以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：53

、訪客IP：3.15.34.122

姓名	陳薇(Wei Chen)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	資訊管理學系
論文名稱	(Do second-hand shoppers really care about these common attributes?)
相關論文	★ 網站設計探討—以國內外連鎖飯店集團為例 ★ 智慧型手機使用者介面與消費者態度之關聯 ★ 零售業全通路策略分析 -以Family Mart為例 ★ 應用服務藍圖及顧客旅程優化汽車租賃業之服務流程: 以某汽車租賃業為例 ★ 顧客對折扣促銷的評價－探討商店定價策略、促銷語意線索與折扣深度對消費者認知的影響 ★ 網路拍賣中外部線索的一致性:在不同的資訊不對稱程度下，起始價格以及賣方聲譽對於拍賣結果影響之探討。 ★ 影響金融服務業之多重通路使用者評估通路整合性的因素 ★ 影響網路口碑行為意圖之因素分析 ★ 在多通路環境中，實體通路的存在如何影響顧客決策 ★ 混合情緒操控與間接體驗產品途徑對消費者之影響－以創新產品為主 ★ 服務業不同廣告型式的效果如何受消費者性別及代言人類型而改變 ★ 消費者於多通路環境下之跨通路搭便車行為之決定因素 ★ 如何撰寫較好的網路口碑 ★ 探討線上環境中互動與故事對廣告效果之影響 ★ 不同決策特質與搜尋時間壓力下部落格設計與使用者滿意度之探討 ★ 主購社群關係與主購經驗分享對網路合購行為因素影響之探討
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中)	二手購物行為已經盛行數十年。每一個人都能夠當二手購物的買家或是賣家，但每個人會去二手市場上購物的動機不盡相同。根據過去的研究指出，當二手買家再考慮要不要購買時，會因以下四項商品屬性而影響決策：商品的資訊、價格、稀有性和商品的故事。在某些情況下，消費者會選擇購買資訊較不充足的商品；而在某些情形下，人們會願意在交易中捨棄一點自己的金錢利益。另外，在市場上，商品的稀有性一直都是個會吸引消費者做購買的因素，也有學者提出，商品的故事性會引領消費者有不同的購買決策。因此，本篇研究的目的是探索出各類型動機的買家會在意哪些商品屬性。研究方法採用量化與訪談，並以手錶這類型產品作為情境實驗的商品。此研究發現，經濟動機的買家會受到價格影響，並且是低經濟動機的買家會因低價而較願意做購買。另一方面，高娛樂動機的買家在無商品故事性的情形下較願意做購買。
摘要(英)	Second-hand shopping has been a trend of shopping. Everyone can be either a second-hand buyer or a seller, however the motivation of shoppers is different when buying second-hand products. According to prior research, when considering buy or not, people are influenced by information of products, price, scarcity and even story of products. In some cases, people would choose the product with not enough information; in other cases, people would abandon personal monetary benefits when having the transactions. Also, scarcity always is an attractive element for consumers in the markets and some researchers proposed that story of products can influence consumers’ consideration when making the decisions. Therefore, the main purpose is to explore that which kind of motivations second-hand shoppers have are influenced by those common attributes of products. Both the qualitative and quantitative research methods are used, and in this study, watch is the kind of products chosen to designed in the situational experiment. There are two main findings. First, when second-hand shoppers have economic motivation, their purchasing intension will be influenced by price. Especially, second-hand shoppers who have low economic motivation are more willing to buy second-hand products than others when the price of products is low. The second one is when second-hand shoppers have high recreational motivation, their purchasing intension will increase in no story designed condition.
關鍵字(中)	★ 二手購物 ★ 購物動機 ★ 購物者 ★ 娛樂型購物	關鍵字(英)	★ Second-hand shopping ★ Shopping motivation ★ Shoppers ★ Recreational shopping
論文目次	摘要............................................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. III 誌謝.............................................................................................................IV 目錄............................................................................................................................... V 圖目錄..........................................................................................................................VI 表目錄........................................................................................................................ VII 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND...........................................................................4 2.1. SECOND-HAND CONSUMPTION .................................................................................4 2.1.1. PRICE ....................................................................................................................4 2.1.2. STORY OF PRODUCT ..............................................................................................4 2.1.3. PRODUCT INFORMATION .......................................................................................6 2.1.4. SCARCITY..............................................................................................................7 2.2. MOTIVATIONS OF SECOND-HAND SHOPPER .............................................................7 2.2.1. CRITICAL MOTIVATION..........................................................................................8 2.2.2. ECONOMIC MOTIVATION .......................................................................................9 2.2.3. RECREATIONAL MOTIVATION................................................................................9 2.2.4. FASHION MOTIVATION.........................................................................................11 3. METHOD ................................................................................................................13 3.1. QUANTITATIVE STUDY...........................................................................................13 3.2.QUALITATIVE STUDY..............................................................................................18 4. DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULT ........................................................................19 5. DISCUSSION..........................................................................................................29 6. CONCLUSION AND LIMITATION......................................................................33 REFERENCE: .............................................................................................................35 APPENDIX 1...............................................................................................................38 APPENDIX 2...............................................................................................................38 APPENDIX 3...............................................................................................................39 APPENDIX 4...............................................................................................................39 APPENDIX 5...............................................................................................................40
參考文獻	[1]. Amaldoss, W. and Jain, S., 2005, “Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking,” Management Science, 51, 1449-1466. [2]. Anderson, S. P., and Ginsburgh, V. A., 1994, “Price discrimination via second-hand markets,” European Economic Review, 38(1), 23-44. [3]. Arsel, Z., and Thompson, C. J., 2011, “Demythologizing consumption practices: how consumers protect their field-dependent identity investments from devaluing marketplace myths,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 791-806. [4]. Bardhi, F., and Arnould, E. J., 2005, “Thrift shopping: combining utilitarian thrift and hedonic treat benefits,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(4), 223-233. [5]. Becker, G. S., 1976, “The economic approach to human behavior Chicago: University of Chi cago.” [6]. Belk, R. W., Sherry Jr, J. F., and Wallendorf, M., 1988, “A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behavior at a swap meet,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 449-470. [7]. Bettman, J. R., 1979, “Information processing theory of consumer choice,” Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. [8]. Brough, A. R., and Isaac, M. S., 2012, “Finding a home for products we love: how buyer usage intent affects the pricing of used goods,” Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 78-91. [9]. Cervellon, M. C., Carey, L., and Harms, T., 2012, “Something old, something used: determinants of women′s purchase of vintage fashion vs second-hand fashion,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(12), 956-974. [10]. Cowan, N., 2000, “The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity,” Behavior Brain Science, 24, 87-185. [11]. DeLong, M., Heinemann, B., and Reiley, K., 2005, “Hooked on vintage!” Fashion Theory, 9(1), 23-42. [12]. Ehrich, K. R., and Irwin, J. R., 2005, “Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 266-277. [13]. Eisend, M., 2008, “Explaining the impact of scarcity appeals in advertising: the mediating role of perceptions of susceptibility,” Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 33-40. [14]. Escalas, J. E., 2004, “Narrative processing: building consumer connections to brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 168-180. [15]. Ferraro, C., Sands, S., and Brace-Govan, J., 2016, “The role of fashionability in second-hand shopping motivations,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 262-268. [16]. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D., 1981, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable 35 variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. [17]. Gerrig, R. J., 1993, “Experiencing narrative worlds: on the psychological activities of reading,” Yale University Press. [18]. Green, M. C., and Brock, T. C., 2000, “The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701. [19]. Gregson, N., and Crewe, L., 1997, “The bargain, the knowledge, and the spectacle: making sense of consumption in the space of the car-boot sale,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(1), 87-112. [20]. Gruber, V., Schlegelmilch, B. B., and Houston, M. J., 2014, “Inferential evaluations of sustainability attributes: exploring how consumers imply product information,” Psychology & Marketing, 31(6), 440-450. [21]. Guiot, D., and Roux, D., 2010, “A second-hand shopper’ motivation scale: antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers,” Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 355-371. [22]. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L., 2006, Multivariate data analysis 6th edition, “Pearson prentice hall. new jersey. humans: critique and reformulation,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49-74. [23]. Halliday, J., 2004, “Auto industry pushes prints creative limits,” Automotive News, 78(6085), 38. [24]. Kardes, F. R., Posavac, S. S., and Cronley, M. L., 2004, “Consumer inference: a review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 230-256. [25]. Kumar, A., Lee, H. J., and Kim, Y. K., 2009, “Indian consumers′ purchase intention toward a United States versus local brand,” Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 521-527. [26]. Miller, G. A., 1956, “The magical number seven or minus two: some limits on our capacity of processing information,” Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. [27]. Monroe, K. B., and Krishnan, R., 1985, “The effect of price on subjective product evaluations,” Perceived Quality, 1, 209-232. [28]. Nell, V., 1988, “Lost in a book: the psychology of reading for pleasure,” Yale University Press. [29]. Parker, J. R., and Lehmann, D. R., 2011, “When shelf-based scarcity impacts consumer preferences,” Journal of Retailing, 87(2), 142-155. [30]. Petty, R., and Cacioppo, J., 2012, “Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change,” Springer Science & Business Media. [31]. Sasaki, T., Becker, D. V., Janssen, M. A., and Neel, R., 2011, “Does greater product information actually inform consumer decisions? The relationship between product information quantity and diversity of consumer decisions,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(3), 391-398. [32]. Sata, M., 2013, “Factors affecting consumer buying behavior of mobile phone devices,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(12), 103. 36 [33]. Sherry Jr, J. F., 1990, “A sociocultural analysis of a Midwestern American flea market,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 13-30. [34]. Stone, J., Horne, S., and Hibbert, S., 1996, “Car boot sales: a study of shopping motives in an alternative retail format,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 24(11), 4-15. [35]. Streufert, S., and Driver, M. J., 1965, “Conceptual structure, information load and perceptual complexity,” Psychonomic Science, 3, 249-250. [36]. Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O. and Hunter, G.L., 2001, “Consumers’ need for uniqueness: scale development and validation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50–66. [37]. Turunen, L. L. M., and Leipämaa-Leskinen, H., 2015, “Pre-loved luxury: identifying the meanings of second-hand luxury possessions,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(1), 57-65. [38]. Tuttle, B., 2014. The rise of snobby secondhand fashion retail. Time. http://business.time.com/2014/02/25/the-rise-of-snobby-secondhand-fashion-retail/ [39]. Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R., and Zeelenberg, M., 2009, “When demand accelerates demand: trailing the bandwagon,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 302-312. [40]. Williams, Colin C., and Christopher Paddock, 2003, “The meanings of informal and second- hand retail channels: some evidence from Leicester,” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 13(3), 317-336. [41]. Wu, Couchen, and San-san Hsing, 2006, “Less is more: how scarcity influences consumers’ value perceptions and purchase intents through mediating variables,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 125-132. [42]. Zhou, Lina, Liwei Dai, and Dongsong Zhang, 2007, “Online shopping acceptance model-A critical survey of consumer factors in online shopping,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 41.
指導教授	謝依靜	審核日期	2017-7-18
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare