官股企業的ESG績效

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：29

、訪客IP：3.147.86.104

姓名

張懷文(HUAI-WEN CHANG) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系在職專班

論文名稱

官股企業的ESG績效
(The ESG performance of the state-owned holding company)

相關論文

★ 越南台商融資模式之研究	★ 新冠肺炎對財富管理資產配置之影響
★ 勞工失業保險與公司創新	★ 台灣加權指數與證券商市占率關聯性之研究
★ 瓶裝飲料對食品業經營績效之探討	★ 房貸逾放風險的影響因子探討-以F銀行為例
★ 參與都市更新對建設業績效之探討	★ ETF運用於存股策略之探討
★ 波羅的海綜合指數對台灣房價之影響	★ 傳統銀行面對純網銀之競爭策略分析- 以第一商業銀行為例
★ 情緒指標與費城半導體指數之研究	★ 銀行併購案-以C銀行及D銀行為例
★ 恐怖活動對避稅行為的影響	★ 台股動能投資策略：以 0050成分股為例
★ ESG對現金持有及現金價值的影響 —以台灣上市上櫃公司為例	★ 世界不確定性指數對台灣銀行績效的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

企業為追求永續發展勢必要考量所有利害關係人的利益，達到極大化社會責任績效，依可持續會計準則將其分成環境 (Environmental) 、社會 (Social) 、公司治理 (Governance) 三構面來探討，本文想了解政府作為股東投資該企業，在ESG績效上的表現如何，經實證結果發現，在環境績效的表現，溫室氣體排放量與政府持股呈現顯著正相關，顯示仍有進步的空間；在社會績效的表現，違反勞基法筆數與政府持股呈顯著負相關、基本員工薪酬呈顯著正相關，說明政府持股企業較能提供員工基本保障；在公司治理績效的表現，當最大外部股東持股率與政府持股呈顯著正相關，表示其更具有監督控制股東的力量；而最終控制股東持股率、董監持股設質率、股份盈餘偏離差與政府持股皆呈現顯著負相關，說明政府持股在公司治理績效表現優異，可降低代理問題，並為企業永續發展奠定堅實的基礎。

摘要(英)

To pursue the sustainable development, it is necessary to maximize the social responsibility performance for all stakeholders. According to sustainable accounting standards, the practice focuses on three dimensions: Environmental, Social, and Governance. This study investigates the role of government-owned shares played in determining the ESG performance of the company. The empirical findings suggest that, in the environmental performance, greenhouse gas emissions are positively related to the ownership of government. These results suggest that governmental ownership has space to improve the firm’s performance on environment. Second, in terms of social performance, the number of violations of the Labor Standards Law is significantly negatively correlated with the ownership of government, and base salary for employees is significantly positively correlated. It shows that government-owned companies are better to provide a basic living allowance for employees. Last, in terms of corporate governance performance, the ownership of blockholder is significantly positively correlated with government-owned shares. The ownership of controlling shareholders, share pledged ratio of directors, and the deviation of control right and cash flow right are significantly negatively correlated with government-own shares. These suggest that government-own shares are effective in monitoring the shareholders. The results find that the ownership of government has an excellent performance in corporate governance, which can reduce the agency problems and establish the foundation for the sustainable development of the enterprise.

關鍵字(中)

★ 政府持股
★ ESG
★ 企業社會責任

關鍵字(英)

★ Government Shareholding
★ ESG
★ Corporate Social Responsibility

論文目次

中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
表目錄 iv
第一章緒論 1
第二章文獻探討 5
第三章研究方法 10
第一節研究資料與樣本 10
第二節變數定義 10
第三節實證模型 12
第四章實證結果與分析 14
第一節敘述統計 14
第二節相關係數及差異性分析 15
第三節迴歸結果 16
第四節內生性討論 20
第五章結論 21
參考文獻 23
附表一變數定義 27

參考文獻

網站資料
金融監督管理委員會，網址：https://www.fsc.gov.tw/。
勞動部，網址：https://announcement.mol.gov.tw/。
經濟日報，網址：https://money.udn.com/money/index。
證券期貨局，網址：https://www.sfb.gov.tw/。
愛地球學院，網址：https://theworldshouldbe.org/。

中文文獻
林江亮、鄭菽萱 (2006) ，「政府持股與公司價值之關聯性研究」，當代會計，第7卷，237-260頁。
柯瓊鳳、馮雅玲 (2019) ，「企業社會責任、公司治理與環保違規事件之關聯性研究」，東吳經濟商學學報，第99期，57-90頁。
胡友貞 (2003) ，「企業環境績效與經營績效關聯性之研究」，東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
高惠松、鄭品卉 (2012) ，「集團企業特性、公司治理與社會責任績效」，中華管理評論國際學報，第15卷，1-34頁。
張育琳 (2017) ，「減碳會增加公司價值嗎?兼論高階經理人現金紅利之調節效果」，中華會計學刊，第13卷，1-47頁。
張育琳 (2019) ，「節能減碳、企業綠色環境管理策略與公司績效之關連性」，中山管理評論，第27卷，279-326頁。
陳安琳、高蘭芬、陳怡凱、陳烷鈺 (2013) ，「董監事股權質押與公司治理之研究」，中山管理評論，第21卷，299-337頁。
陳寬裕 (2017) ，「應用統計分析：SPSS的運用」，五南圖書出版股份有限公司出版。
曾昱幃 (2019) ，「政府持股與企業價值之關聯-金融海嘯前後之分析」，國立中正大學，財務金融學系碩士論文。
楊嵐雁 (2007) ，「以公司治理角度探討公股角色與企業績效關係之研究」，國立臺灣海洋大學，航運管理學系碩士論文。
葉協隆 (2017) ，「以公司治理觀點探討公股事業管理之研究」，國大臺灣大學，會計與管理決策組碩士論文。
赫淑幸 (2014) ，「人員流動率對壽險業客服中心的影響-以T人壽為例」，國立中山大學，高階經營管理碩士論文。
蔡秉翰 (2014) ，「員工薪酬與績效之關聯性-企業社會責任之調節效果」，東海大學，會計學系碩士論文。

英文文獻
Baron, J., Hannan, M. and Burton, M. (2000). Change in Organizational Models and Employee Turnover in Young High-tech Firms, American Journal of Sociology, 1064, 961-1012.
Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Hasan, I. and Kobeissi, N. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder’s Value, Journal of Business Research, 65,1628-1635.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. and Lang, L. (2002). Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57, 2741-2771.
Davies, J., Hillier, D. and McColgan, P. (2005). Ownership Structure, Managerial Behavior and Corporate Value, Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 645-660.
Fan, J., and Wong., T. (2005). Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia, Journal of Accounting Research, 43, 35-72.
Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston.
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360
Jensen, M. and Ruback, R. (1983). The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5-50.
Lee, T. and Yeh, Y. (2004). Corporate Governance and Financial Distress: Evidence from Taiwan, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12, 378-388.
Li, Q., Luo, W., Wang, Y. and Wu, L. (2013). Firm Performance, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in China. Business Ethics: A Eruopean Review, 22, 159-173.
Li, W. and Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 631-645.
Preston,　L. and O’Bannon, P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship, Business and Society, 36, 419-429.
Rupp, D., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. and Williams, C. (2006). Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Organizational Justice Framework. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 537-543.
Shahin, A. and Zairi, M. (2007). Corporate Governance as a Critical Element for Driving Excellence in Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24, 753-770.
Stanwick, P., and Stanwick, S. (1998). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195-204.
Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G. (1991). Economic Perspectives on Privatization, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 111-132.
Villalonga, B. and Amit, R. (2006). How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385-417.
Waddock, S. and Graves, S. (1997). The Corporate Social Porformance-Financial Porformance Link. Strategic Management Jornal, 18, 303-319.
Wahba, H. (2008). Does the Market Value Corporate Environmental Responsibility? An Empirical Examination. Corporate Socical Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 89-99
White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estima-Tor and Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48, 817-838.
Wood, D. and Jones, R. (2005). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Heoreticalproblem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.

指導教授

何柏欣

審核日期

2021-6-30

推文