CSR 政策波動度與股價報酬之關係

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：3.143.9.115

姓名

王昱程(Yu-Cheng Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

CSR 政策波動度與股價報酬之關係
(The Relationship between CSR Volatility and Stock Return)

相關論文

★ 避險基金之績效評估	★ 展望理論與共同基金績效
★ 生命週期基金 :行為財務學觀點	★ 行為特性與投資績效相關性之研究
★ 專業投資人行為特性探討	★ 中小型企業融資缺口與資訊不對稱之探討
★ 九型人格特質與理財偏誤行為之相關性研究	★ 銀行通路轉型策略個案研究
★ 銀行財富管理行銷策略分析-以兩家在台外商銀行為例	★ 羅盤玫瑰可預測型態之探討
★ 巢式與非巢式資產定價理論之比較與檢定	★ 投資者情緒與市場報酬
★ 資產定價模型樣本外績效之檢定	★ 規模效果和元月效應之微觀
★ 因子或特徵:全球觀點	★ 特徵與因子：日本證據

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在近年許多企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility，簡稱CSR)相關新聞中，企業往往在事件發生後才匆匆提升自己的企業社會責任水平以博取社會大眾的信任。然而，在先前的文獻中提到，長期迎合投資人CSR 需求而使得CSR政策搖擺不定的結果將反而使一般投資人認為其CSR 落實不真誠而降低對其持股，導致其股票報酬降低。而本文欲使用美國上市公司之追蹤資料，並以CSR 分數波動度做為CSR 政策變化之代理變數做迴歸分析，證實此推論。
研究發現CSR 政策之波動度的提升將顯著使該公司股價報酬下降，並且此結果在使用不同波動度衡量方法的穩健性測試之下依然顯著有效。另外亦發現造成高CSR 波動度之公司經常是風險較高的公司，而此高風險卻未帶來高報酬的原因可能為投資人不理性所致。最後，雖然低CSR 波動度能提升股價報酬，但維持CSR 政策將產生額外成本而使公司之ROE、ROA 降低。

摘要(英)

In many corporate social responsibility(Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR) news in recent years, companies often hurriedly improve their corporate social responsibility level after the incident to cater to the trust of the public. However, in the previous literature, it is mentioned that the long-term catering to investors′ CSR needs would cause high volatility of CSR policy and make investors doubt the sincerity of companies’ CSR implementation and reduce their shareholding, resulting in lower stock returns. This article intends to use the tracking data of listed companies in the United States, and use the volatility of CSR scores as a proxy variable for CSR policy changes to do regression analysis to confirm this inference.
We find the increase in volatility of CSR policy will significantly reduce the company’s stock price returns, and this result is still significantly valid under the robustness test using different volatility measurement methods. The research also found that companies that cause high CSR volatility are often higher-risk companies, and the reason of high-risk without high returns may be due to investors irrationality. In addition, although low CSR volatility can increase stock price returns, maintaining the CSR policy will incur additional costs and reduce the company′s ROE and ROA.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 迎合效果
★ 股價報酬
★ 投資人行為偏誤

關鍵字(英)

★ Corporate Social Responsibility
★ Catering Effect
★ Stock Return
★ Investors’ Behavioral Biases

論文目次

摘要 .................................................................................................................................... i
ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................. ii
目錄 .......................................................................................................................................... iii
表目錄 ...................................................................................................................................... iv
一、緒論 ................................................................................................................................... 1
二、文獻回顧 ............................................................................................................................ 3
三、資料與研究方法 ................................................................................................................ 5
3.1 變數處理 .................................................................................................................. 5
(1) CSR 分數及波動度 ............................................................................................. 5
(2) 其他變數 ............................................................................................................ 6
3.2 研究方法 .................................................................................................................. 7
四、實證結果 ............................................................................................................................ 8
4.1 CSR 政策波動度與股價報酬 ................................................................................... 8
4.2 影響CSR 政策波動度之要素 .................................................................................. 9
4.3 不同公司績效指標 ................................................................................................ 11
五、穩健性測試 ...................................................................................................................... 13
5.1 波動度衡量指標 .................................................................................................... 13
(1) 平均變動量 ...................................................................................................... 13
(2) 標準差 .............................................................................................................. 13
(3) 產業調整前波動度 .......................................................................................... 14
5.2 測試結果 ................................................................................................................ 14
六、結論 ................................................................................................................................. 15
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................. 17

參考文獻

池祥麟(2017). 企業社會責任—行為財務學的觀點. 證券市場發展季刊. Vol.29, No.4,
63-104.
Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock
Market Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, 479-486.
Asmah, G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Does motivation matter? Does it matter
whether a corporation’s participation in CSR is an exercise in window-dressing or
genuine CSR in action? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1553181
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does It Pay to Be Really Good? Addressing The
Shape of The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance. Strategic
Management Journal, Vol.33, 1304-1320.
Brammer, S. J., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate Social Performance and Stock
Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management, Vol.35,
No.3, 97-116.
Carhart M.(1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Finance, Vol.52,
57-82.
Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial
performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.30, No.8, 895-907.
Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French (1992). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock
Returns. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, No. 2, 427-465.
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate
social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management
hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.30, No.4, 425-445.
Lodsgård, L., & Aagaard, A. (2017). Creating value through CSR across company functions
and NGO collaborations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol.33, No.3, 162-
174.
Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B. and Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility and
Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies. The Academy of
Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 817-835.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21,
No.5, 603-609.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm
Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, Vol.26, No.1, 117.
Tsoutsoura, Margarita (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.
working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
Vance, S. (1975). Are socially responsible firms goodinvestment risks? Management Review,
Vol.64, 18-24.
Vujicic, T. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Returns: Examining US Stock
Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2595769.

指導教授

周賓凰(Pin-Huang Chou)

審核日期

2020-7-28

推文