App圖標設計屬性與圖標特性之關聯性探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：39

、訪客IP：3.23.101.60

姓名

林佳陞(Chia-Sheng Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

App圖標設計屬性與圖標特性之關聯性探討
(A Study on the Relation Between App Icon Design Attributes and Icon Traits)

相關論文

★ 以破壞性創新理論分析中國山寨產業--以手機產業為例	★ 初探線上遊戲對未來領導力的影響
★ 研究機構之開放創新模式－以工研院為例	★ 影響個人在虛擬社群環境中知識分享因素之探討
★ Wiki使用者與使用行為之研究	★ 醫療院所科技化服務創新與組織能力關係之研究
★ 社會網路服務網站的利益—以Facebook為例	★ 協同寫作工具對寫作成效的影響
★ 部落格之網路口碑評比機制平台管理與應用	★ 虛擬貨幣交易平台之實現
★ 數位匯流創新經營模式研究 - 以台灣電信業者為例	★ SNS遊戲影響社會網路服務持續使用之探討
★ 網路團體購物之使用者行為分析	★ 探討微網誌使用者持續使用意圖之研究
★ 如何透過Facebook成員轉送線上內容來行銷？	★ 臉書看世界，你!Travel了嗎

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著行動網路的蓬勃發展，人們所使用的智慧型裝置從固定位置變成隨身攜帶，相關應用軟體的開發也持續延燒，APP更大幅度改變人們的生活態度與方式。如何能在數以萬計同類型的App中脫穎而出，讓使用者選擇優先下載，App圖標即成為十分關鍵的角色！畢竟圖標是使用者下載App時最先接觸到的視覺刺激，也可以說是第一印象，不僅難以抹滅更有著深遠的影響。

本研究將針對使用過智慧型手持裝置且下載過任何App的使用者，在不同App的類別下，App的圖標設計屬性的排序與圖標特性之間的關聯性。藉由相關文獻，以型態辨識的屬性區別理論為基礎，提出了五種圖標設計屬性（活躍性、平衡性、複雜性、深度性、有機性）針對十二項App類別（動作街機遊戲、益智遊戲、休閒遊戲、娛樂、工具、通訊、生產應用、個人化、音樂與音效、社交、媒體與影片、旅遊與地方）進行辨識、情感影響、主觀熟悉度、支配性、意義性等圖標特性的研究與分析。

本研究透過實驗設計方法發現，圖標設計屬性中屬活躍性最具吸引力，設計圖標時可將此屬性列入考量，而複雜性與平衡性則相對不受歡迎，表示使用者對於看不懂或較單調的圖標興趣較低。同時根據研究發現，所有的圖標特性均會影響圖標設計屬性的排序，僅有辨識此特性在長時間下幾乎不會影響排序。而辨識在短時間内，部分App類別也不會影響排序，但受到影響的App類別大多是下載率排序較高的類別。足以可見圖標特性對於使用者而言是極具影響力的。

摘要(英)

With vigorous development of the mobile network comes the evolving of smart devices from fixed-line ones to portable ones. The development of related application programs keeps growing furiously. Apps greatly change people’s lifestyle and life attitude. An app icon plays a crucial role when it comes to making an app stand out from millions of other similar ones to make that app more preferable for users to download. An icon is, after all, the very first visual stimulation that users receive when they download an app. An icon can be taken as the first impression of an app; it is indelible and has a profound influence as well.

Targeting users who have used handheld smart devices and downloaded any apps, this study focuses on the relevance between app design attributes’ ranking and icon traits in different categories of apps. Through organizing and studying related literature and on the base of the theory of Feature Discrimination Theory, this study presents five sorts of icon design attributes（activity, balance, complexity, depth and organic） and focuses on twelve app categories（arcade game, brain game, casual game, entertainment, tools, communication, productivity, personalization, music and audio, social, media and video, and travel and local） to perform research and provide analyses on the icon traits such as identification, influence of feelings, subjective familiarity, dominance and significance.

Through experimental design methodology, this study discovers that in all icon design attributes, activity is the most attractive one. This attribute can be taken into consideration when designing icons. Complexity and balance, however, are relatively not popular. This result shows that users have lower interests in the icons whose meanings are hard to understand or whose appearances are tedious. Furthermore, this study finds that all icon traits would influence the ranking of icon design attributes. Only identification would hardly influence the ranking in a long period of time. The ranking of some app categories, however, would not be influenced by identification in a short period of time, and those categories that would be influenced are the ones with higher download rates. This finding thus shows that iconic traits are profoundly influential to users.

關鍵字(中)

★ 圖標設計屬性
★ App圖標
★ 實驗法
★ 屬性區別理論
★ 無母數分析

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

論文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝辭 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 3
1.3 研究目的 4
第二章文獻探討 5
2.1 圖標 5
2.2 型態辨識 5
2.2.1 模版比對理論 6
2.2.2 雛型識別論 6
2.2.3 屬性區別理論 6
2.3 圖標設計屬性 7
2.3.1 活躍性 7
2.3.2 平衡性 8
2.3.3 複雜性 8
2.3.4 深度性 8
2.3.5 有機性 9
2.3.6 比例性 9
2.3.7 代表性 10
2.3.8 對稱性 10
2.4 辨識 10
2.5 情感影響 11
2.6 主觀熟悉度 12
2.7 支配性 12
2.8 意義性 13
第三章研究方法 14
3.1 App類別選擇 14
3.2 設計屬性 16
3.3 圖標設計 18
3.4 屬性測試 18
3.5 實驗設計 26
3.5.1 實驗對象與組別 26
3.5.2 實驗方式與準備 26
3.5.3 問卷內容 27
3.5.4 實驗專有名詞之操作型定義 28
3.6 實驗流程 28
3.6.1 實驗I–辨識 28
3.6.2 實驗II–情感影響 29
3.6.3 實驗III–主觀熟悉度 29
3.6.4 實驗IV–支配性 30
3.6.5 實驗V–意義性 30
3.6.6 實驗VI–排序 30
第四章資料分析 32
4.1 問卷內容效度 32
4.2 樣本特性描述 32
4.3 人口統計變數分析 34
4.4 實驗I–辨識之分析 77
4.4.1 正確辨識相關分析 77
4.4.2 錯誤辨識相關分析 80
4.5 實驗II–情感影響之分析 83
4.6 實驗III–主觀熟悉度之分析 85
4.7 實驗IV–支配性之分析 87
4.8 實驗V–意義性之分析 89
4.9 實驗VI–排序之分析 91
4.9.1 弗里德曼檢定 91
4.9.2 魏克森符號等級檢定 94
第五章結論 101
5.1 研究結論與發現 101
5.2 研究貢獻 103
5.2.1 學術研究 104
5.2.2 實務領域 104
5.3 研究限制與建議 105
參考文獻 107

參考文獻

拓墣產業研究所Topology Research Institute, 2011：智慧手機ASP大幅下滑拓墣：2012年平價竄起。2011年10月26日, 取自 http://www.topology.com.tw/DataContent/release/%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E6%89%8B%E6%A9%9FASP%E5%A4%A7%E5%B9%85%E4%B8%8B%E6%BB%91++%E6%8B%93%E5%A2%A3%EF%BC%9A2012%E5%B9%B4%E5%B9%B3%E5%83%B9%E7%AB%84%E8%B5%B7/393
資策會FIND, 2014：智慧型行動裝置普及率近7成市場即將飽和！資策會FIND：行動族群半年增加逾100萬人、全臺滑世代破1,432萬, 2014/12/29, 取自http://www.find.org.tw/market_info.aspx?n_ID=8303
Alario, F-X., & Ferrand, L., 1999, “A set of 400 pictures standardized for french: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), pp. 531-552
Android Developer Blog, 2011: A closer look at 10 billion downloads, 2011/12/08, from http://android-developers.blogspot.tw/2011/12/closer-look-at-10-billion-downloads.html
App Annie, 2016: App Annie 2015 Retrospective — Monetization Opens New Frontiers, 2016/01/20, from http://blog.appannie.com/app-annie-2015-retrospective/
App Annie, 2015: App Annie Index: Market Q3 2015, 2015/10/14, from http://blog.appannie.com/app-annie-index-market-q3-2015/
App Annie, 2014: Taiwan App Annie Index December 2014, 2014/01/27, from http://blog.appannie.com/tw-taiwan-app-annie-index-december-2014/
Apple Press Info, 2015: App Store Rings in 2015 with New Records, 2015/01/08, from http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2015/01/08App-Store-Rings-in-2015-with-New-Records.html
Ashcraft, M. H., 1993, Human Memory and Cognition, HarperCollins College Publishers, New York
Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F., 1973, “Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition”, Attention and Performance IV, pp. 583-612
Berlyne, D. E., 1971, Aesthetics and psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Bevlin, M. E., 1994, Design through discovery: An introduction to art and design, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth
Biel, A. L., 1992, “How Brand Image Drives Brand Equity”, Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), pp. 6-12
Block, C. E., 1969, “Symbolic branding: The problem of mistaken identity with design marks”, The Trademark Reporter, 59(6), pp. 399-413
Bornstein, R. F., 1989, “Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987”, Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), pp. 265-289
Bradley, S., 2010: Dominance: Creating Focal Points In Your Design, 2010/02/01, from http://www.vanseodesign.com/web-design/dominance/
Buswell, G. T., 1935, How people look at pictures, University of Chicago Press., Chicago
Chatterjee, R., & Eliasberg, J., 1990, “The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population: A micromodeling approach”, Management Science, 36(9), pp. 1057-1079
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook M. B., 2001, “The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty”, Journal of Marketing, 65(2), pp. 81-93
Clark, V., 1988, “Strategies: Identify yourself”, Canadian Business, 61, pp. 21-22
Comscore, 2012: ComScore reports july 2012 U.S. mobile subscriber market share, 2012/09/04, from http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2012/9/comScore_Reports_July_2012_US_Mobile_Subscriber_Market_Share
Crowley, & Elizabeth, A., 1990, The Golden Section: An Information- Theoretic Approach to Understanding Two-Sided Persuasion, University of Texas at Austin, Ph.D.Thesis
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O., 1963, “An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts”, Management Science, 9(3), pp. 458-467
Dondis, D. A., 1973, A primer of visual literacy, The MIT Press, Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Durgee, J. F., & Stuart, R. W., 1987, “Advertising symbols and brand names that best Represent Key product meanings”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(3), pp. 15-24
Edell, J. A., & Staelin, R., 1983, “The information processing of pictures in print advertisements”, Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), pp. 45-61
Foster, P. R., & Kozak, M. R., 1986, “Characteristics of a model industrial technology education field experience”, Technology Teacher, 46(2), pp. 23-26
Galotti, K. M., 2013, Cognitive psychology: in and out of the laboratory, 5th, SAGE Publications, USA
Gartner Newsroom, 2013: Gartner Says Mobile App Stores Will See Annual Downloads Reach 102 Billion in 2013, 2013/09/19, from111111111111111111111111111111111111 http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2592315
Gartner Newsroom, 2016: Gartner Says Global Smartphone Sales to Only Grow 7 Per Cent in 2016, 2016/03/31, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3270418
Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., Das, S., & Dellarocas, C., 2005, “The Firm’s Management of Social Interactions”, Marketing Letters, 16(3), pp. 415-428
Goonetilleke, R. S., Shih, H. M., On, H. K., & Fritsch, J., 2001, “Effects of training and representational characteristics in icon design”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(5), pp. 741-760
Hammitt, W. E., 1981, “The familiarity‐preference component of on‐site recreational experiences”, Leisure Sciences, 4(2), pp. 177-193
Heer, P. M., Farquhar, P. H., & Fazio, R. H., 1993, “Using dominance measures to evaluate brand extensions”, Marketing Science Institute, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, pp. 93-120
Henderson, P. W., & Cote, J. A., 1998, “Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos”, The Journal of Marketing, 62(2), pp. 14-30
Hilliard, J. E., Kropp, H. R., & French, W. A., 1990, “Trademark management - not brand management”, Business, 40, pp. 17-24
Horton, W. K., 1994, The icon book: Visual symbols for computer systems and documentation, John Wiley, & Sons, New York
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M., 1981, “On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), pp. 306-340
Jeong, E. H., & Jang, S. C., 2011, “Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth（eWOM） motivations”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), pp. 356-366
Koen, F., 1969, Verbal and nonverbal mediators in recognition memory for complex visual stimuli, Office of Education Report, Washington D.C
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Alpert, N. M., 1997, “Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: a positron emission tomography study”, NeuroImage, 6, pp. 320-334
Krathwohl, D. R., 1993, Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach, Longman, New York
Larsen, A., & Bundesen, C., 1996, “A template-matching pandemonium recognizes unconstrained handwritten characters with high accuracy”, Memory, & Cognition, 24(2), pp. 136-143
Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A., 1977, Human Information Processing : Introduction to Psychology, Academic Press, New York
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M., 1975, The delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley
Lunardo, R., & Mbengue, A., 2009, “Perceived control and shopping behavior: The moderating role of the level of utilitarian motivational orientation”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Behavior, 16(6), pp. 434-441
Masten, D. L., 1988, “Logo′s power depends on how well it communicates with target market”, Marketing News, 22(25), pp. 20
Marcus, A., 1992, Graphics design for electronic documents and user interfaces, ACM Press, New York
McKinsey Global Institute, 2013: Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy, 2013/05, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/disruptive-technologies
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A., 1974, “The basic emotional impact of environments”, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38(1), pp. 283-301
Messaris, P., 1997, Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising, SAGA Publications
Millennial Media, 2015: 2015 State of the Apps Industry Snapshot, 2015/01/22, from http://www.millennialmedia.com/mobile-insights/industry-research/2015-state-of-the-apps-industry-snapshot
Millward Brown, 2014: Marketing in a multiscreen world, 2014/03/17, from https://www.millwardbrown.com/adreaction/2014/report/Millward-Brown_AdReaction-2014_Global.pdf
Mirzoeff, N., 2002, The Visual Culture Reader, Psychology Press, New York
Neisser, U., 1967, Cognitive Psychology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Nelson, K. E., 1971, “Memory development in children: Evidence from nonverbal tasks”, Psychonomic Science, 25(6), pp. 346-348
Nemett, B., 1992, Images, objects, and ideas: Viewing the visual arts, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers
Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A., 1993, “The role of formal art training on perception and Aesthetics judgment of art composition”, Leonardo, 26(3), pp. 219-227
Olavarrieta, S., & Friedmann, R., 2007, “Logo selection and modification guidelines: An empirical international validation in chile”, Estudios De Administración, 14(1), pp. 1-21
Peter, J., 1987, “Designing logos”, Folio: The Magazine for Magazine Management, 18(7), pp. 139-141
Pew Research Center, 2015: Chapter 1: The Majority of Smartphone Owners Download Apps, 2015/11/10, from111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/11/10/the-majority-of-smartphone-owners-download-apps/
Potter, M. C., 1976, “Short-term conceptual memory for pictures”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), pp. 509-522
Radach, R., Vorstius, C., & Radach, K., 2001, “Eye Movements in the processing of advertisements: effects of pragmatic complexity”, 11th European Conference on eye movements, Turku, Finland, August 22-25
Rieber, L. P., 1995, “A historical review of visualisation in human cognitionEducational technology”, Research and Development, 43(1), pp. 45-56
Solso, R. L., MacLin, O. H., & MacLin, M. K., 2008, Cognition psychology, 8th, Pearson
Robertson, K., 1989, “Strategically desirable brand name characteristics”, Journal of Consumer Marketin, 6(4), pp. 61-71
Rogers, Y., 1989, “Icons at the interface: Their usefulness”, Interacting with Computers, 1(1), pp. 105-117
Schechter, I., 1994, “Logo Value Survey”, Proprietary Research Report
Schmitt, B. H., Simonson, A., & Marcus, J., 1995, “Managing corporate image and identity”, Long Range Planning, 28(5), pp. 82-92
Seifert, L. S., 1992, “Pictures as a means of conveying information”, The Journal of General Psychology, 119(3), pp. 279-287
Selfridge, O. G., & Neisser, U., 1960, “Pattern recognition by machine”, Scientific American, 203(2), pp. 60-68
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O′Donoghue T., 2002, “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review”, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), pp. 351-401
Statista, 2016: Number of available applications in the Google Play Store from December 2009 to February 2016, 2016/05/10, from http://www.statista.com/statistics/266210/number-of-available-applications-in-the-google-play-store/
Statista, 2016: Most popular Google Play app categories in February 2014, by device installs, 2016/05/10, from11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 http://www.statista.com/statistics/279286/distribution-of-worldwide-google-play-app-downloads-by-category/
Thoma, V., & Williams, A., 2013, “The devil you know: The effect of brand recognition and product ratings on consumer choice”, Judgment, & Decision Making, 8(1), pp. 34-44
Tversky, A., 1977, “Features of similarity”, Psychological Review, 84(4), pp. 327-352
Vartorella, W., 1990, “Doing the bright thing with your company logo”, Advertising Age, 61(2), pp. 31
Veryzer, Jr. R. W., 1993, “Aesthetic Response and the Influence of Design Principles on Product Preferences”, Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), pp. 224-228
Ward, J. C., & Barnes, J. W., 2001, “Control and affect: The influence of feeling in control of the retail environment on affect, involvement, attitude, and behavior”, Journal of Business Research, 54(2), pp. 139-144
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A., 2002, “Habits in Everyday Life: Thought, Emotion, and Action”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), pp. 1281-1297
West, C. K., Farmer, J. A., & Wolff, P. M., 1991, Instructional Design: Implications From Cognitive Science, Prentice Hall College Div, Englewood Cliffs
Westbrook, R. A., 1987, “Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes”, Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), pp. 258-270
Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M., 2002, “Binding in short-term visual memory”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), pp. 48-64
Yan, R., 2011, “Icon design study in computer interface”, Procedia Engineering, 15, pp. 3134-3138
Zajonc, R. B., 1968, “Attitudinal effects of mere exposure”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2P2), pp. 1-27
Zeithaml, V. A., 1988, “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-end Model and Synthesis of Evidence”, Journal of marketing, 52(3), pp. 2-22

指導教授

粟四維(Wesley Shu)

審核日期

2016-7-6

推文