開放性人格與適應性績效： 探討學習敏捷性與恆毅力之中介

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：18

、訪客IP：18.191.117.41

姓名

陳宜歆(I-Hsin Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

開放性人格與適應性績效：探討學習敏捷性與恆毅力之中介
(Openness to Experience and Adaptive Performance: Exploring the Mediation by Learning Agility and Grit)

相關論文

★ 創造力與創業精神-探索創業動機與創業環境之調節	★ 工作壓力源、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係—以在職進修者為例
★ Shopping Motivation on Purchase intention: Can Loyalty Program and Corporate Image Enhance Such Relationship?	★ 企業社會責任對求職者應徵意圖之影響：以組織人才吸引力與企業聲望為中介
★ 人力資源彈性策略和組織創新相關性之研究：論適應型文化調節適應能力及知識整合之中介效果	★ 個人靈性與人生滿意度-探討人格特質之中介
★ 購買動機與便利商店集點行為之研究	★ 五大與九型人格對工作績效、組織公民行為及工作滿意度的影響
★ 體育賽事觀賽體驗與球隊吉祥物品牌個性對職業球隊品牌權益之關聯－以MLB為例	★ 學習成效、組織承諾對留職意願之影響：
★ 消費者特徵與購物意願：探討網站與商品特性之中介	★ 資訊來源之信任與品質對於購買傾向之影響
★ 享樂購物動機與衝動購買：探討購後後悔之影響與因應行為	★ 產品包裝設計與化妝品之購買意圖：探討生活型態與消費者認知之中介
★ 信任與價值觀一致性對轉型領導與適應性績效關係之中介	★ 品牌信任受價值知覺與服務品質之影響：以旅館顧客滿意度為中介

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-4-10以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討開放性人格與適應性績效之關係，是否會受學習敏捷性與恆毅力之中介。適應性績效是個人為因應環境、工作的要求來修正其行為的工作績效。學習敏捷性指的是在新的、艱難的或不同的條件下，表現出學習新能力的意願和能力(Lombardo & Eichinger, 2000)。恆毅力指的是為達成長期目標所具備的毅力與熱情(Duckworth et al., 2007)。透過問卷調查法，共計回收320份來自不同行業員工之問卷。研究結果顯示，學習敏捷性可中介開放性人格與適應性績效之關係，但是恆毅力與適應性績效僅有低到中度相關。

摘要(英)

The present study aims to explore the relationship between openness to experience and adaptive performance, with regards to the possible mediation by learning agility and grit. Adaptive performance is a type of job performance that an individual adapts to its environmental and work demand. Learning agility refers to “the willingness and ability to learn new competencies in order to perform under first-time, tough, or different conditions” (Lombardo & Eichinger, 2000). Grit refers to “perseverance and passion for long-term goals” (Duckworth et al., 2007). A total of 320 questionnaires from working adults were collected and analyzed. Results show positive correlation among openness to experience and adaptive performance. While learning agility is able to mediate such relationship, the mediation of grit is not present, probably due to low to moderate correlations with adaptive performance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 開放性人格
★ 學習敏捷性
★ 恆毅力
★ 適應性績效

關鍵字(英)

★ openness to experience
★ learning agility
★ adaptive performance
★ grit

論文目次

摘要 ii
Abstract iii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究動機 3
1-4 研究流程 4
第二章文獻探討 6
2-1 適應性績效 6
2-2 開放性人格 9
2-2-1 五大人格特質與開放性 9
2-2-2 開放性人格與適應性績效 11
2-3 學習敏捷性 12
2-3-1 學習敏捷性的理論 12
2-3-2 學習敏捷性的應用 13
2-4恆毅力 16
第三章研究方法 20
3-1 研究架構 20
3-2 研究範圍與對象 20
3-3 研究變項量表與衡量工具 21
3-4 研究步驟 22
第四章研究結果 24
4-1 樣本基本資料分析 24
4-2 信度與效度分析 22
4-2-1 內部一致性信度 22
4-2-2 相關矩陣 24
4-2-3 區別效度 26
4-2-4 CFA之信度與效度分析 26
4-3 模式驗證與適配分析 30
4-3-1 開放性人格與適應性績效 32
4-3-2 開放性人格與學習敏捷性 33
4-3-3 學習敏捷性與適應性績效 33
4-3-4 開放性人格與恆毅力 33
4-3-5 恆毅力與適應性績效 33
4-3-6 中介效果討論 34
第五章結論與建議 36
5-1 研究結果 36
5-2 管理意涵 38
5-3 研究限制與後續建議 39
參考文獻 41

參考文獻

一、中文部分
池進通、李鴻文與陳芬儀(2008)。五大人格特質與工作績效關係之研究。經營管理論叢，4(2)，1-9。
莊如松與葉柏秀(2006)。高績效人力資源管理與知識分享之關係：以組織承諾與組織公民行為為中介變項。2006年中國管理研究學會中文論壇，中國南京。
二、英文部分
Arifin, W. N., & Yusoff, M. S. B. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Universiti Sains Malaysia emotional quotient inventory among medical students in Malaysia. SAGE Open, April-June 2019, 1-9.
Albrecht, A.-G., Dilchert, S., Deller, J., & Paulus, F. (2013). Openness in cross-cultural work settings: A multicountry study of expatriates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 64-75.
Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1997). Construct‐oriented biodata: Capturing change‐related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111.
Anseel, F. (2017). Agile learning strategies for sustainable careers: a review and integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior and reflection. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 51-57.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, J. P. (1999). The deﬁnition and measurement of performance in the New Age. In D. R. Ilgen & D. P. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for stafﬁng, motivation and development (pp. 399-429). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Camperio Cciani, A., Capiluppi, C., Veronese, A., & Sartori, G. (2007). The adaptive value of personality differences revealed by small island population dynamics. European Journal of Personality, 21(1), 3-22.
Chang, W. (2014). Grit and academic performance: Is being grittier better? Unpublished doctoral dissetation, University of Miami.
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012) Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280-293.
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296-325.
Connolly, J. (2001). Assessing the construct validity of a measure of learning agility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida International University.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (p. 179–198). Sage Publications, Inc.
Dai, G., De Meuse, K. P., & Tang, K. Y. (2013). The role of learning agility in executive career success: The results of two field studies. Journal of Managerial Issues, 25(2), 108-131.
De Meuse, K., Dai, G., & Hallenbeck, G. (2010). Learning agility: A construct whose time has come. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62, 119-130.
Delaney, L., Harmon, C., Ryan, M. (2013). The role of noncognitive traits in undergraduate study behaviours. Economics of Education Review, 32, 181-195.
DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 258-279.
De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., & Wu, J. (2011). Leadership skills across organizational levels: A closer examination. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14(2), 120–139.
De Vera, M. J., Gavino, J. C., & Portugal, E. J. (2015). Grit and superior work performance in an asian context. Proceedings of 11th International Business and Social Science Research Conference.
Dries, N., Vantilborgh, T., & Pepermans, R. (2012). The role of learning agility and career variety in the identification and development of high potential employees. Personnel Review, 41(3), 340-358.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.
Dweck, C. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65(2), 34-39.
Eichinger, R., & Lombardo, M. (2004). Learning agility as a prime indicator of potential. Human Resource Planning, 27, 12-16.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable behaviours for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of psychology, 55(2), 65-73.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162-179.
Jachimowicz, J.M., Wihler A., Bailey, E.R., Galinsky, A.D. (2018). Why grit requires perseverance and passion to positively predict performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(40), 201803561.
John, O. P., Naumann, L., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.114-158). New York: The Guilford Press.
Jundt, D. K., Shoss, M. K., & Huang, J. L. (2013). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), 553-571.
Karaevli, A., & Hall, D. T. (2006). How career variety promotes the adaptability of managers: A theoretical model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 699(3), 359-373.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed). New York: Guilford Press.
Kurtz, J. E., Puher, M. A., & Cross, N. A. (2012). Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(6), 630–637.
Laxson, E. N. (2018). Within and between person effects of learning agility: A longitudinal examination of how learning agility impacts future career success. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.
Lin, C. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2017). Personality and family context in explaining grit of Taiwanese high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2197-2213.
Lombardo, M. M. & Eichinger, R.W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321-33.
Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2003). The LEADERSHIP ARCHITECT® norms and validity report. Minneapolis: Lominger International: A Korn/Ferry Company.
Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (1997). HR’s Role in Building Competitive Edge Leaders. Human Resource Management, 36(1), 141-146.
London, M., & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 119-153). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193-210.
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 927-935.
McCauley, C. D., Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., & Morrow, J. E. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 544-560.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
Mohan, G., & Mulla, Z. (2013). Openness to experience and work outcomes: Exploring the moderating effects of conscientiousness and job complexity. Great Lakes Herald, 7, 18-36.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583.
Nye, C., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F. (2012). Vocational interests and performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years of research. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7, 384-403.
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299-323
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Hedge, J. W., & Borman, W. C. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15, 299-323.
Pulakos, E., Arad, S., Donovan, M., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, B. C. (2015). How does learning agile business leadership differ? Exploring a revised model of the construct of learning agility in relation to executive performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
Suzuki, Y., Tamesue, D., Asahi, K., & Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Grit and Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 10(9): e0137501.
Vogelsang, K. (2018). The Relationship between Person-Environment fit, Grit, and Task performance: A mediation analysis. Unpublished bachelor thesis, University of Twente.

指導教授

杜秉叡(Ben-Roy Do)

審核日期

2020-4-10

推文