以行為和事件相關腦電位探討手足關係對自我評估及自我參照影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：62

、訪客IP：3.23.101.241

姓名

王予君(Yu-Chun Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

以行為和事件相關腦電位探討手足關係對自我評估及自我參照影響
(The Effect of Siblings on Self-evaluation and Self-reference: Behavioral and ERP Studies)

相關論文

★ 意旁結合度、意旁表意透明度對中文閱讀的影響	★ 以行為及事件相關電位探討中文雙字詞的記憶聯結錯誤
★ 項目指示遺忘效果的行為與事件相關電位研究	★ 項目指示遺忘作業中記憶登錄及提取歷程的行為及事件相關腦電位研究
★ 以語意促發作業探討項目指示遺忘中線索對於記憶登錄歷程影響之行為及事件相關腦電位研究	★ 特定與非特定來源記憶提取的行為及事件相關腦電位
★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位探討處理層次與聯結性登錄方式對記憶連結錯誤之影響	★ 中文字詞辨識的語音運作單位
★ 由語意透明度所引發的再認記憶鏡像效應：行為與事件相關腦電位研究	★ 登錄作業對於中文雙字詞語意透明度在再認記憶中所引發鏡像效應之影響：行為及事件相關腦電位實驗
★ 以事件相關腦電位探討細節性與概要性記憶的提取導向	★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位實驗探討前瞻記憶線索出現機率對於前瞻干擾效果的影響
★ 以跨顱電刺激與事件相關腦電位探討左側後頂葉腦區於再認記憶中所扮演之角色	★ 測驗表現回饋對測驗效應之調控的行為與事件相關腦電位研究
★ 以非侵入式腦刺激探討左後側頂葉與情節記憶提取之因果關係	★ 中文假字形聲限制高低對於試誤與無誤學習之影響的行為與事件相關腦電位研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究利用自我參照作業（self-referencing task）探討自我概念（self-concept）是否以及如何在隱性比較的情況下受到手足的影響。四個實驗皆包含了兩個學習—測驗循環，在學習階段中，受試者需要判斷一系列的形容詞是否符合自己或者他人。受試者和他/她的手足會是其中一循環的指涉對象，而擁有與手足相似熟悉程度的朋友則是另一循環的指涉對象。在測驗階段中，我們將使用不同的作業來測試受試者對於形容詞的記憶（實驗一的再認測驗、實驗二的排除作業、實驗三和四自由回憶）。指涉對象（自己或是他人）以及是否有血緣（手足或是朋友）兩個變項，將用來分析肯定率（自我參照作業中回答「是」的比例）和記憶表現。
實驗一的結果觀察到受試者在與手足配對時，對自我評估有較高的肯定率，與朋友配對時則並無顯著差異，說明和比起朋友，受試者和手足配對時對於自己有更高的肯定。再認記憶測驗中，對自己的記憶表現也比他人更好，是為自我參照效應，且在朋友情境中的整體記憶表現比手足情境更好。然而，兩個情境中的自我參照效應大小並無差別。
在手足情境中，對自我評估有較高的肯定率一結果，在實驗二中仍然被觀察到。此外，為了探討朋友情境中的記憶優勢，是否來自於不同的檢索方向或是回憶策略，實驗二採用排除作業並記錄腦波。透過手足情境和朋友情境中，正確拒絕拒絕反應（new item correct-rejection）的腦波差異，發現了顯著的檢索方向效應，說明檢索記憶在兩個情境中的處理方式是不同的。
實驗三則使用特異刺激典範（oddball paradigm）探討朋友情境的記憶優勢是否來自學習階段中，挹注了不同程度的注意力而導致記憶表現更好。在自我參照作業中，四分之一的形容詞用來判斷是否符合自己，而四分之三的形容詞用來判斷是否符合他人。自己和他人所誘發的P300和N400波形差異，將作為手足情境和朋友情境中注意力分配和語意處理的指標。此外，聚類比率分數（adjusted ratio of clustering）也將用來計算受試者回憶字詞的組織程度。腦波結果顯示在手足情境的P300效應比朋友情境更大，表示和朋友情境相比，受試者在手足情境中分配了更多的注意力。但兩種情境下的聚類比率分數皆無差別，說明回憶字詞的組織程度並沒有因為不同的指涉對象而有所不同。
為了確認實驗三聚類比率分數的結果不是因指涉對象比例不同所致，實驗四將自己和他人的比例調整為一致。實驗四還使用四組短的刺激材料取代兩組長的刺激材料，來降低實驗難度。然而，兩個情境的聚類比率分數依然沒有差異，驗證實驗三的結果並非來自比例的不同。
以上實驗顯示，自我評估會受到手足的影響，進而產生較高的自我肯定率，和朋友配對時則無這現象。同時，實驗中也觀察到自我參照效應，即與自己相關的記憶表現較他人更好。但朋友情境的記憶優勢僅止於一般記憶，並未包含更多細節。雖然對手足和朋友的記憶表現沒有顯著差異，但神經生理結果顯示，兩者在判斷形容詞和回憶檢索時可能有不同的處理機制。

摘要(英)

This study employed the self-referencing task to investigate whether and in what way self-concept could be modified when an individual is being implicitly compared with his or her siblings. Each of the four experiments reported in this thesis comprised two study-test cycles. During the study phases, participants were presented with a series of adjectives, to each of which they had to judge whether it described themselves or another referent well. The participant’s sibling was designated as the companion referent in one of the two cycles and a friend that was of similar familiarity in the other cycle. In the following test phase, the participants’ memory of these adjectives was tested with an old/new recognition test (Experiments I), exclusion task (Experiment II), or free recall task (Experiments III and IV). The affirmation rates (i.e., the proportion of yes responses in the referencing task) and the memory performance were both analyzed with the factors of referent type (self vs. other) and consanguinity (sibling vs. friend).
Experiment 1 showed that the affirmation rate to self was higher in the sibling block than in the friend block, suggesting that the participants were more affirmative about their self-concept when the companion referent was their siblings in comparison to friends. A significant self-reference effect was also observed during the test phase as the adjectives that were referred to the participants themselves were better remembered than those that were referred to the participant’s siblings or friends. Moreover, the recognition memory performance was in general better in the friend block than in the sibling block. The mnemonic self-reference effects were however of equivalent magnitudes in the sibling and friend blocks.
The finding of a higher affirmation rate to the self in the sibling block than in the friend block was replicated in Experiment II. In addition, Experiment II employed the exclusion task and recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether the better memory performance in the friend block than in the sibling block resulted from retrieval processes such as retrieval orientation and strategic retrieval. A reliable retrieval orientation effect, indexed by the distinct ERP patterns between the correct rejection trials in the sibling and friend blocks, suggested that the retrieval cues were processed differently in these two blocks.
Experiment III employed the oddball paradigm to investigate mnemonic processes during the encoding phase contributed to better memory performance in the friend block than in the sibling block. In the study phase of both cycles, one-fourth of the adjectives were related to self and the other three-fourths were related to the non-self referent. The P300 and N400 waves elicited by the self and non-self referents were compared to examine the attentional resource allocation and semantic processing in the friend and sibling blocks. In addition, the adjusted ratio of clustering (ARC) score of the recall performance was employed to examine the memory organization in the sibling and friend blocks. The ERP analysis found a greater P300 effect in the sibling block compared to the friend block, suggesting greater attentional allocation when the companion referent was the sibling in comparison to friends. The ARC scores were statistically equivalent in the sibling and friend blocks, revealing no evidence that friends and siblings as different companion referents exerted effects on memory organization.
To ensure that the null result of the ARC analysis in Experiment 3 was not due to the different proportions of self and companion referents in the oddball paradigm, Experiment IV replicated the procedure of Experiment 3 with the modification that the ratio of self to companion referent was 1. In addition, the task difficulty was decreased by presenting four short study lists instead of two long lists. The results from both blocks still remained no difference which verified that the proportion did not influence the results from the previous experiment.
Across the four experiments, the self-evaluation was influenced by the siblings with consanguinity rather than friends. The self-reference effect was observed, while the memory advantage for friend block only exist in general memory but contained less details. Despite that there was no significant difference on memory performance between sibling and friend, neural physiological results suggested that there could be differences in the processes of judging adjectives and retrieval orientation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 自我參照效應
★ 自我評估
★ 手足關係
★ 事件相關腦電位

關鍵字(英)

★ Self-reference effect
★ Self-evaluation
★ Sibling Relationship
★ Event-related Potentials (ERPs)

論文目次

中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... i
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………...…………………………... iii
致謝…………………..…………………..…………………..…………………..…………………..…………... vi
Content Table vii
Lists of Tables x
Lists of Figures xi
Introduction 1
Self-reference effect 2
Memory Studies 4
Neuroimaging Studies 5
Culture studies 7
Group-reference effect 9
The role of siblings 9
Aim of this study 12
Experiment 1 14
Methods and Materials 15
Participants 15
Stimuli 15
Procedures 15
Results 18
Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale 18
Self-reference task 19
Recognition task 23
Discussion 26
Experiment 2: An ERP Experiment 28
Methods and Materials 30
Participants 30
Stimuli 30
Procedures 30
Electrophysiological Recordings 31
ERP Data Processing 32
Results 33
Behavioral Results 33
ERP Results 41
Discussion 51
Experiment 3: Oddball ERP and Recall Experiment 54
Methods and Materials 55
Participants 55
Stimuli 55
Procedures 55
Electrophysiological Recordings 56
ERP Data Processing 56
Results 57
Behavioral Results 57
ERP Results 61
Discussion 72
Experiment 4: A Clarify Experiment 76
Methods and Materials 76
Participants 76
Stimuli 76
Procedures 76
Results 77
Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale 77
Self-reference task 78
Adjusted Ratio of Clustering (ARC) Scores 80
Discussion 81
General Discussion 83
Applications 86
Limitations 87
References 89
Appendix I 98
Appendix II 99
Appendix III 100
Appendix IV 101
Appendix V 112

參考文獻

楊國樞、李本華 (1971)。五百五十七個中文人格特質形容詞之好惡度，意義度及熟悉
度。台灣大學心理系研究報告，13，36-57。
Addis, D. R., Barense, M., & Duarte, A. (2015). The Wiley handbook on the cognitive
neuroscience of memory. John Wiley & Sons.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other
in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
Bowlby, J. (1998). Attachment and loss (No. 3). Random House.
Chiou, R., Cox, C. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2021). Bipartite functional fractionation within
the neural system for social cognition supports the psychological continuity of self vs.
other. BioRxiv, 2021.04.04.438408. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.04.438408
Coronel, J. C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2016). The N400 reveals how personal semantics is processed: Insights into the nature and organization of self-knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 84(5), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.029
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in
episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory &
cognition, 28(6), 923-938. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209340
Czernochowski, D. (2005). Age differences in familiarity and recollection. Universal-
Publishers.
D’Argembeau, A., Ruby, P., Collette, F., Degueldre, C., Balteau, E., Luxen, A., Maquet, P., & Salmon, E. (2007). Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(6), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.935
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-
trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 13, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate
recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671
Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R., & Park, H. S. (2012). The unidimensional relationship closeness scale (URCS): Reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026265
Donaldson, D. I., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Recognition memory for new associations:
Electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection. Neuropsychologia, 36(5), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00143-7
Fan, W., Chen, J., Wang, X. Y., Cai, R., Tan, Q., Chen, Y., Yang, Q., Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Yang, Z., Wang, X. A., & Zhong, Y. (2013). Electrophysiological correlation of the degree of self-reference effect. PLoS ONE, 8(12), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080289
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory
Structure and Sentence Processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469-495. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–
140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Friedman, D., & Johnson, R. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding
and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Techniques, 51, 6 –28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0029(20001001)51:1<6::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-R
Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2014). Cultural differences in human brain activity: a quantitative meta-
analysis. NeuroImage, 99, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062
Hardin, E. E., Leong, F. T., & Bhagwat, A. A. (2004). Factor structure of the self-construal
scale revisited: Implications for the multidimensionality of self-construal. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(3), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104264125
Herron, J. E. (2007). Decomposition of the ERP late posterior negativity: Effects of retrieval
and response fluency. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00489.x
Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Strategic influences on recollection in the exclusion task: Electrophysiological evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(3), 703–710. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196535
Huff, S.T., Yoon, C., Lee, F., Mandadi, A., & Gutchess, A.H. (2013). Self-referential
processing and encoding in bicultural individuals. Culture and Brain, 1, 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-013-0005-1
Huff, S., Ligouri, L., & Gutchess, A. (2015). Cultural influences on social and self-relevant
memory. In J. E. Warnick & D. Landis (Eds.), Neuroscience in intercultural contexts (pp. 215–241). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2260-4_9
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional
uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
Jensen, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2015). What makes siblings different? The development of
sibling differences in academic achievement and interests. Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 29(3), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000090
Johnson, C., Gadon, O., Carlson, D., Southwick, S., Faith, M., & Chalfin, J. (2002). Self-reference and group membership: evidence for a group-reference effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.83
Keenan, J. M., & Baillet, S. D. (1980). Memory for personally and socially significant
events. Attention and performance, 8, 651-669.
Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup Jr, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Self-recognition
and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(9), 338-344.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01521-7
Klein, S. B., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1986). Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect
in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 26–
38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.26
Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of
elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.5
Knyazev G. G. (2013). EEG correlates of self-referential processing. Frontiers in human
neuroscience, 7, 264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00264
Lieberman, M. D., Straccia, M. A., Meyer, M. L., Du, M., & Tan, K. M. (2019). Social, self,
(situational), and affective processes in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC): Causal, multivariate, and reverse inference evidence. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 99, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis
of event-related potentials. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 213.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2007). Developing a new measure of independent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.09.005
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition,
emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., Helms-Erikson, H., & Crouter, A. C. (2001). Sibling
influences on gender development in middle childhood and early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.1.115
Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition
memory. Psychophysiology, 37(5), 565-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3750565
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer
appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
Müller, H. M., & Kutas, M. (1996). What′s in a name? Electrophysiological differences
between spoken nouns, proper names and one′s own name. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 8(1), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199612200-00045
Murphy, M. D., & Puff, C. R. (1982). Free recall: Basic methodology and analyses.
In Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 99-128). Academic Press.
Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., & Penney, T. B. (2001). Event related brain potentials and
illusory memories: the effects of differential encoding. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(3),
283-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00049-5
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words
not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the
estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031355
Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of
personal information. Journal of personality and social psychology, 35(9), 677. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
Rogers, T. B., Rogers, P. J., & Kuiper, N. A. (1977). Recognition memory for personal
adjectives: Some evidence for self-reference as an aspect of memory. Unpublished
manuscript, University of Calgary.
Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in
cognitive sciences, 11(6), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004
Rugg, M. D., Otten, L. J., & Henson, R. N. (2002). The neural basis of episodic memory:
evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 357(1424), 1097–1110. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1102
Rugg, M. D., & Wilding, E. L. (2000). Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), 108–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01445-5
Santrock, J. W., Readdick, C. A., & Pollard, L. (1980). Social comparison processes in sibling and peer relations. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 137(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1980.10532804
Schachter, F. F., Shore, E., Feldman-Rotman, S., Marquis, R. E., & Campbell, S. (1976).
Sibling deidentification. Developmental Psychology, 12(5), 418–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.12.5.418
Shi, Z., Zhou, A., Liu, P., Zhang, P., & Han, W. (2011). An EEG study on the effect of self-
relevant possessive pronoun: self-referential content and first-person perspective. Neuroscience letters, 494(2), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.007
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory:
applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 117(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34
Sparks, S., Cunningham, S. J., & Kritikos, A. (2016). Culture modulates implicit ownership-
induced self-bias in memory. Cognition, 153, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.003
Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The Integrative Self: How Self-Reference Integrates Perception and Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015
Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-
analysis. Psychological bulletin, 121(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
Tacikowski, P., Cygan, H. B., & Nowicka, A. (2014). Neural correlates of own and close-
other’s name recognition: ERP evidence. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00194
Tanguay, A. N., Benton, L., Romio, L., Sievers, C., Davidson, P. S. R., & Renoult, L. (2018). The ERP correlates of self-knowledge: Are assessments of one’s past, present, and future traits closer to semantic or episodic memory? Neuropsychologia, 110(October), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.024
Taumoepeau, M. and Reese, E. (2014), Siblings and Self-wareness. Social Development, 23:
1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12035
Tesser, A. (1980). Self-esteem maintenance in family dynamics. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 39(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.77
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological
distance. Psychological review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Tulving E. (2001). Episodic memory and common sense: how far apart?. Philosophical
transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 356(1413), 1505–1515. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0937
Tulving E. (2002). Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annual review of psychology, 53,
1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114
Tucker, C.J. and Winzeler, A. (2007), Adolescent Siblings′ Daily Discussions: Connections to
Perceived Academic, Athletic, and Peer Competency. Journal of Research on
Adolescence, 17: 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00515.x
Wang, B., Fu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). Influence of language and culture on retrieval-induced forgetting under the self-referential condition: Evidence from the Han and the Mosuo. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(4), 450-461. http://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00450
Wang, J., Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., & Zhou, C. (2019). A self-reference false memory effect in
the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples. Memory &
cognition, 47(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0851-3
Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Obonsawin, M. C., & Jentzsch, I. (2007). Seeing yourself in a
positive light: brain correlates of the self-positivity bias. Brain research, 1152, 106–110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.049
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119(3), 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.3.889
Wood, D., Harms, P., & Vazire, S. (2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your
perceptions of others say about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019390
Yang, L., Truong, L., Fuss, S., & Bislimovic, S. (2012). The effects of ageing and divided attention on the self-reference effect in emotional memory: Spontaneous or effortful mnemonic benefits? Memory, 20(6), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.690040
Yang, X., Mao, X., Han, M., Li, X., & Guo, C. (2019). Electrophysiological evidence of
encoding in self-referential effect. Neuroreport, 30(13), 901–907.
https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001303
Zhu and Zhang. (2002). An Experimental Study on the self-reference effect. Science in China, 45(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2504/kds.29.647
Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047

指導教授

鄭仕坤(Shih-Kuen Cheng)

審核日期

2022-3-24

推文