博碩士論文 106430007 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:21 、訪客IP:18.118.140.108
姓名 蔡佩玲(Pei-Ling, Tsai)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 企業投資效率與負債資金成本之關聯性研究
(Research on the Relationship between Enterprise Investment Efficiency and Cost of Debt Capital)
相關論文
★ 以房養老貸款政策-由台灣金融業之觀點論析★ 企業導入電子商務對經營績效之影響-以N公司為例
★ 台灣網通業應收帳款管理-論析信用保險之功能★ 蘋果概念股金屬機殼產業之投資分析
★ 由鑑識會計角度偵測公司之舞弊-以某個案公司為例★ 企業流程再造-以某食品原料加工公司之報價作業流程為例
★ 企業資源規劃系統導入之關鍵成功因素與效益評估-以某個案公司為例★ 企業組織再造之分析-以某醫材業公司為例
★ 金融機構執行共同申報及盡職審查作業辦法之影響★ 中美貿易戰對台灣企業之影響 -以某公司為例
★ 管理報表編制對企業經營績效之影響—以A公司為例★ 現金減資宣告之股價異常報酬-以台灣上市公司為例
★ 公司價值評估-以半導體產業某公司為例★ 公司併購價格之決定-以電子業大聯大收購文曄為例
★ 製造業轉型之研究-以某個案公司為例★ 鑑識會計於政府採購招標階段之應用
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 資訊不對稱所衍生的逆選擇及道德風險之代理問題所影響的層面極廣,向來是個被廣泛探討的議題。本研究基於資訊不對稱觀點,探討當企業內部經理人和外部關係人兩者之中存在資訊不對稱情形下,內部經理人所產生的代理問題造成公司投資偏離預期,使得公司投資無效率,進而影響負債資金成本。
本研究選取2010年到2017年臺灣上市(櫃)公司電子業為主要樣本,並採用Biddle et al. (2009) 發展之投資效率衡量方式,實際投資偏離預期投資的程度來計算投資效率。負債資金成本則係以利息支出加上資本化利息再除以平均有息負債之有息負債利率為其代理變數,來進行迴歸分析。
本研究實證結果指出,公司當期投資效率對次期負債資金成本存有負向顯著關係,說明企業當期投資效率越佳,次期負債資金成本越低;此外,在敏感性分析一節中也分別針對企業投資效率對超額負債資金成本之影響以及企業當期投資效率對當期負債資金成本之影響進行實證分析,得出之迴歸結果皆符合本研究之假說:企業投資效率對負債資金成本存有負向顯著關聯性,意即相較投資有效率的公司,投資無效率的公司確實存在較昂貴的負債資金成本的現象。
本研究提出關於投資效率和負債資金成本間具有負向關聯性之證據,可供未來欲探討影響負債資金成本的因素之研究將投資效率納入考量之依據。
摘要(英) The adverse selection and moral hazard are caused by the agency problem of information asymmetry have a wide range of issues, there had been many literatures to study this issue in the past. Based on the information asymmetry, this study explores that when there is information asymmetry between senior managers and external stockholders, the agency problems generated by senior managers cause the company′s investment to deviate from expectations, making the company′s investment inefficient, and thus causing the impact of cost of debt capital.
In this study, we use those research sample from 2010 to 2017 of the electronics industry of Taiwan listed company. The measure of investment efficiency is deviation between actual investment and expected investment based on Biddle et al. (2009). The interest expense plus the capitalized interest are divided by the average interest-bearing liabilities as the proxy variable of the cost of debt capital, and the regression analysis is carried out.
The result of this study shows that the better the investment efficiency of the enterprise in the last period, the lower the cost of debt capital, meaning the last period investment efficiency of the enterprise has a significant negative relationship with the current period cost of debt capital. In addition, this study also regression analyzed the impact of the investment efficiency of the enterprise in the last period and the current period cost of excess debt capital in the chapter 4 section 3 sensitivity analysis. This result is in line with the research hypothesis: the investment efficiency of enterprises has a negative relationship with the cost of debt capital, it means that compared with investment-efficient enterprises and investment-inefficient enterprises, the latter do have a higher cost of debt capital.
This study comes up with relevant evidence on the negative relationship between investment efficiency and the cost of debt capital, which can be used to consider the factors affecting the cost of debt capital in the future.
關鍵字(中) ★ 投資效率
★ 負債資金成本
★ 資訊不對稱
★ 代理問題
關鍵字(英) ★ Investment efficiency
★ Cost of debt capital
★ Asymmetric Information
★ Agency Problems
論文目次 摘要...........................................i
ABSTRACT......................................ii
致謝.........................................iii
目錄..........................................iv
表目錄.........................................v
圖目錄.........................................v
第壹章 緒論....................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.........................1
第二節 研究目的與貢獻.........................2
第三節 研究架構...............................4
第貳章 文獻探討與假說發展........................5
第一節 投資效率...............................5
第二節 負債資金成本...........................6
第三節 投資效率與負債資金成本..................7
第參章 研究設計................................8
第一節 資料來源、研究期間與樣本選取............8
第二節 投資效率衡量..........................13
第三節 實證模型..............................15
第四節 變數定義..............................16
第肆章 實證結果................................19
第一節 敘述性統計............................19
第二節 迴歸結果..............................20
第三節 敏感性分析............................24
第伍章 結論與建議..............................30
參考文獻.......................................31
參考文獻 中文部分
王貞靜、潘虹華與戚務君(2012)。以C-Score衡量會計穩健性在臺灣的適用性,會計審計論叢,2卷2期,頁:1-31。
李萬福、林斌、楊德明與孫燁(2010)。內控信息披露、企業過度投資與財務危機—來自中國上市公司的經驗證據,中國會計與財務研究,12卷4期,頁:76-141。
吳幸蓁與廖蕙儀(2017)。自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果,中山管理評論,25卷1期:頁13-62。
林嬋娟、潘昭榮與王大維(2015)。從家族企業論析自由現金流量與投資決策之關聯性。台大管理論叢,26卷1期:頁95-123。
姜家訓與葉鴻銘(2007)。債權人監督,公司治理,會計師公費依賴度與盈餘穩健性之關係,中華會計學刊,6卷2期,頁:173-208。
陳瑞與周林毅(2007)。風險評估與決策管理,五南圖書出版。
陳瑞斌、翁慈青與朱全斌(2009)。揭露水準對於信用評等與負債資金成本之影響,財務金融學刊,17卷2期:頁71-110。
闕河士、菅瑞昌、許蕙怡、蘇月秋與楊雅婷(2008)。資訊不對稱如何影響股利政策---信號發射或融資順位。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。

西文部分
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., and LaFond, R. (2006). “The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42 (1-2), 203-243.
Akerlof, G. (1970). “The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3), 488-500.
Ball, R., and Shivakumar, L. (2005). “Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (1), 83-128.
Ball, R., Robin, A., and Sadka, G. (2008). “Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism.” Review of Accounting Studies, 13 (2-3), 168-205.
Botosan, C.A. (1997). “Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital.” The Accounting Review, 72 (3), 323-349.
Bushman, R. M., and Smith, A. J. (2003). “Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance.” Economic Policy Review, 9 (1), 65-87.
Chan, K. C., and Chen, N. F. (1991). “Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms.” The Journal of Finance, 46 (4), 1467-1484.
Francis, J., Lafond, R., Olsson, P. M., Schipper, K. (2005). “The market pricing of accruals quality.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (2), 295-327.
Givoly, D., and Hayn, C. (2000). “The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (3), 287-320.
Gressle, M. (1996). “How to implement EVA and make share prices rise.” Corporate Cashflow, 17, 28-31.
Hayashi, F. (1982). “Tobin′s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50 (1), 213-224.
Healy, P. M., and Palepu, K. G. (2001). “Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (1-3), 405-440.
Ho, S. S., & Wong, K. S. (2001). “A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure.” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10 (2), 139-156.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4), 305-360.
Julio, B. (2007). “Overcoming overhang: Agency costs, investment and the option to repurchase debt.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Illinois.
Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R. Verrecchia. (2007). “Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital.”Journal of Accounting Research 45 (2), 385-420.
Leland, H. E., and Pyle, D. H. (1977). “Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation.” The Journal of Finance, 32 (2), 371-387.
Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., and Gray, S. J. (1995). “Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations.” Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3), 555-572.
Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1958). “The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment.” The America an Economic Review, 48 (3), 261-297.
Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1963). “Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction.” The American economic review, 53 (3), 433-443.
Myers, S. C. (1984). “The Capital Structure Puzzle.” Journal of Finance, 39 (3), 575-592.
Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S. (1984). “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (2), 187-221.
Rad, S. S. E., Embong, Z., Mohd-Saleh, N., and Jaffar, R. (2016). “Financial information quality and investment efficiency: evidence from Malaysia.” Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AMMJAF), 12 (1), 129-151.
Raffournier, B. (1995). “The Determinants of Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Swiss Listed Companies.” The European Accounting Review, 4 (2), 261-280.
Richardson, S. (2006). “Over-investment of free cash flow.” Review of Accounting Studies, 11 (2-3), 159-189.
Ross, S. A. (1977). “The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signaling approach.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 8 (1), 23-40.
Schulman, C. T., Thomas, D. W., Sellers, K. F. and Kennedy, D. B. (1996). “Effects of tax integration and capital gains tax on corporate leverage.” National Tax Journal, 49 (1), 31-54
Sengupta, P. (1998). “Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt.” The Accounting Review 73 (4), 459-474.
Watts, R. L. (2003). “Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications.” Accounting Horizons, 17 (3), 207-221.
Watts, R. L. (2003). “Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities.” Accounting Horizons, 17 (4), 287-301.
Wittenberg-Moerman, R. (2008). “The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46 (2-3), 240-260.
Yoshikawa, H. (1980). “On the" q" Theory of Investment.” The American Economic Review, 70 (4), 739-743.
指導教授 王曉雯(Hsiao-Wen Wang) 審核日期 2019-7-24
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明