員工與部門主管互動關係對於其績效管理制度執行效能認知影響之研究－以A公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：61

、訪客IP：18.118.144.98

姓名

黃楚涵(Chu-Han Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

員工與部門主管互動關係對於其績效管理制度執行效能認知影響之研究－以A公司為例
(The research on the perceived on performance management implementation efficiency cognition effect between the effect of interaction on employees and department executives)

相關論文

★ 企業內部人力資源入口網站使用者滿意度調查–以A公司為例	★ 員工內部行銷知覺、組織承諾與離職傾向之關係研究─以某科技公司為例
★ 研發人員創造力人格特質、工作價值觀對工作績效之影響-以某高科技研究機構為例	★ 組織生涯管理對組織承諾影響之探討-以A公司為例
★ 導入以職能為基礎之評鑑中心可行性研究－－以銀行業為例	★ 360 度管理職能評鑑與受評者自我覺察能力之探討－個案公司跨年度研究
★ 探討中階主管人格特質、領導風格與工作績效之關聯性--以Y公司為例	★ 因應公司經營策略變革之人力資源配置調整個案探討
★ 從組織變革觀點探討業務流程管理成效之個案研究	★ 主管領導風格與員工人格特質對工作績效之影響
★ 矩陣式組織之專案績效考核制度探討-以某公司為例	★ 企業因應員工分紅費用化之措施及其成效探討
★ 證券後勤基層主管職業生涯地圖之建立	★ 企業導入卓越經營績效評量之案例探討
★ 主管領導風格對組織氣候與績效之影響探討-以T公司為例	★ 人力資源管理措施對工作態度之影響探討-以台灣高鐵為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

績效管理的核心本是通過溝通對話與輔導的行為來提升員工能力、發展員工的潛能，從評核員工定期的工作成果轉而關注員工工作的行為表現，進而透過回饋而改善其績效表現，並把績效管理視為一個持續循環性的經營管理模式，從整體流程來看，其相關活動無法由人力資源部門獨立執行完成，應需要與部門主管合作，其為績效管理制度的使用者，若這些實務措施能夠發揮其效能，那麼部門主管也會是最直接的受益者，若能與其成為夥伴關係，一來能協助組織達成營運的目標，二來則能使其成為人資部門最好的後援者。
　　本研究選擇高科技產業半導體設備公司做為個案研究對象，欲了解此產業之標竿企業在績效管理的應用為何，針對一般員工發放問卷，共回收205份有效問卷。本研究探討員工與部門主管互動變項包括「員工對部門主管的信任」、「員工與主管溝通」，以及「主管授權程度」對於該公司績效管理制度的「目標設定」、「評估標準」、「評價回饋」及「獎酬連結」的認知程度之影響程度。
　　研究結果顯示，整體來說員工與主管的互動狀況是明顯會對於績效管理制度的認知產生影響的，另外從員工互動狀況的評分中可看出，信任與溝通較授權此構面低，可顯示出此公司文化較偏向自由與彈性。

摘要(英)

The core of performance management is through communication and counseling behavior to enhance staff capacity and the development of the potential of employees, from the assessment of staff work on a regular basis to pay attention to the behavior of staff performance, and then improve its performance through evaluation. Performance management as a continuous cycle of business management, viewing the overall process, its related activities cannot be completed by the independent implementation of the human resources department, should be in line with the department executives, the performance management system for users, if these practical measures to play its effectiveness, then the department executives will be the most the direct beneficiaries, if they can become partners, it could help organize the objectives of the operation, secondly, to make it the best back-up for the human resources sector.
For the application of the benchmark enterprise in performance management, this study selected semiconductor industry as a case study object. A total of 205 valid questionnaires were collected for the general staff. This study examine the degree of awareness of the relationship between employee and department executives, including "Trust", "Communication”, and " Authorization" for the company′s performance management system, including "Target setting", "Assessment criteria", "Evaluation" and "Link with compensation".
The findings are the interaction between the staff and the supervisor as a whole is clearly affected by the cognition of the performance management system. In addition, it can be seen from the score of the employee interaction status that the trust and communication are lower than the authorization. This show that corporate culture is more biased towards freedom and flexibility.

關鍵字(中)

★ 人力資源
★ 部門主管
★ 績效管理
★ 信任
★ 溝通
★ 授權
★ 目標設定
★ 評估標準與方法
★ 評價回饋
★ 獎酬連結

關鍵字(英)

★ Human resources
★ department executives
★ performance management
★ trust
★ communication
★ authorization
★ goal setting
★ assessment criteria
★ evaluation
★ link with compensation

論文目次

中文摘要v
英文摘要vi
圖目錄ix
表目錄x
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景與動機1
第二節研究目的2
第三節論文架構3
第二章文獻探討4
第一節績效管理之定義、目的與程序4
第二節認知的相關研究12
第三節員工與主管互動關係之研究 (信任、溝通、賦權)13
第四節員工與主管互動對績效管理制度執行效能認知影響16
第三章研究設計與方法19
第一節研究流程19
第二節研究架構20
第三節研究假設21
第四節研究設計、變數操作與衡量方法22
第五節個案公司簡介與產業角色24
第六節個案公司績效管理制度介紹26
第四章資料分析與結果37
第一節回收樣本基本資料分析37
第二節個案公司之員工與部門主管互動及員工對績效管理制度執行效能認知現況分析39
第三節相關分析40
第四節各研究變項的影響關係：多元迴歸分析41
第五節假設驗證與歸納47
第五章結論與建議48
第一節研究發現48
第二節管理意涵49
第三節研究限制、後續研究與建議49
參考文獻51
附錄55

參考文獻

中文文獻
〔1〕李誠（2002）。人力資源管理的十二堂課。台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
〔2〕許承宏、蔡秉義、陳柏州（2003）。書寫系統與認知結構：認知心理學與神經
〔3〕張春興（2003）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
〔4〕徐佳士（1987）。「大眾傳播理論」。台北：正中書局。
〔5〕陳皎眉（2004）。人際關係與人際溝通（初版）。台北：雙葉。
〔6〕謝文全（1990）。教育行政理論與實務。台北：文景。
〔7〕塗崇俊（1977）。國民中學校長－教師溝通問題研究。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。

外文文獻
〔1〕 Armstrong, M. (1994). Performance management, Kogan Pages.
〔2〕 Armstrong, M. & Baron, A. (1999). Performance Management: The New　Realities. London：Institute of Personnel and Development.
〔3〕 Ashforth, B.E.(1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 207-242.
〔4〕 Berman, E. L. (2000). Look to Internal Customers for Satisfaction,Industrial Management, 42(6), 5.
〔5〕 Bentley, T. (2006,April).Managing Performance. Training Journal, 20-25.
〔6〕 Beer, M. (1982). Performance appraisal: Dilemmas and possibilities, Organizational Dynamics, 9(3), 24-36.
〔7〕 Bryant, B. F., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A New Model of Positive Experience. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
〔8〕 Daft﹐R. L. (1995). Organization Theory and Design, Fifth Edition. St Paul, MN：West Publishing Company.
〔9〕 Davis, K. (1962). Human Relations at Work. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.344.
〔10〕 DeVries, D. L., Morrison, A. M., Shullman, S. L., & Gerlach, M. L.（1986）.Performance appraisal on th line. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
〔11〕 Downs, C., & Hazen, M. (1977). A factor analysis of communication satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 14, 63-74.
〔12〕 Egan, G. (1995). A clear path to peak performance, People Management,18 May, 34-37.
〔13〕 Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Academy of Management Journal, 12(1), 472-485.
〔14〕 Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R., (1980,Aug). Motivation though the design of work: Test of a theory, Organizational Behavior and human Performance, 250-279.
〔15〕 Herrera, F. (2002). Demystifying employee motivation. Employment Relations Today, 28(4):37-52.
〔16〕 Houldsworth, E.(2007,September),Measuring and Managing Performance.Personnel Today, 24-26.
〔17〕 Laschinger, H.K.S.,& Havens, H.D, (1996). Staff nurse work empowerment and perceived control over nursing practice, condition for work effectives, Journal of　Nursing Administration, 24(10), 38-47.
〔18〕 Locke, E. A. (1978). The ubiquity of the technique of goal setting in theories of and approaches to employee motivation. Academy of Management Review, 3,594-601.
〔19〕 Manz, C. C. & Sims, H.P. Jr. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: the external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-129.
〔20〕 Mathis, R. L. & Jackson, J. H. (1991). Human Resource Management,South-Western Pub, Sixth Edition.
〔21〕 McCauley, D. P. & Kuhnert, K. W. (1992). A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management. Public Administration Quarterly,16(3),265-283.
〔22〕 Meyer, C. (1994). How the right measures help team excel. Harvard Business Review (May-June): 95-103.
〔23〕 Moorman, R. H. (1991), Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 176(6), 845-855.
〔24〕 Noe,R. A. (2002). Employee Training and Development. The McGraw-Hill Companies, 110-111.
〔25〕 Philpott, and Sheppard, L. (1992). Managing for improved performance,in M. Armstrong (ed.) Strategies for Human Resources　Management. London, Kogan, Page.
〔26〕 Spreitzer,G.M.(1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, Measurement. And validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1435.
〔27〕 Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B.A.(1990), Cognitive elements of empowerment:An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation, Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 661-681.
〔28〕 Tornow, W. W.（1993）. Editor’s note：Introduction to special issue on 360-degree feedback. Human Resource Management, 32, 211-219.
〔29〕 Waal, A. A. (2007). Successful Performance Management? Apply the Strategic Performance Management Development Cycle, Measuring Business Excellence, 11(2), 4-11.
〔30〕 Walters, M. (1995). The Performance Management Handbook, London, Institute of Personnel and Development.
〔31〕 Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-74.
〔32〕 Wright, P.M., McMahan, G.C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and Sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2): 301-326.

指導教授

鄭晉昌

審核日期

2017-6-13

推文