參考文獻 |
References
Abdous, M. h., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76-95.
Ahn, T. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2016). User experience of a mobile speaking application with automatic speech recognition for EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 778-786.
Alioon, Y., & Delialioğlu, Ö. (2019). The effect of authentic m‐learning activities on student engagement and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 655-668.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Longman, New York.
Ateş, Ö., & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Effectiveness of hands-on and minds-on activities on students′ achievement and attitudes towards physics. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching,
Beghetto, R. A. (2009). In search of the unexpected: Finding creativity in the micromoments of the classroom. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 2.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20-24.
Bondi, A. B. (2000). Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Software and performance,
Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and understanding line graph interpretations using a scoring rubric of organized cited factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333-354.
Brown, B. L. (1998). Applying Constructivism in Vocational and Career Education. Information Series No. 378.
Bryant, C. (2010). A 21st-century art room: The remix of creativity and technology. Art Education, 63(2), 43-48.
Butler, D., & Leahy, M. (2011). Sharing classroom practices: a scalable, sustainable model of teacher professional development for learning in the 21st century. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference,
Cam, P. (2006). 20 thinking tools: Collaborative inquiry for the classroom. Aust Council for Ed Research.
Cheng, S.-C., Hwang, W.-Y., Wen, D.-W., Wu, S.-Y., Hsiehe, C.-H., & Chen, C.-Y. (2010). A mobile and Web system with contextual familiarity and its effect on campus English
94
learning. 2010 Third IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning,
Chin, K.-Y., Lee, K.-F., & Chen, Y.-L. (2019). Effects of a Ubiquitous Guide-Learning System on Cultural Heritage Course Students’ Performance and Motivation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(1), 52-62.
Chu, H.-C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students′ learning achievement and cognitive load—A format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332-344.
Clarke, J., Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Nelson, B. (2006). A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology, 46(3), 27-36.
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational researcher, 32(6), 3-12.
Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology. Technical Report.
Council, N. R. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Academies Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Croy, W. G. (2009). Location-based learning: Considerations for developing and implementing destination-partnered authentic-experiential learning. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 21(1), 17-23.
Curry, L. A. (2004). The effects of self-explanations of correct and incorrect solutions on algebra problem-solving performance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society,
Daluba, N. E. (2013). Effect of Demonstration Method of Teaching on Students′ Achievement in Agricultural Science. World Journal of Education, 3(6), 1-7.
Davies, D., & McGregor, D. (2016). Teaching science creatively. Routledge.
Davis, A. B., Sumara, D. J., & Kieren, T. E. (1996). Cognition, co‐emergence, curriculum. Journal of curriculum Studies, 28(2), 151-169.
Davis, D., & Sorrell, J. (1995). Mastery learning in public schools. Educational psychology interactive.
Davtyan, R. (2014). Contextual learning. ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference,
de Jong, T. (2006). Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. Handling complexity in learning environments: research and theory, 107-128.
Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum,
95
Dirkx, J. M., Amey, M., & Haston, L. (1999). Context in the contextualized curriculum: Adult life worlds as unitary or multiplistic. 18th annual Midwest Research to Practice conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, St. Louis, MS,
Dowd, J. E., Thompson Jr, R. J., Schiff, L. A., & Reynolds, J. A. (2018). Understanding the complex relationship between critical thinking and science reasoning among undergraduate thesis writers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar4.
Eckersley, R. (1998). Measuring progress: Is life getting better?
Ernest, P. (2010). Reflections on theories of learning. In Theories of mathematics education (pp. 39-47). Springer.
Fleener, M. J. (2016). Re-searching methods in educational research: A transdisciplinary approach. In Complex Dynamical Systems in Education (pp. 9-21). Springer.
Gill, D. (2014). The Educational Scalability of inquiry-Based Learning as a Means to Promote Authentic Student Achievement. Journal of Educational Thought/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 108-123.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer assisted language learning, 27(1), 70-105.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14.
Halpern, D. F. (2013). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2000). The Three Dimensions of Reform. Educational leadership, 57(7), 30-33.
Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2007). Authentic mobile learning in higher education.
Herrington, J., & Parker, J. (2013). Emerging technologies as cognitive tools for authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 607-615.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401-412). Springer.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of science education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
Howard, S. K. (2011). Affect and acceptability: Exploring teachers’ technology-related risk perceptions. Educational Media International, 48(4), 261-272.
96
Hung, C.-Y., Sun, J. C.-Y., & Yu, P.-T. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: student motivation and flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive learning environments, 23(2), 172-190.
Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C., & Yang, S. J. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81-91.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive learning environments, 21(4), 338-354.
Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, N.-S., Dung, J.-J., & Yang, Y.-L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191-212.
Hwang, W.-Y., Lin, L.-K., Ochirbat, A., Shih, T. K., & Kumara, W. (2015). Ubiquitous Geometry: Measuring authentic surroundings to support Geometry Learning of the Sixth-Grade students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(1), 26-49.
Hwang, W.-Y., Liu, Y.-F., Purba, S. W. D., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2017). Investigation on the effects of measuring authentic contexts on geometry learning. 2017 10th International Conference on Ubi-media Computing and Workshops (Ubi-Media),
Hwang, W.-Y., Purba, S. W. D., Liu, Y.-F., Zhang, Y.-Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2018). An Investigation of the Effects of Measuring Authentic Contexts on Geometry Learning Achievement. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., & Huang, Y.-M. (2014). Cognitive diffusion model with user-oriented context-to-text recognition for learning to promote high level cognitive processes. In Advanced technologies, embedded and multimedia for human-centric computing (pp. 267-274). Springer.
Hwang, W.-Y., Utami, I. Q., Purba, S. W. D., & Chen, H. S. (2019). Effect of Ubiquitous Fraction App on Mathematics Learning Achievements and Learning Behaviors of Taiwanese Students in Authentic Contexts. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
Ingram, J. (2018). Agricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 26, 117-135.
Jaskyte, K. (2008). Employee creativity in US and Lithuanian nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(4), 465-483.
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education. American journal of distance education, 9(2), 7-26.
97
Josiah, M. M. (2013). Effects of Practical Physics Knowledge on Students’ Academic Achievement: A Study of Pankshin Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria. World Educators Forum,
Kaboodi, M., & Jiar, Y. K. (2012). Cognitive and trait creativity in relation with academic achievement. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(5), 391.
Kali, Y., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Designing effective visualizations for elementary school science. The elementary school journal, 109(2), 181-198.
Khaliliaqdam, S. (2014). ZPD, scaffolding and basic speech development in EFL context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 891-897.
Kibirige, I., & Hodi, T. (2013). Learners’ performance in Physical Sciences using laboratory investigations. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 425-432.
Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 575-602.
Kim, S.-y., & Kim, M.-r. (2012). Kolb′s learning styles and educational outcome: Using Digital Mind Map as a study tool in Elementary English class. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 6(1), 4-13.
Lee, M. C., & Sulaiman, F. (2017). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRACTICAL WORK IN PHYSICS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3).
Li, D. D., & Lim, C. P. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1394-1410. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.013
Lin, T.-J., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Identifying Taiwanese University Students’ Physics Learning Profiles and Their Role in Physics Learning Self-Efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 605-624. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9440-z
Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007), 1-12.
Lu, S., Park, S., Seo, E., & Zhou, Y. (2008). Learning from mistakes: a comprehensive study on real world concurrency bug characteristics. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News,
Montoye, H. J., Willis III, P. W., Cunningham, D. A., & Keller, J. B. (1969). Heart rate response to a modified Harvard step test: males and females, age 10–69. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 40(1), 153-162.
98
Nakhimovsky, Y., Miller, A. T., Dimopoulos, T., & Siliski, M. (2010). Behind the scenes of google maps navigation: enabling actionable user feedback at scale. CHI′10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
Newmann, F. M. (1995). Authentic pedagogy: Standards that boost student performance. Issues in restructuring schools.
Ng, W., & Nguyen, V. T. (2006). Investigating the Integration of Everyday Phenomena and Practical Work in Physics Teaching in Vietnamese High Schools. International Education Journal, 7(1), 36-50.
Nguyen, T.-H., Hwang, W.-Y., Pham, X.-L., & Ma, Z.-H. (2018). User-Oriented EFL Speaking through Application and Exercise: Instant Speech Translation and Shadowing in Authentic Context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 129-142.
Niederhauser, D. S., Howard, S. K., Voogt, J., Agyei, D. D., Laferriere, T., Tondeur, J., & Cox, M. J. (2018). Sustainability and scalability in educational technology initiatives: Research-informed practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 507-523.
Ogata, H., Li, M., Hou, B., Uosaki, N., El-Bishouty, M. M., & Yano, Y. (2011). SCROLL: Supporting to share and reuse ubiquitous learning log in the context of language learning. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2).
Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (2003). Pedagogical designs for. Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning, 94.
Powers, D. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2004). Do standardized tests penalize deep-thinking, creative, or conscientious students? Some personality correlates of Graduate Record Examinations test scores. Intelligence, 32(2), 145-153.
Punch, K. F., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education. Sage.
Purba, S. W. D., & Hwang, W.-Y. (2017). Investigation of Learning Behaviors and Achievement of Vocational High School Students Using an Ubiquitous Physics Tablet PC App. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 322-331.
Purba, S. W. D., & Hwang, W.-Y. (2018). Investigation of learning behaviors and achievement of simple pendulum for vocational high school students with Ubiquitous-Physics app. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2877-2893.
Rauf, R. A. A., Rasul, M. S., Mansor, A. N., Othman, Z., & Lyndon, N. (2013, April 25, 2013). Inculcation of Science Process Skills in a Science Classroom. Asian Social Science, 9(8). https://doi.org/doi:10.5539/ass.v9n8p47
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2003). When Are Graphs Worth Ten Thousand Words? An Expert-Expert Study. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 429-473. https://doi.org/doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2104_3
99
Ruffin, P. (2007). A real fear: It′s more than stage fright, math anxiety can derail academic or professional success, but some scholars are working to help students get over it. Diverse Issues in Higher Education. Findarticle. com (online) http://findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0WMX/is_2_24/ai_n18744928.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Achievement sometimes requires creativity. High Ability Studies, 18(1), 75-77.
Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., Huang, Y.-M., & Liu, T.-Y. (2016). Cognitive diffusion model: facilitating EFL learning in an authentic environment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(2), 168-181.
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233-249). Springer.
Shaughnessy, M. F. (1991). The supportive educational environment for creativity.
Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & McDonald, S. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87(4), 490-516.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (2012). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Constructivism in education (pp. 103-126). Routledge.
Starko, A. J. (2013). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. Routledge.
Stone, A., & Thames, K. U. (2004). Designing scalable, effective mobile learning for multiple technologies. learning with mobiledevices, 145.
[Record #30 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]
Supalo, C. A., Humphrey, J. R., Mallouk, T. E., David Wohlers, H., & Carlsen, W. S. (2016). Examining the use of adaptive technologies to increase the hands-on participation of students with blindness or low vision in secondary-school chemistry and physics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1174-1189. https://doi.org/doi:10.1039/C6RP00141F
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Personnel Press.
Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Introduction to multiple representations: Their importance in biology and biological education. In Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 3-18). Springer.
Van Poeck, K., & Östman, L. (2018). Creating space for ‘the political’in environmental and sustainability education practice: A political move analysis of educators’ actions. Environmental Education Research, 24(9), 1406-1423.
100
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1993). The embodied mind.
Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53(2), 286-299.
Vezzali, L., Gocłowska, M. A., Crisp, R. J., & Stathi, S. (2016). On the relationship between cultural diversity and creativity in education: The moderating role of communal versus divisional mindset. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 152-157.
Wang, J.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Chien, S.-P., Hwang, F.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). Designing applications for physics learning: Facilitating high school students′ conceptual understanding by using tablet pcs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 441-458.
Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students′ learning behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673-695.
Williams, J. D., Harlow, S. D., & Borgen, J. S. (1971). Creativity, dogmatism, and arithmetic achievement. The Journal of psychology, 78(2), 217-222.
Wilson, M. S., & Miller, C. T. (2015). Using Google Maps web-application to create virtual plant maps for use as an online study tool in plant identification courses. HortTechnology, 25(2), 253-256.
Wingkvist, A. (2009). Understanding scalability and sustainability in mobile learning: A systems development framework Växjö University Press].
Xia, J. C., Fielder, J., & Siragusa, L. (2013). Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 97-113. |