| 摘要(英) |
The electronics industry accounts for a large proportion of Taiwan′s overall industrial output. According to the data provided by the Executive Yuan in 2019, the percentage is 30.77%. Due to the low-cost competitive advantage of setting up factories in the mainland in the past, Taiwan′s electronics industry has been deploying overseas production bases in an attempt to create new competitive advantages with a globally integrated layout. In recent years, US President Trump’s radical approach to global trade wars has increased the tension between the world’s two largest economies. More and more Taiwanese companies have set plans to move overseas, or High new facilities to develop contingency plans. However, when choosing the location of production base transfer, enterprises not only need to consider the labor cost of manufacturing industry, but also need to consider other location factors such as infrastructure, policy environment and cultural environment. That is to say, they need to consider the comprehensive level of industrial location, so they need to make comprehensive evaluation and cost-benefit analysis of the location environment of industrial transfer
In this paper, the company′s manufacturing center is located in Taiwan and mainland China. Mainland China is the focus of product production. However, in recent years, mainland authorities have emphasized labor rights and the cost of labor has increased year by year. Coupled with Sino-US trade issues, China′s production is facing severe challenges. In turn, the plan for the future operation of the company will be planned. In this paper, through case study, through literature review and interviews with Taiwanese businessmen, we discuss the case company′s choice of production base to transfer to Vietnam, and discuss the political and social factors, natural environment factors, industrial and economic factors, implementation facilities factors and cost-benefit analysis through location selection theory.
The conclusions of the study were: Vietnam is a production base under the global layout due to political stability, stable social environment, rapid economic development, government′s adherence to reform and opening up policies, abundant natural resources, relatively low labor wages, and preferential tax policies. Advantage. Based on the research conclusions, the following suggestions are made: The first priority for investing in Vietnam is to understand its own operating mode, operating characteristics and industrial characteristics, and to combine Vietnam′s location advantages to ensure that it can play a comparative advantage. |
| 參考文獻 |
一、中文文獻
1. 潘慧玲（1996）,教育研究。載於黃光雄（主編），教育導論（頁341-368）。台北：師大書苑。
2. 葉乃靜（2012）,質性研究qualitative research,圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。
3. 林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花（民94）頁122-136。
4. 黃俊英、林震岩（民83）。SAS精析與實例，初版。台北:華泰書局。
5. 葉重新，（民90）。教育研究法。台北：心理。
6. 林智傑（2002），製造業海外直接投資區域之探討-以中國、美國及東協五國為例，東吳大學經濟系研究所碩士論文。
7. 林明達（2003），台灣製鞋業赴越南投資區位選擇之研究，暨南國際大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。
8. 邱正仁、吳志正、姚美慧（2002），台商投資大陸及東南亞進入模式與經營績效之研究，第42卷，第1期，頁101-122。
9. 高長、陳威如（1998），台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析，管理學報，第15卷，第3期，頁393-481。
10. 康信鴻、廖婉孜（2006），影響台商赴大陸投資額與投資區位因素之實證研究，交大管理學報，第26卷，第1期，頁15-38
11. 陳哲正（2003），台商製造業投資中國大陸區位選擇之研究，國立政治大學地政系碩士班碩士論文。
12. 蔡尚宇（2003），台商赴大陸與東協海外投資額之決定因素與區位選擇因素探討，國立成功大學企業管理研究所論文。
13. 汪承運，民68年，成本效益分析，主計月報，49卷3期，頁20-26。
14. 汪承運，民75年，成本效益分析的目的和特性，主計月報，61卷4期，頁6-10。
15. 周麗芳，民89年，國民年金的成本效益分析，社區發展季刊，第91期，頁119-127。
16. 林華德，民72年，評介成本效益分析，財稅研究，15卷6期，頁84-97。
17. 林華德，民87年，當代財政學。台北：中大國圖書公司。
18. 張四明，民90年，成本效益分析在政府決策上的應用與限制，政策分析的理論與實務研討會，世新大學行政管理學系主辦。
19. 陳天賜，民79年，台鐵西部幹線多軌化成本效益分析，台鐵資料月刊，264期，頁21-57。
20. 陳成興，民69年，成本效益分析與公共投資決策評估，主計月報，49卷3期,頁7-10。
21. 曾子芬，民81年，台灣稻米生產的成本效益分析，國立中興大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
二、英文文獻
1. Ahmed, A. M .and Abdalla , H. S.（2000）,”Beyond competition: a framework for the 21st century”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 38,No, 15,3677-3709
2. Banga, Rashmi, (2006),”The Export-diversifying Impact of Japanese and US Foreign Direct Investments in the Indian Manufacturing Sector,” Journal of International Business Studies, 37, pp.558-568.
3. Barney, J.B(1991),”Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vo. 17,Iss.1,99-120.
4. Bendiksen, B.I. and Dreyer, B.(2003),”Technological changes-the impact on the raw material flow and production”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 144,Iss. 2, 237-246.
5. Belderbos, Rene & Leo Sleuwaegen, (1996),”Japamese Firms and the Decision to Invest Abroad: Business Groups and Regional Core Network,” Review of Economics & Statistics, 78, pp.214-220.
6. Blaise, Severine, (2005), “On the Link Between Japanese ODA and FDI in China: A Microeconomic Evaluation Using Conditional Logit Analysis,” Applied Economics, 37, pp.51-55.
7. Cheng, Shaoming and Roger R. Stough, (2006), “Location decisions of Japanese new manufacturing plants in China: a discrete-choice analysis,” The Annals of Regional Science, 40, pp.369-387.
8. Ferdows, K.(1997),”Making the most of foreign factory”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75,Iss. 2, 73-88.
9. Gleason, K.C., Lee, C.I. and Mathur, I.(2002),”Dimensions of international expansions by US firms to China”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 11, 139-154.
10. Harkness, J. and ReVelle, C.(2003),”Facility location with increasing production costs”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 145,Iss. 1,1-13.
11. Kanter, R.M.(1995), “Thriving locally in global economy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73,Iss. 5, 151-160.
12. Muda, S. and Hendry, L.(2002), “Proposing a world-class manufacturing concept for the make-to-order sector”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 40,No.2, 353-373.
13. Syam, S.S.(2000),”Multiperiod Capacity Expansion in Globally Dispersed Regions”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 31, No.1, 173-195.
14. Yamwaki, Hideki, (2006),”The Location of American and Japanese Multinationals in Europe”.
15. Yin, R. K. (1994), Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd ed, CA: Sage.
16. Yin, R. K.(2003), Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed..Applied social research methods series, 5. CA : Sage.
17. Syam., S.S.(2000), “Multiperiod Capacity Expansion in Globally Dispersed Regions”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 31,No.1, 173-195.
三、網路文獻
1. 博智研究的網頁資料顯示 https://www.embarich.com/Research.html
2. 質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析=Qualitative Research Method: Models and Steps of Interviewing, http://readopac3.ncl.edu.tw/nclJournal/search/detail.jsp?sysId=0005716109&dtdId=000040&search_type=detail&la=ch
3. 經濟部統計處https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/content/ContentLink.aspx?menu_id=6848
4. 越企寶 http://www.yuenanjob.com/
5. 台灣全文資料庫http://www.hyread.com.tw/hyreadnew/
6. 楊瑪利、游常山(2008), 經濟轉型〉招商流入203億美元 投資暴增，從「引資」到「選資」 https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=12286
7. Dezan Shira & Associates，進出口經理人2019年1期，越南憑什麼吸引亞洲製造業者？（下）http://www.fx361.com/page/2019/0116/4684184.shtml
8. 探索經濟全球化條件下產業演化的新趨勢和新問題http://www.bailunwen.com/a/8860.html
9. 工業區位論(industrial location theory) ，MBA智库百科https://wiki.mbalib.com/
10. 區域比較優勢內容，區域比較優勢理論。日期：2019-02-16 11:04:41 來源：互聯網http://www.zdcj.net/other-18374.html
11. 理財網-財經資料庫
https://www.moneydj.com/KMDJ/Wiki/WikiViewer.aspx?KeyID=ce02d386-a1a0-4cf2-b67e-183321bf319e |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit