摘要(英) |
In medical research, the classic parameters use to assess the accuracy of a binary diagnostic test are the positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio.The presence of missing data, When the disease information is missing, the positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio are difficult to estimation.The article considers the disease information is missing or not, proposd the likelihood function method. The article use independent binary likelihood function, inferenced score test, wald test and likelihood ratios test statistics.We use simulation and real data analysis to demonstrate the merit of our new parametric robust technique. We also make comparison with to the wald test proposed by Montero-Alonso and Roldan-Nofuentes (2018), the Napierian likelihood test statistics proposed by Simel et al. (1991) and the likelihood test statistics proposed by Walter (1975). |
參考文獻 |
[1] Alonso, M. A., Nofuentes, J. A.(2019). Approximate confidence intervals for the likelihood ratios of a binary diagnostic test in the presence of partial disease verification, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 29 (1), 56 – 81.
[2] Andrzej, S. K., Huiman, X. B. (2003).A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.Statistics ,22:2711-21
[3] Cecil, M. P. , Kosinski, A. S., Jones, M. T. , Taylor, A. , Alazraki , N. P. , Pettigrew, R. I. , Weintraub, W. S. (1996). The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology; 49:735–742.
[4] Roldan Nofuentes, J. A., Luna del Castillo, J. D., Femia Marzo, P. (2009). Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of the disease.Computational Statistics,24:695-718
[5] Royall, R. M. and Tsou, T. S. (2003). Interpreting Statistical Evidence by Using Imperfect Models: Robust Adjusted Likelihood Functions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 65:391-404
[6] Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., Matchar, D. B. (1991). Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44:763–770.
[7] Strax, P., Venet, L. , Shapiro, S. , Gross, S. (1967). Mammography and clinical examination in mass screening for cancer of breast.Cancer, 20:2184–2188.
[8] Walter, S. D. (1975). The distribution of Levin’s measure of attributable risk. Biometrika, 62:371–374.
[9] Zhou X .(1998). Comparing accuracies of two screening tests in a two-phase study for dementia. Appl Stat ,47:135–147. |