博碩士論文 104122601 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:61 、訪客IP:3.141.38.5
姓名 李雪(Li Xue)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 英美語文學系
論文名稱 LGBT非政府組織的聯合國倡導
(LGBT Non-Governmental Organizations’ Advocacies in the United Nations)
相關論文
★ 新科技、商品化及女性:烏蘇拉.胡斯論消費勞動★  The Question of A Feminist Subject in Li Ang
★  Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Critique of Feminine Domesticity: The Yellow Wallpaper and Herland★ Perverse Penumbrae in Exile: Multiple Technologies of Sexual Policing and Discipline in Crystal Boys
★ 主體言說?--影集「慾望城市」的傅柯權力分析★ 一個再現的問題:閱讀天堂電話不通中的知識份子和賤民
★ 基進女性主義母職︰重思芮曲與費爾史東★ 從白先勇孽子到公視孽子
★ 三位亞美女作家的雙重書寫★ 弱勢酷兒的文本政治:閱讀《羅莉塔》、《繁花聖母》、《天河撩亂》
★ Gay Rave Culture and HIV Prevention: A Subcultural Intervention in Public Policy★ No Shame in the Game of Love: On Killing Husband and Osmanthus Alley
★ “Bad Habits”: Bisexual Practices in Taiwan as Tactics of Sexual Politics★ 批判2003年至2009年台灣的反人口販運運動
★ 情感裂隙與酷兒(對抗)位置性:當代台灣男同志E藥文化中的性與親密關係★ 張亦絢<<壞掉時候>>與<<最好的時光>>中的糾結情感
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 自二十世紀九十年代起,聯合國已經成為全球LGBT運動家的重要倡導陣地。很多LGBT非政府組織正積極參與聯合國事務,利用聯合國人權機制為框架去反對國家支持的恐同行為,并呼籲目標國進行法律或政策改革以保護LGBT群體的權益。現有研究大多從宏觀視角對這種新型的倡導形式表示讚同或批判,本文通過分析國際LGBTI聯合會(ILGA)在聯合國的行動來梳理LGBT非政府組織參與聯合國人權機制的典型操作模式。同時本文對非西方本土LGBT非政府組織的聯合國參與進行的檢視。儘管由於資金,專業性,人脈等因素,非西方本土組織參與聯合國機制的範式和策略選擇受到限制和影響,并與國際LGBT非政府組織的典型操作模式趨同。但在參與聯合國人權機制的過程中,非西方本土組織對不斷複製特定框架,身份和價值的國際人權機制的內在抵抗,是探索解放在地性/別少數群體新路徑的起點。
摘要(英) During the past thirty years, the United Nations (UN), which had a human rights mechanism since 1945, has become a key battlefield for global lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) activists. A number of LGBT non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are active in the United Nations, using human rights as framework to fight against state-sponsored homophobia and call for legal or policy reform in the target states to promote global LGBT rights. Instead of simply celebrating or rejecting this new trend from a macro-perspective, I focus on displaying the specific operation methods of LGBT NGOs by exploring International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association’s (ILGA) engagement at the UN. I also examine non-western LGBT NGOs’ involvement by analyzing cases of non-western NGOs’ participation in the UN. Although the frameworks and strategies of local LGBT NGOs in the United Nations are highly affected by the prevailing operation method for their independence on international funds, expertise and networking, the nonconforming aspects emerging from their participation in the UN imply a potential alternative approach to liberate local sexual minorities, which may bring dynamic into the pedantic and repetitive reproduction of frames, identities and values in international human rights mechanism.
關鍵字(中) ★ LGBT
★ 非政府組織
★ 聯合國
★ 國際LGBTI聯合會
關鍵字(英) ★ LGBT
★ NGO
★ the United Nations
★ ILGA
論文目次 English Abstract……………………………………………………………… Ⅰ
中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ
致謝辭 …………………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
Table of Contents…………………………………………………………… V
Introduction……………………………………………………….. 1
Chapter 1
The Background of LGBT NGOs’ Advocacies in the UN …………………………. 6
Chapter 2
State Sponsored Homophobia and State Protected Homosexuality: ILGA’s Framework and Strategy in the UN ……………………………………………………………. 19
Chapter 3
Reproduction of Dominant Value-Codings in the UN Human Rights system…………………… 36
Chapter 4
Unpredictability Emerging from Local NGOs Participation in the UN………….. 61
Conclusion ……………………………. 75
Works Cited …………………79
參考文獻 Buss, Doris E. ”Finding the Homosexual in Women’s Rights.” International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2004, pp. 257-284.
Carroll, Aengus and L.R Mendos. ”State Sponsored Homophobia 2017: A World Survey of Laws: Criminalisation, Protection and Recognition of Same-Sex Love.” Ginebra: International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA), 2017.
Chaney, Paul. ”Civil Society,‘Traditional Values’ and LGBT Resistance to Heteronormative Rights Hegemony: Analysis of the Un Universal Periodic Review in the Russian Federation.” Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 70, no. 4, 2018, pp. 638-665.
Clark, Ann Marie et al. ”The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of Ngo Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women.” World politics, vol. 51, no. 1, 1998, pp. 1-35.
Clinton, Hillary Rodham. ”Remarks in Recognition of International Human Rights Day.” US Department of State, vol. 6, 2011.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. Fifty-Ninth Session: Summary Record of the 1251st Meeting. 2014.
D’Amico, Francine. ”LGBT and (Dis) United Nations.” Sexualities in World Politics: How LGBTQ Claims Shape International Relations, 2015, pp. 54-76.
Franck, Thomas M. ”The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance.” American Journal of International Law, vol. 86, no. 1, 1992, pp. 46-91.
Gaer, Felice D. ”Reality Check: Human Rights Nongovernmental Organisations Confront Governments at the United Nations.” Third World Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, 1995, pp. 389-404.
Grewal, Inderpal. Transnational America: Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. Duke University Press, 2005.
Hodžić, Saida. ”Seduced by Information, Contaminated by Power: Women’s Rights as a Global Panopticon.” Confronting global gender justice, 2011, pp. 215-230.
Ibhawoh, Bonny. ”Human Rights for Some: Universal Human Rights, Sexual Minorities, and the Exclusionary Impulse.” International Journal, vol. 69, no. 4, 2014, pp. 612-622.
Ilkkaracan, Pinar and Jolly Susie. Gender and Sexuality: Overview Report. Bridge, Institute of Development Studies, 2007.
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission. Equal and Indivisible: Crafting Inclusive Shadow Reports for CEDAW. 2011.
Kirichenko, K. ”United Nations Treaty Bodies: References to Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics.” ILGA, 2016.
Langlois, Anthony J. ”International Relations Theory and Global Sexuality Politics.” Politics, 2015.
Massad, Joseph A. Desiring Arabs. University of Chicago Press, 2008.
---. Islam in Liberalism. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Massad, Joseph et al. ”The Empire of Sexuality: An Interview with Joseph Massad.” Jadaliyya, March, vol. 5, 2013.
Mawerenga, Jones Hamburu. ”International Debate on Human Rights and Homosexuality.” The Homosexuality Debate in Malawi, Mzuni Press, 2018, pp. 205-273.
McDougal, Myres S and Gerhard Bebr. ”Human Rights in the United Nations.” American Journal of International Law, vol. 58, no. 3, 1964, pp. 603-641.
Miller, Alice M. ”Sexual but Not Reproductive: Exploring the Junction and Disjunction of Sexual and Reproductive Rights.” Health and Human Rights, 2000, pp. 68-109.
Moreno-Tabarez, Ulises et al. ”Queer Politics in China: A Conversation with “Western” Activists Working in Beijing.” QED: a journal in GLBTQ worldmaking, vol. 1, no. 3, 2014, pp. 109-132.
Mountford, Tom. ”The Legal Status and Position of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People in the People’s Republic of China.” International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, 2010.
Otto, Dianne. ”Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Nations System: The Emerging Role of International Civil Society.” Hum. Rts. Q., vol. 18, 1996, p. 107.
Paternotte, David. ”The International (Lesbian and) Gay Association and the Question of Pedophilia: Tracking the Demise of Gay Liberation Ideals.” Sexualities, vol. 17, no. 1-2, 2014, pp. 121-138.
Paternotte, David et al. ”ILGA 1978-2007.” ILGA, Web. 2 May. 2017.
Puar, Jasbir. ”Rethinking Homonationalism.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 45, no. 02, 2013, pp. 336-339.
Peng, Yanzi. ” Using the UN to advance LGBT rights in China.” OpenGlobalRights, 6 Nov. 2018. Web. 20 Dec. 2019.
Quinn, Sheila. ”An Activist′s Guide to the Yogyakarta Principles.” edited by ARC international, 2010.
Ritchie, Cyril. ”Coordinate? Cooperate? Harmonise? Ngo Policy and Operational Coalitions.” Third World Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, 1995, pp. 513-524.
Ron, James et al. ”Transnational Information Politics: Ngo Human Rights Reporting, 1986–2000.” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 2005, pp. 557-587.
Sanders, Douglas. ”Getting Lesbian and Gay Issues on the International Human Rights Agenda.” Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 1, 1996, pp. 67-106.
---. ”Out at the Un.” Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups and Human Rights, edited by David S Weissbrodt and Mary Rumsey, Edward Elgar, 2011, pp. 253-286.
---. ”The Role of the Yogyakarta Principles.” International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, 2008.
Thoreson, Ryan Richard. ”Queering Human Rights: The Yogyakarta Principles and the Norm That Dare Not Speak Its Name.” Journal of Human Rights, vol. 8, no. 4, 2009, pp. 323-339.
United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights. Working with the United Nations Human Rights Programme: A Handbook for Civil Society. 2008.
Uvin, Peter. ”Scaling up the Grass Roots and Scaling Down the Summit: The Relations between Third World Nongovernmental Organisations and the United Nations.” Third World Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, 1995, pp. 495-512.
Waites, Matthew. ”Critique of ′Sexual Orientation′ and ′Gender Identity′ in Human Rights Discourse: Global Queer Politics Beyond the Yogyakarta Principles.” Contemporary Politics, vol. 15, no. 1, 2009, pp. 137-156.
Weiss, Thomas G et al. ”The “Third” United Nations.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, vol. 15, no. 1, 2009, pp. 123-142.
Wilkinson, Cai and Anthony J Langlois. ”Not Such an International Human Rights Norm? Local Resistance to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights—Preliminary Comments.” Taylor & Francis, 2014.
Williams, Randall. The Divided World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
指導教授 丁乃非(Ding Nai-fei) 審核日期 2020-1-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明