Kooiman and J.E. Ligthart (2006), “Environmental quality, the macroeconomy, and intergenerational distribution,” Resource and Energy Economics, 28 (1), 74–105.
Hersch, J. and W.K Viscusi (2006), “The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence,” Climatic Change, 77 (1–2), 121–236.
- 49 -
Hamzan, Neveen and Rose Gilroy (2011), “The challenge to UK energy policy: An ageing population perspective on energy saving measures and consumption,” Energy Policy, 39:782–789.
Israel, D. (2004), “International support for environmental protection,” Environment and Development Economics, 9, 757–780
Israel, D. and A. Levinson (2004), “Willingness to pay for environmental quality: testable empirical implications of the growth and environment literature,” Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 3(1), Article 2.
Jensen, Richard, Steven Lugauer and Clayton Sadler (2012), “An estimate of the age distribution’s Effect on Carbon Dioxide Emissions,” University of Notre Dame Department of Economics Working Paper Series #004.
Kühntopf, Stephan and Thusnelda Tivig (2008), “Vorausberechnung der Anzahl und Struktur privater Haushalte in Deutschland, Hamburg und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern bis 2030,” University of Rostock, Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory No 92.
Kronenberg, Tobias (2009), “The impact of demographic change on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Germany,” Ecological Economics, 68.10: 2637-2645.
Liddle, B., & Lung, S. (2010), “Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts,” Population and Environment, 31(5), 317-343.
Liddle, B. (2013), “ Consumption-driven environmental impact and age structure change in OECD countries: A cointegration-STIRPAT analysis,” Demographic Research, 24: 749770.
Liddle, B. (2014), “ Impact of population, age structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions/energy consumption: evidence from macro-level, cross-country analyses,” Population and Environment, 35.3: 286-304.
Menz, Tobias and Heinz Welsch (2012), “ Population aging and carbon emissions in OECD
- 50 -
countries: Accounting for life-cycle and cohort effects,” Energy Economics, 34, 842–849.
O’Neill, Brian C. and Belinda S. Chen (2002), “ Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States,” Population and Development Review, 28, 53–88.
Rehdanz, K. (2007), “ Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Germany,” Energy Economics, 29 (2), 167–182.
Shi, A. (2003), “The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1976– 1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data,” Ecological Economics, 44 (1), 29–42.
Schröder, Carsten, Katrin Rehdanz, Daiju Narita and Toshihiro Okubo (2013), “ Household formation and residential energy demand: Evidence from Japan,” No. 1836. Kiel Working Paper.
Thalmann, P. (2004), “ The public acceptance of green taxes: 2 million voters express their opinion,” Public Choice, 119, 179–217.
Willis, K., Scarpa, R., Gilroy, R., & Hamza, N. (2011), “ Renewable energy adoption in an ageing population: heterogeneity in preferences for micro-generation technology adoption,” Energy Policy, 39(10), 6021-6029.
Yamasaki, E. and N.Tominaga (1997), “ Evolution of an aging society and effect on residential energy demand,” Energy Policy, 25 (11), 903–912.
York, R., E.A.Rosa and T. Dietz (2003), “ STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts,” Ecological Economics, 46, 351– 365.
York, R. (2007), “ Demographic trends and energy consumption in European Union Nations, 1960–2025,” Social Science Research, 36, 855–872. |