運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：18.119.158.110

姓名

段儒(Ru Duann) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務
(Applying Blockchain to the Collaborative Paper Review Service in Academic Research)

相關論文

★ 專案管理的溝通關鍵路徑探討─以某企業軟體專案為例	★ 運用並探討會議流如何促進敏捷發展過程中團隊溝通與文件化：以T銀行系統開發為例
★ 專案化資訊服務中人力連續派遣決策模式之研究─以高鐵行控資訊設備維護為例	★ 以組織正義觀點介入案件指派決策之研究
★ 應用協調理論建立系統軟體測試中問題改善之協作流程	★ 應用案例式推理於問題管理系統之研究 -以筆記型電腦產品為例
★ 運用限制理論於多專案開發模式的人力資源配置之探討	★ 應用會議流方法於軟體專案開發之個案研究：以翰昇科技公司為例
★ 多重專案、多期再規劃的軟體開發接案決策模式：以南亞科技資訊部門為例	★ 會議導向敏捷軟體開發及系統設計：以大學畢業專題為例
★ 一種基於物件、屬性導向之變更影響分析方法於差異化產品設計	★ 會議流方法對大學畢業專題的團隊合作品質影響之實驗研究
★ 實施敏捷式發展法於大學部畢業專題之行動研究 – 以中央大學資管系為例	★ 建立一個用來評核自然語言需求品質的線上資訊系統
★ 結合本體論與模糊分析網路程序法於軟體測試之風險與風險關聯辨識	★ 在軟體反向工程中針對UML結構模型圖之線上品質評核系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-7-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

研究論文是科學發展的重要基石。論文在發表前通常會經由專業同仁來協助審稿
以確認論文品質。有鑑於現有的論文審稿制度需要將論文完整的提供給第三方來進行
審核，審核過程中尚存在一些制度上的漏洞有可能造成學術剽竊;除此之外，由於審
稿者可能因為無酬而不積極的進行審稿，造成整體審稿流程延宕;更甚者敷衍或隨意
回覆審稿結果，降低論文審稿結果的品質保證。區塊鏈及智慧合約技術擁有不可篡改
性及透明交易流程的特性，採用區塊鏈於學術投稿制度能夠將所有可以看過論文的人
都記錄至區塊鏈上，並且所有的人都可以看到有誰看過這篇論文，因此能夠有效的防
止論文作者的學術成果被剽竊，並且使審核流程更加的透明。因此，本研究旨在利用
區塊鏈及智慧合約打造一個線上論文協同審稿系統，使投稿至此系統之論文受到平台
保障並降低遭到學術剽竊之風險。此外，平台提供第三方專業同仁針對審稿建議的協
同審稿機制，降低出現劣質審稿建議的出現機率，以確保最終論文之品質。

摘要(英)

Publishing research papers is the foundation for advancing and sharing scientific knowledge. Before it is published, a research paper requires peer review to ensuring its quality. To perform peer review, it is necessary to provide the content of the paper to the anonymous reviewers for review, which highly exposes the paper to the risk of plagiarism due to the unknown identity of reviewers. Besides, when conducting the review service, reviewers might take a passive attitude due to insufficient incentive, resulting in a delay or poor quality of the review report. To address these issues, this research applies the concepts of block-chain and smart contract to design and implement an online collaborative peer view system. Specifically, with the features of persistency of blockchain, every information related to reviewing is stored and unchangeable; in addition, high transparency of transactions in smart contracts provide the ability to trace back every user who had read the paper, this research develops an online system with mentioned features to facilitate the collaborative review of the research paper. The system is designed to protect peer review from plagiarism with the smart contract and make the review process clearer. Furthermore, the system innovatively allows peers to review on the review of a paper, to help ensure the quality of both the paper and its collaborative review.

關鍵字(中)

★ 同儕評審
★ 協同審稿
★ 審稿品質
★ 區塊鏈
★ 智慧合約

關鍵字(英)

★ Peer review
★ Collaborative review
★ Review quality
★ Blockchain
★ Smart contract

論文目次

中文摘要..II
ABSTRACT III
目錄 ..IV
圖目錄V
表目錄..VI
一、緒論..1
1-1 研究背景.. 1
1-2 研究動機與問題.. 1
1-3 研究目的.. 2
1-4 研究範圍與假設.. 3
1-5 研究步驟.. 4
二、文獻探討 5
2-1 區塊鏈與虛擬貨幣. 5
2-2 智慧合約.. 8
2-3 區塊鏈的相關實務應用研究.. 10
三、研究方法 . 11
3-1 多層次協同審稿框架的提出. 11
3-2 商務模式的提出 13
3-3 線上協同審稿服務.. 14
四、系統實作 . 24
4-1 系統架構 24
4-2 系統使用案例. 25
五、研究討論 . 35
5-1 成效分析：資訊系統成功模式 35
5-2 成效分析：智慧合約驗證.. 41
5-3 研究限制 42
六、結論與未來研究方向. 44
七、參考文獻 . 46

圖目錄
圖 1 研究步驟圖. 4
圖 2 SOLIDITY 範例 9
圖 3 智慧合約簡易流程.. 10
圖 4 協助審稿獎勵流向.. 14
圖 5 協同審稿框架 15
圖 6 使用案例圖 . 17
圖 7 類別圖 19
圖 8 狀態圖 20
圖 9 循序圖—論文作者從投稿後的審稿過程.. 21
圖 10 循序圖—審稿者審稿過程 22
圖 11 循序圖—延伸討論過程. 23
圖 12 系統架構圖 24
圖 13 METAMASK 登入請求.. 25
圖 14 註冊畫面. 26
圖 15 活動圖 – 註冊 . 26
圖 16 登入頁面. 27
圖 17 活動圖 – 登入 . 27
圖 18 論文頁面. 28
圖 19 論文提交頁面.. 29
圖 20 活動圖 – 提交論文 29
圖 21 加入審稿畫面.. 30
圖 22 論文瀏覽畫面（一）.. 30
圖 23 論文瀏覽畫面（二）.. 31
圖 24 活動圖 – 成為審稿者.. 31
圖 25 提出主審稿建議. 32
圖 26 活動圖 – 提出主審稿建議 32
圖 27 提出延伸審稿建議 33
圖 28 活動圖 – 提出延伸審稿建議.. 34
圖 29 資訊系統成功模式 35
圖 30 ETHERSCAN 網站瀏覽智慧合約狀況 41
圖 31 ETHERSCAN 紀錄的交易內容 42

表 1 公有鏈、聯盟鏈、私有鏈 . 6
表 2 共識機制 . 7
表 3 多層次協同審稿框架. 13
表 4 10 位專家背景 36
表 5 問卷調查問項 38
表 6 問卷調查結果及各問項變異數 3

參考文獻

Al-Shibly, H. (2011). Human resources information systems success assessment: An integrative model. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(5), 157-169.
Alshibly, H. H. (2014). Evaluating E-HRM success: A validation of the information systems success model. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(3), 107.
Aldous, K. K., An, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2019, July). View, like, comment, post: Analyzing user engagement by topic at 4 levels across 5 social media platforms for 53 news organizations. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 47-57.
Balaban, I., Mu, E., & Divjak, B. (2013). Development of an electronic Portfolio system success model: An information systems approach. Computers & Education, 60(1), 396-411.
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management science, 29(5), 530-545.
Beneki, C., Koulis, A., Kyriazis, N. A., & Papadamou, S. (2019). Investigating volatility transmission and hedging properties between Bitcoin and Ethereum. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 219-227.
Bhosale, J., & Mavale, S. (2018). Volatility of select Crypto-currencies: A comparison of Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin. Annual Research Journal of SCMS, Pune, 6.
Bordo, M. D., & Kydland, F. E. (1995). The gold standard as a rule: An essay in exploration. Explorations in Economic History, 32(4), 423-464.
Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in human Neuroscience, 7, 291.
Brorsen, B. W. (1987). Observations on the journal publication process. North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(2), 315-321.
Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. white paper, 3(37).
46
運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務
Chang, H. H., Wang, Y. H., & Yang, W. Y. (2009). The impact of e-service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty on e-marketing: Moderating effect of perceived value. Total quality management, 20(4), 423-443.
Chuen, D. L. K., Guo, L., & Wang, Y. (2017). Cryptocurrency: A new investment opportunity?. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 20(3), 16-40.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2(6-10), 71.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of electronic commerce, 9(1), 31-47.
Dixon, N. (2001). Writing for publication–a guide for new authors. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13(5), 417-421.
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Gusmeroli, S., Piccione, S., & Rotondi, D. (2013). A capability-based security approach to manage access control in the internet of things. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5-6), 1189-1205.
Hanafizadeh, P., Ghandchi, S., & Asgarimehr, M. (2017). Impact of Information Technology on Lifestyle: A Literature Review and Classification. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking (IJVCSN), 9(2), 1-23.
47

運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務
Hayek, F. A. V. (1943). A commodity reserve currency. The Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 176-184.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hu, V. C., Kuhn, D. R., Ferraiolo, D. F., & Voas, J. (2015). Attribute-based access control. Computer, 48(2), 85-88.
Hu, Y. C., Lee, T. T., Chatzopoulos, D., & Hui, P. (2018, June). Hierarchical interactions between ethereum smart contracts across testnets. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains for Distributed Systems, 7-12.
Iyer, K., & Dannen, C. (2018). The ethereum development environment. In Building games with ethereum smart contracts, Apress, Berkeley, CA., 19-36.
Jesus, E. F., Chicarino, V. R., de Albuquerque, C. V., & Rocha, A. A. D. A. (2018). A survey of how to use blockchain to secure internet of things and the stalker attack. Security and Communication Networks, 2018.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), 396-403.
Kapoor, K. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2014). Rogers’ innovation adoption attributes: A systematic review and synthesis of existing research. Information Systems Management, 31(1), 74-91.
Keister, T., & Sanches, D. (2018). Should Central Banks Issue Digital Currency?. Manuscript, Rutgers University.
Khan, K. M., Arshad, J., & Khan, M. M. (2018). Secure digital voting system based on blockchain technology. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 14(1), 53-62.
Lamport, L. (2019). Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. In Concurrency: the Works of Leslie Lamport, 179-196.
48

運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PloS one, 10(6).
Latif, R. M. A., Hussain, K., Jhanjhi, N. Z., Nayyar, A., & Rizwan, O. (2020). A remix IDE: smart contract-based framework for the healthcare sector by using Blockchain technology. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-24.
Mahalle, P. N., Anggorojati, B., Prasad, N. R., & Prasad, R. (2013). Identity authentication and capability based access control (iacac) for the internet of things. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 1(4), 309-348.
Makhdoom, I., Abolhasan, M., Abbas, H., & Ni, W. (2019). Blockchain′s adoption in IoT: The challenges, and a way forward. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 125, 251- 279.
Mingxiao, D., Xiaofeng, M., Zhe, Z., Xiangwei, W., & Qijun, C. (2017, October). A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2567-2572.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. white paper.
Oberdorf, V. (2016). Blockchain and Development. Utrecht University. Researchgate, draft.
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2015). Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142.
Ranganthan, V. P., Dantu, R., Paul, A., Mears, P., & Morozov, K. (2018, October). A decentralized marketplace application on the ethereum blockchain. In 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), 90-97.
Rinkeby: Authenticated Faucet. Rinkeby: Authenticated Faucet. Retrieved May 25, 2021, from https://faucet.rinkeby.io/
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations, 432-448. 49

運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務
Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. A. (2003). Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 42.
Sandhu, R. S., Coyne, E. J., Feinstein, H. L., & Youman, C. E. (1996). Role-based access control models. Computer, 29(2), 38-47.
Santos, J. R. A. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of extension, 37(2), 1-5.
Seddon, P., & Yip, S. K. (1992). An empirical evaluation of user information satisfaction (UIS) measures for use with general ledger account software. Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 75-92.
Seligman, L. (2006). Sensemaking throughout adoption and the innovation‐decision process. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(1), 108-120.
Singh, S., & Remenyi, D. (2016). Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct. South African Journal of Science, 112(5-6), 1-7.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (August 10, 2016).
Teller, A. (1994, June). Turing completeness in the language of genetic programming with indexed memory. In Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 136-141.
Trading View. Trading View. Retrieved May 25, 2021, from https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/BTCUSD/?exchange=BITBAY
Wang, S., Yuan, Y., Wang, X., Li, J., Qin, R., & Wang, F. Y. (2018, June). An overview of smart contract: architecture, applications, and future trends. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 108-113.
Wöhrer, M., & Zdun, U. (2018, March). Smart contracts: security patterns in the ethereum ecosystem and solidity. In 2018 International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software
50

運用區塊鏈技術於學術論文協同審稿服務
Engineering (IWBOSE), 2-8.
Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction
ledger. Ethereum project yellow paper, 1-32.
Zhang, Y., Kasahara, S., Shen, Y., Jiang, X., & Wan, J. (2018). Smart contract-based access
control for the internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 1594-1605.
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and
opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375.

指導教授

陳仲儼(Chung-Yang Chen)

審核日期

2021-6-16

推文