特定與非特定來源記憶提取的行為及事件相關腦電位

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：38

、訪客IP：3.145.75.69

姓名

吳宣辰(Hsuan-chen Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

特定與非特定來源記憶提取的行為及事件相關腦電位
(Behavioral and ERP Studies of the Retrieval of Specific and Non-Specific Source Memory)

相關論文

★ 意旁結合度、意旁表意透明度對中文閱讀的影響	★ 以行為及事件相關電位探討中文雙字詞的記憶聯結錯誤
★ 項目指示遺忘效果的行為與事件相關電位研究	★ 項目指示遺忘作業中記憶登錄及提取歷程的行為及事件相關腦電位研究
★ 以語意促發作業探討項目指示遺忘中線索對於記憶登錄歷程影響之行為及事件相關腦電位研究	★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位探討處理層次與聯結性登錄方式對記憶連結錯誤之影響
★ 中文字詞辨識的語音運作單位	★ 由語意透明度所引發的再認記憶鏡像效應：行為與事件相關腦電位研究
★ 登錄作業對於中文雙字詞語意透明度在再認記憶中所引發鏡像效應之影響：行為及事件相關腦電位實驗	★ 以事件相關腦電位探討細節性與概要性記憶的提取導向
★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位實驗探討前瞻記憶線索出現機率對於前瞻干擾效果的影響	★ 以跨顱電刺激與事件相關腦電位探討左側後頂葉腦區於再認記憶中所扮演之角色
★ 測驗表現回饋對測驗效應之調控的行為與事件相關腦電位研究	★ 以非侵入式腦刺激探討左後側頂葉與情節記憶提取之因果關係
★ 中文假字形聲限制高低對於試誤與無誤學習之影響的行為與事件相關腦電位研究	★ 情緒入碼情境對於記憶登錄與提取中的控制歷程之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究結合來源記憶作業和記得知道程序，比較受試者在不同的登錄以及提取情境下，對於特定與非特定來源訊息的提取以及事件相關腦電位效果的影響，藉此探討特定與非特定來源訊息在記憶中的表徵形式，是符合來源監控架構或是模糊痕跡理論的預測。在實驗一學習階段，刺激字出現的同時由，一男性或女性的聲音將該刺激字唸出，測驗階段中，受試者要在作出性別判斷後，再作一個記得知道的反應。結果顯示正確的來源判斷主要伴隨著記得反應。實驗二使用受試者內設計，操弄學習階段中唸出刺激字的講者數量，分為提供兩男兩女四種聲音的學習四聲音情境，以及提供一男一女兩種聲音的學習二聲音情境，分別要求受試者記憶唸出刺激字的講者或是性別訊息，在測驗階段都要求受試者回憶項目的性別訊息。結果顯示在學習二聲音情境下，受試者的性別回憶正確率，比在學習四聲音情境下高，支持模糊痕跡理論的想法，以細節性痕跡登錄的訊息導致較好的記憶表現。實驗三使用和實驗二類似的設計，並同時記錄受試者的電生理訊號，發現在學習二聲音情境下，受試者引發較大的頂葉新舊效果，代表受試者能夠重拾出較多的性別訊息，然而在學習四聲音情境下，在兩側後方頭皮似乎有個嘗試將講者訊息轉換成性別訊息的Late Negativity效果。實驗四在學習階段提供兩男兩女四種聲音，並要受試者記憶唸出刺激字的講者訊息，測驗階段依照不同的提取需求，區分為需要回憶講者訊息的回憶講者情境，以及只需要回憶性別的回憶性別情境。結果顯示回憶性別情境的來源回憶表現比回憶講者情境好，代表細節性和概要性痕跡的提取，並非是完全獨立的。根據實驗二、實驗三和實驗四的結果，特定與非特定的來源訊息在登錄的過程中分別以細節性和概要性痕跡的形式儲存在記憶中，而兩種記憶痕跡在提取的過程中並非完全獨立。

摘要(英)

The characteristics of specific (verbatim) and non-specific (gist) information are debated between the Source Monitoring Framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi and Lindsay, 1993) and the Fuzzy-trace theory (Reyna and Brainerd, 1995). The main purpose of the study is to test the representation of specific and non-specific information. Experiment 1 incorporated source memory test and Remember/Know procedure to address this issue. Subjects listened to words spoken by one male voice and one female voice at study, and made source judgments as well as Remember/Know judgments at test. We found that correct source judgments were primarily associated with Remember response. In experiment 2, we increased the variability of source attributes by presenting words spoken by either 4 speakers (2 males and 2 females) or by only 2 speakers (1 male and 1 female). At test, subjects made gender judgments followed by Remember/Know judgments. In accordance to the Fuzzy-trace theory, the gender recognition rate in the 4-voices condition was worse than the 2-voices condition. This result may due to the reliance on gist memory in the 4-voices condition hence decreasing the source accuracy. In experiment 3, we used ERPs under the similar procedure as in experiment 2 and found that the 2-voices condition elicited larger left parietal old/new effect, which is sensitive to the amount of information recollected. However, the Late Negativity effect, which reflects processes that form and retain integrated task-relevant information when needs continued evaluation (Johansson and Mecklinger, 2003) was larger in the 4-voices condition than in the 2-voices condition. Experiment 4 presented words spoken by 4 speakers (2 males and 2 females). At test, subjects made either gender or speaker judgments followed by Remember/Know judgments. The results showed that the retrieval of specific and non-specific information may not be independent. Consequently, the encoding of specific and non-specific information is more likely to accommodate by the Fuzzy-trace theory, but the retrieval of specific and non-specific information is not dissociated.

關鍵字(中)

★ 記得知道程序
★ 來源記憶
★ 再認記憶
★ 事件相關腦電位

關鍵字(英)

★ ERPs
★ Remember Know procedure
★ source memory
★ recognition memory

論文目次

第一章文獻回顧 1
1.1 來源記憶 1
1.2 來源監控架構 2
1.3 模糊痕跡理論 4
1.4 雙歷程理論 7
1.5 記得/知道程序 8
1.6 小結 9
第二章事件相關電位 10
2.1 引言 10
2.2 早期中額葉新舊效果 10
2.3 頂葉新舊效果 12
2.4 右額葉新舊效果 13
2.5 Late Negativity效果 15
2.6 小結 17
第三章研究目的與方法 18
第四章實驗一 20
4.1 引言 20
4.2 實驗方法 22
4.3 實驗結果 24
4.4 討論 28
第五章實驗二 30
5.1 引言 30
5.2 實驗方法 33
5.3 實驗結果 36
5.4 討論 40
第六章實驗三 42
6.1 引言 42
6.2 實驗方法 44
6.3 行為結果 46
6.4 電生理訊號結果 47
6.5 實驗討論 57
第七章實驗四 60
7.1 引言 60
7.2 實驗方法 63
7.3 實驗結果 66
7.4 實驗討論 71
第八章綜合討論 73
8.1 實驗結果與討論 73
8.2 研究限制 76
8.3 未來研究方向 78
參考文獻 80
附錄 88
附錄一：實驗刺激材料 88
附錄二：事件相關腦電位效果包含的電極位置示意圖 93
附錄三：指導語（以實驗二「學習四聲音情境」為例） 95

參考文獻

Allan, K., Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 98(2-3), 231-252.
Ankrum, C., & Palmer, J. (1989, November). The perception and memory of objects and their parts.Paper presented at Psychonomic Society, Atlanta, GA.
Azimian-Faridani, N., & Wilding, E. L. (2006). The influence of criterion shifts on electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1075-1086.
Bodner, G. E., & Lindsay, D. S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 563-580.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Brandse, E. (1995). Are children’s false memories more persistent than their true memories? Psychological Science, 6, 359–364.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False-recognition reversal: when is similarity distinctive?. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157-185.
Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children's false memories. Journal Experimental Child Psychology, 71(2), 81-129.
Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 231-248.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 923-938.
Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research, 15(2), 191-205.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., & Snodgrass, J. G. (2001). Remembering the color of objects: an ERP investigation of source memory. Cereb Cortex, 11(4), 322-334.
Dodson, C. S., Holland, P. W., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memeory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1121-1136.
Ferguson, S. A., Hashtroudi, S., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). DAge differences in using source-relevant cues. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 443-52.
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Bersick, M. (2005). The late negative episodic memory effect: the effect of recapitulating study details at test. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research, 23(2-3), 185-198.
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Mem Cognit, 16(4), 309-313.
Hayama, H. R., Johnson, J. D., & Rugg, M. D. (2008). The relationship between the right frontal old/new ERP effect and post-retrieval monitoring: specific or non-specific? Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1211-1223.
Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Ritschel, L. (2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 28(3), 503-508.
Hoffman, H. G. (1997). Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: evidence from source attribution biases. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 23(2), 371-383.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), 306-340.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513-541.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Seperating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(2), 139-154.
Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. Psychol Aging, 8(2), 283-293.
Johansson, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2003). The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biol Psychol, 64(1-2), 91-117.
Johansson, M., Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., & Rosen, I. (2002). Memory for perceived and imagined pictures--an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 986-1002.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychol Bull, 114(1), 3-28.
Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 20(6), 1409-1419.
Kelley, C. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Hollingshead, A. (1989). Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: judgments of modality. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 15(6), 1101-1108.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87(3), 252-271.
McCabe, D. P., & Balota, D. A. (2007). Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 33(3), 536-549.
Mecklinger, A., Johansson, M., Parra, M., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007). Source-retrieval requirements influence late ERP and EEG memory effects. Brain Res, 1172, 110-123.
Moravcski, J. E., & Healy, A. F. (1995). Effect of meaning on letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 82–95.
Parkin, A. J., & Walter, B. M. (1992). Recollective experience, normal aging, and frontal dysfunction. Psychol Aging, 7(2), 290-298.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past. Mem Cognit, 21(1), 89-102.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1990). Fuzzy processing in transitivity development. Annals of Operation Research, 23, 37-63.
Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1994). The development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30, 178–191.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995a). Fuzzy-trace theory: an interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995b). Fuzzy-trace theory: some foundational issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 145-162.
Reyna, V. F., & Titcomb, A. L. (1996). Constraints on the suggestibility of eyewitness testimony: A fuzzy-trace theory analysis. In D. G. Payne & F. G. Conrad (Eds.), A synthesis of basic and applied approaches to human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory: new frontiers. J Exp Child Psychol, 71(2), 194-209.
Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 47-69.
Senkfor, A. J., & Van Petten, C. (1998). Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 24(4), 1005-1025.
Smith, M. E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 5, 1-13.
Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., Fabiani, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychol Aging, 14(3), 390-413.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26(1), 1-12.
Vallesi, A., & Shallice, T. (2006). Prefrontal involvement in source memory: an electrophysiological investigation of accounts concerning confidence and accuracy. Brain Res, 1124(1), 111-125.
Vilberg, K. L., Moosavi, R. F., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Res, 1122(1), 161-170.
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119 ( Pt 3), 889-905.
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997). Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task. Neuropsychologia, 35(2), 119-128.
Wilding, E. L. (2000). In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? Int J Psychophysiol, 35(1), 81-87.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1341-1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 20(6), 1341-1354.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: effects of interference and of response speed. Can J Exp Psychol, 48(4), 516-535.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as basis for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(5), 622-643.
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Dobbins, I., Lazzara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12(3), 323-339.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 25(6), 1415-1434.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen, 130(3), 361-379.

指導教授

鄭仕坤(Shih-Kuan Cheng)

審核日期

2008-7-25

推文