| 摘要(英) |
In recent years, due to the huge financial risks and economic losses caused by environmental pollution and climate change, the United Nations and international organizations have put forward various climate finance initiatives. Central banks and financial supervision units in major countries around the world have also realized that "extreme climate change has Become a source of financial risk". In particular, the 2020 epidemic has triggered environmental and social risks, caused major changes in the global economy, changed many industrial supply chain models and work patterns, and made attention to ESG risks (environmental, social and corporate governance) a mainstream social consciousness. Therefore, the financial industry is also heading towards the development of ESG to achieve the goal of sustainable development. It is urgent to promote green finance.
The signing of the Equator Principles by financial institutions will be regarded as a positive display of ESG. Companies selected for the sustainability index have better performance in financial performance indicators than their peers. Bank loans to green companies have relatively low risk of ESG occurrence. , Contribute to its credit risk management. Publicly-owned banks should take the lead in signing the Equator Principles and TCFD. However, domestic banks are actually private banks first, mainly because they are still autonomous in joining relevant initiatives. If they do not join, there will be no penalties; secondly, the scope of green finance and the wide range of products. The financial industry has not yet become the mainstream commodity or climate in the market. The financial industry needs to invest considerable manpower and costs to cultivate relevant talents and know-how. Therefore, for public stock banks, this is an obligation and responsibility, and they have not yet been able to fully invest in green promotion. financial.
The biggest driving force for financial institutions to promote sustainable finance is regulations and risks. However, only a few domestic financial industries in the country are prepared and capable of implementing sustainable finance. Therefore, this study explores the adoption of ESG and the Equator Principles by Chinese financial institutions to promote green The current financial situation serves as a reference for banks to promote green finance business. |
| 參考文獻 |
1. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(1), 98. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
2. Hee, J. N. (2010). Financial Strategy to Accelerate Green Growth. Korea Capital Market Institute.
3. Jin, D., Liu, L., Ma, J., Wang, H., & Yin, D. (2018). How Have Green Companies Fared in Transactions with Banks? A Stakeholder-Management Perspective. 30(4), 89-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12320
4. Migliorelli, M. (2021). What Do We Mean by Sustainable Finance? Assessing Existing Frameworks and Policy Risks. Sustainability, 13(2), 975. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13020975
5. Ong, D. M. (2010). From ′International′ to ′Transnational′ Environmental Law? A Legal Assessment of the Contribution of the ′Equator Principles′ to International Environmental Law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 79(1), 35. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181009X125812581245929604
6. Park, H., & Kim, J. D. (2020). Transition towards green banking: role of financial regulators and financial institutions. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41180-020-00034-3
7. Plastun, A., Makarenko, I., Yelnikova, Y., & Makarenko, S. (2020). Environmental, social and governance investment standardization: moving towards sustainable economy. Environmental Economics, 10(1), 12-22. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.02
8. Sarwar Uddin, A., Samiul Parvez, A., & Hasan, I. (2018). Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending? Banks and Bank Systems, 13(3), 71-80. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
9. 王皓軒. (2020). 企業導入氣候相關財務揭露(TCFD)之現況研究－以台灣上市(櫃)公司為例. (碩士), 國立臺北科技大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/99ar72
10. 朱祥瑋. (2020). ESG、環境績效與公司風險之探討. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w7wt4x
11. 林淑如. (2020). 股票市場對於與違反社會責任記錄企業往來銀行的反應：以簽署赤道原則之銀行為例. (碩士), 國立高雄科技大學, 高雄市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8689n2
12. 邱雅琴. (2019). 道瓊永續指數與公司績效之關聯性─以台灣半導體業與金融業為例. (碩士), 國立中央大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p4fv5c
13. 郭怡萱. (2020). ESG績效對公司風險之影響. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r5fh7u
14. 游琇螢. (2019). ESG分數對公司績效表現與風險的影響 —以台灣市場為例. (碩士), 國立中央大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9u3428
15. 湯偉宏. (2020). 企業投入ESG效益之研究–以總體經濟、機構投資人探討. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mhdkjk
16. 楊舒婷. (2019). ESG揭露程度對公司風險之影響. (碩士), 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tdx3v6
17. 中國大陸人民銀行研究局編著: 「中國綠色金融發展報告2019年」 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit