工業4.0成熟度對企業財務績效的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：47

、訪客IP：3.15.142.42

姓名

彭姿茹(Tzu-Ju Peng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

工業4.0成熟度對企業財務績效的影響
(The Impact of Industry 4.0 maturity on corporate financial performance)

相關論文

★ 在社群網站上作互動推薦及研究使用者行為對其效果之影響	★ 以AHP法探討伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標的權重決定分析
★ 以AHP法探討智慧型手機產業營運中心區位選擇考量關鍵因素之研究	★ 太陽能光電產業經營績效評估－應用資料包絡分析法
★ 建構國家太陽能電池產業競爭力比較模式之研究	★ 以序列採礦方法探討景氣指標與進出口值的關聯
★ ERP專案成員組合對績效影響之研究	★ 推薦期刊文章至適合學科類別之研究
★ 品牌故事分析與比較-以古早味美食產業為例	★ 以方法目的鏈比較Starbucks與Cama吸引消費者購買因素
★ 探討創意店家創業價值之研究- 以赤峰街、民生社區為例	★ 以領先指標預測企業長短期借款變化之研究
★ 應用層級分析法遴選電競筆記型電腦鍵盤供應商之關鍵因子探討	★ 以互惠及利他行為探討信任關係對知識分享之影響
★ 結合人格特質與海報主色以類神經網路推薦電影之研究	★ 資料視覺化圖表與議題之關聯

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-12-27以後開放)

摘要(中)

工業 4.0 的時代來臨了，工業4.0的目標並非創造新穎的製造技術，而是整合現有的製造資源，並建立能夠快速反應市場需求、精準生產、減少成本浪費、並達到跨領域合作的製造產業。然而，至今大多數研究都集中在推進工業4.0與工業4.0 的技術，如大數據分析、物聯網、雲的議題，相對較少的研究探討工業4.0成熟度對企業財務績效的影響。因此，本研究目的為探討以製造業大國為主的台灣進行工業4.0成熟度現況分析，並實證工業4.0成熟度會對財務績效指標 Tobin’s Q產生正向的影響。除此之外，台灣企業大多皆導入過ERP系統，因此想進一步探討ERP系統的有用性對工業4.0成熟度與企業Tobin’s Q之間的關係。研究結果得出當前台灣工業4.0成熟度平均為2.37，表示企業處於初步實施階段，並觀察到帶來的好處。而工業4.0成熟度對Tobin’s Q 指標t值為2.236，已達顯著水準；在干擾效果中對Tobin’s Q 指標t值為2.054，也達到顯著水準，表示本研究的兩個假設都成立。

摘要(英)

Industry 4.0 is here. The goal of Industry 4.0 is not to create novel manufacturing technologies, but to integrate existing manufacturing resources and establish a manufacturing industry that can quickly respond to market demand, precise production, reduce cost and waste, and achieve cross-field cooperation. However, most studies so far have focused on the advancement of Industry 4.0 and Industry 4.0 technologies, such as big data analysis, Internet of Things, and cloud issues. Relatively few studies have explored the impact of Industry 4.0 maturity on corporate financial performance. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore the current of industry 4.0 maturity in Taiwan, a major manufacturing country, and to demonstrate that industry 4.0 maturity will have a positive impact on the financial performance indicator Tobin’s Q. In addition, most Taiwanese companies have implemented ERP systems, so I want to further explore the relationship between the usefulness of ERP systems and the maturity of Industry 4.0 fluence the company’s Tobin’s Q. The results of the study show that the current Taiwan’s Industry 4.0 maturity is 2.37 on average, indicating that the company is in the initial implementation stage and has observed the benefits. The industry 4.0 maturity has reached a significant level for the Tobin’s Q. In the moderating effect, the Tobin’s Q index t value is 2.054, which has also reached a significant level, indicating that the two hypotheses of this study are both valid.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工業4.0
★ 工業4.0成熟度
★ Tobin’s Q
★ ERP有用性

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要.......................................................i
Abstract..................................................ii
目錄.....................................................iii
圖目錄....................................................iv
表目錄.....................................................v
第一章緒論................................................1
1-1 研究背景..............................................1
1-2 研究動機..............................................2
1-3 研究目的..............................................3
1-4 研究架構..,...........................................3
第二章文獻探討.............................................4
2-1 工業4.0成熟度模型.......................................4
2-1-1 工業4.0技術..........................................4
2-1-2 RAMI 4.0.............................................5
2-1-3 工業4.0 成熟度模型....................................8
2-2 工業4.0與企業績效......................................15
2-2-1工業4.0..............................................15
2-2-2 企業績效............................................15
第三章研究假設與模型......................................18
3-1 研究假設..............................................18
3-2 模型建構..............................................21
3-3 資料收集..............................................27
3-4 調查與分析............................................30
第四章研究結果............................................34
4-1 敘述統計分析...........................................34
4-2 測量模型分析...........................................36
4-3 整體模型分析...........................................38
第五章結論...............................................41
5-1 研究結論..............................................41
5-2 研究限制與未來建議.....................................42
參考文獻..................................................43

參考文獻

Jazdi, N. (2014). Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE international conference on automation, quality and testing, robotics.
[2] Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014). Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP, 16, 3-8.
[3] Lolli, F., Balugani, E., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., Rimini, B., & Regattieri, A. (2019). Machine learning for multi-criteria inventory classification applied to intermittent demand. Production Planning & Control, 30(1), 76-89.
[4] Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin′s q. Management science, 45(7), 1008-1024.
[5] Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information systems research, 6(1), 3-23.
[6] Alpar, P., & Kim, M. (1990). A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(2), 55-69.
[7] Ahituv, N., & Giladi, R. (1993). Business success and information technology: Are they really related? : Tel Aviv University, Faculty of Management, The Leon Recanati Graduate ….
[8] Rossit, D. A., Tohmé, F., & Frutos, M. (2019). Industry 4.0: smart scheduling. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3802-3813.
[9] Marcucci, G., Antomarioni, S., Ciarapica, F. E., & Bevilacqua, M. (2021). The impact of Operations and IT-related Industry 4.0 key technologies on organizational resilience. Production Planning & Control, 1-15.
[10] Vrchota, J., & Pech, M. (2019). Readiness of enterprises in Czech Republic to implement industry 4.0: Index of industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 9(24), 5405.
[11] Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161-166.
[12] Imtiaz, J., & Jasperneite, J. (2013). Scalability of OPC-UA down to the chip level enables “Internet of Things”. Paper presented at the 2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).
[13] Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., & Miragliotta, G. (2014). Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of Things paradigm. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management.
[14] Ungurean, I., Gaitan, N.-C., & Gaitan, V. G. (2014). An IoT architecture for things from industrial environment. Paper presented at the 2014 10th International Conference on Communications (COMM).
[15] Büchi, G., Cugno, M., & Castagnoli, R. (2020). Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119790.
[16] Mazak, A., & Huemer, C. (2015). A standards framework for value networks in the context of Industry 4.0. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).
[17] Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., & Verl, A. (2015). Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready. Production Engineering, 9(1), 143-148.
[18] Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing letters, 3, 18-23.
[19] Santos, R. C., & Martinho, J. L. (2019). An Industry 4.0 maturity model proposal. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
[20] Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016). Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. Paper presented at the 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS).
[21] Henning, K. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0.
[22] Resman, M., Pipan, M., Šimic, M., & Herakovič, N. (2019). A new architecture model for smart manufacturing: A performance analysis and comparison with the RAMI 4.0 reference model. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag, 14(2), 153-165.
[23] dos Santos, K. C. P., Loures, E. d. F. R., Junior, O. C., & Santos, E. A. P. (2018). Product lifecycle management maturity models in industry 4.0. Paper presented at the IFIP International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management.
[24] Wiesner, S., Gaiardelli, P., Gritti, N., & Oberti, G. (2018). Maturity models for digitalization in manufacturing-applicability for SMEs. Paper presented at the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems.
[25] Narula, S., Prakash, S., Dwivedy, M., Talwar, V., & Tiwari, S. P. (2020). Industry 4.0 adoption key factors: an empirical study on manufacturing industry. Journal of Advances in Management Research.
[26] Lichtblau, K. (2015). Industrie 4.0-Readiness: Impuls-Stiftung.
[27] Leyh, C., Bley, K., Schäffer, T., & Forstenhäusler, S. (2016). SIMMI 4.0-a maturity model for classifying the enterprise-wide it and software landscape focusing on Industry 4.0. Paper presented at the 2016 federated conference on computer science and information systems (fedcsis).
[28] Stefan, L., Thom, W., Dominik, L., Dieter, K., & Bernd, K. (2018). Concept for an evolutionary maturity based Industrie 4.0 migration model. Procedia CIRP, 72, 404-409.
[29] Colli, M., Berger, U., Bockholt, M., Madsen, O., Møller, C., & Wæhrens, B. V. (2019). A maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era. Annual Reviews in Control, 48, 165-177.
[30] Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., ten Hompel, M., & Wahlster, W. (2017). Industrie 4.0 maturity index: managing the digital transformation of companies: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH.
[31] Lin, B., Wu, W., & Song, M. (2019). Industry 4.0: Driving factors and impacts on firm’s performance: An empirical study on China’s manufacturing industry. Annals of Operations Research, 1-21.
[32] Michna, A., & Kmieciak, R. (2020). Open-mindedness culture, knowledge-sharing, financial performance, and industry 4.0 in SMEs. Sustainability, 12(21), 9041.
[33] Hsiung, H.-H., Wang, J.-L., & Chen, Y.-H. (2019). The Impact of Enterprise Adoption of ERP Systems on Corporate Value. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on E-Business and Internet.
[34] 曹恒翎. (2018). 工業 4.0 潮流下機器人產業鏈經營績效分析. 臺灣大學經濟學研究所學位論文, 1-83.
[35] O′Donovan, P., Bruton, K., & O′Sullivan, D. T. (2016). IAMM: A maturity model for measuring industrial analytics capabilities in large-scale manufacturing facilities. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 7.
[36] Dos Santos, B. L., Peffers, K., & Mauer, D. C. (1993). The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information systems research, 4(1), 1-23.
[37] El Hamdi, S., Abouabdellah, A., & Oudani, M. (2018). Disposition of Moroccan SME Manufacturers to Industry 4.0 with the Implementation of ERP as a First Step. Paper presented at the 2018 Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES).
[38] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
[39] Negash, S., Ryan, T., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Quality and effectiveness in web-based customer support systems. Information & management, 40(8), 757-768.
[40] Salim, M., Alfansi, L., Anggarawati, S., Saputra, F., & Afandy, C. (2021). The role of perceived usefulness in moderating the relationship between the DeLone and McLean model and user satisfaction. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 755-766.
[41] Lin, H.-F. (2010). An investigation into the effects of IS quality and top management support on ERP system usage. Total Quality Management, 21(3), 335-349.

指導教授

許秉瑜

審核日期

2022-1-17

推文