以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：50

、訪客IP：3.143.3.114

姓名	莊敬(Ching Chuang)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	學習與教學研究所
論文名稱	多媒體階層圖於商用英文寫作之成效研究 (Study of Multimedia Hierarchy Chart on Business English Writing Performance)
相關論文	★ 社群媒體中結構化知識活動對英文為外語學生預寫成效之研究 ★ 認知風格與先備知識於預測、模擬、觀察、解釋科學探究活動之影響 ★ 雲端概念構圖結合小組互動於國小六年級自然科學習成效之研究 ★ A synthesis of data-driven pattern analysis on co-construction concept map activity and social learning network ★ TIMSS 2015臺灣資料中學生變項與數學成就之關聯：學習分析取向 ★ 以行動者網絡理論探究座落於國小的列聯表 ★ 實施課前結構階層圖對於國中生寫作活動 成效之研究 ★ 學生對於線上概念構圖融入國文科教學的觀點 ★ 同儕互教對國中生數學學習成效之影響：準備、講解、互動三階段分析 ★ 幼兒數概念體驗的遊戲化學習環境設計 ★ 探討國中生應用英語口說對話機器人的學習動機與接受度 ★ 一行禪師正念教育思想之研究
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	對許多學生來說，完成商用英文寫作是一項艱鉅的任務。為了協助學生克服此困難，本研究透過兼具教學與通訊的社會學習網絡平台──CoCoing.info，不僅提供學生相互觀摩與學習的數位空間，平台內建的多媒體階層圖功能，更讓學生能夠將所思所想結構化、可視化的呈現出來，以利寫作時有所參照。本研究使用準實驗研究法，並採用了桃園市某大學59名大學生作為研究對象──實驗組32名、對照組27名。實驗為期十六週，每週教學兩小時，以探討多媒體階層圖對商用英文寫作之成效、多媒體階層圖分數與商用英文寫作表現間之關係以及同儕評量結果與教師評量間之關係。研究結果顯示，雖然實驗組在多媒體階層圖的輔助下，其商用英文寫作表現顯著優於對照組，但多媒體階層圖分數與商用英文寫作成績間並無相關性，所以本研究進一步分析後，發現多媒體階層圖之階層數與商用英文寫作之段落數間具有顯著相關性，而教師評量多媒體階層圖之成績與同儕評量之結果間亦具有顯著相關性。因此，綜合以上發現，本研究歸納出了多媒體階層圖對寫作之效益及同儕評量成效等重點，並希望這些研究成果與建議能對相關領域之學者在進一步的研究探索與發展中有所助益。
摘要(英)	For many English as a second language students, Business English writing is a challenging task. To help students overcome this difficulty, this research used CoCoing.info, a social learning network platform that combined education and communication. It not only provided a digital learning space for students to observe and learn from each other, but also the function of multimedia hierarchical chart allowed students to present their thoughts in a structured and visual way, so that they could refer to them in writing. A total of 32 hours of experimental study with 59 students from a university in Taoyuan City was adopted of which 32 students were grouped as the experimental group and 27 students as the control group to explore the effectiveness of multimedia hierarchy charts in business English writing, the relationship between the scores of the multimedia hierarchy charts and the business English writing scores, and the relationship between results of the peers’ assessment and teachers’ assessments were involved and evaluated for the study. The results showed that although the experimental group’s business English writing performance was significantly better than the control group with the aid of the multimedia hierarchy chart, there was no correlation between the scores of the multimedia hierarchy chart and the business English writing scores. Thus, after further analysis in this study, we found there was a positive correlation between the number of levels in the multimedia hierarchy chart and the number of paragraphs in business English writing, and there was also a moderate positive correlation between the results of the teacher’s assessment and the peer assessment. Therefore, based on the above findings, this study summarized the research conclusions and recommendations of the effectiveness of multimedia hierarchy chart on business English writing and the effectiveness of peer assessment, which I hoped can be used for reference by related researchers in the future.
關鍵字(中)	★ 多媒體階層圖 ★ 概念構圖 ★ 專業英文 ★ 商用英文寫作 ★ 同儕評量	關鍵字(英)	★ multimedia hierarchy chart ★ concept map ★ ESP ★ business English writing ★ peer assessment
論文目次	一、緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.1.1 大學商用英文課程教學狀況 1 1.1.2 學生對商用英文寫作的重視度 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.2.1 以多媒體階層圖降低學生學習商用英文寫作之困難 2 1.2.2 了解社會學習網絡平台的重要性 2 1.2.3 透過同儕評量達到同儕學習之效益 3 1.3 研究目的 3 1.4 研究問題 4 1.5 名詞釋義 4 二、文獻探討 6 2.1 概念構圖 6 2.1.1 電腦輔助概念構圖 6 2.1.2 電腦輔助概念構圖之建構方式 8 2.1.3 概念構圖與寫作表現 9 2.1.4 概念構圖與評量 11 2.1.5 小結 11 2.2 專業英文（ESP） 12 2.2.1 ESP之歷史與教學發展 12 2.2.2 商用英文與寫作 13 2.2.3 小結 15 三、研究方法 16 3.1 研究設計 16 3.1.1 實驗設計 16 3.1.2 課程設計 17 3.2 研究場域與對象 18 3.2.1 研究場域 18 3.2.2 研究對象 18 3.3 研究流程 19 3.4 研究工具 22 3.4.1 CoCoing.info平台 22 3.4.2 多媒體階層圖評分量表 23 3.4.3 商用英文寫作評分量表 23 3.5 資料分析與整理 26 四、研究結果 28 4.1 六個寫作面向成績與總成績結果分析 28 4.1.1 從寫作體裁角度分析 28 4.1.2 從各別寫作面向分析 31 4.2 多媒體階層圖與寫作之相關性分析 36 4.2.1多媒體階層圖分數與寫作成績 36 4.2.2 多媒體階層圖之階層數與寫作段落數 36 4.3 教師評量與同儕評量之結果分析 37 4.4 多媒體階層圖之學習輔助回饋分析 38 4.4.1 三種寫作體裁之學習成效 38 4.4.2 多媒體階層圖之寫作效益 40 五、結論與建議 43 5.1 研究結論 43 5.1.1 多媒體階層圖輔助寫作之成效 43 5.1.2 同儕評量之效益 45 5.2 研究限制與建議 46 5.2.1 實驗設計 46 5.2.2 教學設計 47 六、參考資料 48 中文書目 48 英文書目 48 七、附錄 59 附錄一、研究知情同意書 59 附錄二、109-1職場英文課之背景問卷 60 附錄三、109-1職場英文課之期末問卷與回饋 62 附錄四、Rubric for Business English Writing 65
參考文獻	中文書目 王千倖（2003）。以「網路同儕教學」建構「網路學習社群」之行動研究。師大學報：科學教育類，48（1），頁119-141。 余民寧（1997）。有意義的學習──概念構圖之研究。台北：商鼎。 李晧銘（2016）。使用線上同儕互評機制探討學生學習成就與同儕互評觀點之關係研究。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系，新北市。 林倍伊、林顯達、李佩蓉、詹雯靜、洪國財、洪煌堯（2016）。在不同模式的電腦支援協作學習環境下，師培生理解教學理論層次之差異—以blackboard和knowledge forum為例。資訊社會研究，31，頁66-102。 張基成、吳明芳（2011）。網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕 互評之信效度比較。教育資料與圖書館學，49（1），頁135-170。 郭于華（2017）。大學生對商用英文寫作課程的需求與看法。未出版之碩士論文，國立屏東大學應用英語學系，屏東縣。 廖柏森（2005）。以英語為國際語（EIL）之義涵與教學觀。英語教學，30（1），頁1-14。 蔡叔翹（2013）。任務型學習應用於以英語為外語學生之商務英文寫作學習策略與困難之個案研究。高應科大人文社會科學學報，10（2），頁217-237。 英文書目 Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994). Structural knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 303-311. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying for active learners. Computing Teacher, 21(1), 6-11. Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2006). Prospective teachers and L2 writing anxiety. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 100-118. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Blunt, J. R., & Jeffrey D. Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 849-858. DOI: 10.1037/a0035934 Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426. DOI: 10.1080/02602939902 40405 Boyd, F. (1991). Business English and the case method: A reassessment. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 729-734. doi:10.2307/3587095 Chang, B. & Lu, F. C. (2018). Social media facilitated English prewriting activity design and evaluation. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 33-42. Chang, B., Shih, Y. A., & Lu, F. C. (2018). Co-construction concept through cloud-based social network platform design, implementation, and evaluation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5), 239-253. Chang, C. C., Liu, G. Y., Chen, K. J., Huang, C. H., Lai, Y. M. & Yeh, T. K. (2017). The effects of a collaborative computer-based concept mapping strategy on geographic science performance in junior high school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5049-5060. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21-33. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., Chang, R. B., & Lin, S. C. (2005). A new assessment for computer-based Concept Mapping. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 138-148. Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229-236. Cheng, L. C., & Chu, H. C. (2019). An innovative consensus map-embedded collaborative learning system for ER diagram learning: Sequential analysis of students’ learning achievements. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 410-425. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1482357 Chiou, C. C., Lee, L. T., Tien, L. C., Wang, Y. M. (2017). Analyzing the effects of various concept mapping techniques on learning achievement under different learning styles. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3687-3708. De Weerd, J., Tan, E., & Stoyanov, S. (2017). Fostering interdisciplinary knowledge construction in computer-assisted collaborative concept mapping. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, & M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.). Proceedings of the European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 391–396). Cham, CH: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_32. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.). Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Dowd, J. E., Duncan, T., & Reynolds, J. A. (2015). Concept maps for improved science reasoning and writing: Complexity isn’t everything. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), ar39. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.15-06-0138 Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dwyer, J. (2005). Communication in business: Strategies and skills (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Australia: Frenchs Forest. Eid, M. I., & Al Jabri, I. M. (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education, 99, 14-27. Farrokhnia, M., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction. Computers & Education, 142, 103640. Flanagan, S., & Bouck, E. C. (2015). Mapping out the details: Supporting struggling writers’ written expression with concept mapping. Preventing School Failure, 59(4), 244-252. DOI: 10.1080/1045988X.2014.933400 Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A review of studies on collaborative concept mapping: What have we learned about the technique and what is next? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18, 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_7. Gülbahar, Y., Rapp, C., Kilis, S., & Sitnikova, A. (2017). Enriching higher education with social media: Development and evaluation of a social media toolkit. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2656 Hutchinson, T., & Water, A. (1993). English for specific purpose: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hwang, G. J., Shi, Y. R., & Chu, H. C. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778-789. Iswati, L., & Triastuti, A. (2021). Voicing the challenges of ESP teaching: Lessons from ESP in non-English departments. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 276-293. J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035934 Jenkins, M. (2005). Unfulfilled promise: Formative assessment using computer-aided assessment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 67-80. Johns, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 297-314. Joseph, C., Conradsson, D., Wikmar, L. N., & Rowe, M. (2017). Structured feedback on students’ concept maps: The proverbial path to learning? BMC Medical Education, 17, 90. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0930-3 Kara, S. (2013). Writing anxiety: A case study on students’ reasons for anxiety in writing classes. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 3(1), 103-111. Kassem, M. A. M. (2017). Developing business writing skills and reducing writing anxiety of EFL learners through Wikis. English Language Teaching 10(3), 151-163. Killeen, J. (2013). Poor writing skills lead to lost business and career paralysis. The Los Angeles Business Journal, An advertising supplement, 28. Kinchin, I., & Hay, D. (2005). Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: A pilot study. Journal of Advance Nursing, 51(2), 182-187. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2. Kwon, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057. Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2007). Using computers to individually-generate vs. collaboratively-generate concept maps. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 269-280. Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computer & Education, 52(2), 365-375. Lai, C. Y. (2005). A study on applied English department students’ needs for taking English for specific purposes courses and students’ perceptions of an effective ESP teacher (Master dissertation). Southern Taiwan University of Technology, Tainan. Lalor, S. B., & Rainford, M. (2014). The effects of using concept mapping for improving advanced level biology students′ lower- and higher-order cognitive skills. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 839-864. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.829255 Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16-31. Lee, B. (2017). TELL us ESP in a flipped classroom. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4995-5007. DOI: 10.12973 Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Chen, J. F. (2018). A flipped contextual game-based learning approach to enhancing EFL students’ English business writing performance and reflective behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society , 21(3), 117-131. Lin, C. P., Wong, L. H., & Shao, Y. (2012). Comparison of 1:1 and 1:m CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00421.x. Liu, P. L. (2011). A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing. Computers & Education, 57, 2548-2558. Liu, P. L. (2014). Using eye tracking to understand learners′ reading process through the concept-mapping learning strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 237-249. Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54, 436-445. Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 207-222. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018. Lundin, R. (2008). Teaching with Wikis: Towards a new worked pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 432-448. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.06.001 Mammen, J. R. (2016). Computer-assisted concept mapping: Visual aids for knowledge construction. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(7), 403-406. DOI:10.3928/01484 834-20160615-09. Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins of concept maps, how to construct them, and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29-42. Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. London: Prentice Hall. Otter, R. R., Seipel, S., Graeff, T., Alexander, B., Boraiko, C., Gray, J., … Sadler, K. (2013). Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 27-35. Olanezhad, M. (2015). A comparative study of writing anxiety among Iranian university students majoring English translation, teaching and literature. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 59-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n3p59 Pei, X., & Milner, J. O. (2016). Problems in transforming EGP teachers in China’s universities into ESP teachers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2102-2108. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 151-161. Reader, W., & Hammond, N. (1994). Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: Concept mapping tools and beyond. Computers and Education, 12, 99-106. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner′s guide. New York: Prentice Hall. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O′Malley (Ed.). Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Schavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600. Schreiber, M., & Engelmann, T. (2010). Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1701-1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.019. Shuja′a, A. (2004). Business English in Yemen: An empirical study of needs analysis. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute, 64/65, 423-426. Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Slof, B., Nijdam, D., & Janssen, J. (2016). Do interpersonal skills and interpersonal perceptions predict student learning in CSCL-environments? Computers & Education, 97, 49-60. Spence, P., & Liu, G. Z. (2013). Engineering English and the high-tech industry: A case study of an English needs analysis of process integration engineers at a semiconductor manufacturing company in Taiwan. English for Specific Purposes, 32, 97-109. Sturm, J. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 124-139. Sun, J. C. Y., & Chen, A. Y. Z. (2016). Effects of integrating dynamic concept maps with Interactive Response System on elementary school students′ motivation and learning outcome: The case of anti-phishing education. Computers & Education, 102, 117-127. Sung, Y. T., Yang, J. M., & Lee, H. Y. (2017). The effects of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning: A meta-analysis and critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 87, 768-805. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317704307. Surapaneni, KM., & Tekian, A. (2013). Concept mapping enhances learning of biochemistry. Medical Education Online, 18(1), 20157. DOI: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.20157 Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in college and university. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276. Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. Tsai, S. C. (2010). Developing and integrating courseware for oral presentations into ESP learning contexts. Computers & Education, 55, 1245-1258. Tsai, S. C. (2015). Implementing courseware as the primary mode of task-based ESP instruction: A case study of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(2), 171-186. Tsai, S. C. (2019). Implementing interactive courseware into EFL business writing: computational assessment and learning satisfaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(1), 46-61. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1451896 Tsou, W. (2009). Needs-based curriculum development: A case study of NCKU’s ESP program. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1(1), 77-95. Villalon, J., & Calvo, R. A. (2011). Concept maps as cognitive visualizations of writing assignments. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 16-27. Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., Bonell, C., & Booy, R. (2020). School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397-404. Wang, H. Y., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). Effects of a question prompt-based concept mapping approach on students’ learning achievements, attitudes and 5C competences in project-based computer course activities. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 351-364. Wang, M., Peng, J., Cheng, B., Zhou, H., & Liu, J. (2011). Knowledge visualization for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 28-42. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In M. Brian, & R. G. George (Eds.). Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9. Wilt, J., Oehlberg, K., & Revelle, W. (2011). Anxiety in personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 987-993. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.014 Wu, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2014). Exploring the process of planning and implementation phases in an online project-based discussion activity integrating a collaborative concept mapping tool. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 135-141. Wu, S. Y., Chen, S. Y., & Hou, H. T. (2016). Exploring the interactive patterns of concept map-based online discussion: A sequential analysis of users’ operations, cognitive processing, and knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1778-1794, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1057740 Xu, L. (2012). The application of learner autonomy theory and model into ESP technology-assisted curriculum construction. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5), 94. DOI:10.5539/ijel.v2n5p94 Yang, Y. F. (2015). Automatic scaffolding and measurement of concept mapping for EFL students to write summaries. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 273-286. Yu, Z., & Wang, G. (2016). Academic achievements and satisfaction of the clicker-aided flipped business English writing class. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 298-312.
指導教授	張立杰(Li-Chieh Chang)	審核日期	2021-11-19
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare