主管關懷型與定規型領導對於部屬行為之影響－以部屬對主管認同程度為調節變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：97

、訪客IP：18.216.90.244

姓名

黃偉倫(Wei-Lun Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

高階主管企管碩士班

論文名稱

主管關懷型與定規型領導對於部屬行為之影響－以部屬對主管認同程度為調節變項

相關論文

★ 溝通與領導課程訓練成效之分析	★ 母國企業直線主管領導風格與國際人力資源管理措施對外派人員績效之影響
★ 豐田管理模式之人才培育對品質與成本之影響-以某汽車公司為例	★ 360 度回饋系統對企業主管行為改變意圖的影響-以跨國飲料 SC 公司為例
★ 兩岸研發人員職能發展應用研究－以M公司為例	★ 企業併購過程中的人力資源角色
★ 組織變革成功個案分析 - John P. Kotter 領導變革八大步驟之觀點	★ 社群網站經營模式分析－以『BB-BOX』網站為例
★ 觸控IC經營策略之個案研究－以Ａ公司為例	★ 科技研發單位實施接班人計畫之探討─以國內某科技研發單位為例
★ 面對數位匯流，傳統媒體代理商應對策略探討─以安吉斯集團偉視捷媒體公司為例	★ 台灣光電產業選擇產品認證外包廠商的決定因素─以發光二極體照明產品為例
★ 團隊激勵獎金與團隊績效關連性之研究	★ 晶圓代工業關鍵成功因素的探討—以台積公司為例
★ 員工潛能與績效對員工晉升的影響--以營造建築業為例	★ 建構整合性智慧健康照護網絡─以中壢天晟醫院醫療小管家為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

現今的多元化社會，主管因為擁有組織賦予的各項任務與豐厚資源，並且是展現個人效能成為團隊效能的重要角色。所以主管與部屬的互動連帶關係，進而會影響部屬績效與任務適應性。
本研究以雙構面理論（Two Dimension Theory）為基礎，研究主管領導風格特性在團體和組織達成目標過程中的重要性，領導行為模式可分成兩個構面，分別為：1.關懷型（Consideration）；2.定規型（Initiating Structure）為影響參數，作為領導與部屬行為關聯性的依據。
問卷調查方式以台灣蒐集的跨組織有效主管部屬配對問卷為依據，主要發放問卷的方法是採用紙本與網路的管道。每份有效問卷以一位主管搭配置最多三位部屬為原則，皆需有主管及部屬的填答結果以作配對，研究結果發現：
( 1 ) 主管展現關懷型的領導風格，會正向的影響部屬績效與任務適應性。
( 2 ) 主管展現定規型的領導風格，會正向的影響部屬績效與任務適應性。
( 3 ) 部屬對主管認同會正向調節主管展現關懷型領導與部屬績效及任務適應性互相的關係，當部屬對主管認同度越強，主管展現關懷型領導對部屬績效及任務適應性的影響會越強。

摘要(英)

In today′s pluralistic society, supervisors play an important role in team effectiveness because they have all kinds of tasks and rich resources given by the organization, and they show personal effectiveness. Therefore, the interaction between supervisors and subordinates will affect subordinates′ performance and task adaptability.
Based on the two-dimension theory, this study studies the importance of leadership style attributes in the process of achieving group and organizational goals. Leadership behavior patterns can be divided into two dimensions: 1. Consideration; 2; 2. Initiating structure is the influencing parameter, which is the basis of the relationship between leaders and subordinates.
The questionnaire survey is based on the cross organizational effective counterpart questionnaire collected in Taiwan. The main method of issuing the questionnaire is to use paper and Internet channels. Each valid questionnaire is based on the principle that one supervisor should match up with up to three subordinates. The results of both supervisors and subordinates are required for matching
（1） Supervisor′s consideration leadership style has a positive impact on subordinates′ performance and task adaptability.
（2） Supervisors′ initiating structure leadership style has a positive impact on subordinates′ performance and task adaptability.
（3） Subordinates′ identification with supervisors positively moderates the relationship between supervisor′s display of consideration leadership and subordinates′ performance and task adaptability. The stronger the subordinates′ identification with supervisors, the stronger the influence of supervisor′s display of consideration leadership on subordinates′ performance and task adaptability.

關鍵字(中)

★ 互動連帶關係
★ 雙構面理論
★ 關懷型領導風格
★ 定規型領導風格
★ 部屬對主管認同
★ 部屬績效

關鍵字(英)

★ Interactive Relationship
★ Two-Dimensional Theory
★ Consideration Leadership Style
★ Initiating Structure Leadership Style
★ Leader Identification
★ Subordinate Performance

論文目次

一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
二、文獻探討 4
2-1 領導理論的意涵 4
2-2 俄亥俄州立大學的關懷型與定規型領導風格 10
2-2-1 關懷型領導(Consideration Leadership) 10
2-2-2 定規型領導(Initiating Structure Leadership) 10
2-2-3 關懷型與定規型領導之四種領導模式 11
2-3 部屬績效(Job Performance)的意涵 12
2-4 任務適應性(Task Adaptivity)的意涵 13
2-5 主管關懷型與定規型領導對於部屬行為之關係 14
2-6 部屬對主管認同(Leader Identification)的意涵 16
2-6-1 部屬對主管認同在主管展現關懷型與定規型領導與部屬行為間的調節效果 16
三、研究方法 18
3-1 研究架構 18
3-2 研究樣本與資料蒐集程序 19
3-3 研究工具 19
3-3-1 關懷型與定規型領導風格 20
3-3-2 對主管認同 21
3-3-3 部屬績效 21
3-3-4 任務適應性 22
3-4 資料分析與統計方法 22
四、研究結果 23
4-1 資料來源與樣本特性 23
4-2 信度分析 25
4-3 驗證性因素分析 26
4-4 相關分析 27
4-5 迴歸分析 28
五、結論與建議 36
5-1 研究結論 36
5-2 學術貢獻 37
5-3 管理意涵 38
5-4 研究限制與未來建議之研究 39
六、參考文獻 40

參考文獻

李金芳，主管領導型態對部屬工作投入影響之研究-以南區國稅局為例。國立成功大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文，民國91年。
余文(1999)，領導心理學導論，人民教育出版社。
房美玉(2003)，台灣高科技產業之組織文化對於人力資源管理制度與組織競爭力之關聯
的影響，國科會專題研究計畫，計畫編號:NSC90-2416-H-008020。
吳定，行政機關生產力衡量模式之研究，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員編印。
林文政:領導者思維:｢能否承受變動，主管需要培養三大關鍵思考力。2017年9月14日取
自https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0008639.html。
林俐俐，領導風格與任務不確定性對員工創新行為表現的影響。國立交通大學，碩士論文，民國102 年。
柯維(Stephen R.Covey)，與領導有約，天下遠見出版社，民87。
科特(John p. kotter)，領導與變革，中國生產力出版，民89。
曾玉琦、張瑞當，會計師事務所領導行為對審計小組成員溝通行為之影響－以審計結構化為調節變數，會計學報，第二卷第二期，61-82 頁，民國99 年。
傅馨瑩，矛盾領導行為對部屬工作績效之影響:矛盾追隨行為的中介與調節效果探討，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國107年。
許士軍，管理學，第十版，台北：東華印書館。
許雅隸，主管領導型態、員工人格特質、組織激勵制度與員工績效之相關關係-以保險業務員為例，東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國90年。
陳義勝，組織行為，華泰書局，民78。
陳譓森，轉換型領導對警政服務品質之影響研究，國立政治大學公共行政研究所論文，民國85年。
陳蕙君，資訊真實性，人與組織之契合度以及工作經驗對新進人員組織社會化之影
響。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國88年。
謝廷豪，領導型態與領導效能關係之研究-以中部某連鎖零售業為例，中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國91年。
蘇義祥，中華電信專戶服務部門領導型態與工作績效關係之研究：服務人員特質及成熟度的調節作用，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國88年。
曹國雄、黃英忠、黃同圳、張火燦、王秉君(民86)，人力資源管理，台北：華泰書局。
張世佳(2007)，管理學，三民書局，臺北市，ISBN 978-957-14-4122-8。
張明智，不確定性規避對創新行為與工作績效之影響：以主管的矛盾領導行為作為調
節變項，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國108年。
張麗英(2003)，人力資源管理策略對團隊績效的影響-以軟體產業為例。國立中山大學
人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
虞舜光，醫院藥局主任領導型態與其部屬工作滿足之研究－以台北市區域醫院為例。
國立中山大學，碩士論文，民國88年。
鍾怡安（2019）。兩全其美領導? 關懷與定規領導風格兼具對部屬行為之影響。碩士論文，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，桃園縣。
Austin, J.T., & Villanova,P.(1992).The criterion problem：1917-1992.Journal of Applied
Psychology,pp.845-874.
Badin, I. J. (1974). Some moderator influences on relationships between consideration, initiating structure and organizational criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 380-382.
Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of
imitative responses.,1(6),589-595.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1995).Self-efficacy in changing societies, Cambridge University.
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-836
Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J.(1996).Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Palo
Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: J. Wiley.
Borman, W.C. & S.J. Motowidlo (1997).Task Performance and Contextual Performance：
The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research, Human Performance,pp.99-109.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Byrne, D. , Baskett, G.D. & Hodges, L. (1971) `Behavioral Indicators of Interpersonal
Attraction′, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1: pp.137-149.
Carsten, Melissa K.; Uhl-Bien, Mary; West, Bradley J.; Patera, Jaime L.; and McGregor, Rob, (2010). "Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study" Leadership Institute Faculty Publications. 20.
Campbell, J.P.(1983).Some Possible Implications of “Modeling”for the Conceptualization of
Measurement, In Landy,F .,S .Zedeck & J. Cleveland (Eds.) ,Performance Measurment
and Theory,Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Eelbaum Associates,Inc,pp.277-298.
Campbell, J.P.(1990).Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and
organizational psychology. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough(Eds.),Handbook of
industrial and organizational psychology(Vol 2,pp.687-732.),Palo Alto, CA：Consulting
Psychologists Press.
Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet
feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on
work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.749-780.
Chan, S. C., & Mak, W. M. (2012). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The
mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of
Management, 29(2),pp. 285-301.

Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective
trust in chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance.
Journal of Management, 40(3), pp.796-819.
Chia, Yew Ming(1998)，“Motivation and Junior Supervisors’ Performance: The Moderating
Role of Work-group Cohesion.”International Journal of Management,15(4),pp.441-453.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary
review. Journal of Management, 31(6), pp. 874-900.
Cordery,J,L., & Wall,T.D, (1985). Work Design and Supervisory practice: A Model.Human
Relations,38(5),425-441.
Cummins, R. C. (1971). Relationship of initiating structure and job performance as moderated
by consideration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(5), pp. 489-490.
Davis, K. (1972).Human Behavior at work：The Dynamies of Organizational Behaver, New
York.
Demir, M. (2011). Effects of organizational justice, trust and commitment on employees′
deviant behavior. Anatolia, 22(2), pp.204-221.
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and performance: toward a
theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science,6(5),
pp.524-540.
Dess, G.G., and R.B. Jr. Robinson, “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of
Objective Measure: The Case of the Privately- held Firm and Conglomerate Business
Unit”, Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), pp. 265-273, 1984.
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A
critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), pp.618-634.
Fiedler, F. E. (1967).A Theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fleishman, E. A., & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee
grievances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15(2), pp.43-56.
Fleishman, E. A., & Salter, J. A. (1963). Relation between the leaders behavior and his
empathy toward subordinates. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 1(3), pp.79-84.
Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. and Sakakibara, S. “A Framework for Quality Management
Research and an Associated Measurement Instrument”, Journal of Operations
Management, 11, 339-366, 1994.
Fombrum, C., Tichy, N. M. & Devanna, M. A., Strategic Human Resource Management.
New York: Wiley. USA.1984.
Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations:
A developmental approach. Leadership Frontiers, 143(1), 143-166.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership:
Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years:
Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2),
219-247.

Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance:
positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management
Journal, 50(2), pp.327-347.
Guion, R. M. (1998).Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel selection.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Halpin, A. W. & B. J. Winter(1957),A Factorial Study of the Leadership Behaver Description
Questionnaire. Leader Behavior :Its description and Management, Edited by Stogdill
R.M. & A.E. Coons, Bureau of business Research, Ohio State University.
Hesketh, B., & Neal, A.(1999).Technology and performance. In D.R. Ilgen & E.D. Pulakos
(Eds),The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and
development:21-55.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holtz, B. C., & Harold, C. M. (2013). Effects of leadership consideration and structure on
employee perceptions of justice and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 34(4), pp.492-519.
Holland, B.K.(1989).“Motivation and Job Satisfaction,”Journal of Property Management,
54(5).,pp.32-36.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6),
pp.597-606.
House, R. J., Filley, A. C., & Kerr, S. (1971). Relation of leader consideration and initiating
structure to r and d subordinates′ satisfaction. Administrative Science Quarterly,16(1)
,pp.19-30.
Huang, Q., Davison, R., Liu, H., & Gu, J. (2008). The impact of leadership style on
knowledge-sharing intentions in china. Journal of Global Information Management,
16,pp.67-91.
Ismail, A., Guatleng, O., Cheekiong, T., Ibrahim, Z., & Dollah, N. F. D. (2009). The
indirect effect of distributive justice in the relationship between pay structure and
work attitudes and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 234-248.
Ilgen, D. R. & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance appraisal : A process focus. In L.
L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.). Research in Organization Behavior, 5, 141-197.
Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
Johnson, J.W.(2003) Toward a better understanding of the relationship between personality
and individual job performance. In M.R. Barrick & A.M. Ryan (Eds),Personality and
work:83-120.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of
consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 89(1), pp.36-51.
Kerr, S., Schriesheim, C. A., Murphy, C. J., & Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Toward a contingency
theory of leadership based upon the consideration and initiating structure literature.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12(1), 62-82.
Keller, R.T.,“A Test of the Path-Goal Theory of Leaderships with Need for Clarity as a
Moderator in Research and Development Organizations”,Journal of Applied Psychology,
pp.208-212.April 1989.
Kelley, R. “In Praise of Followers”., Harvard Business Review, 66, 142-148, (1988).
Klein H.J.(1989).“An Integrated Control Theory of Work Motivation.”Academy of
Management,14(2).pp.150-172.
Lambert, L. S., Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Holt, D. T., & Barelka, A. J. (2012). Forgotten but
not gone: an examination of fit between leader consideration and Initiating structure
needed and received. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), pp.913-930.
Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of
leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), pp.451-465.
Lowin, A., Hrapchak, W. J., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1969). Consideration and initiating structure:
An experimental investigation of leadership traits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(2), pp.238-253.
Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2012). directive versus empowering leadership: a
field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of
Management Journal, 56(5),pp.1372-1395.
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and
the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology,
92(4), pp.1159-1168.
Robbins, S. P.(2003).Essentials of organizational behavior (7th ed.). New Jersey：Prentice-
Hall.
Schriesheim, C. A., House, R. J., & Kerr, S. (1976). Leader initiating structure: A reconciliation of discrepant research results and some empirical tests. Organizational
Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), pp.297-321.
Seltzer, J., & Numerof, R. E. (1988). Supervisory leadership and subordinate burnout.
Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 439-446.
Stogdill, R.M.(1948).Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the
Literature, Journal of Psychology,pp.35-72.
Stogdill, R.M.(1974).Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York:
Macmillan.
Swamidass, P.M., and W.T. Newwell, “Manufacturing Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty
and Performance, A Path Analytic Model, Management Science, 33(4), pp.509-524,
1987.
Tichy. N.M. & Sherman S.(1993).Control your Destiny or Someone Else Will. New York:
Harper Collins.

Van Vianen, A. E., Shen, C. T., & Chuang, A. (2011). Person–organization and person–
supervisor fits: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 32(6), pp.906-926.
Wang, A. C., Chiang, J. T. J., Tsai, C. Y., Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2013). Gender makes
the difference: The moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between
leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 122(2), pp.101-113.
Wang, A. C., Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Yammarino , F. J., Spain, S. M., Ling, H. C. Cheng, B. S. (2018). Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and Classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), pp.686-697.
Weissenberg, P., & Kavanagh, M. J. (1972). The independence of initiating structure and
consideration: a review of the evidence. Personnel Psychology, 25(1),.pp.119-130.

指導教授

林文政

審核日期

2021-7-14

推文