摘要(英) |
Under the wave of digitization, Fintech started a whirlwind reform in the global financial market, and various countries have engaged in the ranks in order to occupy the leading position. The financial industry is facing the era of changing consumer transactions and the low interest rate that has been bottoming out. In order to maintain the scale of the reorganized enterprise and the operating income, the financial industry that originally used closed management must throw away traditional thinking. Behind the brain, in response to the arrival of this wave of financial technology, there should be relative protection under the development of financial technology. Therefore, the birth of financial patents. Here we want to discuss the impact of the number of financial patents on company performance, taking 23 listed financial companies in Taiwan as samples. You can use the sample and ROA as the strain number, and then add the number of financial patents, price-earnings ratio, debt ratio, company age, foreign exchange holdings, operating income, and company size as independent variables. Analyzing the impact of the number of patents on the company’s performance but focusing more on the biotechnology and electronics industries. There are very few literatures in the financial industry. It is also because of the rapid development of financial patents in recent years. Therefore, this article hopes that financial industry researchers will face this The wave research found that there is a positive impact on financial patents. Does the innovation that operates under the wave of financial technology, which represents the increasing number of financial patents, bring immediate results to the company, and therefore can also be one of the reference targets for investors. For a long time, it will bring a higher effect to a company, which is consistent with the expected effect, because the greater the number of financial patents of a company, the more the company has technology that other companies do not have. It can bring its own strength and value to a higher level, or the more willing investors are to invest, and ROA is not in line with the expected results. I think it is the enterprise that should deal with a relatively large amount of funds to develop technology and obtain a patent, but this patent Almost in a short period of time, it will bring actual profit-making effects, so it cannot bring a positive impact on net profit. |
參考文獻 |
1. 葉玉慧. (2003). 「專利權, 創新投資與公司價值創造關係之研究—以研發投資宣告為例.」 《成功大學國際企業研究所學位論文》, 1-36.
2. 劉芷岑(2017),「金融專利與公司價值- 以台灣上市金融業公司為例。」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所在職專班碩士論文
3. 陳惠慈(2016),「技術多角化與研發密度對企業績效之影響 ─以組織寬裕為調節變數。」,銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班碩士論文
4. 王牧樺. (2016). 「CEO 持股率與研發支出和公司績效之關係.」 《臺北大學經濟學系學位論文》, (2016 年), 1-42.
5. Boscaljon, B., Filbeck, G., & Smaby, T. (2006). “Information content of business methods patents.” Financial Review, 41(3), 387-404.
6. Lin, C., & Chang, C. C. (2015). “The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 575-586.
7. Beccalli, E. (2007). “Does IT investment improve bank performance? Evidence from Europe.” Journal of banking & finance, 31(7), 2205-2230.
8. Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). “Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges.” Business Horizons, 61(1), 35-46.
9. Lerner, J. (2002). “Where does State Street lead? A first look at finance patents, 1971 to 2000.” The Journal of Finance, 57(2), 901-930.
10. Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., & Hatfield, D. E. (2003, August). “Firm performance: a longitudinal study of R&D, patents, and product innovation.” In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2003, No. 1, pp. B1-B6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
11. Pakes, A. (1985). “On patents, R & D, and the stock market rate of return.” Journal of political economy, 93(2), 390-409. |