探討幼兒詞彙聯想能力與口語理解之關係

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：3.143.23.103

姓名

李甄甄(Chen-Chen Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

探討幼兒詞彙聯想能力與口語理解之關係
(Exploring the relationship between children’s word association ability and oral comprehension)

相關論文

★ 以眼動型態探討背景知識對詞彙辨識的影響	★ 合作寫作對於國小學童科學概念學習之影響
★ 影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園縣中壢市為例	★ 國小學童圖文閱讀的理解策略
★ 幼童敘說書面故事之後設認知表現	★ 新移民家庭子女口語敘說能力之發展
★ 圖文提示對學童閱讀科學說明文記憶與理解之影響	★ 識字教學法與口語詞彙能力對新移民女性中文識字學習之影響
★ 先備知識對於不同閱讀能力的學童在閱讀歷程中自我提問的影響	★ Exploring Computer-based Nature Science Instruction Based on the Cognitive Load Theory: Spatial Contiguity Effect, and Effects of Prior Knowledge on Performance Assessments
★ 教師示範與文本提示對國小學童自我解釋與閱讀理解表現之影響	★ 國小學童之工作記憶能力對於閱讀理解監控表現的影響
★ 成人與幼童的言談行為分析：比較電子書與紙本書親子共讀的情境	★ 探討幼兒的早期書寫表現及其影響因素
★ 探究教師閱讀教學自我效能與閱讀自我調整教學信念及實踐之關係	★ 探討閱讀能力與文本架構對於國小學童使用理解策略的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

幼兒早期的口語理解能力是學習語言的基礎，因此，提升幼兒口語理解能力有其必要性，然而，過去研究多聚焦在不同教學方法與策略對口語理解的影響，而本研究是以構成口語理解的要素為目標，深入瞭解詞彙知識的深度與口語理解的相關性。奠基於詞彙聯想測驗是測量詞彙知識深度的方式，本研究主要目的為瞭解幼兒詞彙聯想表現，以及探討幼兒詞彙聯想能力與口語理解之關係。研究對象為桃園市幼兒園大班幼兒，共計79位，平均年齡為六歲一個月。本研究測驗工具有四項，分別是畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗、幼兒工作記憶測驗、幼兒口語理解測驗以及研究者自編之詞彙聯想測驗。研究結果顯示(1)幼兒在詞彙聯想的組合關係和聚合關係使用次數相當；(2)幼兒對詞彙的熟悉度會影響聯想類型的使用，對詞彙越熟悉，詞彙聯想時會使用較多的聚合關係，而對詞彙越不熟悉，詞彙聯想時則會使用較多的組合關係；(3)經淨相關分析發現在控制詞彙量下，詞彙聯想的聚合關係與口語理解呈顯著相關；及(4)詞彙聯想的聚合關係能獨立預測11.3%的口語理解分數。

摘要(英)

It has been widely recognized that word knowledge, which generally refers to the breadth of vocabulary knowledge, is an important predictor of oral comprehension. However, there is relatively few studies investigated how other dimensions, such as the depth of vocabulary knowledge, contribute to children’s oral comprehension. Word association tests provide insights into the depth of vocabulary knowledge. The main purpose of the study was to explore the relationship between word association and oral comprehension. Participants of this study involved 79 kindergartners, aged 5 to 6 years. There were two tests to assess students’ word association and oral comprehension. Other variables, such as individual difference in working memory and vocabulary size were also investigated. The results of the study showed that (1) there are no significant difference between the frequency of paradigmatic and syntagmatic responses in word association test; (2) familiar vocabulary elicited more paradigmatic responses, in contrast, unfamiliar vocabulary elicited more syntagmatic responses; (3) with children’s vocabulary size taken into account, a significant partial correlation was found between children’s paradigmatic knowledge of words and oral comprehension but non-significant correlation between syntagmatic and oral comprehension; and (4) after statistically controlling the influence of vocabulary size, children’s paradigmatic knowledge uniquely explained 11.3% of variance in oral comprehension scores. The findings suggest that the paradigmatic knowledge among Chinese words emerged as a significant predictor of oral comprehension.

關鍵字(中)

★ 幼兒
★ 口語理解
★ 詞彙聯想

關鍵字(英)

★ children
★ oral comprehension
★ word association

論文目次

摘要 ..........................................i
Abstract.........................................ii
目錄 .........................................iv
第一章緒論 ....................................1
第一節研究動機與目的............................1
第二節研究問題..................................3
第三節名詞解釋..................................4
第二章文獻探討..................................5
第一節詞彙聯想的概念與發展.......................5
第二節口語理解能力的發展與研究..................16
第三節詞彙聯想與口語理解的相關研究與侷限.........23
第三章研究方法.................................27
第一節研究對象.................................27
第二節研究設計.................................28
第三節測驗工具.................................28
第四節資料處理與分析...........................35
第四章研究結果與討論...........................39
第一節幼兒的詞彙聯想表現.......................39
第二節詞彙聯想能力與口語理解之關係..............43
第五章研究結論與建議...........................47
第一節研究結論................................47
第二節研究限制與建議...........................47
參考文獻 .........................................51

參考文獻

呂碧霞 (2002)。中國兒童詞彙定義能力之發展(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學，台中。
李俊仁 (2015)。T2000【工具性質】。未岀版之工具。取自https://sites.google.com/site/brainlearninglab/characteranalyze
沈文娟 (2002)。國小低年級兒童口語理解能力之表現情形及相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺中教育大學，臺中。
林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇慧 (2007)。學前兒童語言障礙評量表指導手冊。台北：教育部特殊教育工作小組。
林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇慧 (2009)。修訂學齡兒童語言障礙評量表指導手冊。臺北：教育部。
林寶貴、錡寶香 (2002)。兒童口語理解測驗指導手冊。台北：教育部特殊教育工作小組。
邱淑惠 (2017)。學前幼兒語文評量(網路版)。台北：心理。
宣崇慧 (2015)。學前至小一學童詞彙理解、語言理解與詞素理解與應用發展相關情形之探究。「2015年兩岸溝通障礙學術研討會」發表之論文，臺灣師範大學。
胡中凡、陳彥丞、卓淑玲、陳學志、張雨霖、宋曜廷 (2017)。1200個中文雙字詞的聯想常模與被聯想反應參照表。教育心理學報，49(1)，137-160。
徐庭蘭 (2004)。親子共讀對語言發展遲緩幼兒語言理解與口語表達之學習成效。醫護科技學刊，6(4)，349-370。
高子淇 (2014)。幼兒聽覺理解能力表現之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北。
張欣戊 (1991)。學前兒童語言能力的測驗。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 (編號：NSC 79-0301-H-002-067)，未出版。
張雯惠 (2006)。國小學生詞彙聯想與造句能力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄。
陳美芳 (1998)。國小學童口語語言理解與閱讀理解能力之關係。特殊教育研究學刊，16，171-184。
陳美芳 (2003)。語文理解能力測驗之發展與效度分析。特殊教育研究學刊，92，1-14。
陳美芳 (2008)。中小學學童生活口語理解評量工具建構與效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊，33(3)，77-93。
陳修元 (2013)。閱讀研究議題五：台灣兒童聯想常模。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究成果報告 (編號：NSC101-2420-H845-001)，未出版。
陸莉、劉鴻香 (1994)。修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗。台北：教育部特殊教育工作小組。
曾世杰 (1999)。工作記憶測驗。台北：行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。
辜玉旻 (2011)。閱讀研究議題五：學齡前幼兒與小學低年級學童的口語和書面語言理解能力的發展。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究成果報告 (編號：NSC 99-2420-H-008-001)，未出版。
黃淑君 (2003)。國小學童聽覺理解能力與閱讀理解能力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺中教育大學，臺中。
黃博聖、陳學志、黃鴻程、劉政宏 (2009)。詞彙聯想策略擴散性思考測驗之編製。測驗學刊，56(2)，153-177。
楊志堅、蘇啟明、沈文娟 (2006)。學童早期口語理解能力之檢測。教育科學研究期刊，51(1)，213-232。
楊坤堂、張世彗、李水源 (2005)。學前幼兒與國小低年級兒童口語語法能力診斷測驗指導手冊。台北：教育部特殊教育工作小組。
劉惠美、張鑑如 (2011)。口語和閱讀關連性研究之文獻回顧與展望。教育心理學報，43， 251-268。
鄭竹秀 (2015)。國內使用繪本教學介入兒童語言能力成效之後設分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中。
鄭麗玉 (2009)。認知心理學－理論與應用。台北：五南。
錡寶香 (1998)。國小學童語意與語法能力之研究。國教學報，10，165-196。
錡寶香 (2000)。國小低閱讀能力學童語言能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，20，69-96。
錡寶香 (2009)。兒童語言語溝通發展。台北：心理。
謝瓊瑩 (2011)。分享式閱讀教學提升語言發展遲緩幼兒口語理解能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北。
簡馨瑩、連啟舜、張紹盈 (2017)。故事提示策略、工作記憶能力對幼兒故事理解能力的影響。教育科學研究期刊，62(4)，181-207。
簡馨瑩、趙子揚、王繼伶 (2014)。幼兒工作記憶測驗之編製。測驗學刊，61(2)，159-181。
Agdam, S. J., & Sadeghi, K. (2014). Two formats of word association tasks: A study of depth of word knowledge. English Language Teaching, 7(10), 1-12.
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Brown, R., & Berko, J. (1960). Word association and the acquisition of grammar. Child Development, 31(1), 1-14.
Byrnes, H. (1984). The role of listening comprehension: A theoretical base. Foreign language annals, 17(4), 317-329.
Carlisle, J. F. (1991). Planning an assessment of listening and reading comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 86-91.
Chang, W.-C., Ku, Y.-M., Lin, C.-H., & Hsu, C.-C. (2012, July). Investigating the role of vocabulary knowledge in the reading comprehension of early grade school students. Paper presented at the Nineteenth annual meeting of Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Montreal, Canada.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-428.
Cremer, M., Dingshoff, D., de Beer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2010). Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), 187-204.
Cronin, V., Pratt, M., Abraham, J., Howell, D., Bishop, S., & Manning, A. (1986). Word association and the acquisition of reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(1), 1-11.
Dabbagh, A. (2016). The predictive role of vocabulary knowledge in listening comprehension: depth or breadth? International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 4(3), 1-13.
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 3(4), 422-433.
Dymock, S. (1993). Reading but not understanding. Journal of Reading, 37(2), 86-91.
Entwisle, D. R., Forsyth, D. F., & Muuss, R. (1964). The syntactic-paradigmatic shift in children′s word associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3(1), 19-29.
Ervin, S. (1961). Changes with age in the verbal determinants of word-association. The American Journal of Psychology, 74(3), 361-372.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2000). Using word association techniques to measure productive vocabulary in a second language. Language Testing Update, 27, 64-69.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2006). Habits and rabbits: Word associations and the L2 lexicon. EUROSLA Yearbook, 6(1), 121-145.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2007). Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 319-331.
Florit, E., Roch, M., & Levorato, M. C. (2011). Listening text comprehension of explicit and implicit information in preschoolers: The role of verbal and inferential skills. Discourse Processes, 48, 119-138.
Goldfarb, R., & Halpern, H. (1984). Word association responses in normal adult subjects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13(1), 37-55.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-317.
Kim, Y. S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101-120.
Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2017). Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading Comprehension: It′s Simple, but complex. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12861.
Mattheoudakis, M. (2011). A word-association study in Greek and the concept of the syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 11(2), 167-197.
Meara, P. (1983). Word associations in a foreign language. Nottingham Linguistics Circular, 11(2), 29-38.
Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. P. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students as differing competency levels. Reading Research and Instruction, 29, 73-84.
Morrow, L. M. (1985). Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children′s comprehension, concept of story structure, and oral language complexity. The Elementary School Journal, 85(5), 647-661.
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(1/2), 1-135.
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review, 81(4), 267.
Nelson, K. (1975). The nominal shift in semantic-syntactic development. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 461-479.
Nelson, K. (1977). The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift revisited: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 84(1), 93.
Nissen, H. B., & Henriksen, B. (2006). Word class influence on word association test results. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 389-408.
Qian, D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian modern language review, 56(2), 282-308.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28-52.
Racine, J. P. (2012). Replicating rabbits: Toward a comprehensive categorization of word association responses. Vocabulary Education & Research Bulletin, 1(1), 7-9.
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing,10, 355-371.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. UK: Springer.
Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577-607.
Templin, M. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and interrelationships (Monograph Series No. 26). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, The Institute of Child Welfare.
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457-479.
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390-416.
Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., & Wolf, M. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills, word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1093-1109.
Wren, S. (2000). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

指導教授

辜玉旻(Yu-Min Ku)

審核日期

2018-7-4

推文