從精實生產到工業4.0：台灣地區中小企業的實證研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：157

、訪客IP：18.224.0.25

姓名

蔡薈芳(Hui-Fang Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

從精實生產到工業4.0：台灣地區中小企業的實證研究
(From Lean to Industry 4.0: An Empirical Study of SMEs in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 企業流程為核心的食品產業運籌體系規劃:低溫物流部份	★ 以企業流程方法規劃整體飛航後勤維修體系之研究
★ 成衣產業導入ERP運籌管理方案之個案研究	★ 光電產業試產基地之生產最佳化模式：以光投影機為例
★ TFT LCD產業獲利因素之探討	★ 科技事業進行合併/讓售之決策過程與成效之個案探討
★ 企業治理、風險及遵循解決方案導入之個案研究-以職責分離資訊系統為例	★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用
★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響	★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析
★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響	★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ 電子產業新產品開發參考模式之發展
★ 應用資料科學方法提昇國防裝備可靠度之研究－以防空系統為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2024-12-31以後開放)

摘要(中)

德國在發展工業4.0的過程中以精實生產為基礎。精實生產也被學者認為與工業4.0發展有正相關，並且也與企業的營運績效有關，但很少會提出模型將三者結合在一起進行驗證。

本研究以165份樣本進行實證分析，探討精實在台灣中小型製造業發展工業4.0的過程中所扮演的角色。以精實、工業4.0與營運績效之關係進行探討，採用偏最小平方結構方程模式(PLS-SEM)進行分析，並提出研究模型將三者結合在一起進行驗證。確認精實是否為台灣中小型製造業發展工業4.0的前提，且會對營運績效產生影響。

對受到人力、技術、資金限制的中小企業之製造業而言，一下子要實施工業4.0是不可能的，找出其發展工業4.0之前提並循序轉型才是最重要的。最後，本研究證實對中小企業來說，實施精實之後再發展工業4.0會比直接實施工業4.0更能提升營運績效。

摘要(英)

The process of developing Industry 4.0 is based on lean production in Germany. Lean production is also considered by scholars to be positively related to the development of Industry 4.0 and is also related to the operational performance of enterprises. However, it is rare to propose a model that combines the three dimensions and then verifies them together.

This study uses 165 samples to conduct empirical analysis to explore the role of Lean in the development of Industry 4.0 in Taiwan′s small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. In this study, we discussed the relationship between lean, industry 4.0 and operational performance, using partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM), and proposed a research model that combined the three dimensions for verification. It is used to confirm whether Lean is a prerequisite for Taiwan′s small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises to develop Industry 4.0, and will have an impact on operating performance.

For the manufacturing industry of small and medium-sized enterprises that are restricted by labor force, technology, and capital, it is impossible to implement Industry 4.0 at once. The most important thing is to find out the prerequisites for the enterprise to develop Industry 4.0. Finally, this research confirms that for small and medium-sized enterprises, first implementing Lean and then developing Industry 4.0 will improve operational performance, which is better than directly implementing Industry 4.0.

關鍵字(中)

★ 精實
★ 工業4.0
★ 營運績效
★ 中小型企業
★ 製造業

關鍵字(英)

★ Lean
★ Industry 4.0
★ Operational performance
★ Small and Medium Enterprise
★ Manufacturing

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的與範圍 2
1-3 研究流程與論文結構 3
1-3-1 研究流程 3
1-3-2 論文結構 5
第二章文獻回顧 6
2-1 精實 6
2-1-1 精實生產 6
2-1-2 精實供應鏈 7
2-2 工業4.0 8
2-2-1 工業4.0的發展 8
2-2-2 工業4.0的觀念與技術 9
2-2-3 工業4.0與精實 10
2-3 營運績效 10
2-4 中小型製造業 11
第三章研究方法 13
3-1 研究模型發展歷程 13
3-2 研究模型與研究假設 14
3-3 研究變數與研究方法 17
3-3-1 研究變數與內涵 17
3-3-2 尺度衡量方法 20
3-4 統計分析方法 21
3-4-1 測量模型 22
3-4-2 結構模型 23
3-4-3 中介效果 25
3-5 研究問卷 25
3-5-1 問卷發放方式 25
3-5-2 問卷回收概況 26
第四章研究分析與結果 28
4-1 敘述性統計分析 28
4-2 測量模型分析 34
4-2-1 信度及效度分析 35
4-2-2 區別效度分析 38
4-3 結構模型分析 39
4-3-1 共線性分析 39
4-3-2 路徑分析 39
4-3-3 模型解釋力分析 42
4-3-4 模型預測力分析 42
4-4 中介效果分析 42
4-5 檢驗結果整理 43
4-6 研究論述 45
4-6-1 精實與營運績效的關係 45
4-6-2 工業4.0的數位化管理及數位化工程與營運績效的關係 45
4-6-3 工業4.0的數位化管理與數位化工程的關係 46
4-6-4 工業4.0的數位化管理及數位化工程與精實的關係 46
4-6-5 工業4.0的數位化管理及數位化工程透過精實與營運績效的關係 47
第五章結論與後續研究 49
5-1 研究結論 49
5-2 研究意涵 50
5-2-1 學術上的意涵 50
5-2-2 實務上的意涵 50
5-3 研究限制與後續研究 50
參考文獻 52

參考文獻

主計總處（2020）。國民所得統計及國內經濟情勢展望。行政院。
主計總處（2021）。行業統計分類。行政院。
張文文（2013）。台灣地區中型企業供應鏈基本佈局型態之探討。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班。
黃佳琦（2015）。中型製造業永續供應鏈實踐機制之探討。國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班。
經濟部中小企業處（2020）。中小企業統計。行政院。
Agus, A., & Shukri Hajinoor, M. (2012). Lean production supply chain management as driver towards enhancing product quality and business performance: Case study of manufacturing companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1), 92-121.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Belekoukias, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2014). The impact of lean methods and tools on the operational performance of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5346-5366.
Buer, S.-V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924-2940.
Ciano, M. P., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., & Rossi, T. (2021). One-to-one relationships between Industry 4.0 technologies and Lean Production techniques: a multiple case study. International Journal of Production Research, 59(5), 1386-1410.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences: Academic Press.
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394.
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61-104.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. In New challenges to international marketing: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
IBM. (2020). Transforming different Likert scales to a common scale. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/422073
Kolberg, D., & Zühlke, D. (2015). Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1870-1875.
Kolla, S., Minufekr, M., & Plapper, P. (2019). Deriving essential components of lean and industry 4.0 assessment model for manufacturing SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 81, 753-758.
Lamming, R. (1996). Squaring lean supply with supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 183-196.
Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World′s Greatest Manufacturer. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Manzouri, M., & Rahman, M. N. A. (2013). Adaptation of theories of supply chain management to the lean supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 14(1), 38-54.
Marodin, G. A., Frank, A. G., Tortorella, G. L., & Fetterman, D. C. (2019). Lean production and operational performance in the Brazilian automotive supply chain. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(3-4), 370-385.
Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), 1118-1136.
Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E: Tata McGraw-hill education.
Puchan, J., Zeifang, A., & Leu, J. D. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Practice-Identification of Industry 4.0 Success Patterns. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 1091-1095.
Puchan, J., Krischke, A., & Jun-Der, Leu. (2019年1月)。全台首次566家公司智慧製造大調查：誰是最佳工業4.0企業﹖。天下雜誌，665，72-86。
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
Rahman, S., Laosirihongthong, T., & Sohal, A. S. (2010). Impact of lean strategy on operational performance: a study of Thai manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(7), 839-852.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor′s Comments: A Critical Look at the Use of PLS-SEM in "MIS Quarterly". MIS Quarterly, 36(1), iii-xiv.
Romero, D., Gaiardelli, P., Powell, D., Wuest, T., & Thürer, M. (2019). Rethinking Jidoka Systems under Automation & Learning Perspectives in the Digital Lean Manufacturing World. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(13), 899-903.
Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2020). Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644-1661.
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 129-149.
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 785-805.
Tortorella, G. L., & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975-2987.
Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 47-82): Springer.
Weking, J., Stöcker, M., Kowalkiewicz, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Leveraging industry 4.0–A business model pattern framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, 107588.
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962.
Yin, Y., Stecke, K. E., & Li, D. (2018). The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 848-861.

指導教授

呂俊德(Jun-Der Leu)

審核日期

2021-10-25

推文