福爾摩沙衛星五號遙測儀之在軌絕對輻射校正

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：20

、訪客IP：3.19.31.73

姓名

張瑞中(Jui-Chung Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

遙測科技碩士學位學程

論文名稱

福爾摩沙衛星五號遙測儀之在軌絕對輻射校正
(On-orbit Absolute Radiometric Calibration of Formosat-5 RSI)

相關論文

★ 應用經驗模態分解法在福衛五號遙測照像儀之相對輻射校正	★ 應用衛星資料及地理資訊系統在印尼BALURAN國家公園野生牛棲息地之測繪
★ 利用MISR衛星資料反演陸地區域氣膠光學厚度和地表反射率	★ 衛星資料在臺灣地區西南氣流降雨估算之應用
★ 結合MODIS與MISR觀測資料在氣膠單次散射反照率反演之應用	★ 結合衛星資料與建物資訊解析台北市空間發展與都市熱島效應之鏈結
★ Landsat-7衛星資料反演都市大氣氣膠光學厚度之研究與應用	★ 對數常態分布在氣膠消光係數廓線擬合之應用
★ 氣膠光學厚度與懸浮微粒濃度關係之探討及其在衛星觀測之應用	★ 地球同步衛星（Himawari-8）在逐時大氣氣膠光學厚度之反演與分析
★ 同時輻射率定法在向日葵八號氣膠光學厚度反演之應用	★ 應用Landsat衛星影像探討越南河內都市化所致土地利用改變在都市熱島效應強度之影響
★ 結合衛星與地面觀測資料在台中地區能見度與氣膠參數變化之分析	★ 福爾摩沙衛星五號遙測儀升空前後等化係數之率定
★ 應用氣膠種類與垂直分布建立衛星氣膠光學厚度和PM濃度之關係	★ 應用地面測站及衛星觀測之氣膠光學厚度估算越南河內地區PM2.5

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

一般高地面解析影像要能充分發揮其實際的應用功能，其輻射的品質扮演極重要的角色。福爾摩沙五號衛星(福衛五號)已於2017年8月發射升空，其主要的光學遙測酬載為資源遙測應用的高地面解析遙測儀器(Remote Sensing Instrument，RSI)。福衛五號在升空後一年內RSI的輻射參數明顯變化，為維持RSI之輻射品質，定期得在軌絕對輻射校正極其重要；另一方面，根據前期的校正結果，特定目標輻射校正與相互輻射校正間仍有差異存在，對於輻射校正係數之選用尚其不確定因素有待釐清。為達成提供高品質影像資料之目標，本研究將藉由衛星與地面同步量測實驗，檢驗並整合輻射校正方法，研擬最佳之福衛五號在軌輻射校正作業方法與程序，包括特定目標輻射校正 (vicarious calibration)與相互輻射校正 (cross calibration)，針對福衛五號RSI進行密集在軌絕對輻射校正掌握儀器輻射特性變化，以期維持福衛五號觀測影像之輻射品質。校正結果顯示，兩種方法之校正結果相當一致，且所獲之RSI輻射轉換係數在升空後持續地變化，與發射前之相對差異在可見光頻道達27%；全色態頻道達22%，各頻道彼此間的相對差異約5-8%，相較於2017年校正結果相對穩定。此外，本研究結果亦確認特定目標法的主要不確定因素來自於大氣氣膠光學參數。

摘要(英)

FORMOSAT-5 (FS-5), launched in August 2017. The main payload onboard is optical sensor named Remote Sensing Instrument (RSI). The radiometric sensitivity of a new optical sensor may be unstable especially during the first year after launched. Therefore, the on-orbital absolute radiometric calibration is essential and significant to maintain the image quality of optical sensor, which is the main aim of this study. Two on-orbital radiometric calibration approaches, vicarious and cross calibration, are examined by field campaigns on the calibration sites. The ground-based measurements of atmospheric parameters and surface reflectance are primarily collected for vicarious calibration, while the reference images from Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (L-8 OLI) are employed for cross-calibration. The derived calibration coefficient of RSI spectral bands are based on the near simultaneous observations between the received radiance on the top of atmosphere, FS-5 RSI and L-8 OLI spectral digital numbers. The results indicate that the variation of optical sensitivity of RSI are obvious after launched. The calibration coefficient in each band has no evident consistency in 2017, but it tends to stable on the order of 5-8% of variation for most part of spectral bands in 2018. The results of calibrations indicate that the atmospheric environment should be taken into account, especially the aerosol optical depth. The results also suggest that the periodical calibration is necessary and very important to the further scientific applications.

關鍵字(中)

★ 輻射轉換係數
★ 福衛五號遙測儀
★ 特定目標輻射校正
★ 相互輻射校正
★ 大氣氣膠

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要 I
Abstract III
致謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 X
第一章緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 文獻回顧 3
1.2.1 特定目標輻射校正法 5
1.2.2 相互輻射校正法 6
1.3 研究目的 8
第二章理論與研究方法 9
2.1 絕對輻射校正 9
2.2 輻射轉換方程式 11
2.3 輻射傳送理論 12
2.3.1 輻射傳送方程式 12
2.3.2 環境效應理論 13
2.4 特定目標輻射校正法 16
2.5 相互輻射校正法 18
第三章資料蒐集與處理 21
3.1 校正場址 21
3.1.1 Railroad Valley Playa 22
3.2.2 Alkali Lake 23
3.2 特定目標輻射校正法 24
3.2.1福衛五號遙測儀及其影像產品 24
3.2.2地表反射率 27
3.2.3大氣參數 29
3.3 相互輻射校正法 31
3.3.1 福衛五號遙測儀及其影像產品 31
3.3.2 大地衛星八號及其影像產品 33
3.3.3 地表均向反射特性 35
3.3.4 大氣參數 37
第四章結果與討論 38
4.1 特定目標輻射校正結果 38
4.1.1 不同大氣產品下特定目標輻射校正結果 38
4.1.2整體特定目標輻射校正結果 41
4.2 相互輻射校正結果 45
4.3校正方法之比較分析 47
4.4 年際之變化分析 48
第五章結論與展望 50
5.1 結論 50
5.2 展望 51
參考文獻 53

參考文獻

1. 林唐煌、黃智遠、張智安、曾聖凱、張瑞中、賴澤恩、葉弘毅、蔡育德、郭人維(民107)，福衛五號委外研究，財團法人國家實驗研究院國家太空中心委託研究計畫(編號：NSPO-S-107067)，未出版。
2. 林唐煌、黃智遠、張智安、曾聖凱、蕭閔中(民106)，福衛五號遙測儀之輻射與幾何校正作業，財團法人國家實驗研究院國家太空中心委託研究計畫(編號：NSPO-S-106080)，未出版。
3. 林唐煌、黃智遠、張智安、劉振榮、陳良健、曾聖凱、蕭閔中(民105)，影像品質在軌率定作業，財團法人國家實驗研究院國家太空中心委託研究計畫(編號：NSPO-S-105068)，未出版。
4. 林唐煌、劉振榮、廖敦佑和曾聖凱(民 104)，福爾摩沙五號光學遙測酬載之特定目標輻射校正(Vicarious Calibration)與相互輻射校正(Cross Calibration)方法之規劃與研究，財團法人國家實驗研究院國家太空中心委託研究計畫(編號：NSPO-S-104096)，未出版。
5. 國家太空中心(無日期)。福爾摩沙衛星五號。民108年5月16日，取自財團法人國家實驗研究院國家太空中心網頁：http://www.nspo.narl.org.tw/tw2015/projects/FORMOSAT-5/program-description.html
6. 曾聖凱(民106)，福衛二號絕對輻射校正及全球動態量程之建立。國立中央大學太空科學研究所碩士論文，中壢。
7. 廖敦佑(民105)，福爾摩沙衛星二號遙測照相儀之在軌相互輻射校正。國立中央大學太空科學研究所碩士論文，中壢。
8. 劉小菁、許國賢、張勝聰、張和本(民106)，福衛五號遙測儀性能評估與校正。航測及遙測學刊，22(1), 61-75.
9. 劉小菁、曾世平、林喆、張和本(民103)，福衛五號遙測酬載系統工程經驗。航測及遙測學刊，18(1), 29-38.
10. Akihide Kamei, Kazuki Nakamura, Hirokazu Yamamoto, Ryosuke Nakamura, Satoshi Tsuchida, Naotaka Yamamoto, Satoshi Sekiguchi, Soushi Kato, Cheng-Chien Liu, Kuo-Hsien Hsu, and An-Ming Wu, 2012: Cross Calibration of Formosat-2 Remote Sensing Instrument (RSI) Using Terra Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(11), 4821-4830.
11. Akihide Kamei, Kazuki Nakamura, Hirokazu Yamamoto, Ryosuke Nakamura, Satoshi Tsuchida, Naotaka Yamamoto, Satoshi Sekiguchi, Soushi Kato, Cheng-Chien Liu, Kuo-Hsien Hsu, and An-Ming Wu, 2012: Cross Calibration of Formosat-2 Remote Sensing Instrument (RSI) Using Terra Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(11), 4821-4830.
12. Amit Angal, Gyanesh Chander, Xiaoxiong Xiong, Taeyoung Choi, and AishengWu, 2011: Characterization of the Sonoran desert as a radiometric calibration target for Earth observing sensors, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 5, 059502-1.
13. Amit Angal, Gyanesh Chander, Xiaoxiong Xiong, Taeyoung Choi, and AishengWu, 2011: Characterization of the Sonoran desert as a radiometric calibration target for Earth observing sensors, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 5, 059502-1.
14. Arai, K. Vicarious calibration of the solar reflection channels of radiometers onboard satellites through the field campaigns with measurements of refractive index and size distribution of aerosols. Adv. Space Res. 2007, 39(1), 13-19.
15. Chander, G., Markham, B. L., & Helder, D. L. (2009). Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote sensing of environment, 113(5), 893-903.
16. Chern, J.S.; Wu, A.M.; Lin, S.F. On-orbit performance verification of FORMOSAT-2---A look back. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, Series A 2009, 41(3), 205-211.
17. CNES. (2011). Absolute Calibration of Formosat-2 Using Desert Site. December 2011 Update.
18. CNES. (2014). Absolute Calibration of Formosat-2 Using Desert Site. June 2014 Update.
19. Dinguirard, M.; Slater, P.N. Calibration of space-multispectral imaging sensors: A review. Remote Sens. Environ. 1999, 68(3), 194-205.
20. F. Sakuma, A. Ono, S. Tsuchida, N. Ohgi, H. Inada, S. Akagi, and H. Ono, “Onboard calibration of the ASTER instrument,” IEEE Trans. Geosci Remote Sens., 43(12), 2715–2724, Dec. 2005.
21. H. Murakami, T. Tadono, H. Imai, J. Nieke, and M. Shimada, “Improvement of AVNIR-2 radiometric calibration by comparison of crosscalibration and onboard lamp calibration,” IEEE Trans. Geosci Remote Sens., 47(12), 4051–4059, Dec. 2009.
22. Hagolle, O.; Goloub, P.; Deschamps, P.Y.; Cosnefroy, H.; Briottet, X.; Bailleul, T.; Nicolas, J.M.; Parol, F.; Lafrance, B.; Herman, M. Results of POLDER in-flight calibration. IEEE Trans. Geosci Remote Sens. 1999, 37(3), 1550-1566.
23. Hagolle, P. Goloub, P.-Y. Deschamps, H. Cosnefroy, X. Briottet, T. Bailleul, J.-M. Nicolas, F. Parol, B. Lafrance, and M. Herman, “Results of POLDER in-flight calibration,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 37(3), 1550–1566, May 1999.
24. J. Nieke, T. Aoki, T. Tanikawa, H. Motoyoshi, and M. Hori, “A satellite cross-calibration experiment,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 1(3), 215–219, Jul. 2004.
25. Kamei, A.; Nakamura, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Nakamura, R.; Tsuchida, S.; Yamamoto, N.; Sekiguchi, S.; Kato, S.; Liu, C.C.; Hsu, K.H.; Wu, A.M. Cross Calibration of Formosat-2 Remote Sensing Instrument (RSI) Using Terra Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(11), 4821-4831.
26. Lin, T.-H., A. J. Chen, G.-R. Liu, and T.-H. Kuo, 2002: Monitoring the Atmospheric Aerosol Optical Depth with SPOT Data in Complex Terrain. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 23(4), 647-659.
27. Lin, T.H.; Liu G.R. On-orbit Radiometric Calibration of the FORMOSAT-2 Remote Sensing Instrument. Terr Atmos. Ocean Sci. 2009, 20(6), 833-838.
28. Liu, C.C.; Kamei, A.; Hsu, K.H.; Tsuchida, S.; Huang, H.M.; Kato, S.; Nakamura, R.; Wu, A. M. Vicarious calibration of the Formosat-2 remote sensing instrument. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2010, 48(4), 2162-2169.
29. Mendenhall, J. A.; Lencioni, D. E.; Evans, J. B. Spectral and radiometric calibration of the Advanced Land Imager. Linc. Lab. J. 2005, 15(2), 207.
30. Mishra, N.; Haque, M.O.; Leigh, L.; Aaron, D.; Helder, D.; Markham, B. Radiometric Cross Calibration of Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+). Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 12619-12638
31. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (May, 2019)。Landsat Science.https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/landsat-data-continuity-mission/
32. Ouaidrari H. and Vermote E. F., 1999: Operational atmospheric correction of Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70, 4-15.
33. P. M. Teillet, J. L. Barker, B. L. Markham, R. R. Irish, G. Fedosejevs, and J. C. Storey, “Radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TMsensors based on tandem data sets,” Remote Sens. Environ., 78(1/2), 39–54, Oct. 2001.
34. S. F. Biggar, K. J. Thome, and W. Wisniewski, “Vicarious radiometric calibration of EO-1 sensors by reference to high-reflectance ground targets,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41(6), 1174–1179, Jun. 2003.
35. S. F. Biggar, P. N. Slater, and D. I. Gellman, “Uncertainties in the in-flight calibration of sensors with reflectance to measured ground sites in the 0.4–1.1μm range,” Remote Sens. Environ., 48(2), 245–252, May 1994.
36. Slater, P.N.; Biggar, S.F.; Holm, R.G.; Jackson, R.D.; Mao, Y.; Moran, M.S.; Palmer, J.M.; Yuan, B. Reflectance-and radiance-based methods for the in-flight absolute calibration of multispectral sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 1987, 22(1), 11-37.
37. Tao, P., Lu, L., Zhang, Y., Xu, B., and Zou, S. 2014. On-Orbit Geometric Calibration of the Panchromatic/Multispectral Camera of the ZY-1 02C Satellite based on Public Geographic Data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 80(6), 505-517.
38. Teillet P.M., Fedosejevs G., Thome K.J., Barker J.L. Impacts of spectral band difference effects on radiometric cross-calibration between satellite sensors in the solar-reflective spectral domain.Remote Sensing of Environment, 110 (2007), pp. 393-409
39. Teillet, P.M.; Markham, B.L.; Irish, R.R. Landsat cross-calibration based on near simultaneous imaging of common ground targets. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 102(3), 264-270.
40. Thome, K.J.; Biggar, S.F.; Wisniewski, W. Cross comparison of EO-1 sensors and other Earth resources sensors to Landsat-7 ETM+ using Railroad Valley Playa. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41(6), 1180-1188.
41. Vermote, E. F., Tanré, D., Deuze, J. L., Herman, M., & Morcette, J. J., (1997). Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: An overview. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 35(3), 675-686.
42. Vermote, E., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J. L., Herman, M., & Morcrette, J. J., (1995). Second simulation of a satellite signal in the solar spectrum (6S). 6S User Guide Version, 1.
43. Wang, M., Yang, B., Hu, F., and Zang, X. 2014. On-Orbit geometric calibration model and its applications for high-resolution optical satellite imagery. Remote Sensing, 6(5), 4391-4408.

指導教授

林唐煌

審核日期

2019-7-26

推文