家族企業與企業社會責任之關聯性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：36

、訪客IP：3.142.173.227

姓名

譚英旋(Ying-Syuan Tan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

家族企業與企業社會責任之關聯性
(家族企業與企業社會責任之關聯性)

相關論文

★ 我國中小企業貸款門檻操縱行為分析 -以某銀行授信戶為例	★ 董事會結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性
★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效：台灣上市公司董事會結構論析	★ 國際化對公司經營績效的影響：資訊透明度的中介效果
★ 內部人持股與會計師選擇關聯性之研究-以馬來西亞上市公司為例	★ 利用吸引力因子進行嚴重服務失誤補救之成效
★ 提升企業價值之永續發展策略－以H公司資源回收為例	★ 組織變革對業務人員銷售力的影響-以電子零組件通路商為例
★ 會計保守性與法說會的關聯性	★ 探索產品品牌、品牌個性與人格特質的對應關係
★ 復徵證券交易所得稅對台灣股市之影響	★ 法人說明會對國際化績效與創新的影響
★ 投資人情緒與資訊透明度關聯性之研究	★ 公司股權結構與內部人交易關聯性之研究
★ 分析師是否高估應計項目的價值-兼論其對現金增資偏低訂價之影響	★ 分析師預測與新上市公司新股折價關聯性之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究首先將焦點放於以社會情感財富途徑探討家族企業與非家族企業，對於企業社會責任參與的程度差異；並加入高階經理人身分及併購等變數，探討其與企業社會責任參與程度的關聯性。本研究樣本資料來源主要以台灣經濟新報社(TEJ)以及公開資訊觀測站為主，社會責任參與程度則是以是否公布該年度的社會責任報告書作為指標。根據社會情感財富理論認為，家族企業應比非家族企業更重視企業社會形象、由家族成員擔任高階經理人會比非家族成員更願意投入企業社會責任，以及原生家族會比經過購併的家族更有向心力。研究結果顯示，家族企業投入社會責任的程度比非家族企業高，且由家族成員擔任CEO在企業社會投入的表現較非家族成員擔任CEO來的高，而併購的部分，則是沒有併購過的原生家族其參與社會責任的程度比經過併購的家族高。

摘要(英)

We use a socioemotional wealth explanation for the differences in the degree of corporate social responsibility participation between family and non-family firms. Then we add the high-level managers, acquisitions and other variables to explore its association with the degree of corporate social responsibility participation. Our source is mainly based on the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) and the Market Observation Post System (MOPS). And we use the social responsibility report as an indicator. The results show that family firm will pay more attention on corporate social responsibility than non-family firm, and the participation of who use family members as CEO is higher than using non-family members. The degree of social responsibility participation of the native family is higher than that of the merged firm.

關鍵字(中)

★ 家族企業

關鍵字(英)

★ family-firm

論文目次

第壹章、緒論 1
1-1研究動機 1
1-2研究背景 1
1-3研究目的與貢獻 3
第貳章、文獻回顧與假說 4
2-1家族企業與社會情感財富 4
2-2家族企業與社會責任 7
第參章、研究假設發展 10
第肆章、研究方法 13
4-1抽樣與資料來源 13
4-2家族企業定義 13
4-3研究設計 14
4-4變數預測 17
第伍章、實證結果 19
5-1敘述性統計分析 19
5-2相關係數分析 21
5-3迴歸結果分析 27
第陸章、結論 34
6-1研究結果 34
6-2研究貢獻與限制 35
參考文獻 36

參考文獻

1. 沈中華、張元 (2008). "企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國 FTSE 社會責任指數為例." 經濟論文 36(3): 339-385.

2. 曹壽民、林哲弘 (2012). "家族企業與自願性財務預測." 會計學報 4(2): 71-113.

3. Achleitner, A. K. and C. Figge (2014). "Private equity lemons? Evidence on value creation in secondary buyouts." European Financial Management 20(2): 406-433.

4. Amin, M., et al. (2004). "Effects of moisture content on some physical properties of lentil seeds." Journal of Food Engineering 65(1): 83-87.

5. Anderson, R. C. and D. M. Reeb (2003). "Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500." The journal of finance 58(3): 1301-1328.

6. Arregle, J. L., et al. (2007). "The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms." Journal of management studies 44(1): 73-95.

7. Bacon, D., et al. (1973). "The effect of dislocation self-interaction on the Orowan stress." Philosophical Magazine 28(6): 1241-1263.

8. Beaty, T. H., et al. (2010). "A genome-wide association study of cleft lip with and without cleft palate identifies risk variants near MAFB and ABCA4." Nature genetics 42(6): 525-529.

9. Berrone, P., et al. (2012). "Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research." Family Business Review 25(3): 258-279.

10. Berrone, P., et al. (2010). "Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?" Administrative science quarterly 55(1): 82-113.

11. Carroll, A. B. (1999). "Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct." Business & society 38(3): 268-295.

12. Corbetta, G. and C. Salvato (2004). "Self‐serving or self‐actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non‐family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28(4): 355-362.

13. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., et al. (2007). "Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills." Administrative science quarterly 52(1): 106-137.

14. Pazzaglia, F., et al. (2013). "Earnings quality in acquired and nonacquired family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective." Family Business Review 26(4): 374-386.

15. Schulze, W. S., et al. (2003). "Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms." Journal of business venturing 18(4): 473-490.

16. Sharma, P. and S. Manikutty (2005). "Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture." Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(3): 293-311.

17. Stanwick, P. A. and S. D. Stanwick (1998). "The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination." Journal of business ethics 17(2): 195-204.

18. Wood, D. J. (1991). "Corporate social performance revisited." Academy of management review 16(4): 691-718.

19. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce (1989). "Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model." Journal of management 15(2): 291-334.

20. Hirigoyen, G. and T. Poulain-Rehm (2014). "The corporate social responsibility of family businesses: An international approach." International Journal of Financial Studies 2(3): 240-265.

指導教授

曹壽民(SHOUMIN-TSAO)

審核日期

2017-6-27

推文