中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係⎼⎼ 探討工作要求與工作資源的調節式中介作用

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：129

、訪客IP：3.129.63.252

姓名

許嘉珉(Chia-Min Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係⎼⎼ 探討工作要求與工作資源的調節式中介作用
(Research of aging employee’s employability—Discussion of the moderated mediation effects of perceiving Job Demands and Job Resources for older workers)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在人口紅利逐漸消失，未來人口負擔越趨沈重的時代背景下，本研究針對中高齡的勞動參與率漸升，但其就業力仍然容易衰退之議題，以社會情緒選擇理論及資源保存理論，了解中高齡員工的心態轉換、資源流失會如何影響職場中的發展，更結合工作要求與資源理論，來探討中高齡員工對於工作要求及資源的知覺是否能幫助他們在職場中成功發展，並增進他們的就業力。本研究以台灣 443 位中高齡員工作為研究樣本，採用問卷法進行研究發現，職場成功老化在職涯未來時間觀與就業力間具有中介作用，且三變項間為正向影響關係。此外，高工作資源能增強職涯未來時間觀與職場成功老化之間的正向關係，使中高齡員工更容易達成職場成功老化，並透過職場成功老化程度的改善，更加推升了中高齡員工於勞動市場上的就業力。最終提出管理意涵及未來建議，期望研究結果可以在企業中發揚光大，應用於中高齡員工的個人發展計畫、培訓計畫、職涯或退休諮詢等，讓企業可以找到方法引導組織內的中高齡員工，確實改善他們的職涯發展歷程，讓他們能夠持續在勞動市場中發光發熱，為企業及社會持續創造價值。

摘要(英)

In the context of the gradual disappearance of the demographic dividend and the increasing burden of the population, this research focuses on the problem that the labor participation rate of the middle-aged and the elderly is increasing, but its employability is still declining. Using socioemotional selectivity theory and resources theory to understand how middle-aged and elderly employees’ mentality changes and resource loss will affect the development of the workplace, and combine Job Demand and Resource theory to explore whether middle-aged and elderly employees’ perception of JDJR can help them develop successfully in the workplace and increase their employability.
This study uses 443 middle-aged and elderly employees in Taiwan as a research sample and uses the questionnaire method to conduct research. It is found that successful aging in the workplace has a mediation effect on the Occupational Future Time Perspectives (OFTP) and employability, and there is a positive relationship between these three variables. In addition, high Job Resources can enhance the positive relationship between the OFTP and Successful Aging at Work (SAW), making it easier for middle-aged and elderly employees to achieve SAW, and through the improvement of the degree of SAW, it further promotes the middle-aged and elderly employees’ employability in the labor market. Finally put forward management implications and future recommendations, hoping that the research results can be carried forward in the enterprise, and applied to the personal development plan, training plan, career or retirement consulting of middle-aged and elderly employees, so that the enterprise can find ways to guide the middle-aged and elderly people in the organization. Senior employees have indeed improved their career development process, allowing them to continue to shine in the labor market and continue to create value for the company and society.

關鍵字(中)

★ 職涯未來時間觀
★ 職場成功老化
★ 就業力
★ 工作要求
★ 工作資源

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄
一、緒論 1
二、文獻探討與假設建立 5
2-1 文獻探討 5
2-1-1 社會情緒選擇理論與職涯未來時間觀 5
2-1-2 職場成功老化 6
2-1-3 就業力 7
2-1-4 工作要求與資源理論 (Job Demands-Resources theory) 8
2-2假設建立 10
2-2-1職場成功老化在職涯未來時間觀與就業力間之中介作用 10
2-2-2 職場成功老化在職涯未來時間觀與期望退休年齡間之中介作用 11
2-2-3 工作要求對職涯未來時間觀及職場成功老化之調節作用 12
2-2-4 工作要求的調節式中介作用 12
2-2-5 工作資源對職涯未來時間觀及職場成功老化之調節作用 13
2-2-6 工作資源的調節式中介作用 14
三、研究方法 15
3-1 研究對象 15
3-2 研究程序 15
3-3 研究工具 16
四、研究結果 18
4-1 資料來源與樣本特性 18
4-2 驗證性因素分析 19
4-3 信度與效度分析 20
4-4 相關性分析 22
4-5 假設檢定 22
4-5-1 職場成功老化（在職涯未來時間觀與就業力之間）的中介效果 23
4-5-2 職場成功老化（在職涯未來時間觀與期望退休年齡之間）的中介效果 24
4-5-3 工作要求的調節效果及調節式中介效果 24
4-5-4 工作資源的調節效果及調節式中介效果 26
五、研究結論與討論 29
5-1 研究結論與討論 29
5-2 研究貢獻 31
5-3 管理意涵 32
5-4 研究限制與建議 34
參考文獻 35

參考文獻

中高齡者及高齡者就業促進法（2019年12月4日）。
中華民國國家發展委員會（2020）。中華民國人口推估（2020至2070年）。取自：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=695E69E28C6AC7F3
行政院主計處（2019）。108 年 8 月人力資源調查統計結果。取自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/992313471SQKUP4R8.pdf
吳孟津（2016）。中高齡員工未來時間觀、認知未來機會與持續工作動機間的關係—調節式中介模型的檢驗（碩士）。國立中央大學，桃園縣。Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zfvj9612
周俐君（2017）。高齡員工持續工作動機之研究— 探討知覺高齡相關人資方案的調節式中介作用（碩士）。國立中央大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ve2yzu
陳欽雨、蔡宜雯（2016）。服務業員工自我概念，正向態度與專業契合對升遷機會之影響。人力資源管理學報，16(2)，81-114。
勞動部（2019）。國際勞動統計。取自：
https://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/2452/2457/
鄭羽伶（2020）。中高齡員工年齡、未來時間觀、人力資源措施滿意度與持續工作動機間的關係—調節式中介模型的作用（碩士）。國立中央大學，桃園縣。Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5dcfb3
簡嘉貞（2015）。工作要求－資源模式的效度考驗－以台灣企業員工為例（碩士）。國立政治大學，台北市。Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6pgu83
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Berntson, E., & Marklund, S. (2007). The relationship between perceived employability and subsequent health. Work & Stress, 21(3), 279-292.
Bieling, G., Stock, R. M., & Dorozalla, F. (2015). Coping with demographic change in job markets: How age diversity management contributes to organisational performance. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 5-30.
Borritz, M., Bültmann, U., Rugulies, R., Christensen, K. B., Villadsen, E., & Kristensen, T. S. (2005). Psychosocial work characteristics as predictors for burnout: findings from 3-year follow up of the PUMA Study. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 47(10), 1015-1025.
Böttcher, K., Albrecht, A.-G., Venz, L., & Felfe, J. (2018). Protecting older workers’ employability: A survey study of the role of transformational leadership. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 120-148.
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models.
Carless, S. A., & Arnup, J. L. (2011). A longitudinal study of the determinants and outcomes of career change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(1), 80-91.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American psychologist, 54(3), 165.
Carstensen, L. L., & Lang, F. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Cate, R. A., & John, O. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychol Aging, 22(1), 186-201. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.186
Cheung, F., Yeung, D. Y., & Wu, A. M. S. (2017). Occupational Future Time Perspective and Successful Aging at Work. Journal of Career Development, 46(1), 3-16. doi:10.1177/0894845317696805
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied psychology, 86(3), 499.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (1990). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5(3), 335-347. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.335
Frins, W., van Ruysseveldt, J., van Dam, K., & van den Bossche, S. N. J. (2016). Older employees’ desired retirement age: a JD-R perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 34-49. doi:10.1108/jmp-05-2013-0133
Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L., & Lutz, A. M. (1999). Influence of time on social preferences: {Fung, 1999 #13}Implications for life-span development. Psychology and Aging, 14(4), 595-604. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.4.595
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th ed Uppersaddle river: Pearson prentice hall.
Halbesleben, J. R. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 8(1), 102-117.
Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances: Jhu Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.
Hillage, J., & Pollard, E. (1998). Employability: developing a framework for policy analysis (Vol. 107): DfEE London.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of general psychology, 6(4), 307-324.
Hobfoll, S. E., Shirom, A., & Golembiewski, R. (2000). Conservation of resources theory. appears in Handbook of Organizational Behavior, RT Golembiewski (ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, 57-80.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user′s reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL: Scientific Software International.
Kochoian, N., Raemdonck, I., Frenay, M., & Zacher, H. (2017). The role of age and occupational future time perspective in workers’ motivation to learn. Vocations and Learning, 10(1), 27-45.
Kooij, D. T., Bal, P. M., & Kanfer, R. (2014). Future time perspective and promotion focus as determinants of intraindividual change in work motivation. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 319.
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125-139. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.125
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: toward a micro‐intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(3), 387-393.
Meijman, T. F., Mulder, G., Drenth, P., & Thierry, H. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. Volume, 2.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: MacGraw-Hill. _ d. Intentar embellecer nuestras ciudades y también las.
Olson, D. A., & Shultz, K. S. (2019). Lifespan Perspectives on Successful Aging at Work. In Work Across the Lifespan (pp. 215-234).
Oostrom, J. K., Pennings, M., & Bal, P. M. (2016). How do idiosyncratic deals contribute to the employability of older workers? Career Development International, 21(2), 176-192. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2015-0112
Park, Y., & Choi, W. (2016). The effects of formal learning and informal learning on job performance: the mediating role of the value of learning at work. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 279-287. doi:10.1007/s12564-016-9429-6
Robson, S. M., Hansson, R. O., Abalos, A., & Booth, M. (2006). Successful Aging: Criteria for Aging Well in the Workplace. Journal of Career Development, 33(2), 156-177. doi:10.1177/0894845306292533
Rothwell, A., & Arnold, J. (2007). Self‐perceived employability: development and validation of a scale. Personnel Review, 36(1), 23-41. doi:10.1108/00483480710716704
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
Sickles, R. C., & Taubman, P. J. (1984). An analysis of the health and retirement status of the elderly (0898-2937). Retrieved from
Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282-298.
Szinovacz, M. E., DeViney, S., & Davey, A. (2001). Influences of family obligations and relationships on retirement: Variations by gender, race, and marital status. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(1), S20-S27.
Taneva, S. K., & Arnold, J. (2018). Thriving, surviving and performing in late career: A mixed-method study of pathways to successful aging in organizations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 189-212.
Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., de Lange, A. H., Demerouti, E., & Van der Heijde, C. M. (2009). Age effects on the employability–career success relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(2), 156-164. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.009
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International journal of stress management, 14(2), 121.
Zacher, H. (2013). Older job seekers′ job search intensity: The interplay of proactive personality, age and occupational future time perspective. Ageing & Society, 33(7), 1139-1166.
Zacher, H. (2015). Successful aging at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 4-25. In.
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychol Aging, 24(2), 487-493. doi:10.1037/a0015425
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 291-318.
Zappalà, S., Depolo, M., Fraccaroli, F., Guglielmi, D., & Sarchielli, G. (2008). Postponing job retirement?: Psychosocial influences on the preference for early or late retirement. Career Development International, 13(2), 150-167.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2021-6-29

推文