摘要(英) |
With the development of the economic globalization, multinational business activities have become a common business pattern. In response to the globalization, most contents of transaction were turned from physical products to intangible products. Intellectual property (IP) belongs to one of the intangible products. IP, containing patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret as well as integrated circuit design, now becomes the most important and valued asset to corporations. Cross-licensing between corporations is especially common.
Recently, some major events like Brexit, the US-China trade war, COVID-19, the “circuit breaker” in the US stocks as well as the negative oil price, have posted potential effects on the global economy. Consequently, corporations around the world fear that those effects would make various kinds of assets fall in value, causing the worldwide economic downturn. Moreover, the decline of demand would cut down supply. In the end, a large number of corporations start to declare bankruptcy. In this situation, when licensing IP, both parties might face enormous and potential risks in that one party’s declaring bankruptcy would directly affect the other party’s rights and obligations. Facing it, we not only should try to avoid risks, but also need to win the strategic advantages in such game. In this day, under the changeable international situation, corporations urge to prevent the cross-border risks and try to adjust their strategies at any time. As a consequence, when there are risks existing in the IP transaction or licensing, it is necessary and extremely important to be intimated with the bankruptcy laws in every country, especially “The U.S. Bankruptcy Code.”
When a multinational corporation, as a debtor, spontaneously or let the creditor declare bankruptcy to the court due to the poor management of that corporation, Transnational bankruptcy would take place. In such case, because of a lot of stakeholders involved in, the complicated legal relationship and other unpredictable situations, how to reach coordination between nations and ensure creditors are treated fairly during the bankruptcy proceedings matter a lot.
In this thesis, I plan to discuss the issue concerning licensing agreement as well as bankruptcy law through the introduction to IP, focusing on the treatment to bankruptcy proceedings of licensing IP according to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Furthermore, I am going to discuss the current status and critics toward Taiwan’s bankruptcy proceedings regulated by Taiwan Bankruptcy Law, the draft which was amended as “Taiwan’s 2016 Draft of Debts Clearance Act”. Ultimately, mainly based on IP licensing, I will provide the corporations that face bankruptcy some suggestions about the measures for avoiding and dealing with the risks they might meet. |
參考文獻 |
壹、中文文獻
一、 專書
(一) 王澤鑑,基本理論債之發生:契約,代理權授與無因管理,三民書局,2012年3月增訂3版。
(二) 邱聰智,新訂民法債篇通則(上),華泰文化事業股份有限公司,2014年3月新訂二版。
(三) 施茂林、顏上詠,智慧財產權與法律風險析論:人工智慧商業時代的來臨,五南圖書出版股份有限公司,2019年9月。
(四) 陳計男,破產法論,三民出版社,2015年4月修訂3版11刷。
(五) 陳榮宗,破產法,三民書局股份有限公司,1991年四版。
(六) 鄭有為,破產法學的美麗新世界,元照出版社,2012年9月3版。
(七) 潘琪,美國破產法,法律出版社,1999年初版。
(八) 錢國成,破產法要義,作者自版,1981年。
(九) 謝銘洋,智慧財產權法,元照出版社,2018年9月8版。
(十) 韓長印等譯,David G. Epstein, Steve H. Nickles, James J. White 原著,美國聯邦破產法,中國法政大學出版社,2003 年9月。
二、 期刊論文
(一) 王偉霖,論智慧財產權證券化的法律問題-以證券化法、擔保設定及破產問題為核心,科技法學評論10卷1期,2013年。
(二) 吳家林,檢視我國債務清理法草案與聯合國《破產法立法指南》接軌-以經商環境評比債務清理架構指數為中心,月旦法學雜誌,238期,2018年11月。
(三) 吳俊英、劉尚志 美國破產法中智財授權契約當事人破產之法律問題,月旦法學雜誌,184期,2010年10月。
(四) 李博信,「專利權權利金之考量與決定之方式」(上)、(下),工業財產權與標準八十二年十月號,1993年。
(五) 許士宦,破產程序之再生機能—回應鄭傑夫法官「破產事件之處理程序」一文,月旦法學雜誌,第93期,2003年2月。
(六) 許士宦,債務清理之理論與立法—破產法修正草案解說,台灣本土法學雜誌,第51期,2003年10月。
(七) 黃慧嫺,論智慧財產交易於破產發生時之法律因應機制,科技法律透析,2007年4月。
(八) 黃慧嫺,德國修法加強智慧財產授權之破產保護,科技法律透析,2008年4月。
(九) 馮震宇,「論新商標法對商標註冊與商標專用權之修正」,刊登於工業財產權與標準 八十三年七月號,1994年。
(十) 鄭有為,從美國聯邦破產法角度出發論智慧財產權授權契約於我國未來破產法上的應有處理—兼論對司法院破產法修正草案的幾點相關建議,台北大學法學論叢,第53期,2003年12月。
(十一) 劉尚志、吳俊英,美國破產法中智財授權契約當事人破產之法律問題,月旦法學雜誌,第184期,2010年8月。
(十二) 謝銘洋,智慧財產權授權契約之性質,月旦法學雜誌第 82 期,2002年。
三、 學位論文
(一) 王清峰,專利之國際授權,政治大學法律研究所碩士論文, 1977年7月。
(二) 吳紋雀,論利害關係人於公司重整之角色-建立以債權人權益為衡量基準之重整制度,東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文,2018年6月。
(三) 郝月葵,論破產程序中「進行中雙務契約」之處理—以智慧財產權授權契約為中心,中央大學產經所碩士論文,2005年7月。
(四) 張衛仁,競爭法下的專利聯盟規範趨勢之研究,東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文, 2012 年6月。
(五) 賴文智,智慧財產權與民法的互動—以專利授權契約為主,國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文,2000年6月。
四、 網路資料
(一) 月旦法學知識庫: http://www.lawdata.com.tw/
(二) 全國法規資料庫: http://law.moj.gov.tw/
(三) 法源法律網: http://www.lawbank.com.tw/
(四) 經濟部智慧財產局網站: https://www.tipo.gov.tw/
(五) 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統:
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dwebmge
貳、外文文獻
一、 專書
(一) Adam J. Levitin, Business Bankruptcy: Financial Restructuring and Modern Commercial Markets, Wolters Kluwer, (2015).
(二) Brian A. Blum, Samir D. Parikh, Examples & Explanations for Bankruptcy and Debtor/Creditor, Seventh Edition, (2018).
(三) Douglas G. Baird, Thomas H. Jackson, Cases, Problems and Materials on Bankruptcy, Little, Brown & Company, (1985).
(四) Gene K. Landy, Amy J. Mastrobattista, The IT / Digital Legal Companion: A Comprehensive Business Guide to Software, IT, Internet, Media and IP Law, (1st Edition, 2008).
(五) Michael J. Holleran, Donna Larsen Holleran, John D. McMickle & John B. Corr, Bankruptcy Code Manual(2003 ed.).
(六) Thomas Jackson, The Logic and Limits of Bankruptcy Law, Harvard University Press, (1986).
(七) Thomas J. Salerno, Jordan A. Kroop, Bankruptcy Litigation and Practice: A Practitioner′s Guide, Fourth Edition, (2007).
(八) William D. Warren & Daniel J. Bussel, Bankruptcy, New York : Foundation Press, (6th ed. 2002).
二、 期刊論文
(一) American Bar Association, Report of the Commission on the Bankruptcy Laws of the United States, (1973) .
(二) Charles Jordan Tabb, The Historical Evolution of the Bankruptcy Discharge, American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 65, (1991).
(三) David G. Epstein & Steve H. Nickles, The National Bankruptcy Review Commission′s Section 365 Recommendations and the Larger Conceptual Issues, 102 Dick. L. Rev. 679 (1998).
(四) Darren W. Sauders, Should The Bankruptcy Code Be Amended to Protect Trademark LicenSees? 22-JAN Am. Bankr. Inst. J., (2004).
(五) Jay Lawrence Westbrook, A Functional Analysis of Executory Contracts, Minnesota Law Review, (1989).
(六) Jesse M. Fried, Executory Contracts and Performance Decisions in Bankruptcy, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 46, No. 3, (1996).
(七) Michael T. Andrew, Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy: Understanding the “Rejection”, 59 U. Colo. L. Rev., (1988).
(八) Michael T. Andrew, Executory Contracts Revisited: A Reply to Professor Westbrook, 62 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1, (1991).
(九) National Bankruptcy Conference (U.S.), Reforming the Bankruptcy Code: The National Bankruptcy Conference′s Code Review Project: final report. New York: M. Bender, (Rev. ed. 1997).
(十) Peter N. Barnes-Brown, Licensing Intellectual Property from and to Distressed Companies, (2006).
(十一) Silverstein, Rejection of Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy and Reorganization, 31 U. Chi. L. Rev., (1964).
(十二) Vern Countryman, Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy: Part I, Minnesota Law Review, (1973).
三、 司法實務
(一) In re Cho, 581 B.R. 452, 461-66 (Bankr. D. Md. 2018).
(二) In Re Exide Technologies, 607 F.3d 957 (3d Cir. 2010).
(三) In re Lakewood. Engineering & Manufacturing Co., 459 B.R. 306, 333–38. (Bankr. N.D. III. 2011).
(四) Jaffe v. Samsung Elecs Co., Ltd., 737 F.3d 14 (4th Cir. 2013) (“Qimonda”).
(五) Lubrizol Enterprises v. Richmond Metal Finishers, 756 F.2d 1043 (1985).
(六) Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, No. 17-1657 (S.Ct. May 20, 2019).
(七) Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, No. 17-1657 (S.Ct. May 20, 2019).
(八) RCI Tech. Corp. v. Sunterra Corp. (In re Sunterra Corp.), 361 F.3d 257, 271 (4th Cir. 2004).
(九) Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, 686 F.3d 372 (2012).
四、 網路資料
(一) American Bankruptcy Institute: https://www.abi.org/
(二) JSTOR:https://www.jstor.org/
(三) The American Bar Association
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/intellectual_property_law/
(四) U.S. Department of Justice: https://www.justice.gov/
(五) U.S. Courts:
https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics
(六) USPTO:http://www.uspto.gov
(七) Westlaw: http://web2.westlaw.com/ |