派遣員工與廠商績效：台灣製造業之實證

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：56

、訪客IP：3.145.85.74

姓名

黃俞翔(Yu-Hsiang Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

派遣員工與廠商績效：台灣製造業之實證

相關論文

★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響	★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究	★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及銀行不動產授信業務之影響	★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 貿易、技術與薪資溢酬	★ 聚集與生產力:台灣紡織產業的實證研究
★ 勞工派遣與正職受僱型態之實證研究－金融海嘯前後之分析比較	★ 影響政府採購效率之實證研究—以某縣市政府為例
★ 台灣民眾轉換從業身分的決策以及「不景氣-推擠」假說之檢定	★ 汽車燃油效率、反彈效果與特徵價格之研究
★ Three Essays on the Industrial Economics	★ 研究發展與技術購買-台灣製造業之實證研究
★ 合併廠商的績效表現與決策因素分析	★ 合併型態對廠商績效與股票報酬的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究採用民國100年製造業廠商調查資料，探討雇用派遣員工與廠商績效之關聯性。四項派遣員工指標包括：有無雇用派遣員工、每月最多使用派遣員工人數、每月經常使用派遣員工人數，以及派遣員工全年花費支出。廠商績效則是以勞動生產力和總要素生產力來衡量。實證結果發現，四項派遣員工使用指標對勞動生產力皆有正向但不顯著之影響；而總要素生產力方面，除了有無派遣員工之使用無顯著影響外，每月最多與經常使用派遣員工人數兩項指標每增加1%的人數會增加0.02%的總要素生產力，而派遣員工全年薪資支出較多的廠商，亦有較高的總要素生產力，唯其效果幅度上更小。若進一步觀察個別二欄位產業，可發現在電腦電子產品及光學製品、藥品及醫用化學製品、塑膠製品，以及汽車及其零件製造業，使用派遣員工與其勞動生產力尤其有明顯正向之關聯。針對有雇用派遣員工的廠商進行分析，仍可發現使用派遣員工人數愈多，以及全年花費在派遣員工薪資愈多的廠商，其勞動生產力與總要素生產力皆明顯較高。本文證實台灣製造業廠商使用派遣員工與其廠商績效之間的確有正向關係。

摘要(英)

This study used the 2011 survey data of manufacturing firms to investigate the relation between hiring temporary workers and the performance of firm. The four indexes of hiring temporary workers are whether hiring temporary workers, the maximum number of temporary workers every month, the regular number of temporary workers every month and the annual expense of temporary workers. And the performance of firm is measured by labor productivity and total factor productivity. The empirical result shows that the four indexes of hiring temporary workers have positive but insignificant effect on labor productivity. In term of total factor productivity, except the whether hiring temporary workers variable has no significant effect, the maximum and regular number of temporary workers every month indicate that the total factor productivity will increase 0.02% if we increase 1% number of temporary workers. And the firms that have more annual expense of temporary workers also have higher total factor productivity. Furthermore, we observed Two-Digit Industries individually and found that hiring temporary workers and labor productivity have obviously positive relation in Manufacture of Computers, Electronic and Optical Products, Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals and Medicinal Chemical Products, Manufacture of Plastics Products and Manufacture of Motor Vehicles and Parts. Then, we focus on the firms that have temporary workers, we can still find the firms that have more number of temporary workers and more annual expense of temporary workers have higher labor productivity and total factor productivity. This study proved that hiring temporary workers and the performance of firm indeed have positive relation for manufacturing firms of Taiwan.

關鍵字(中)

★ 派遣員工
★ 廠商績效
★ 生產力

關鍵字(英)

★ temporary workers
★ performance of firm
★ productivity

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝辭 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1.1　研究背景與動機 1
1.2　部分時間與臨時性就業人口分析 1
1.3　研究目的 4
1.4　研究架構 4
第二章　文獻回顧 5
2.1　派遣人員的使用對廠商績效之影響 5
2.2　派遣員工使用的對正式員工與工資影響 7
2.3　派遣員工轉為正式員工的可能性 7
2.4　國際化對派遣員工的影響 8
第三章資料來源與實證模型 9
3.1　資料來源 9
3.2　實證模型 11
3.3　樣本基本分析 15
第四章　實證結果 17
4.1　敘述性統計 17
4.2　派遣員工使用與廠商績效之實證結果 19
4.2.1　勞動生產力之實證結果 19
4.2.2　總要素生產力之實證結果 22
4.2.3　派遣員工使用比重前五名之產業估計結果 24
4.2.4　其他派遣員工使用變數較為顯著之產業迴歸估計結果 25
4.3　針對有派遣員工的廠商分析採用派遣與績效之關聯性 26
4.4　小結 29
第五章結論與研究限制 30
5.1　結論 30
5.2　研究限制與建議 31
參考文獻 32

參考文獻

劉珮儀（2006），「人力派遣控制機制與工作績效之研究」。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展研究所碩士論文。
劉育陞（2017），「網路科技與廠商績效的影響–台灣製造業的實證」，國立中央大學產業經濟學研究所碩士論文
魯慧中、陳明賢（2017），「典型和非典型全日工作的工資差異―雙變數就業選擇之實證分析」《經濟論文》。
Angeles Diaz-Mayans, M., & Sanchez, R. (2004). Temporary employment and technical efficiency in Spain. International Journal of Manpower, 25(2), 181-194.
Arvanitis, S. (2005). Modes of labor flexibility at firm level: Are there any implications for performance and innovation? Evidence for the Swiss economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 993-1016.
Bachmann, R., & Braun, S. (2011). The impact of international outsourcing on labour market dynamics in Germany. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 58(1), 1-28.
Bassanini, A., Booth, A. L., Brunello, G., De Paola, M., & Leuven, E. (2005). Workplace training in Europe.Bosio, G. (2014). The implications of temporary jobs on the distribution of wages in Italy: an unconditional IVQTE approach. Labour, 28(1), 64-86.
Becker, G. S. (1975). Front matter, human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. In Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Second Edition (pp. 22-0). NBER.
Beckmann, M., & Kuhn, D. (2009). Temporary agency work and firm performance: Evidence from German establishment-level panel data (No. 01/09). WWZ Discussion Paper.Booth, A. L., Dolado, J. J., & Frank, J. (2002). Symposium on temporary work: Introduction. The Economic Journal, 112(480).
Bryson, A. (2007). Temporary agency workers and workplace performance in the private sector. Manpower Human Resources Lab Discussion Paper, 3.
Cappellari, L., Dell’Aringa, C., & Leonardi, M. (2012). Temporary employment, job flows and productivity: A tale of two reforms. The Economic Journal, 122(562).
Ebenstein, A., Harrison, A., McMillan, M., & Phillips, S. (2014). Estimating the impact of trade and offshoring on American workers using the current population surveys. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 581-595.
Egger, P. and H. Egger (2006), “International Outsourcing and the Productivity of Low-skilled Labor in the EU,” Economic Inquiry, 44(1), pp. 98–108.
Forde, C., Slater, G., & Green, F. (2008). Agency working in the UK: What do we know. Policy Report, 2.
Geishecker, I., & Görg, H. (2008). Winners and losers: A micro‐level analysis of international outsourcing and wages. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d′économique, 41(1), 243-270.
Geishecker, I. (2009). Perceived job insecurity and well-being revisited: Towards conceptual clarity.
Görg, H., & Görlich, D. (2015). Offshoring, wages and job security of temporary workers. Review of World Economics, 151(3), 533-554.
Güell, M., & Petrongolo, B. (2007). How binding are legal limits? Transitions from temporary to permanent work in Spain. Labour Economics, 14(2), 153-183.
Hirsch, B., & Mueller, S. (2012). The productivity effect of temporary agency work: Evidence from German panel data. The Economic Journal, 122(562).
Hirsch, B. (2015). Dual labour markets at work: The impact of employers′ use of temporary agency work on regular workers′ job stability.
Jahn, E. J., & Bentzen, J. (2012). What drives the demand for temporary agency workers?. Labour, 26(3), 341-355.
Kleinknecht, A., Oostendorp, R. M., Pradhan, M. P., & Naastepad, C. W. M. (2006). Flexible labour, firm performance and the Dutch job creation miracle. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(2), 171-187.
Lee, H., & Lee, J. (2015). The impact of offshoring on temporary workers: evidence on wages from South Korea. Review of World Economics, 151(3), 555-587.
Liu, R., & Trefler, D. (2008). Much ado about nothing: American jobs and the rise of service outsourcing to China and India (No. w14061). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Nielen, S., & Schiersch, A. (2012). Productivity in German manufacturing firms: Does fixed-term employment matter? (No. 2012-004). Schumpeter Discussion Papers.
Nielen, S. (2016). Temporary agency work and firm competitiveness: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. In Trade Credit and Temporary Employment (pp. 41-67). Springer, Cham.
Ortega, B., & Marchante, A. J. (2010). Temporary contracts and labour productivity in Spain: a sectoral analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(3), 199-212.
Sanchez, R., & Toharia, L. (2000). Temporary workers and productivity: the case of Spain. Applied Economics, 32(5), 583-591.
Tanaka, A. (2017). Foreign direct investment and temporary workers in Japan. Journal of Asian Economics, 48, 87-99.

指導教授

鄒孟文(Men-Wen Tsou)

審核日期

2018-6-29

推文