赴中國投資對台灣母公司績效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：18.188.185.65

姓名

游晶華(Jing-Hua You) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

赴中國投資對台灣母公司績效之影響

相關論文

★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響	★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究	★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及銀行不動產授信業務之影響	★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 貿易、技術與薪資溢酬	★ 聚集與生產力:台灣紡織產業的實證研究
★ 勞工派遣與正職受僱型態之實證研究－金融海嘯前後之分析比較	★ 影響政府採購效率之實證研究—以某縣市政府為例
★ 台灣民眾轉換從業身分的決策以及「不景氣-推擠」假說之檢定	★ 汽車燃油效率、反彈效果與特徵價格之研究
★ Three Essays on the Industrial Economics	★ 研究發展與技術購買-台灣製造業之實證研究
★ 合併廠商的績效表現與決策因素分析	★ 合併型態對廠商績效與股票報酬的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-7-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

文使用1997年至2005年台灣經濟新報資料庫（TEJ）上市上櫃製造業廠商的資料，結合這些公司在經濟部投資審委員會之中國投資審查資料彙整之數據進行研究分析，探討台灣赴中國直接投資對台灣母公司生產績效的影響。本研究分為兩個部分：第一部分，將中國直接投資視為一外生變數，以固定效果模型進行估計。第二部分，將赴中國直接投資視為一內生變數，以2001年台灣投資政策變動作為一對外投資選擇的外生衝擊，以解決廠商自我選擇之潛在內生性問題。第一部分實證結果發現，廠商中國投資強度越高，對總要素生產力和勞動生產力來說，皆為正向影響，但僅有總要素生產力統計上顯著。而以勞動生產力為應變數時，則不具有統計顯著性。然而，當控制了廠商自我選擇之效果後，對中國投資程度越強，對總要素生產力以及勞動生產力皆具有正向且顯著的影響效果。從上述兩種迴歸模型結果得知，本研究發現無論是否考慮潛在內生性，當廠商中國直接強度越高，公司能創造更高的生產績效。

摘要(英)

This paper provides empirical evidence on the relationship between FDI in China and the production performance of Taiwan ’s parent company. Base on the data from Taiwan Economic Journal of firms listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange from 1997 to 2005, and FDI in China collected by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. This study is divided into two parts: In the first part, China′s direct investment is regarded as an exogenous variable, which is estimated by a fixed effect model. In the other one, direct investment in China is regarded as an endogenous variable, and the change of Taiwan ’s investment policy in 2001 is regarded as an exogenous shock of foreign investment to deal with the potential endogenous problems of manufacturers ’self-selection. The empirical result of the first part finds that the higher the intensity of Chinese investment by manufacturers, the positive effect on firm’s productivity; however, it only reveals when the total factor productivity as the dependent variable is statistically. On the other hand, when labor productivity is seen as the dependent variable, it is not statistically significant. However, after controlling the effect of manufacturers′ self-selection, more the investment in China, the more positive and significant effects on manufacturers productivity. According to the results of the two regression models, this study finds that regardless of the potential endogenous, the higher the investment intensity in China, the company can create better production performance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 中國直接投資
★ 直接投資
★ 廠商績效
★ 生產績效
★ 總要素生產力
★ 勞動生產力

關鍵字(英)

★ China FDI
★ foreign direct investment
★ FDI
★ LP

論文目次

目錄
摘要 ......................................................................................................................... i Abstract........................................................................................................................... ii 誌謝辭 ....................................................................................................................... iii 目錄 ....................................................................................................................... iv 圖目錄 ....................................................................................................................... vi 表目錄 ...................................................................................................................... vii 第一章緒論...................................................................................................................1
1-1 研究動機與目的..............................................................................................1
1-2 研究架構..........................................................................................................6 第二章研究背景–台灣對外投資政策.......................................................................7 2-1 「戒急用忍」政策..........................................................................................8 2-2 「積極開放，有效管理」政策......................................................................9 第三章文獻回顧.........................................................................................................13 3-1 境外生產與生產力........................................................................................13 3-2 境外生產與研發與生產力............................................................................15 3-3 投資地點選擇效果........................................................................................16 第四章資料來源與研究方法.....................................................................................18 4-1 資料來源........................................................................................................18 4-2 變數定義........................................................................................................20 4-3 敘述統計........................................................................................................24 4-4 Levinsohn and Petrin Approach (L-P approach) ......................................25 4-4 Panel Data 模型 .............................................................................................29 4-4-1 特性說明 ............................................................................................29
iv
4-4-2 固定效果模型(Fixed-Effect Model, FE) ......................................29 4-4-3 隨機效果模型(Random-Effect Model, RE) .................................30 4-4-4 Hausman Test.......................................................................................31
4-5 實證模型........................................................................................................32 4-5-1 固定效果模型(Fixed-Effect Model, FE) ......................................32 4-5-2 兩階段最小平方法 (Two-Stage Least Squares, 2SLS)...............34
第五章實證結果.........................................................................................................36 5-1 固定效果模型(Fixed-Effect Model, FE)實證結果 .................................36 5-2 兩階段最小平方法 (Two-Stage Least Squares, 2SLS)實證結果 ..........39
第六章結論.................................................................................................................43 參考文獻 .......................................................................................................................45 附錄一.......................................................................................................................48 附錄二.......................................................................................................................50 附錄三.......................................................................................................................51

參考文獻

李喬萱，「我國對大陸經貿政策與規範之國家安全分析」，國立台灣大學，碩士論文，民國九十五年六月
夏樂生，「論大陸經貿政策演變及影響-從「戒急用忍」、「積極開放、有效管理」到「積極管理、有效開放」」，展望與探索，4(3)，86-101 頁，民國九十五年三月
徐耀浤，「以政策競爭吸引外國直接投資之研究」，經濟研究，第 10 期，399-422 頁，民國九十九年四月
曾美萍，「環境管制與總要素生產力--台灣製造業的實證研究成果報告」，民國一百年十月
劉孟俊，陳靜怡，顏扶昌，潘品穎，「2006 年赴中國大陸投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告」，民國九十五年十二月
Bandick, R.(2020), “Global Sourcing, Productivity and Export Intensity”, The World Economy, 43(3), 615-643.
Fung, L., Jin-Tan, L., & Wang, F. M.(2013), “Are FDI in China and Parent Firm Exports Substitutes or Complements? An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms”, Jing Ji Lun Wen Cong Kan, 41(2), 167.
Ghosh, I. D.(2019), “Offshoring, R&D and Productivity Growth: Evidence from US Census Microdata”.
Glennon,B.,&Yang,C.H.(2017),”DoesOffshoringManufacturingHarmInnovation in the Home Country? Evidence from Taiwan and China”
Hayakawa, K., Matsuura, T., & Motohashi, K.(2016), “How Does FDI Affect Productivity at Home? : Evidence from a Plant-Level Analysis”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 16(4), 403-422.
45
Helpman, E.(1984), “A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations”, Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 451-471.
Hijzen, A., Inui, T., & Todo, Y.(2010), “Does Offshoring Pay? Firm‐level Evidence from Japan”, Economic Inquiry, 48(4), 880-895.
Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y.(2017), “How Does Outward Foreign Direct Investment Enhance Firm Productivity? A Heterogeneous Empirical Analysis from Chinese Manufacturing”, China Economic Review, 44, 1-15.
Jabbour, L.(2010), “Offshoring and Firm Performance: Evidence from French Manufacturing Industry”, World Economy, 33(3), 507-524.
Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. R.(2009), “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-level Evidence from the United States”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 821-831.
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A.(2003), “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables”, The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317-341.
Markusen, J. R.(1984), “Multinationals, Multi-plant Economies, and the Gains from Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 16(3-4), 205-226.
Marschak, J., & Andrews, W. H.(1944), “Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production”, Econometrica, Journal of The Econometric Society, 143- 205.
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. ( 1992 ) , “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Iindustry”, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w3977.
Schwörer, T.(2013), “Offshoring, Domestic Outsourcing and Productivity: Evidence for A Number of European Countries”, Review of World Economics, 149(1), 131- 149.
Tang, J., & Do Livramento, H.(2010), “Offshoring and Productivity: A Micro‐Data Analysis”, Review of Income and Wealth, 56, S111-S134.
46

Tsou, M. W., Liu, J. T., Hammitt, J. K., & Chang, C. F.(2013), “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in China on Employment Adjustments in Taiwan: Evidence from Matched Employer–employee Data”, Japan and The World Economy, 25, 68-79.

指導教授

鄒孟文(Meng-Wen Tsou)

審核日期

2020-8-20

推文