參考文獻 |
徐峻賢 (2005)。表音一致性、聲旁結合度對中文閱讀的影響。中央大學認知神經科學研究所碩士論文。中壢
黃緒文 (2003)。鄰項個數對中文雙字詞詞彙判斷的影響。陽明大學生命科學院神經科學研究所碩士論文。台北
Academia Sinica balanced corpus (version 3). (1998). Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica.
Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition : evidence from ERPs. NeuroReport, 15(3), 545-548.
Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Barber, H. (2005). Early event-related potential effects of syllabic processing during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(11), 1803-1817.
Chen, M. J., & Weekes, B. S. (2004). Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 181-196.
Chen, M. J., Weekes, B. S., Peng, D.-L., & Lei, Q. (2006). Effects of semantic radical consistency and combinability in Chinese character processing. In P. Li et al. (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics. Vol. 1: Chinese. (pp. 175-186). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Coles, M., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). Event-related brain potentials: an introduction. In Rugg, M. D., & Coles, M.(Eds.) Electrophysiology of Mind. Oxyford University Press.
Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530-539.
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). Right words and left words: elelctrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 373-392.
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 40, 730-747.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 776-781.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559-576.
Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. T. (1999). Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 19-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61.
Holcomb P. J., Grainger J., & O’Rourke T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938-950.
Hsiao, J. H. -W., Shillcock, R., & Lavidor, M. (2006). A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition. Brain Research, 1078, 159-167.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials reflect word expectancy and semantic association during reading. Nature, 307, 161-163.
Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2003). ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1231-1247.
Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291-308.
Perfetti, C.A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time-course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1-18.
Perfetti, C.A., & Tan, L. H. (1999). The consitiruency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C.A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43-59.
Pylkkanen, L., Stringfellow, A., & Marantz, A. (2002). Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: an MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to beighborhood density. Brain and Language, 81, 666-678.
Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 267-279.
Sereno, S. C., Rayner K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(10), 2195-2200.
Taft, M. (2006). Processing of characters by native Chinese readers. In P. Li et al. (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics. Vol. 1: Chinese. (pp. 237-249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761-775.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce P. A., (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word recognition. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce P. A., (1999). Probabilistic phonotatics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 347-408.
Yeh, S.-L., & Li, J.-L. (2004). Sublexical processing in visual recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence from repetition blindness for subcharacter components. Brain and Language, 88, 47-53.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson W. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 37-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zhou, Y. G. (1978).Xiandai hanzihong shengpangde biayyin gongneng wenti [To what degree are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic?] Zhongguo Yuwen, 146, 172-177. |