CSR報告書重大議題矩陣與ESG行為之關聯性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：3.137.171.121

姓名

莊承穎(Chen-Yin Chuang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

CSR報告書重大議題矩陣與ESG行為之關聯性
(The Relationship between CSR Report Materiality Matrix and ESG Behavior)

相關論文

★ 半導體產業購併對股東財富效果之影響-以聯發科公司為例	★ 區塊鏈技術應用於金融科技公司企業資金電子調撥系統實作與驗證
★ 金融科技浪潮下銀行分行經營績效之探討－以個案銀行為例	★ 收購案後，主併公司與目標公司財務顧問之間開始合作原因之探討
★ 併購交易完成後，主併公司與目標公司財務顧問延續合作之因素探討	★ 產品組成變動與公司投資決策
★ CEO年齡與選擇併購目標公司之偏好	★ 外部董事產業經驗對於併購的影響
★ 目標公司執行長年齡與併購決策	★ 企業生命週期轉變對股利變化的影響
★ 經理人文化認同形成對風險承擔行為之影響 -以S&P500指數上市公司為例	★ 併購如何創造綜效──以台灣與韓國為例
★ CEO文化認同與債務期限選擇	★ 台灣上市櫃公司撰寫CSR報告書與公司價值之相關性探討
★ 經理人文化認同與公司CSR政策執行之關聯性-以S&P500指數上市公司為例	★ COVID-19疫情對全球航空產業營運之影響–以中華航空為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-6-25以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究探討企業CSR報告書中重大議題矩陣變數與ESG行為之間的關聯性，蒐集2008 年至2018 年台灣所有發行的CSR報告書，將報告書中的重大議題矩陣切割並計算出三個主要變數，分別是利害關係人與公司營運衝擊程度的一致性(ALIGN)、側重於公司營運衝擊之比例(P.O.)以及側重於利害關係人關注之比例(S.O.)，利用這三個主要變數與目前可蒐集到的台灣ESG行為變數去做單變量分析，除了全樣本分析之外，本研究進一步依照自願性、市值大小及產業類別將樣本區分，分析主要變數在不同樣本是否會呈現不同的結果。結果顯示這三個主要變數確實與部分企業ESG行為相關，但因為目前台灣ESG相關資料質量欠佳和數量不足，導致結果較無明顯的模式。本研究也額外發現自願性發布報告書的企業ESG評分表現更差，因此這些企業可能有綠洗的嫌疑，另外，我們也發現大公司ESG 的表現並沒有比小公司還要好，說明公司規模與企業投入在CSR的成效關係不大。

摘要(英)

This study aims to study the relationship between variables derived from the CSR report materiality matrix and actual ESG behavior of the firm. The data of the study includes the listed companies from 2008 to 2018 in Taiwan. In this paper, I divided the materiality matrices and
calculated three main variables, 1) the alignment between stakeholders’ interest and the company′s operational impact, 2) the proportion focusing on the company′s operational impact and 3) the proportion focusing on stakeholders′ concern The three main variables are used for univariate analysis, In addition to the full sample analysis, this study further distinguishes the samples according to voluntariness, market value and industry category, and analyzes whether the main variables present different results in different samples.The results show that the three main variables can somehow capture the ESG behavior of companies, but the results do not present a clear pattern because of the low quality of ESG data in Taiwan. In addition, this study also found that the ESG scores of voluntary reporting companies are worse, so these companies may be suspected of green wash. In addition, we also find that the ESG performance of large
companies is worse than small companies, indicating that the size of the company may not have much relationship with the effectiveness of CSR invested by companies.

關鍵字(中)

★ CSR 報告書
★ 重大議題矩陣
★ ESG 行為

關鍵字(英)

★ CSR report
★ materiality matrix
★ ESG behavior

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究特徵與貢獻 2
第二章文獻回顧 4
2-1 CSR活動與企業價值或績效的文獻回顧 4
2-2 台灣市場CSR研究的文獻回顧 5
第三章研究內容與方法 7
3-1研究方法 7
3-2 研究假說 10
3-2-1 利害關係人與公司營運衝擊程度的一致性 10
3-2-2 側重於公司營運衝擊之比例 10
3-2-3側重於利害關係人關注之比例 11
3-3 樣本描述 11
3-4變數敘述 14
3-4-1主要變數 14
3-4-2 ESG行為變數 17
3-5其他分類 27
3-5-1自願性發布CSR報告書 28
3-5-2公司市值大小 29
3-5-3產業分類 29
3-6敘述統計 30
第四章實證分析結果 33
4-1 全樣本 33
4-2自願性與非自願性 34
4-3市值100億以上與以下 40
4-4科技業與非科技業 45
第五章結論與未來建議 51
參考文獻 52
附錄 55

參考文獻

沈中華、張元 (2008)，「企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?—以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例」，經濟論文，36 卷，3 期，339-385頁。
邱慈觀、黃啟瑞 (2019)，「治理結構對企業社會責任的影響」，中山管理評論，27 卷，3 期，511-550頁。
吳筌翔 (2020)，「企業執行CSR之策略與權益資金成本之關聯性」，國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
高蘭芬、盧正壽、黃冠智 (2012)，「公司治理、公司績效與投資策略」，中山管理評論，36 卷，3 期，851-880頁。
陳振遠、王健聰、洪世偉 (2017)，「公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影響」，中山管理評論，25 卷，1 期，135-176頁。
陳泰諭 (2019)，「企業社會責任活動之動機層次與公司價值之關聯性」，國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
曹晏寧 (2020)，「企業執行CSR之策略與公司價值之關聯性」，國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
黃瓊瑤、方世榮、陳育成 (2012)，「家族控制與企業社會責任績效之關聯性」，中山管理評論，20 卷，2 期，673-711頁。
廖益均 (2015)，「從員工議題談企業社會責任--以基層員工薪資、員工流動率為例」，貨幣觀測與信用評等，115 期，109-122頁。
趙御雲 (2018)，「台灣上市櫃公司撰寫CSR報告書與公司價值之相關性探討」，國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D., (1985), An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
Claessens, S., Djankov, Simeon , & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771.
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268.
Edwards, J., & Weichenrieder, A. J. (1999). Ownership Concentration and Share Valuation: Evidence from Germany. Working Paper, University of Cambridge.
Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L., (1983), Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.
Friedman , M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. , & Mishra, D. (2011). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.
Gross, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383.
Kao, L., Chiou, J., & Chen, A. (2004). The Agency Problems, Firm Performance and Monitoring Mechanisms: The Evidence from Collateralised Shares in Taiwan. Corporate Governance : An International Review, 12(3), 389–402.
Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43(C), 1–13.
Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), 163–185.
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170.
Lemmon, M. L., & Lins, K. V. (2003). Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 58(4), 1445–1468.
Lins, K. V. (2003). Equity Ownership and Firm Value in Emerging Markets. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 159–184.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824.
Lin, L., Hung, P., Chou, D., & Lai, C. W. (2019). Financial Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(1), 61–71.
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value , Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.
Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through Corporate Accountability Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56–72.
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854-872.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D., (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
Moore , G. (2001). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(No. 3-4), 299–315.
Peters, R., & Mullen, M. R. (2009). Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance. Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(1), 1–14.
Pound, J. (1988). Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237–265.
Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419–429.
Shu, P., & Chiang, S. (2020). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Performance: Cases from Listed Firms in Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 61(C).
Ting, P. (2021). Do Large Firms Just Talk Corporate Social Responsibility? - The Evidence from CSR Report Disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 38(C).
Yeh, Y., Lee , T., & Pen , J. (2002). Stock Returns and Volatility under Market Segmentation: The Case of Chinese A and B Shares. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 18(3), 239–257.

指導教授

李韋憲(Wei-Hsien Li)

審核日期

2021-6-29

推文