摘要(英) |
In the past, the primary source of Taiwan′s banking industry’s profit was interest income. However, after the financial turmoil in 2008, central banks cut interest rates and implemented quantitative easing policies, so that bank deposits spreads narrowed. In order to break through the financial environment, domestic banks followed the example of foreign investors. The bank began to develop practices of wealth management business based on fee income.
This study mainly explores two foreign banks – H camp and U Bank - that have been operating in the wealth management business in Taiwan for the first time. After the 2008 financial turmoil, the marketing strategies of the two banks were different. As a result H camp grew slowly compared to U Bank; U Bank has become the model for wealth management and standard banks. This study conducts comparative analysis, in-depth discussion of the differences between the two banks in marketing strategies and business strategies, and put forward proposals for the development of future wealth management business of the two banks.
This study concludes that marketing strategy, which can be developed by ensuring high brand recognition with clear target customers, determines the success of a bank’s wealth management business. This study proposes the development of the future wealth management business for the two case banks, U Bank and H Bank. U bank should provide more diversified products and adopt group common marketing. H Bank should market to the real needs of customers, enhance the existing service quality by maintaining and strengthening customer relationships, and establish an open and transparent bonus system and incentive program. This study′s finding and recommendations are aimed to help enhance the competitive advantage and future business development of the two case banks.
|
參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1.呂玉華(1990),「產品特質」、「資訊價值」與「企業行銷策略」關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
2.李世強(2012),服務品質、財富管理業務、稽核內控與財務績效關係之探討:以S銀行分行為例,世新大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
3.周文賢(1999),行銷管理。台北市:智勝文化出版社。
4.林建于(2006),我國銀行業財富管理品牌行銷之研究-以C銀行為例,開南管理學院企業管理學系碩士班,碩士論文。
5.林青壕(2010),台灣銀行業財富管理差異性之研究-以本土銀行與外商銀行,輔仁大學金融研究所,碩士論文。
6.林孟儒(2017),探討銀行財富管理策略行銷4C之研究-以星展銀行為例,銘傳大學管理學院高階經理碩士學程,碩士論文。
7.吳淑華(2009),外商銀行財富管理差異化策略之個案研究,國立臺灣科技大學企業管理系,碩士論文。
8.何宜玲(2004),台灣地區外商銀行財富管理業務策略形成之分析-以A銀行為例,淡江大學國際貿易學系國際企業學碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
9.莫蓮花(2006),台灣「財富管理」業務未來發展趨勢之探討-以銀行業為例,義守大學管理研究所碩士班,碩士論文。
10.黃俊英(2000),行銷管理策略性的觀點。台北市:華泰書局。
11.黃國良(2004),人才招募行銷策略之研究-以國軍三軍四校人才招募為例
國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程,碩士論文。
12.陳邦杰(1991),新產品行銷,台北:遠流。
13.陳向明(2002),社會科學質的研究。台北:五南圖書出版社股份有限公司
14.郭思妤(2007),科特勒談政府如何做行銷(Philip Kotler & Nancy Lee原著),台北:台灣培生教育。
15.曾婉珍(2011),銀行業導入財富管理業務後之近況分析與未來發展方向之探討,國立清華大學經營管理碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
16.楊哲丞(2012),台灣財富管理業務競爭優勢個案分析--以花旗銀行與匯豐行為例,國立中央大學經濟學研究所,碩士論文。
17.蔡佳泰(2005),銀行業發展財富管理業務經營策略之研究,國立中山大學經濟學研究所,碩士論文。
18.魏啟林(1993),策略行銷。台北:時報。
二、英文部分
1.Anderson, J.C and J.A.Narus (1984) ,”A model of the Distributor’s Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer working Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48, pp.62-74
2.Foxall, G.R.(1981).Marketing behaviour : Issues in managerial and buyer
decision-making.Gower.
3.Kotler,p.(1967) Marketing Management : Analaysis Planning, Implementation and Contorl,N.Y.: Prentice Hall.,
4.Kotler(2003),An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice,Mass:Addison Wesley.
5.Kotler,P.&Armstrong, G.,(2005).Marketing: an introduction Prentice Hall.
6.Kotler and Keller(2006),”Marketing Management” 12e,Pearson Education.
7.Kotler, P.,& Keller, K.L.(2006).Administração de marketing.
8.McCarthy, E.J., & Perreault, W.D.(1960).Basic Marketing, Homewood, IL: Richard D.
9.Schramm, W. (1971).How Communication Works. In Joseph DeVito (Ed), Communication: Concepts and Processes (pp.13-20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.Stern, L.W., El-Ansary, A. I., & Coughlan, A.T. (1996).Marketing channels (Vol.5):Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
11.Weihrich, H. (1982). The Tows Matrix-a Tool for Situational Analysis, Long Range Planning, April(60).
12.Yin, R.K. (1994).Case study research: design and methods. Thousands Oaks. International Educational and Professional Publisher. |