| 摘要(英) |
The thesis discusses how to design the plastic hinge relocation of New RC beams. The method of hinge relocation referred basically in according with New Zealand Standard (NZS 3101 2006). The study performed the cyclic load testing on the New RC cantilever beams to verify the validation of the plastic hinge relocation design specified in NZS 3101. Meanwhile, this verification is also to check the application to the New RC beams.
To relocate the plastic hinge a distance away from column face toward the beam middle span, an extra beam bar setting at the beam end will be used. That is, the extra steel bars anchored in both beam and into beam-column joint with t-head bars. The extra t-headed bars extended a length normally equal to beam depth (h_b) from column face. The extra flexural strength according to the detailing of the section is increased up to 40%. Then, the plastic hinge can move away a distance of beam depth (450mm). Totally four 350 mm wide x 450 mm deep New RC are tested, in which two are 2.4 meters and the other two are 1.9 meters long. The longitudinal bars are arranged with three SD690 #8 in the top section and three SD690 #10 in the bottom. Three extra t-headed bars (3-SD690 #8) are placed at the top lower and bottom upper layers, respectfully. The transverse bars are arranged with SD790 #3 and SD790 #4. The concrete compressive strength is about 60 MPa. One beam with 2.4 meter long is control specimen RC beam, called as HR-Y0-L. The other with 2.4 meter long, having plastic hinge relocation of 450 mm away from beam end, is called as HR-Y450-L. The other two beams with 1.9 meters long are control specimen (HR-Y0-S) and hinge relocation specimen (HR-Y450-S).
Test results indicated that all the specimens (HR-Y0-L, HR-Y450-L, HR-Y0-S, and HR-Y450-S) satisfied the minimum seismic performance required by ACI 374.2r-13. The load degradation of all specimens happened at the drift ratio of 6%. Because HR-Y450-L and HR-Y450-S arranged more bars (40% increase in flexure) at the column face, it was observed this two specimens increased 20% in shear strength. Thus the design of the hinge relocation can force the plastic hinge exert in the desired region and prevent the joint failure from occurring. However, plastic hinge length (l_p) and and diagonal shear cracks in plastic hinge relocation beams are longer than control beams. The shear crack pattern at the hinge region presented non-smear x-shape and sliding shear like in the plastic hinge zone when the specimens were loaded until drift ratio reached 6%. So, the bent-up extra bars instead of t-headed bars may be used to prevent the non-smear diagonal shear cracks develop. It is also recommended for New RC beams a more conservative design shear of 1.15M_n/l_(n,R) shall be considered to obtain a higher shear demand, where M_n is nominal flexure strength of prototype beams, and l_(n,R) is a beam structural length accounting from new relocated hinge zone. |
| 參考文獻 |
[1] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI318-14 & Commentary, American Concrete Institute, 2014.
[2] 內政部營建署，「混凝土工程設計規範與解說 (土木401-100)」，民國一百年。
[3] NZS 3101, Concrete Structural Standard, The design of Concrete Structures & Commentary on the Design of Concrete Structures, New Zealand Standard, 2006.
[4] Paulay, T.,& Priestley, M., J., N., 1992, “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings” Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 194-199.
[5] Antonopoulos, C., P., Triantafillou, T., C., 2003, “Experimental Investigation of FRP-Strengthened RC Beam-Column Joints” Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 7, No. 1, February.
[6] Chutarat, N., and Aboutaha, R., S., 2003, “Cyclic Response of Exterior Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints Reinforced with Headed Bars-Experimental Investigation” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 100, No. 2, March-April.
[7] ACI Innovation Task Group 4, Report on Structural Design & Detailing for High Strength Concrete in Moderate to High Seismic Applications, American Concrete Institute (2007).
[8] NIST GCR 14-917-30, Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Earthquake-Resistant Concrete Structures, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014.
[9] Moehle, J., 2015, “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings” McGraw-Hill Education, United States of America, pp. 203-205.
[10] 經濟部標準檢驗局，土木材料及品質管理相關國家標準(CNS規範) 。
[11] 內政部營建署，「混凝土工程施工規範與解說 (土木402-94)」，民國九十五年。
[12] ACI Committee 374, Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary (ACI 374.1-05), American Concrete Institute, 2005.
[13] ACI Committee 374, Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads (ACI374.2R-13), American Concrete Institute, 2013.
[14] 國家地震工程研究中心，「高強度鋼筋混凝土結構設計手冊(初稿) 」，民國一百零四年。
[15] 社團法人台灣混凝土學會，「新高強度鋼筋混凝土技術委員會報告」，民國一百零三年。
[16] 林毅忠，「以T錨錠頭型鋼筋轉移鋼筋混凝土梁柱接頭之梁塑鉸位置」，國立雲林科技大學，碩士論文，指導教授:李宏仁，民國九十六年。
[17] 中國土木水利工程學會混凝土工程委員會，「鋼筋混凝土學 (土木406-100)」，民國九十五年。
[18] Bahjat Abdel-Fattah, Wight J., K., 1987, “Study of Moving Beam Plastic Hinging Zones for Earthquake-Resistant Design of R/C Building” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 84, January-February, pp. 31-39.
[19] 楊政穎，「高拉力SD690鋼筋截斷設計之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，指導教授:王勇智，民國一百零五年。
[20] 何立文，「高強度鋼筋混凝土梁構件耐震設計參數之研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，指導教授:王勇智，民國一百零五年。
[21] 洪立彥，「New RC梁撓曲剪力行為研究」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，指導教授:王勇智，民國一百零三年。 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit