員工知覺企業福利供給與自身福利需求差異對組織認同及離職傾向之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：45

、訪客IP：18.226.226.186

姓名

蔡宜君(Yi-Chun Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

員工知覺企業福利供給與自身福利需求差異對組織認同及離職傾向之影響
(The impact of employee-perceived difference between supply and demand of employee benefits on organizational identification and turnover intention.)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

新知識經濟時代的來臨，員工成為企業內最具競爭力的資源，如何吸引到優秀的人才，留住具有潛力的成員，是近年來企業相當關心的議題，隨著雇傭關係逐漸改變，現代人追求的生活模式也較以往不同，企業應將員工福利依據員工的需求做調整，才能使員工福利對雙方發揮最大的效益。
本研究目的在探討員工知覺企業福利的供給與需求差異是否會對員工之組織認同感與離職傾向產生影響，使用問卷調查法，以目前在台灣地區任職之企業員工為探討對象，共取得221份有效問卷，利用統計軟體SPSS與Amos 結構方程模式軟體進行資料分析，研究結果顯示: 員工知覺企業提供給員工的員工福利高於或是遠大於員工對於福利的需求，員工會有較高的組織認同程度，且會降低員工的離職傾向。
綜合上述研究結果，員工福利供給的程度多寡不一定會影響員工的組織認同和離職傾向程度，而是員工福利的供給程度需超越員工自身對於員工福利的需求程度，唯有如此福利的本質才能發揮，企業的給予才會有意義，因此若企業希望能增加員工的留任意願或是提高員工的組織認同程度，可以從實施福利需求調查著手，協助企業的福利政策能更貼近、符合員工的需求。

摘要(英)

With the advent of the Knowledge Based Economy era, employees have become the most competitive resources in the company. How to attract outstanding talents and retain potential members has been a topic of great concern for companies in recent years. The employment relationship is gradually changing, and the life style that people pursue is different from the past. Employee benefits should be adjusted according to the needs of employees in order to maximize employee benefits.
The purpose of this research is to explore employees’ perception of whether the difference between supply and demand of employee benefits will affect employees’ sense of organizational identification and turnover intentions. Using the questionnaire survey method, with employees currently working in Taiwan as the research object, a total of 221 valid questionnaires were obtained. The results of the study indicate that whether employee-perceived employee benefits supply are higher or far greater than the demand, which will make employee have a higher degree of organizational identification and reduce the intention of leave.
In conclusion, the amount of employee benefits does not necessarily affect the employee’s organizational identification and turnover intention, but the level of employee benefits needs to exceed the employee’s own demand. Only the nature of such benefits can be effective and meaningful. Therefore, if the company hopes to increase the employees′ willingness to stay or increase the employee′s organizational identification, it can start with the benefits needs surveys to help the company’s benefits policy to be closer to the needs of the employees.

關鍵字(中)

★ 員工福利
★ 供給程度
★ 需求程度
★ 組織認同
★ 離職傾向

關鍵字(英)

★ Employee benefits
★ Supply
★ Demand
★ Organizational identification
★ Turnover intention

論文目次

一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 2
1-3研究流程 3
二、文獻探討 4
2-1員工福利 4
2-2組織認同 12
2-3離職傾向 14
2-4 員工福利供需差異與離職傾向之關係 16
2-5 員工福利供需差異與組織認同之關係 17
2-6組織認同與離職傾向之關係 18
2-7員工福利供需差異、組織認同和離職傾向之關係 19
三、研究方法 20
3-1研究架構 20
3-2研究假設 20
3-3研究變項之操作性定義與衡量 22
3-4資料蒐集和分析方法 25
四、研究結果 27
4-1樣本描述 27
4-2信度和效度分析 29
4-3相關係數矩陣 32
4-4假設檢定分析 34
4-5假設檢驗結果彙整 37
五、研究與建議 38
5-1研究結論 38
5-2管理意涵 39
5-3研究限制與建議 41
六、參考文獻 42
附錄 49

參考文獻

王素玲 (2019 年 7 月)。員工要的「幸福企業」！？，管理知識中心。取自https://mymkc.com/article/content/23176
王秀禾 (2019年11月)。風傳媒。中市五星幸福職場員工福利多免費電影票、心情假、車資補助。https://www.storm.mg/localarticle/1970135
林杏娥 (2001)。企業福利，員工工作滿足與離職傾向之探討：以某報社為對象(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
林俊宏 (2008)。彈性福利制度對員工福利滿意度，工作投入和組織承諾的影響 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學。
洪榮昭 (1992)。台灣地區工作生活品質調查研究。行政院勞委會。
徐育珠、黃仁德 (1993)。台灣地區跨國公司企業福利制度之研究。行政院勞工委員會。
徐育珠、黃仁德 (1996)。臺灣地區跨國公司企業福利制度之研究。行政院勞委會委託政治大學經濟研究所。
王麗容 (1993)。企(職)業福利的雙元性格和其組織性功能。社會科學論叢，41，63-80 。
朱建平 (2003)。組織成員的政治知覺對離職傾向之影響：工作滿足的中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
朱瑞年 (2019)。企業福利制度與工作壓力對員工幸福感與離職傾向之相關研究-以中油第一線員工為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立淡江大學。
吳美連、林俊毅 (2002)。人力資源管理：理論與實務。智勝文化。
吳俊瑩 (2016) 。企業福利制度與員工離職傾向之探討-以工作投入為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。私立義守大學。
周詩琳、李誠 (1999)。員工特徵對員工福利需求及滿意度的影響－以B公司為例。第五屆企業人力資源管理診斷專案研究成果研討會。行政院勞工委員會、國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所主辦，桃園市國立中央大學。
洪文德 (2010)。跨國企業員工心裡所有權、組織認同與離職傾向關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立大葉大學。
梁雙蓮 (1984)。中央行政機關公務員主之認同之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣大學政治研究所博士論文。
許道然 (1995)。論員工福利制度的規劃。空大行政學報，3， 285-298。
許士軍 (1988)。管理學。東華書局。
陳欽雨、呂博裕、邱明欽 (2013)。內部行銷、關係品質及薪酬福利對員工離職債向之影響-以保險業為例。經營管理論叢，特刊，17-35。
陳重志 (2011)。人格特質、激勵制度、領導風格、員工需求與工作滿意度的關聯性--以半導體電子業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學。
陳世雄 (2016)。以多層次分析探討組織認同在個人-組織適配度與離職傾向之調節式中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽 (2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23，77-98。
黃同圳 (2016)。人力資源管理：全球思維臺灣觀點。華泰書局。
黃金柱 (2007)。休閒管理。師大書苑。
黃英忠 (1998)。人力資源管理。三民書局。
黃英忠 (2016)。人力資源管理。三民書局。
黃熾森 (2013)，研究方法入門：組織行為及人力資源的應用，二版。鼎茂出版。
郭穎昌(1997)。企業員工福利制度之經驗分析。勞工研究季刊，128，86-97。
楊松德、洪榮昭與王麗容 (1993)。企業福利措施對提升工作意願與生產力之研究。勞工季刊，110，1-19。
楊一峰、陳效淳與陳清燿 (2012)。台灣觀光產業之員工工作壓力與離職傾向之研究：探討工作滿意度為干擾影響因素。管理科學研究，8(2)，47-66。
蔡宏昭 (1992)。勞工福利政策。桂冠圖書。
張瑜芬 (2011)。激勵因素與組織認同對離職傾向影響之研究─ 以光華商圈 3C 零售業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
張秋蘭、林淑真 (2007)。1600 大企業之福利實施與員工福利需求差異探討。人力資源管理學報，7(1)，19-40。
張秘 (1981)。如何建立員工福利制度。中華徵信所企業股份有限公司出版部。
張銘宗 (2001)。以實驗設計法探討彈性員工福利制度之資訊揭露對員工認知及態度的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。私立朝陽科技大學。
張春興、楊國樞 (1971)。心理學。三民書局。
簡德金、李右婷 (2008)。企業福利政策之滿意決策模式－以新竹科學園區為例。中華管理評論國際學報，11(4)，5-7。
羅麗婉 (2008)。研發人員福利需求與滿意度之研究－以高科技產業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
謝函融、房美玉 (2005)。工作值價觀與工作投入程度對離職傾向之研究。人力資源管理年鑑，6(7)，59-64。
Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers′ turnover intentions. Personality and Social psychology bulletin, 24(10), 1027-1039.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Byars, L., & Rue, L. W. (2003). Human resource management. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 19, 533-546.
Bartels, J. (2006). Organizational identification and communication: employees’ evaluations of internal communication and its effect on identification at different organizational levels (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, the Netherlands.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Caplan, R. D., & Jones, K. W. (1975). Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate. Journal of applied psychology, 60(6), 713.
Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field-Study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
Cohen, A. (1998). An Examination of the Relationship between Work Commitment and Work Outcomes Among Hospital Nurses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14, 1-17.
DeCenzo, D. A., Robbins, S. P., & Verhulst, S. L. (2016). Fundamentals of human resource management. John Wiley & Sons.
Dutton J, Dukerich J. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Imageand identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517-554.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, MA：Addison-Wesley.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
Heneman, R. L. (1984). Pay for performance: Exploring the merit system. Work in America Institute Studies in Productivity. New York: Pergamon Press.
Hersey, P., &Blanchard, K.H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 23(2), 26-34.
Irvine, D. M., & Evans, M. G. (1995). Job satisfaction and turnover among nurses: Integrating research findings across studies. Nursing Research, 44, 246-253.
Jones, K. (2017). “The Most Desirable Employee Benefits.” Harvard Business Review, February 15, 2017. Accessed February 27, 2019. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/02/the-most-desirable-employee-benefits.
Lineberry, J., & Trumble, S. (2000). The role of employee benefits in enhancing employee commitment. Compensation & Benefits Management, 16(1), 9-14.
Mael, F. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel psychology, 48(2), 309-333.
Mathieu. J. E., & Farr, J. L. (1991). Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 127-133.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237-240.
Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied psychology, 63(4), 408-414.
Mobley, W H, Griffeth, R. W, Hand, H. H, & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493-522.
McLeod, S. (2007). Maslow′s hierarchy of needs. Simply psychology, 1, 1-8.
Miller, H. E., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. (1979). Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner, and Hollings-worth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 509-517.
Miller, V. D., & Jablin, F. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 92-120.
Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4), 626-658.
Miller, J., Job, D., & Vassilev, V. (2000). Principles in the evolutionary design of digital circuits-part I. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 1, 7-36.
Milkovich, G. T., & Boudreau, J. W. (1991). Human Resource Management. Richard D. Irwin. Inc., Boston.
Milkovich, G., & Newman, J. (1993). Compensation. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Publishers.
Milkovich, G., & Newman, J. (2005). Moderating effect of procedural justice in the relationship between participation in pay systems and personal outcomes. Journal Kemanusiaan bill, 9, 84-92.
Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, Achievement and Involvement on the Job. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
Porter. L.W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F.J. (1976). Organizational Commitment. And Managerial Tunover : A Longitudinal Study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(1), 87-98.
Resick, C. J., Baltes, B. B., & Shantz, C. W. (2007). Person-organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1446-1455.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384.
Rosenbloom, J. S. (1984). The Handbook of Employee Benefits: Design, Funding and Administration. Homewood, Illinois: Dow-Jones-Irwin.
RosenBloom, J. S. (1988). The handbook of employee benefit. Homewood, illlionois.
Rosenbloom, J. S., & Hallman, G. V. (1991). Employee benefit planning. Prentice Hall.
Spector, P.E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693-713.
Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members′ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in higher education, 45(3), 285-309.
Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., et al. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15, 351-360.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: self‐definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(5), 571-584.
Wegge, J., Van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C., & Moltzen, K. (2006). Work motivation, organizational identification, and well-being in call centre work. Work & Stress, 20(1), 60-83.
Wheeler , A. R., Buckley , M. R., Halbesleben , J. R., Broue , R. L., & Ferris , G. R. (2005). The elusive criterion of fit revisited: Toward an integrative theory of multidimensional fi. Greenwich, : JAI Press.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen)

審核日期

2021-1-21

推文