先備知識對學習英語聽力的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：101

、訪客IP：3.149.229.253

姓名

鄧啓宏(Qi-Hong Deng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

先備知識對學習英語聽力的影響
(The Influences of Prior Knowledge on English Listening Learning)

相關論文

★ 將可用性整合融入遊戲式學習	★ 探討認知風格對於行動學習與合作學習的影響
★ 學習型網站的可用性評估：從問題到解決方案	★ 從人因的觀點評估遊戲式學習
★ 探討認知風格在遊戲式學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響	★ 探討認知風格在行動學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響
★ 性別差異與認知風格對合作化遊戲式學習的影響	★ 探討認知風格如何影響使用者在行動載具下使用電子期刊
★ 探討專家和新手對遊戲式學習進行可用性評估的觀感差異	★ 毒品經驗與遊戲先備知識對客製化與個人化遊戲式反毒宣導系統的影響
★ 探討背景音樂和認知風格對遊戲式學習的影響	★ 以多媒體科技和數位遊戲為小小人兒及患者家屬發展線上生活百科
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ 從認知風格的角度探討提示對學習英文片語與文法的影響
★ 探討先備知識對學習者在使用鷹架英文學習系統的影響: 限制與扣分機制	★ 發展動畫電子書之研究：從性別差異到性別均等之歷程

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

數位遊戲式學習(DGBL)包含許多遊戲元素，而這些遊戲元素可以提供學習者愉悅學習的體驗。因此，它常常被應用在不同領域當中，英語學習就是其中一個領域。英語學習包含聽、說、讀、寫四個方面，在這四者當中，聽力很重要，因此，DGBL常被用來支援聽力學習，聽力學習包含了兩個部分，一個是字彙部分，一個是句子部分，這兩個部份的複雜度有所差異，可是，過去鮮少有研究比較這兩個部份的差異。

此外，鷹架輔助的學習系統能夠讓學生的挫折感降低，但是，過去的研究少有將鷹架輔助整合進入數位遊戲式英語學習，為彌補此缺失，本研究將結合鷹架輔助來發展數位遊戲式英語聽力學習。然而在另一方面，鷹架輔助具有多樣性，可是學習者之間也存在著個別差異性，所以不同的學習者可能會喜好不同的鷹架輔助，也就是說，個別差異性扮演一個重要的角色。先備知識是其中一個有影響性的個別差異性，這是因為每個人對於特定領域的所擁有的知識量不同，有鑑於此，本研究包含兩個實驗，此兩個實驗皆是從學習成效和學習行為的角度來探討先備知識對使用數位遊戲式英語聽力學習的影響，不論是實驗一或是實驗二，受試者皆為北部某大專院校的學生。然而，實驗一著重在字彙聽力，而實驗二則以句子聽力為主。

更明確的說，實驗一為探討不同先備知識學習者在使用DGBL來學習字彙聽力上有何差異。其結果顯示，高先備學習者與低先備學習者展現不同的學習成效和學習行為。在學習成效方面，無論是在進行學習同義字還是反義字，兩者存在著顯著差異。無論是在任務分數、剩餘提示分數還是答題狀況，高先備學習者表現比低先備學習者有更好的學習成效。另外，在學習行為部分，不論是同義字的學習或反義字的學習，高先備學習者與低先備學習者皆有所差異。在學習同義字中，高先備學習者會使用多種策略來進行學習任務，而低先備學習者會採取固定的策略進行學習任務；在學習反義字中，高先備學習者有較多大範圍動作，而低先備學習者有較多小範圍的動作。

實驗二為探討不同先備知識學習者在使用DGBL來學習句子聽力上有何差異。如同實驗一，高先備學習者與低先備學習者顯示出不同的學習成效和學習行為。在學習成效方面，無論是在學習任務還是遊戲任務，高先備學習者之表現皆優於低先備學習者。這可能是因為實驗二的學習任務和遊戲任務是有高度的關聯性。另外，在學習行為上，高先備學習者和低先備學習者亦有許多不同之處。例如高先備學習者偏好自己解決問題，而低先備學習者會尋找其他解決問題的策略。而在提示使用上，高先備學習者試圖從單一提示中獲得線索，而低先備學習者傾向於從許多提示中獲得線索。

綜上所述，兩個實驗結果顯示出不同先備知識學習者在不同類型的聽力學習中，有不同的學習方式。在字彙聽力學習上，高先備學習者會採取多種策略來解決問題，而低先備學習者會採取固定式的策略來解決問題。而在句子聽力學習上，高先備學習者會偏好從單一提示中獲得線索，靠自己將問題解決；而低先備學習者偏好從不同的提示中搜尋線索來將問題解決。從前述之結果可知，差異性不僅存在高先備學習者與低先備學習者之間，而學習者對於字彙聽力和句子聽力也採用不同的方式。因此，本研究的貢獻不僅是在於其研究結果，可以用來發展個人化的英語聽力學習，以兼顧不同先備知識學習者的需要。也可提供教學者和設計者指引，使他們能用不同的策略來發展字彙聽力和句子聽力的數位學習工具。

摘要(英)

Digital game-based learning (DGBL) contained many game elements. These game elements can provide pleasant learning experience for learners. Thus, it is often applied in a variety of fields. English learning is one of these fields. English learning includes four aspects, which are listening, speaking, reading and writing. Among them, listening is very important. Therefore, DGBL is often used to support listening learning. Listening learning consists of two parts. One part is vocabulary listening while the other part is sentence listening. The complexity of these two parts is different. However, few studies examined how students reacted to these two parts differently.

On the other hand, scaffolding hints can reduce the frustration of students. Nevertheless, paucity of past research integrated scaffolding hints into digital game-based English learning. To fill in this gap, this research incorporated scaffolding hints digital game-based English listening learning. However, there are diverse scaffolding hints. On the other hand, learners have various background, knowledge and skills so that they may prefer scaffolding hints differently. In other words, individual differences play an important role. Prior knowledge is one of influential individual differences. This is because everyone has different levels of knowledge in a specific field. Accordingly, two empirical studies were conducted to examine the impacts of prior knowledge on the use of digital game-based English listening learning, in terms of learning performance and learning behavior. The participants of these two studies were students who studied in a university in the northern Taiwan, regardless of Study One or Study Two. Study One focused on vocabulary listening while Study Two emphasized on sentence listening.

More specifically, Study One investigated how High Prior Knowledge (HPK) learners and Low Prior Knowledge (LPK) learners used DGBL to learn vocabulary listening. The results indicated that great differences existed between HPK learners and LPK learners, in terms of learning performance and learning behavior. Regarding learning performance, significant differences were found for both synonyms and antonyms. HPK learners performed better than LPK learners, regardless of task scores, deducted hint scores or answer status. Regarding learning behavior, there were great differences between HPK learners and LPK learners, irrespective of synonyms or antonyms. In the aspect pf synonyms, HPK learners used a variety of strategies to complete the tasks while LPK learners adopted fixed strategies. In the aspect of antonyms, HPK learners tended to make large-scale movement while LPK learners preferred to make small-scale movement.

Study Two investigated how HPK learners and LPK learners used DGBL to learn sentence listening. Like Study One, HPK learners and LPK learners showed different learning performance and learning behavior. Regarding learning performance, HPK learners performed better than LPK learners, regardless of learning tasks or gaming tasks. This might be because there were high correlations between the learning tasks and the gaming tasks in Study Two. Regarding learning behavior, there were many differences between HPK learners and LPK learners. For instance, HPK learners preferred to solve problems by themselves while LPK learners looked for other problem-solving strategies. Furthermore, HPK learners tended to obtain clues from a single scaffolding hint while LPK learners preferred to obtain clues from many scaffolding hints.

In summary, the results from these two studies showed that HPK learners and LPK learners used different learning approaches for different types of English listening contexts. Regarding vocabulary listening, HPK learners adopted multiple strategies to solve problems while LPK learners used fixed strategies to solve problems. Regarding sentence listening, HPK learners preferred to obtain clues from a single scaffolding hint and solved problems by themselves while LPK learners tended to acquire clues from many scaffolding hints to sort out problems. The aforementioned results not only showed differences existed between HPK learners and LPK learners, but also indicated that learners adopt different approaches for vocabulary listening and sentence listening. Therefore, the contribution of this research covered two aspects. One was results from the two empirical studies, which could be used to develop personalized English listening learning to cater for the needs of learners with different levels of prior knowledge. The other was to provide guidance for instructors and designers. By doing so, they could know how to use different strategies to develop digital learning tools for vocabulary listening and sentence listening.

關鍵字(中)

★ 數位遊戲式學習
★ 英語聽力
★ 先備知識

關鍵字(英)

★ Digital Game-based Learning
★ English Listening
★ Prior Knowledge

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT iii
Table of Contents vi
List of Figures viii
List of Tables ix
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Aims and Research Objectives 1
1.3 Chapter Outline 4
1.4 Summary 5
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1 Digital game-based learning 6
2.2 English learning 8
2.3 Prior Knowledge 11
2.4 Summary 12
Chapter 3 Research Design 14
3.1 Introduction 14
3.2 Conceptual Framework 15
3.3 Research Instruments 16
3.3.1 Game-based learning system 16
3.3.2 Data Analysis 16
3.4 Summary 17
Chapter 4 Study One – Vocabulary Listening 18
4.1 Participants 18
4.2 Research Instruments 18
4.2.1 Guided Game-based Vocabulary Learning System 18
4.2.2 Pre-test and Post-test 21
4.3 Experimental Procedures 22
4.4 Results 22
4.4.1 Learning performance 22
4.4.2 Learning Behavior 30
4.5 Discussions 38
Chapter 5 Study Two - Sentence Listening 41
5.1 Participants 41
5.2 Research instruments 41
5.2.1 Game-based English listening learning system 41
5.2.2 Pre-test and Post-test 44
5.3 Experimental Procedures 45
5.4 Results 45
5.4.1 Learning Performance 45
5.4.2 Learning Behavior 53
5.5 Discussions 60
Chapter 6 Conclusions 62
6.1 Main Conclusions 62
6.1.1 Answers to Research Questions 62
6.1.2 Vocabulary listening vs Sentences listening 66
6.2 Development of a Framework 67
6.3 Limitations and Future works 68
References 69

參考文獻

Anderson, T. A., Reynolds, B. L., Yeh, X. P., & Huang, G. Z. (2008, November). Video games in the English as a foreign language classroom. In 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (pp. 188-192). IEEE.
Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2012). Supporting problem-solving performance in a hypermedia learning environment: The role of students’ prior knowledge and metacognitive skills. Computers in Human behavior, 28(4), 1162-1169.
Chang, R. C., & Yang, C. Y. (2016, May). Developing a mobile app for game-based learning in middle school mathematics course. In 2016 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) (pp. 1-2). IEEE.
Chang, W. C., Liao, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Improving children’s textual cohesion and writing attitude in a game-based writing environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-26.
Chang, Y. H., Lin, P. R., & Lu, Y. T. (2020). Development of a Kinect-Based English Learning System Based on Integrating the ARCS Model with Situated Learning. Sustainability, 12(5), 2037.
Chen, C. C., & Huang, P. H. (2020). The effects of STEAM-based mobile learning on learning achievement and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17.
Chen, M. P., Wong, Y. T., & Wang, L. C. (2014). Effects of type of exploratory strategy and prior knowledge on middle school students’ learning of chemical formulas from a 3D role-playing game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 163-185.
Chen, S. Y. & Macredie, R. (2010). Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 379-387.
Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2019). The impacts of scaffolding e-assessment English learning: a cognitive style perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23.
Chen, S. Y., Hung, C. Y., Chang, Y. C., Lin, Y. S., & Lai, Y. H. (2018, August). A study on integrating augmented reality technology and game-based learning model to improve motivation and effectiveness of learning English vocabulary. In 2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3) (pp. 24-27). IEEE.
Chua, A. Y. K., & Balkunje, R. S. (2012). An exploratory study of game-based m-learning for software project management.
Deng, L., Wu, S., Chen, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Digital game‐based learning in a Shanghai primary‐school mathematics class: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Dochy, F. J., Moerkerke, G., & Martens, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning and instruction: Assessment of domain-specific and domain transcending prior knowledge and progress. Studies in educational evaluation, 22(4), 309-339.
Gao, Q., Wang, D., & Gao, F. (2015). Impact of knowledge representations on problem-oriented learning in online environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(12), 922-938.
Haas, J. W., & Arnold, C. L. (1995). An examination of the role of listening in judgments of communication competence in co-workers. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 32(2), 123-139.
Hagedorn, C., Renz, J., & Meinel, C. (2017, April). Introducing digital game-based learning in MOOCs: What do the learners want and need?. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1101-1110). IEEE.
Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, M. J., Wang, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Prior knowledge and online inquiry-based science reading: Evidence from eye tracking. International journal of science and mathematics education, 12(3), 525-554.
Huang, B. G., Yang, J. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2020). An investigation of the approaches for integrating learning materials and digital games: a prior ability perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-12.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Facilitating decision-making performances in nursing treatments: a contextual digital game-based flipped learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16.
Hwang, G. J., Hsu, T. C., Lai, C. L., & Hsueh, C. J. (2017). Interaction of problem-based gaming and learning anxiety in language students′ English listening performance and progressive behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 106, 26-42.
Hwang, W. Y., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., Shih, T. K., & Chen, S. Y. (2015). Facilitating listening and speaking with game-based learning activities in situational context. In Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 193-200). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639-657.
Kuo, Y. C., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, M. C. (2017). Effects of an integrated physiological signal-based attention-promoting and English listening system on students′ learning performance and behavioral patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 218-227.
Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. P. (2009). A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: The effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 530-542.
Li, L. Y. (2019). Effect of prior knowledge on attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in video lecture viewing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 415-426.
Liao, C. W., Chen, C. H., & Shih, S. J. (2019). The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 133, 43-55.
Lin, F., & Puntambekar, S. (2019). Designing Epistemic Scaffolding in CSCL.
Liu, G. Z., Chen, J. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Mobile‐based collaborative learning in the fitness center: A case study on the development of English listening comprehension with a context‐aware application. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 305-320.
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
Liu, Z. X., Grady, C., & Moscovitch, M. (2017). Effects of prior-knowledge on brain activation and connectivity during associative memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1991-2009.
McCredden, J. E., O′Shea, P., Terrill, P., & Reidsema, C. (2016). Don′t blame the student, it′s in their mind: Helping engineering students to grasp complex concepts. In 27th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: AAEE 2016 (p. 565). Southern Cross University.
Prasetyo, F. H., & Sofyan, H. Digital Game-Based Larning Model and Design Elements to Increase Student Learning Motivation in English Listening Skills.
Prensky, M. (2001). Fun, play and games: What makes games engaging. Digital game-based learning, 5(1), 5-31.
Ramírez Verdugo, D., & Alonso Belmonte, I. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87-101.
Rico, M., Agudo, J. E., & Sánchez, H. (2015). Language Learning through Handheld Gaming: a Case Study of an English Course with Engineering Students. J. UCS, 21(10), 1362-1378.
Smokotinª, V. M., Alekseyenkob, A. S., & Petrovac, G. I. (2014). The phenomenon of linguistic globalization: English as the global lingua franca (EGLF). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 509-513.
Song, H. S. (2010). The effects of learners′ prior knowledge, self-regulation, and motivation on learning performance in complex multimedia learning environments. New York University.
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, C. J., & Hong, T. W. (2017). Experiencing the Analects of Confucius: An experiential game-based learning approach to promoting students′ motivation and conception of learning. Computers & Education, 110, 143-153.
Tobar-Muñoz, H., Baldiris, S., & Fabregat, R. (2017). Augmented reality game-based learning: Enriching students’ experience during reading comprehension activities. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(7), 901-936.
Tsai, C. H., Cheng, C. H., Yeh, D. Y., & Lin, S. Y. (2017). Can learning motivation predict learning achievement? A case study of a mobile game-based English learning approach. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2159-2173.
Tsai, M. J., Huang, L. J., Hou, H. T., Hsu, C. Y., & Chiou, G. L. (2016). Visual behavior, flow and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 98, 115-129.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1976). Play and its role in the development of the child. Play—Its role in the development of evolution, 537-554.
Wang, J. H., Chen, S. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2016). An investigation of a joyful peer response system: High ability vs. low ability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(6), 431-444.
Wu, C. H., Tzeng, Y. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2020). Measuring performance in leaning process of digital game based learning and static E learning. Educational Technology Research & Development.
Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Effects of prior knowledge on learning performance and anxiety in an English learning online role-playing game. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 174-185.
Yang, J. C., Lin, M. Y. D., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). Effects of anxiety levels on learning performance and gaming performance in digital game‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 324-334.
Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students′ English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, 103808.
Yeh, Y. T., Hung, H. T., & Hsu, Y. J. (2017, July). Digital Game-Based Learning for Improving Students′ Academic Achievement, Learning Motivation, and Willingness to Communicate in an English Course. In 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 560-563). IEEE.

指導教授

陳攸華(Sherry Y. Chen)

審核日期

2020-8-20

推文