適用於多領域虛假評論之判斷模型

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：72

、訪客IP：3.145.98.196

姓名

魏晨珊(Chen-Shan Wei) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

適用於多領域虛假評論之判斷模型
(Devising a cross- domain model to detect deceptive review comments)

相關論文

★ 在社群網站上作互動推薦及研究使用者行為對其效果之影響	★ 以AHP法探討伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標的權重決定分析
★ 以AHP法探討智慧型手機產業營運中心區位選擇考量關鍵因素之研究	★ 太陽能光電產業經營績效評估－應用資料包絡分析法
★ 建構國家太陽能電池產業競爭力比較模式之研究	★ 以序列採礦方法探討景氣指標與進出口值的關聯
★ ERP專案成員組合對績效影響之研究	★ 推薦期刊文章至適合學科類別之研究
★ 品牌故事分析與比較-以古早味美食產業為例	★ 以方法目的鏈比較Starbucks與Cama吸引消費者購買因素
★ 探討創意店家創業價值之研究- 以赤峰街、民生社區為例	★ 以領先指標預測企業長短期借款變化之研究
★ 應用層級分析法遴選電競筆記型電腦鍵盤供應商之關鍵因子探討	★ 以互惠及利他行為探討信任關係對知識分享之影響
★ 結合人格特質與海報主色以類神經網路推薦電影之研究	★ 資料視覺化圖表與議題之關聯

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-1-13以後開放)

摘要(中)

網路購物中評論的影響力對消費者與店家銷售策略已經產生巨大影響，其中，正
向的評論會對於消費者有積極的購買行為。因此許多店家為提升銷售量，會徵求許多
寫手編寫正向虛假評論，混淆消費者的資訊推銷產品。目前辨別真假評論的研究中，
若使用語言類別萃取特定評論的特徵，將導致原先表現良好的辨別方法換成另一批資
料測試時，準確率就會大幅下降。
至今相關研究逐漸由單一領域中辨別虛假評論進一步探討跨領域中辨別虛假評
論，例如：Li, Ott, Cardie, and Hovy (2014)、Ren and Ji (2017)、W. Liu, Jing, and Li
(2019)。無論是使用評論之語言特徵或類神經網路等綜合方法建立辨別模型，皆面臨精
準度降低的問題，其中，也並未明確解釋為何字詞可以應用在跨領域的預測上。
本論文使用：Ott et al.(2011)及 Li, Ott, Cardie, and Hovy (2014)所搜集的三個領域
(hotel、restaurant、doctor)真實與虛假評論資料，利用心理學理論，Stimuli Organism
Response (S-O-R)框架為基礎結合 LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count)，建立一個
跨領使用的分類模型，再加上透過 word2vec 詞向量頻繁特徵建萃取，克服過去論文跨
域辨別精準度大幅降低的狀況。
實驗結果得出若使用方法一，SOR 與評論之特徵權重進行分類演算法計算，表現最
佳的 DNN 方法中準確度達 63.6%。方法二，詞向量頻繁特徵進行分類演算法計算，表
現最佳的 random forest 準確度達 73.75%。

摘要(英)

The online reviews not only have huge impact on consumer shopping behavior but also
online stores’ marketing strategy. Positive reviews will have positive influence for consumer’s
buying decision. Therefore, some sellers want to boost their sales volume. They will hire
spammers to write undeserving positive reviews to promote their products. Currently, some of
the researches related to detection of fake reviews based on the text feature, the model will
reach to high accuracy. However, the same model test on the other dataset the accuracy
decrease sharply.
Relevant researches have gradually explored the identification of false reviews through
field. For example, Li, Ott, Cardie, and Hovy (2014)；Ren and Ji (2017)、W. Liu, Jing, and
Li (2019). Whether the model built using comprehensive methods such as text features or
neural networks, encountering the decreasing of accuracy. On the other hand, the method
didn’t explain why the model can be applied to cross-domain predictions.
In our research, we using the fake reviews and truthful reviews from Ott et al.(2011) and
Li, Ott, Cardie, and Hovy (2014) in the three domain (hotel, restaurant, doctor). The cross
domain detect model based on Stimuli Organism Response (S-O-R) combine LIWC
(Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count), add word2vec quantization feature, overcoming the
decreasing accuracy situation.
According to the research result, in the method one SOR calculation of feature weight of
reviews, the DNN classification algorithm accuracy is 63.6%. In the method two, calculation
of frequent features of word vectors, the random forest classification algorithm accuracy is
73.75%.

關鍵字(中)

★ 判斷虛假評論
★ Stimuli-Organism-Response (S-O-R) 框架
★ word2vec

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄
內容
中文摘要 ................................................................. i
Abstract.................................................................. ii
目錄 ................................................................... iii
圖目錄 ................................................................... v
表目錄 .................................................................. vi
一、緒論 ................................................................ 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 ................................................... 1
1-2 研究方法與目的 ................................................... 2
1-3 效益與貢獻 ....................................................... 4
1-4 研究架構 ......................................................... 5
二、文獻探討 ............................................................ 6
2-1 線上評論之相關研究 ............................................... 6
2-2 辨別虛假評論之相關研究 ........................................... 7
2-3 Stimulus-Organism-Response(S-O-R)框架 ........................... 11
三、研究方法與設計 ..................................................... 13
3-1 研究架構與步驟 .................................................. 13
3-2 SOR 類別篩選方法 ................................................. 15
3-3 方法一：SOR 與評論之特徵權重 ..................................... 16
3-4 方法二：詞向量頻繁特徵 .......................................... 16
四、研究實驗 ........................................................... 18
4-1 實驗資料 ........................................................ 18
4-1-1 資料預處理 ................................................ 19
4-2 SOR 類別資料 ..................................................... 19
iv

4-3 評論與 SOR 詞特徵權重 ............................................ 20
4-4 實驗一：SOR 與評論之特徵權重 ..................................... 25
4-5 實驗二：詞向量頻繁特徵 .......................................... 26
五、結論與建議 ......................................................... 32
5-1 研究結果 ....................................................... 32
5-2 未來建議 ....................................................... 32
參考文獻 ................................................................ 33
附錄一 .................................................................. 37
附錄二 .................................................................. 38
附錄三 .................................................................. 41

參考文獻

參考文獻
[1]. 網路資料 online resources︰iSURVEY 東方線上：消費者相信誰？線上評論如何影
響消費者線上/線下購買決策。2018 年 10 月 21 日，取自
https://www.smartm.com.tw/article/35343537cea3
[2]. 網路資料 online resources︰BuzzFeed.News, Her Amazon Purchases Are Real. The
Reviews Are Fake. November 20, 2019, 取自
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nicolenguyen/her-amazon-purchases-are-real-the
reviews-are-fake
[3]. 網路資料 on line resources︰《Boston 25 News》: Shopping on Amazon, how to tell if
reviews are fake.取自 https://www.boston25news.com/news/consumer/shopping-on
amazon-how-to-tell-if-reviews-are-fake-1/694913717, November 23, 2019,
[4]. Adelaar, T., Chang, S., Lancendorfer, K. M., Lee, B., & Morimoto, M. (2003). Effects of
Media Formats on Emotions and Impulse Buying Intent. Journal of Information
Technology, 18(4), 247-266. doi:10.1080/0268396032000150799
[5]. Aslam, U., Jayabalan, M., Ilyas, H., & Suhail, A. (2019). A survey on opinion spam
detection methods. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9).
[6]. Banerjee, S., & Chua, A. Y. (2014). Applauses in hotel reviews: Genuine or deceptive?
Paper presented at the 2014 Science and Information Conference.
[7]. Björk, P., Bosnjak, M., & Osti, L. (2010). Atmospherics on tour operators’ websites:
Website features that stimulate emotional response. Journal of Vacation Marketing,
16(4), 283-296. doi:10.1177/1356766710372243
[8]. Boujbel, L., & d′Astous, A. (2015). Exploring the Feelings and Thoughts that
Accompany the Experience of Consumption Desires. Psychology & Marketing, 32(2),
219-231. doi:10.1002/mar.20774
34

[9]. Cagnina, L. C., & Rosso, P. (2017). Detecting deceptive opinions: intra and cross
domain classification using an efficient representation. International Journal of
Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 25(Suppl. 2), 151-174.
[10]. Chang, H.-J., Eckman, M., & Yan, R.-N. (2011). Application of the Stimulus-Organism
Response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse
buying behavior. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer
Research, 21(3), 233-249.
[11]. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online
book reviews. Journal of marketing research, 43(3), 345-354.
[12]. Cui, G., Lui, H.-K., & Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new
product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39-58.
[13]. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2001). Atmospheric qualities of online
retailing: A conceptual model and implications. Journal of Business Research, 54(2),
177-184.
[14]. Ettis, S. A. (2017). Examining the relationships between online store atmospheric color,
flow experience and consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
37, 43-55.
[15]. Feng, S., Banerjee, R., & Choi, Y. (2012). Syntactic stylometry for deception detection.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for
Computational Linguistics: Short Papers-Volume 2.
[16]. Gatautis, R., & Vaiciukynaite, E. (2013). WEBSITE ATMOSPHERE: TOWARDS
REVISITED TAXONOMY OF WEBSITE ELEMENTS. Economics & Management,
18(3).
[17]. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic
word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate
themselves on the internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
35

[18]. Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2007). Analyzing and Detecting Review Spam. 547-552.
doi:10.1109/icdm.2007.68
[19]. Kavanagh, D. J., Andrade, J., & May, J. (2005). Imaginary relish and exquisite torture:
the elaborated intrusion theory of desire. Psychological review, 112(2), 446.
[20]. Kim, S., Lee, S., Park, D., & Kang, J. (2017). Constructing and evaluating a novel
crowdsourcing-based paraphrased opinion spam dataset. Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web.
[21]. Klaus, T., & Changchit, C. (2017). Toward an Understanding of Consumer Attitudes on
Online Review Usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 59(3), 277-286.
doi:10.1080/08874417.2017.1348916
[22]. Li, J., Ott, M., Cardie, C., & Hovy, E. (2014). Towards a general rule for identifying
deceptive opinion spam. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting
of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).
[23]. Liu, P., Xu, Z., Ai, J., & Wang, F. (2017). Identifying Indicators of Fake Reviews Based
on Spammer′s Behavior Features. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE International
Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C).
[24]. Liu, W., Jing, W., & Li, Y. (2019). Incorporating feature representation into BiLSTM for
deceptive review detection. Computing, 1-15.
[25]. Menon, S., & Kahn, B. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on
the Internet shopping experience. Journal of retailing, 78(1), 31-40.
[26]. Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V., Liu, B., & Glance, N. (2013). What yelp fake review
filter might be doing? Paper presented at the Seventh international AAAI conference on
weblogs and social media.
[27]. Mummalaneni, V. (2005). An empirical investigation of Web site characteristics,
consumer emotional states and on-line shopping behaviors. Journal of Business
Research, 58(4), 526-532. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(03)00143-7
36

[28]. Oh, J., Fiorito, S. S., Cho, H., & Hofacker, C. F. (2008). Effects of design factors on store
image and expectation of merchandise quality in web-based stores. Journal of Retailing
and Consumer Services, 15(4), 237-249. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.03.004
[29]. Ott, M., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Negative deceptive opinion spam. Paper
presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the north american chapter of the
association for computational linguistics: human language technologies.
[30]. Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Finding deceptive opinion spam
by any stretch of the imagination. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 49th annual
meeting of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies
volume 1.
[31]. Ren, Y., & Ji, D. (2017). Neural networks for deceptive opinion spam detection: An
empirical study. Information Sciences, 385-386, 213-224. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.01.015
[32]. Savage, D., Zhang, X., Yu, X., Chou, P., & Wang, Q. (2015). Detection of opinion spam
based on anomalous rating deviation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8650
8657.
[33]. Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D. (2009). Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel
reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism management, 30(1), 123-127.

指導教授

許秉瑜

審核日期

2020-1-13

推文