透過積木程式的計算機模擬進行科學學習

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：23

、訪客IP：18.189.2.122

姓名

男蘇亞(I Made Surya Kumara) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

透過積木程式的計算機模擬進行科學學習
(Science Learning Through Computer Simulations With Blockly Codes)

相關論文

★ 以視覺為主的遊戲空間輔助全身性學習	★ 以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感
★ 以行動載具支援並分析合作式的探索活動	★ 以混合實境支援工作臺協同探究學習
★ 使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究	★ 以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具
★ 互動式計算桌面環境對於合作學習的優缺點	★ 以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索
★ 合作學習使用網際網路: 學習腳本在面對面網路合作探索的影響	★ 兒童使用超媒體的Web2.0創作故事平台之探究--衍生與重組
★ 以創用為基礎之合作說故事平台 - 衍生、重組、擁有感	★ 透過網路實施模擬實務社群並利用即興創作激發創意
★ 使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動	★ 以Cyber-Physical環境支援程式設計學習之探究
★ 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析：群組軟體的支援與設計	★ 不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

由於科技的進步與發展，電腦模擬在科學教育中的應用變得越發重要。本研究的目的為探討學生使用電腦模擬學習時的概念理解。我們亦分析學生在學習過程中的討論內容以及他們使用積木程式語言的模式。我們開發了一個融入積木程式語言的海陸風模擬，學生須在模擬中利用積木程式語言探測不同位置的氣壓以推斷風的方向。採用POE(預測-觀察-解釋)的學習策略了解學生使用科學模擬學習時的概念理解與概念改變。10位5年級至7年級的學生參與此一實驗且被分為5個組別。每一組別皆被分配到兩張學習單以及一台筆記型電腦以使用科學模擬系統並回答相關問題。研究結果指出，學習策略中的「預測」階段會對於學生的概念理解有直接的影響。而學生的討論內容分析指出，他們會在討論過程中分享知識、互相詢問問題、假設以及形成概念。學生使用積木程式語言模式的分析指出，其中一組的學生有興趣使用積木程式語言探索模擬中每一個區域的氣壓。然而，亦有結果指出使用積木程式語言對於部分學生而言是困難的(學生重複的探索同一區域)。最後，雖然有一些學生在實驗一開始無法成功地使用積木程式語言，但在實驗的最後皆能使用積木程式語言針對不同的區域進行氣壓探測。由此得知，使用科學模擬進行學習能夠提升學生的程式語言使用能力。

摘要(英)

Computer simulations have become increasingly powerful and well developed due to the advanced technology. The aim of this study was to investigate students’ conceptual understanding with the POE (prediction-observation-explanation) strategy by using a scientific simulation. Furthermore, we also analyzed students’ discussions and blockly programming sequences during their manipulation. In this study, we developed a simulation with the topic of sea-land wind and integrate it with blockly library. A total of 10 students were recruited (from 5th to 7th graders) and they were divided to 5 groups. Two worksheets and one computer were given to each group. The results showed that POE strategy had a direct impact on students′ conceptual understanding in scientific concept while using simulation. The recorded discussions showed that students′ shared knowledge among peers, asked questions from each other, hypothesized, and formulated ideas together during the learning process. The result of blockly programming sequence indicated that one of the groups was interested in exploring all areas in the simulation. Some other groups performed probe several times in the same area. The result indicated that students had difficulty operating the blockly programming system. Students’ programming skills improved after learning with the simulation. Though there were groups did not understand how to write blockly programming in the beginning, they were able to observe the area with blockly programming in the end of the study.

關鍵字(中)

★ 電腦模擬
★ POE 策略
★ 積木程式
★ 概念理解

關鍵字(英)

★ computer simulation
★ POE strategy
★ blockly programming
★ conceptual understanding

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES vii
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS viii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Purpose 3
1.3 Limitations 3
1.4 Significances of the Study 3
1.5 Thesis Outline 3
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 4
2.1 Conceptual Understanding in Science 4
2.2 Computer Simulations in Science Learning 5
2.3 The Effect of Discussion on Learning 6
2.4 Prediction-Observation-Explanation Strategy 7
2.5 Impact of Blockly Visual Programming 8
CHAPTER THREE: SYSTEM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 10
3.1 System Design 10
3.2 Implementation 13
CHAPTER FOUR: METHOD 19
4.1 Participants 19
4.2 Design of Experiment 19
4.3 Procedure 22
CHAPTER FIVE: RESULTS AND DATA ANALYSES 24
5.1 Analyses of Students’ Conceptual Understanding 24
5.1.1 Analyses of Students’ Conceptual Understanding on Surface Area 26
5.1.2 Analyses of Students’ Conceptual Understanding on Vertical Area 27
5.1.3 Analyses of Students’ Conceptual Understanding on High-State Area 28
5.2 Analyses of Student Discussions 29
5.3 Analyses of Student Blockly Programming Sequence 35
CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSIONS 37
6.1 Conclusion 37
6.2 Limitations and Future Work of the Study 38
REFERENCES 39
APPENDIX 44

參考文獻

Abdullah, S., & Syarif, A. (2008). The Effects of Inquiry-Based Computer Simulation with Cooperative Learning on Scientific Thinking and Conceptual Understanding of Gas Law. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(4), 387-398.
Adams, M. (1992). Cultural inclusion in the American college classroom. In L. Border, & N. Chism (Eds.), Teaching for diversity (pp. 5–17). San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.
Akpan, J. (2001). Issues Associated with Inserting Computer Simulations into Biology Instruction: A Review of The Literature. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(3). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/viewArticle/7656/5423
C. Donald, A., & Henson, R. (n.d.). Meteorology today : an introduction to weather, climate, and the environment.
Chang, H. Y., Quintana, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter. Science Education, 94, 73-94.
Chen, Y., Hong, Y., Sung, Y., & Chang, K. (2011). Efficacy of simulation-based learning of electronics using visualization and manipulation. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 269–277.
Chen, Y.-L., Pan, P.-R., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Correcting Misconceptions on Electronics: Effects of a simulation-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society .
Hilario, J. S. (2015). The Use of Predict-Observe-Explain-Explore (POEE) as a New Teaching Strategy in General Chemistry Laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(3), 38-39.
Honey, M., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning science: computer games, simulations, and education. Committee on Science Learning. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/ openbook.php?record_id=13078&page=R1
Hsu, C.-Y., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Facilitating Preschoolers’ Scientiﬁc Knowledge Construction via Computer Games Regarding Light and Shadow: The Effect of the Prediction-Observation-Explanation (POE) Strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 482–493. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9298-z
Hudson, J. N., & Tonkin, A. L. (2008). Clinical skills education: Outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers and simulated patients. Medical Education, 42(9), 901–908. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03107.x
Jimenez, Y., Kapoor, A., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2018). Usability Challenges that Novice Programmers Experience when Using Scratch for the First Time. 2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 327–328). IEEE.
Karlsson, G., Ivarsson, J., & Lindström, B. (2013). Agreed Discoveries: Students’ Negotiations in a Virtual Laboratory Experiment. Instructional Science, 41(3), 455-480.
Kelly, R. M., & Jones, L. L. (2007). Exploring how different features of animations of sodium chloride dissolution affect students’ explanations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 413–429.
Konicek-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. NSTA Press, National Science Teachers Association.
Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174-187.
Loke, A. J., & Chow, F. L. (2007). Learning partnership-The experience of peer tutoring among nursing students: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 237–244.
Lutgens, F., Tarbuck, E., & Tasa, D. (n.d.). The Atmosphere: an introduction to meteorology.
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: what is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61.
Miliszewska, I., & Tan, G. (2007). Befriending computer programming: a proposed approach to teaching introductory programming. Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 278-289.
Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (1998). Reform and innovation in science teaching: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Naps, T. L., Rößling, G., Almstrum, V., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Hundhausen, C., & Velázquez-Iturbide, J. A. (2003). Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2), 131–152.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National.
Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student Affect and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908-937.
Posner, G., K. A., S., P. W., H., & W. A., G. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The Effect of Talk and Writing on Learning Science: An Exploratory Study. Science Education.
Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation-a bridge between theory and reality : The case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 14–26.
Ruiz-Gallardo, J.-R., & Reavey, D. (2019). Learning Science Concepts by Teaching Peers in a Cooperative Environment: A Longitudinal Study of Preservice Teachers. JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES Journal of The Learning Sciences, 1050-8406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1506988
Sadideen, H., Hamaoui, K., Saadeddin, M., & Kneebone, R. (2012). Simulators and the simulation environment: getting the balance right in simulation-based surgical education. International Journal of Surgery, 10, 458-462.
Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013, January 3). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18, pp. 351–380. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
Seraj, M., Katterfeldt, E.-S., Bub, K., Autexier, S., & Drechler, R. (2019). Scratch and Google Blockly: How Girls’ Programming Skills and Attitudes are Influenced. Koli Calling ′19: Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education ResearchNovember 2019, (pp. 1–10). Koli, Finland. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364515
Shannon, R. (1992). Introduction to Simulation. Proceedings of the 1992 Winter Simulation Conference, (p. Texas).
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9). doi:1337e1370
Tao, P-K., & Gunstone, R.F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported in physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 859-882.
Treagust, D., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297-328.
Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2004). Motivational aspects of learning genetics with interactive multimedia. The American Biology Teacher, 66, 277-285.
Tversky, B., Bauer Morrisony, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Prediction-observation-explanation. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Widyatmoko, A. (2018). The Effectiveness of Simulation in Science Learning on Conceptual Understanding : A Literature Review. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 24, 35-43.
Zulaeha, I.W., Darmadi, & K. Werdhiana. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Predict, Observe And Explain terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas X Sma Negeri 1 Balaesang. Journal Pendidikan Fisika Todulako.

指導教授

劉晨鐘(Chen-Chung Liu)

審核日期

2021-1-19

推文